Search

B-cell-maturation-antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies are highly active for multiple myeloma, but infections are emerging as a major challenge. In this retrospective, single-center analysis we evaluated infectious complications after BCMA-targeted chimeric-antigen-receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), bispecific-antibodies (BsAb) and antibody-drug-conjugates (ADC). The primary endpoint was severe (grade ≥3) infection incidence. Amongst 256 patients, 92 received CAR-T, 55 BsAb and 109 ADC. The incidence of severe infections was higher with BsAb (40%) than CAR-T (26%) or ADC (8%), including grade 5 infections (7% vs 0% vs 0%, respectively). Comparing T-cell redirecting therapies, the incidence rate of severe infections was significantly lower with CAR-T compared to BsAb at 1-year (incidence-rate-ratio [IRR] = 0.43, 95%CI 0.25−0.76, P = 0.004). During periods of treatment-emergent hypogammaglobulinemia, BsAb recipients had higher infection rates (IRR:2.27, 1.31−3.98, P = 0.004) and time to severe infection (HR 2.04, 1.05–3.96, P = 0.036) than their CAR-T counterparts. During periods of non-neutropenia, CAR-T recipients had a lower risk (HR 0.44, 95%CI 0.21−0.93, P = 0.032) and incidence rate (IRR:0.32, 95% 0.17–0.59, P < 0.001) of severe infections than BsAb. In conclusion, we observed an overall higher and more persistent risk of severe infections with BsAb. Our results also suggest a higher infection risk during periods of hypogammaglobulinemia with BsAb, and with neutropenia in CAR-T recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Recent reports have raised concerns about the association of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR‐T) with non‐negligible cardiotoxicity, particularly atrial arrhythmias. First, we conducted a pharmacovigilance study to assess the reporting of atrial arrhythmias following CD19‐directed CAR‐T. Subsequently, to determine the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of atrial arrhythmias post‐CAR‐T, we compiled a retrospective single‐centre cohort of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Only commercial CAR‐T products were considered. Atrial arrhythmias were nearly fourfold more likely to be reported after CAR‐T therapy compared to all other cancer patients in the FAERS (adjusted ROR = 3.76 [95% CI 2.67–5.29]). Of the 236 patients in our institutional cohort, 23 (10%) developed atrial arrhythmias post‐CAR‐T, including 12 de novo arrhythmias, with most (83%) requiring medical intervention. Atrial arrhythmias frequently co‐occurred with cytokine release syndrome and were associated with higher post‐CAR‐T infusion peak levels of IL‐10, TNF‐alpha and LDH, and lower trough levels of fibrinogen. In a multivariable analysis, risk factors for atrial arrhythmia were history of atrial arrhythmia (OR = 6.80 [2.39–19.6]) and using CAR‐T product with a CD28‐costimulatory domain (OR = 5.17 [1.72–18.6]). Atrial arrhythmias following CD19‐CAR‐T therapy are prevalent and associated with elevated inflammatory biomarkers, a history of atrial arrhythmia and the use of a CAR‐T product with a CD28 costimulatory domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lenalidomide maintenance is associated with a significantly improved progression-free in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Maintenance with lenalidomide is generally well tolerated; however, lenalidomide associated diarrhea is a common side effect and bile acid malabsorption has been suggested as an underlying mechanism. We conducted a single arm phase 2 trial of colesevelam, a bile acid binder, for lenalidomide-associated diarrhea in multiple myeloma. Patients were treated with colesevelam daily starting at 1250 mg (2 tablets 625 mg) for 12 weeks. The trial included 25 patients, 1 patient with grade 3 diarrhea, 14 with grade 2, and 10 with grade 1 diarrhea. All patients were on treatment with single agent lenalidomide maintenance and no patient progressed during the trial. Colesevelam treatment was highly effective for treatment of lenalidomide-associated diarrhea; 22 (88%) of the 25 patients responded where 17 patients (68%) had complete resolution of diarrhea, and 5 patients (20%) had improvement by 1 grade of diarrhea. The responses to colesevelam were seen within the first two weeks of treatment. These findings support the conclusion that lenalidomide-associated diarrhea is driven by bile acid malabsorption. Five patients reported mild gastrointestinal side effects including constipation. Importantly, the pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide were not affected by concomitant colesevelam treatment. The stool microbiome composition was not significantly different before and after colesevelam treatment. Patients reported improved diarrhea, fewer gastrointestinal symptoms, and less interference with their daily life after starting colesevelam. In summary, colesevelam was safe and highly effective for treatment of lenalidomide-associated diarrhea in multiple myeloma and does not reduce the clinical effect of lenalidomide., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest disclosure MH reports research funding from Daiichi Sankyo, Cosette Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbvie, Beigene; has received honoraria for consultancy/participated in advisory boards for Curio Science LLC, Projects in Knowledge, Intellisphere LLC, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and GlaxoSmithKline. HH reports grants from Celgene, Takeda, and Janssen; NK reports research funding through Amgen and participates in advisory board with Medimmune. KM reports grant support from ASH, MMRF, and IMS. SM reports research funding from Allogene Therapeutics, Juno/Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda Oncology, and Janssen Oncology; personal fees from Plexus communication, and Physician Education Resource. UAS reports personal fees from Physicians Educations Resources; grants and other from Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb; other from Janssen; and grants from Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and HealthTree Foundation. CRT reports research funding from Janssen and personal fees from Physician Educations Resource; DJC receives research funding from Genentech; HL has served as a paid consultant for Takeda, Genzyme, Janssen, Karyopharm, Pfizer, Celgene, Caelum Biosciences, and has received research support from Takeda. MS served as a paid consultant for McKinsey & Company, Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc., and Omeros Corporation; received research funding from Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc., Omeros Corporation, and Amgen, Inc.; served on ad hoc advisory boards for Kite – A Gilead Company; and received honoraria from i3Health, Medscape, and CancerNetwork for CME-related activity. GLS reports research funding from Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Beyond Spring, and serves on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for ArcellX. SG reports personal fees and advisory role (scientific advisory board) from Actinium, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Amgen, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, JAZZ, Janssen, Omeros, Takeda, and Kite. MP Research Funding: Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Nektar, Sanofi, Pfizer, Regeneron Honoraria/Consultancy: Janssen, Sanofi, Oncopeptides, Karyopharm, GSK, Pfizer; OBL reports serving on Advisory Board for MorphoSys; SZU reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Merck, MundiPharma, Oncopeptides, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, SkylineDX, and Takeda. OL acknowledges funding from: NCI/NIH, FDA, LLS, Rising Tide Foundation, MMRF, IMF, Paula and Rodger Riney Foundation, Perelman Family Foundation, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Glenmark, Seattle Genetics, Karyopharm; has received honoraria for scientific talks/participated in advisory boards for Adaptive, Amgen, Binding Site, BMS, Celgene, Cellectis, Glenmark, Janssen, Juno, Pfizer; and served on Independent Data Monitoring Committees (IDMC) for international randomized trials by: Takeda, Merck, Janssen, Theradex. AML reports grants from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; grants from Bristol Myers Squibb; personal fees from Trillium Therapeutics; grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer; and grants and personal fees from Janssen. AML also has a patent US20150037346A1 with royalties paid; The remaining authors have no competing interest to disclose.

