Search

Introduction: Seladelpar (MBX-8025) is a once-daily administered highly specific PPAR-δ agonist in Phase 3 and extension trials for use in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Areas covered: This review provides background on current treatment options for PBC, and summarizes clinical trial data regarding the safety and effectiveness of seladelpar within the context of these treatments. Expert opinion: Clinical trials results demonstrate the safety and tolerability of seladelpar use for PBC, including in patients with cirrhosis. The primary composite endpoint (ALP <1.67 times ULN, decrease ≥ 15% from baseline, and TB ≤ULN) was met in 61.7% of the patients treated with seladelpar and in 20% receiving placebo (p < 0.001). Moreover, pruritus – a cardinal and often intractable symptom of PBC – was improved with seladelpar treatment, as were overall quality of life measurements. Improvements in markers of inflammation were likewise observed. These biochemical and clinical findings therefore represent landmark developments in PBC treatment and offer a therapeutic option for PBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Prevalence and severity of pruritus among US patients with chronic hepatitis B and C (HBV, HCV) are not well-documented. Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS) patients were surveyed to examine pruritus prevalence and impact on quality of life (QoL). Methods: Patients who reported experiencing pruritus ≥3 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) within the past 30 days were invited to participate in a 6-month study using the SF-36 questionnaire. General regression (univariate followed by multivariable modelling) was used to analyse pruritus intensity and eight QoL dimensions. Results: Among 1654 patients (HBV = 358, HCV = 1296, HBV/HCV = 6), pruritus prevalence was significantly higher among patients with HCV than those with HBV (44% vs. 35%; p < .05). One hundred and twenty-three patients (21 HBV and 102 HCV) participated in the QoL study (72% ≥60 years; 50% men; 25% Black; 37% with cirrhosis; 66% had BMI > 25). Mean NRS was 4.9--5.3. QoL responses for social functioning and emotional well-being were higher (70--72 points) than responses for energy/fatigue (50--51). Antiviral treatment rates were higher in HCV (92%, SVR 99%) than HBV (71% ever, 43% ongoing). Multivariable analyses showed no significant effect of hepatitis type or antiviral treatments on itch. Antihistamines were associated with severe itch. Higher NRS was associated with significantly reduced QoL. Each unit increase in NRS was associated with a 2--3 unit decline in emotional well-being, general health, physical function, energy/fatigue, social functioning and emotional health. Conclusion: Pruritus negatively affects many viral hepatitis patients, regardless of antiviral treatment status. Improved treatment options are needed to address its impact on QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Seladelpar is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐δ agonist that targets multiple cell types involved in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), leading to anti‐cholestatic, anti‐inflammatory and anti‐pruritic effects. Aims: To evaluate the long‐term safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with PBC. Methods: In an open‐label, international, long‐term extension study, patients with PBC completing seladelpar lead‐in studies continued treatment. Seladelpar was taken orally once daily at doses of 5 or 10 mg with dose adjustment permitted for safety or tolerability. The primary analysis was for safety and the secondary efficacy analysis examined biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury. The study was terminated early due to the unexpected histological findings in a concurrent study for non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis, which were subsequently found to predate treatment. Safety and efficacy data were analysed through 2 years. Results: There were no serious treatment‐related adverse events observed among 106 patients treated with seladelpar for up to 2 years. There were four discontinuations for safety, one possibly related to seladelpar. Among 53 patients who completed 2 years of seladelpar, response rates increased from years 1 to 2 for the composite endpoint (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] <1.67 × ULN, ≥15% decrease in ALP, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalisation from 66% to 79% and from 26% to 42%, respectively. In those with elevated bilirubin at baseline, 43% achieved normalisation at year 2. Conclusions: Seladelpar was safe, and markedly improved biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury in patients with PBC. These effects were maintained or improved throughout the second year. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03301506; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2017‐003910‐16. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a featured cover image for the journal Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. The image is based on a clinical trial extension study on the safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. The study was conducted by a team of authors and provides two-year results. The document does not provide any specific details or findings from the study, but it serves as a visual representation of the research. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) slows disease progression among patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), yet not all patients receive this standard-of-care medication. Our study aims to identify reasons why PBC patients did not receive the recommended UDCA treatment., Methods: Using medical record data collected by the Fibrotic Liver Disease (FOLD) Consortium for 2006-2016, we identified PBC patients from a single site with no UDCA therapy record. Two independent reviewers used a structured data collection instrument to systematically confirm and record the reasons for the lack of treatment., Results: Among 494 PBC patients (11% men and 13.2% Black patients) with a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 35 (7%) had never received UDCA (16% men and 24% Black patients). Of these, 18 (51%) had laboratory indications of PBC but were not formally diagnosed. Among the remaining 17 patients with recognized PBC, six were never offered UDCA, seven declined treatment, and four remained untreated despite being offered treatment. We did not find a statistically significant association between the lack of PBC diagnosis and treatment and patients' age (p = 0.139), gender (p = 0.222), race (p = 0.081), or insurance coverage (p = 0.456), perhaps due to our small sample size., Conclusions: Multiple factors influencing the lack of evaluation and treatment in PBC patients were identified at the provider and patient levels. The most common reasons included financial barriers, loss to follow-up, severe decompensated disease at diagnosis, and lack of referral to specialists for further evaluation. Future interventions targeting modifiable provider and patient barriers may improve rates and timeliness of PBC diagnosis and treatment., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Henry Ford Health’s Institutional Review Board issued approval 9762. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Shamaa et al.)

Introduction: Prevalence and severity of pruritus among US patients with chronic hepatitis B and C (HBV, HCV) are not well-documented. Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS) patients were surveyed to examine pruritus prevalence and impact on quality of life (QoL)., Methods: Patients who reported experiencing pruritus ≥3 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) within the past 30 days were invited to participate in a 6-month study using the SF-36 questionnaire. General regression (univariate followed by multivariable modelling) was used to analyse pruritus intensity and eight QoL dimensions., Results: Among 1654 patients (HBV = 358, HCV = 1296, HBV/HCV = 6), pruritus prevalence was significantly higher among patients with HCV than those with HBV (44% vs. 35%; p < .05). One hundred and twenty-three patients (21 HBV and 102 HCV) participated in the QoL study (72% ≥60 years; 50% men; 25% Black; 37% with cirrhosis; 66% had BMI > 25). Mean NRS was 4.9-5.3. QoL responses for social functioning and emotional well-being were higher (70-72 points) than responses for energy/fatigue (50-51). Antiviral treatment rates were higher in HCV (92%, SVR 99%) than HBV (71% ever, 43% ongoing). Multivariable analyses showed no significant effect of hepatitis type or antiviral treatments on itch. Antihistamines were associated with severe itch. Higher NRS was associated with significantly reduced QoL. Each unit increase in NRS was associated with a 2-3 unit decline in emotional well-being, general health, physical function, energy/fatigue, social functioning and emotional health., Conclusion: Pruritus negatively affects many viral hepatitis patients, regardless of antiviral treatment status. Improved treatment options are needed to address its impact on QoL., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)