Search

Abstract Background Increasing number of studies have demonstrated certain patterns of microbial changes in gynecological diseases; however, the interaction between them remains unclear. To evaluate the consistency or specificity across multiple studies on different gynecological diseases and microbial alterations at different sites of the body (gut and genital tract), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to December 5, 2022(PROSPERO: CRD42023400205). Eligible studies focused on gynecological diseases in adult women, applied next-generation sequencing on microbiome, and reported outcomes including alpha or beta diversity or relative abundance. The random-effects model on standardized mean difference (SMD) was conducted using the inverse-variance method for alpha diversity indices. Results Of 3327 unique articles, 87 eligible studies were included. Significant decreases were found in gut microbiome of patients versus controls (observed species SMD=-0.35; 95%CI, -0.62 to -0.09; Shannon index SMD=-0.23; 95%CI, -0.40 to -0.06), whereas significant increases were observed in vaginal microbiome (Chao1 SMD = 1.15; 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.56; Shannon index SMD = 0.51; 95%CI, 0.16 to 0.86). Most studies of different diagnostic categories showed no significant differences in beta diversity. Disease specificity was observed, but almost all the changes were only replicated in three studies, except for the increased Aerococcus in bacterial vaginosis (BV). Patients with major gynecological diseases shared the enrichment of Prevotella and depletion of Lactobacillus, and an overlap in microbes was implied between BV, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and cervical cancer. Conclusions These findings demonstrated an association between alterations in gut and genital microbiota and gynecological diseases. The most observed results were shared alterations across diseases rather than disease-specific alterations. Therefore, further investigation is required to identify specific biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment in the future.

Background: Increasing number of studies have demonstrated certain patterns of microbial changes in gynecological diseases; however, the interaction between them remains unclear. To evaluate the consistency or specificity across multiple studies on different gynecological diseases and microbial alterations at different sites of the body (gut and genital tract), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to December 5, 2022(PROSPERO: CRD42023400205). Eligible studies focused on gynecological diseases in adult women, applied next-generation sequencing on microbiome, and reported outcomes including alpha or beta diversity or relative abundance. The random-effects model on standardized mean difference (SMD) was conducted using the inverse-variance method for alpha diversity indices. Results: Of 3327 unique articles, 87 eligible studies were included. Significant decreases were found in gut microbiome of patients versus controls (observed species SMD=-0.35; 95%CI, -0.62 to -0.09; Shannon index SMD=-0.23; 95%CI, -0.40 to -0.06), whereas significant increases were observed in vaginal microbiome (Chao1 SMD = 1.15; 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.56; Shannon index SMD = 0.51; 95%CI, 0.16 to 0.86). Most studies of different diagnostic categories showed no significant differences in beta diversity. Disease specificity was observed, but almost all the changes were only replicated in three studies, except for the increased Aerococcus in bacterial vaginosis (BV). Patients with major gynecological diseases shared the enrichment of Prevotella and depletion of Lactobacillus, and an overlap in microbes was implied between BV, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and cervical cancer. Conclusions: These findings demonstrated an association between alterations in gut and genital microbiota and gynecological diseases. The most observed results were shared alterations across diseases rather than disease-specific alterations. Therefore, further investigation is required to identify specific biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify the effects of subcutaneous drain insertion on wound dehiscence and infection in patients who underwent gynecological midline laparotomy. This analysis identified the secondary endpoints of the KGOG 4001 study, a prospective, multicenter, non-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled to undergo midline laparotomy for gynecological diseases and, with body mass index<35 kg/m2, were randomized (1:1) to treatment (with subcutaneous drain) and control (without subcutaneous drain) groups from February 2021 to December 2021. We compared the incidence rate of wound dehiscence 4 weeks post-surgery and the cumulative incidence rate of wound dehiscence and infection up to 4 weeks post-surgery between the two groups. Of 174 patients randomized to the treatment (n = 84) and control (n = 90) groups, 12 were excluded owing to loss to follow-up; finally, 162 patients (treatment, n = 79; control, n = 83) were included in intention-to-treat analysis. The frequency of cancer surgery (79.7 % vs. 77.1 %, p = 0.683), mean surgery time (227.7 vs. 226.7 min, p = 0.960), and mean wound length (24.2 vs. 24.3 cm, p = 0.933) were comparable between two groups. No significant differences were observed in the incidence rate of wound dehiscence 4 weeks post-surgery (1.3 % vs. 2.4 %, p > 0.999), cumulative incidence rate of wound dehiscence (8.9 % vs. 6.0 %, p = 0.491), and cumulative incidence rate of wound infection (1.3 % vs. 0.0 %, p = 0.488) up to 4 weeks post-surgery between the two groups. Subcutaneous drain insertion is not associated with a significant improvement in the incidence of wound dehiscence and infection in patients who undergo gynecological midline laparotomy. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04643197. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Blood stasis is the slowing or stagnation of blood and can cause metabolic, musculoskeletal, and gynecological diseases. This study developed the Blood Stasis Questionnaire for gynecological disease (BSQ-GD) by extracting clinical indicators related to gynecological diseases using the Blood Stasis Questionnaires I and II (BSQ-I and II, respectively) and analyzed the clinical data of a cross-sectional study., Patients and Methods: In total, 103 women aged between 25 and 65 years who met gynecological disease criteria were enrolled in this study. Blood stasis scores (BSS) were evaluated using the BSQ-II and categorized into BSS and non-BSS groups. To assess the reliability of BSQ-GD, the internal consistency coefficient was employed using Cronbach's α. Furthermore, correlation analyses were conducted for the clinical symptoms related to gynecological diseases, and the discriminant validity was confirmed by comparing the two groups. The prediction accuracy was determined using logistic regression and the cut-off value of the BSQ-GD was established via the sensitivity and specificity calculations., Results: The BSQ-GD showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient = 0.71) and validity, with significant differences in mean scores between blood stasis (22.30 ± 3.34) and non-blood stasis (14.93 ± 3.49) groups. The cut-off value of the BSQ-GD score was 19 points when the Youden index (73.45) and the concordance probability (0.75) were at their maximum. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was approximately 96%, and the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic accuracy according to the cut-off value are 80.95% and 92.50%, respectively., Conclusion: The BSQ-GD can be an appropriate instrument to estimate blood stasis in patients with gynecological diseases; its diagnostic sensitivity according to the cut-off value is high., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)