Search

Purpose: Large language models (LLM) show potential for decision support in breast cancer care. Their use in clinical care is currently prohibited by lack of control over sources used for decision-making, explainability of the decision-making process and health data security issues. Recent development of Small Language Models (SLM) is discussed to address these challenges. This preclinical proof-of-concept study tailors an open-source SLM to the German breast cancer guideline (BC-SLM) to evaluate initial clinical accuracy and technical functionality in a preclinical simulation., Methods: A multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) is used as the gold-standard to assess the initial clinical accuracy in terms of concordance of the BC-SLM with MTB and comparing it to two publicly available LLM, ChatGPT3.5 and 4. The study includes 20 fictional patient profiles and recommendations for 5 treatment modalities, resulting in 100 binary treatment recommendations (recommended or not recommended). Statistical evaluation includes concordance with MTB in % including Cohen's Kappa statistic (κ). Technical functionality is assessed qualitatively in terms of local hosting, adherence to the guideline and information retrieval., Results: The overall concordance amounts to 86% for BC-SLM (κ = 0.721, p < 0.001), 90% for ChatGPT4 (κ = 0.820, p < 0.001) and 83% for ChatGPT3.5 (κ = 0.661, p < 0.001). Specific concordance for each treatment modality ranges from 65 to 100% for BC-SLM, 85-100% for ChatGPT4, and 55-95% for ChatGPT3.5. The BC-SLM is locally functional, adheres to the standards of the German breast cancer guideline and provides referenced sections for its decision-making., Conclusion: The tailored BC-SLM shows initial clinical accuracy and technical functionality, with concordance to the MTB that is comparable to publicly-available LLMs like ChatGPT4 and 3.5. This serves as a proof-of-concept for adapting a SLM to an oncological disease and its guideline to address prevailing issues with LLM by ensuring decision transparency, explainability, source control, and data security, which represents a necessary step towards clinical validation and safe use of language models in clinical oncology., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Emerging digital technologies promise to improve breast cancer care, however lack of awareness among clinicians often prevents timely adoption. This study aims to investigate current awareness and intention-to-use of three technologies among breast cancer healthcare professionals (HCP): (1) digital health applications (DHA), (2) artificial intelligence (AI), and (3) blockchain technology (BC). A 22-item questionnaire was designed and administered before and after a 30 min educational presentation highlighting technology implementation examples. Technology awareness and intention-to-use were measured using 7-point Likert scales. Correlations between demographics, technology awareness, intention-to-use, and eHealth literacy (GR-eHEALS scale) were analyzed. 45 HCP completed the questionnaire, of whom 26 (57.8%) were female. Age ranged from 24 to 67 {mean age (SD): 44.93 ± 12.62}. Awareness was highest for DHA (68.9%) followed by AI (66.7%) and BC (24.4%). The presentation led to a non-significant increase of intention-to-use AI {5.37 (±1.81) to 5.83 (±1.64)}. HCPs´ intention-to-use BC after the presentation increased significantly {4.30 (±2.04) to 5.90 (±1.67), p  < 0.01}. Mean accumulated score for GR-eHEALS averaged 33.04 (± 6.61). HCPs´ intended use of AI significantly correlated with eHealth literacy (ρ = 0.383; p  < 0.01), intention-to-use BC (ρ = 0.591; p  < 0.01) and participants´ age (ρ = -0.438; p  < 0.01). This study demonstrates the effect that even a short practical presentation can have on HCPs´ intention-to-use emerging digital technologies. Training potential professional users should be addressed alongside the development of new information technologies and is crucial to increase HCPs´ corresponding awareness and intended use., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Griewing, Knitza, Gremke, Wallwiener, Wagner, Lingenfelder and Kuhn.)

Background: Precision oncology treatments are being applied more commonly in breast and gynecological oncology through the implementation of Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs), but real-world clinical outcome data remain limited. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with breast cancer (BC) and gynecological malignancies referred to our center's MTB from 2018 to 2023. The analysis covered patient characteristics, next-generation sequencing (NGS) results, MTB recommendations, therapy received, and clinical outcomes. Results: Sixty-three patients (77.8%) had metastatic disease, and forty-four patients (54.3%) had previously undergone three or more lines of systemic treatment. Personalized treatment recommendations were provided to 50 patients (63.3%), while 29 (36.7%) had no actionable target. Ultimately, 23 patients (29.1%) underwent molecular-matched treatment (MMT). Commonly altered genes in patients with pan-gyn tumors (BC and gynecological malignancies) included TP53 ( n = 42/81, 51.9%), PIK3CA ( n = 18/81, 22.2%), BRCA1/2 ( n = 10/81, 12.3%), and ARID1A ( n = 9/81, 11.1%). Patients treated with MMT showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival (median PFS 5.5 vs. 3.5 months, p = 0.0014). Of all patients who underwent molecular profiling, 13.6% experienced a major clinical benefit (PFSr ≥ 1.3 and PR/SD ≥ 6 months) through precision oncology. Conclusions: NGS-guided precision oncology demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in a subgroup of patients with gynecological and breast cancers.

Purpose: Given the relatively high incidence of both endometriosis and breast cancer, investigating the potential connection between these gynecological diseases is of substantial clinical significance. However, there is no clear consensus in the literature on the extent to which the risk of breast cancer is increased in patients with endometriosis. Therefore, we conducted a large-scale observational study investigating the association between endometriosis and breast cancer risk., Methods: This study included women aged ≥ 18 years with an initial endometriosis diagnosis from one of 315 office-based gynecologists in Germany between January 2005 and December 2021. Non-endometriosis patients were matched 1:1 to patients with endometriosis based on age, index year, average yearly consultation frequency, and predefined co-diagnoses within 12 months before or on the index date, including obesity and benign breast disorders. The association between endometriosis and the 10-year incidence of breast cancer was studied using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Finally, a univariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between endometriosis and breast cancer., Results: Over a follow-up period of up to 10 years, no significant difference was observed between the endometriosis (2.4%) and the matched non-endometriosis group (2.5%) with regard to breast cancer diagnoses. Furthermore, the regression analysis revealed no significant association between endometriosis and subsequent breast cancer., Conclusion: In summary, our comprehensive 10-year study involving a substantial sample of women indicates that endometriosis is not significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent breast cancer., (© 2023. The Author(s).)