Purpose: Prognostic Immunophenotyping in Myeloma Response (PRIMeR) is an ancillary study of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment for multiple myeloma by next-generation multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC). Patients were enrolled on a three-arm randomized control trial (Blood and Marrow Transplants Clinical Trials Network 0702 Stem Cell Transplant for Myeloma in Combination of Novel Agents [STaMINA]; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01109004)., Methods: Four hundred and thirty-five patients consented to the MRD panel, which included 10 monoclonal antibodies measured via six-color MFC. MRD was measured at baseline/preautologous hematopoietic cell transplant (BL/preAutoHCT), premaintenance (PM), and 1 year (Y1) after AutoHCT with a sensitivity of 10 -5 to 10 -6 . The primary objective was to assess MRD-negative (MRD neg ) at 1 year after AutoHCT and progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS/OS)., Results: Similar to the STaMINA results, at a median follow-up of 70 months, there was no significant difference in PFS/OS by treatment arm in the PRIMeR patients. MRD neg at all three time points was associated with significantly improved PFS, and MRD neg at Y1 had significantly longer OS. Multivariate analysis of PFS, adjusting for disease risk and treatment arm, demonstrated hazard ratios (HRs) in MRD-positive patients compared with MRD neg patients at BL, PM, and Y1 of 1.55 ( P = .0074), 1.83 ( P = .0007), and 3.61 ( P < .0001), respectively. Corresponding HRs for OS were 1.19 ( P = .48), 0.88 ( P = .68), and 3.36 ( P < .001). Patients with sustained MRD neg or who converted to MRD neg by Y1 had similar PFS/OS., Conclusion: To our knowledge, this first, prospective US cooperative group, multicenter study demonstrates that MRD neg at Y1 after AutoHCT with lenalidomide maintenance is prognostic for improved 6-year PFS and OS. Serial MRD measurements may direct trials to test how further therapy may improve long-term PFS and OS.

Comprehensive genomic sequencing is becoming a critical component in the assessment of hematologic malignancies, with broad implications for patient management. In this context, unequivocally discriminating somatic from germline events is challenging but greatly facilitated by matched analysis of tumor:normal pairs. In contrast to solid tumors, conventional sources of normal control (peripheral blood, buccal swabs, saliva) could be highly involved by the neoplastic process, rendering them unsuitable. In this work we describe our real-world experience using cell free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from nail clippings as an alternate source of normal control, through the dedicated review of 2,610 tumor:nail pairs comprehensively sequenced by MSK-IMPACT-heme. Overall, we find nail cfDNA is a robust source of germline control for paired genomic studies. In a subset of patients, nail DNA may have tumor DNA contamination, reflecting unique attributes of the hematologic disease and transplant history. Contamination is generally low level, but significantly more common among patients with myeloid neoplasms (20.5%; 304/1482) compared to lymphoid diseases (5.4%; 61/1128) and particularly enriched in myeloproliferative neoplasms with marked myelofibrosis. When identified in patients with lymphoid and plasma-cell neoplasms, mutations commonly reflected a myeloid profile and correlated with a concurrent/evolving clonal myeloid neoplasm. For nails collected after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, donor DNA was identified in 22% (11/50). In this cohort, an association with recent history of graft-vs-host disease was identified. These findings should be considered as a potential limitation for the use of nail as normal control but could also provide important diagnostic information regarding the disease process.