Search

Background: Despite remarkable progress, cancer remains a life-threatening disease for millions of people worldwide, also resulting in significant psychosocial limitations. High-quality, comprehensive cancer care requires patient and family involvement and the provision of needs-based, targeted psychosocial services. Although progress has been made in understanding the occurrence of mental comorbidity and psychosocial distress in cancer patients, comparatively little is known about the course of psychological comorbidity and psychosocial distress in early survivorship among patients and their families. We therefore aim to estimate the prevalence of mental disorders according to the DSM-5, psychosocial distress, perceived needs for psychosocial support and utilization of psychosocial support offers in newly diagnosed cancer patients and their relatives, taking into account potential contributing biopsychosocial factors for the occurrence of psychological comorbidity. Methods/design: This study follows a prospective multi-center observational cohort design across four measurement time points: within 2 months after cancer diagnosis (t1), and in the follow-up period at 6 months (t2), at 12 months (t3), and at 18 months (t4) after t1. Patients older than 18 years who have a confirmed initial diagnosis of a malignant solid tumor and are scheduled for cancer treatment at one of the participating cancer centers are eligible for study participation. Relatives of eligible patients are also eligible for study participation if they are older than 18 years. Patients are interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders (SCID-5-CV). In addition, patients and relatives receive a set of validated questionnaires at each measurement time point, covering comorbid conditions and functional performance, perceived psychological distress and quality of life, partnership aspects and social relationships, supportive care needs and use of psychosocial support services, health literacy, and health behavior and meaning in life. Discussion: This prospective multi-center observational cohort study has a major focus on increasing quality of care and quality of life in cancer survivors through providing rigorous longitudinal data for the development and implementation of target group-specific psychosocial support services. Trial registration: NCT04620564, date of registration 9/11/2020; DKG OnkoZert: Registrier-No.: ST-U134, date of registration 5/11/2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended to women with a pathogenic BRCA variant, but as a main side effect, RRSO could lead to an early onset of menopause. Aim: To evaluate the impact of RRSO and preoperative menopausal status on menopausal symptoms, sexual functioning, and quality of life (QOL). Methods: The study was conducted between November 2019 and April 2020. Women were included who tested positive for a pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant between 2015 and 2018. Depression levels, QOL, and global health status were measured and compared with those of women who opted against RRSO. Furthermore, women who underwent RRSO treatment were asked to report menopausal complaints that they experienced at 1 month postsurgery and any current complaints. Outcomes: RRSO had no significant impact on QOL, but women who were premenopausal at the time of surgery reported more sexual complaints than postmenopausal women. Results: In total, 134 carriers of a BRCA mutation were included: 90 (67%) underwent RRSO and 44 (33%) did not. At the time of the survey, neither the control nor experimental group experienced significant changes in QOL (b = –0.18, P = .59). Women who underwent RRSO reported a significantly lower global health status (b = –0.66, P = .05). Women who were premenopausal at the time of surgery were bothered more by sexual symptoms (b = 0.91, P = .19) but experienced fewer vasomotor complaints (b = –1.09, P = .13) than women who were postmenopausal at the time of RRSO. Clinical Implications: The decrease of sexual functioning after RRSO should be an integral part of preoperative counseling because it is important for BRCA carriers, especially for premenopausal women. Strengths and Limitations: Some strengths of the present study were the long follow-up, a high response rate, and the existence of a control group, whereas defining menopausal status by last menstrual bleeding and self-report of data (eg, breast cancer history) increased the risk of errors. Conclusion: Our study indicated that women who underwent RRSO experienced no difference in QOL when compared with women without RRSO and that patients with premenopausal status seemed to be at higher risk to experience sexual complaints after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]