Search

Introduction: The Weight Bias Internalization Scale and the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale are well-established self-report questionnaires for assessing weight bias internalization, which is widespread among bariatric patients. However, among this group, psychometric properties of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale have only been examined in small samples showing unsatisfactory model fit and have not been explored for the modified questionnaire. Methods: This study psychometrically evaluated and compared the Weight Bias Internalization Scale and Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale in a large sample of prebariatric patients (N = 825, mean age = 46.75 years, SD = 11.55) regarding item characteristics, model fit to unidimensionality, reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance. Results: Item 4 of both questionnaires showed low corrected item-total correlations (<0.40) and was therefore removed from the scales. The new 10-item versions showed improved item characteristics, internal consistency, model fit to unidimensionality, and convergent and divergent validity when compared to the 11-item versions. The best psychometric properties were found for the 10-item version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Conclusion: The 10-item version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale surpasses the other versions studied in all psychometric properties. Therefore, it should be used in prebariatric patients to detect weight bias internalization and provide them with psychological interventions that could improve bariatric surgery outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Weight bias internalization (WBI) is associated with reduced psychological well-being in individuals with obesity. The aim of this study was to investigate the application of Cohen's stress-buffering model of social support for WBI on well-being in patients presenting for bariatric surgery., Methods: In N = 804 adult prebariatric patients, WBI, social support, depression severity, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and self-esteem were assessed by self-report questionnaires. Structural Equation Modeling was applied to test for direct associations between social support and well-being and for a buffering effect of social support on the relationship between WBI and well-being., Results: After controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, greater social support was directly associated with reduced depression severity and increased self-esteem, but not with increased HRQOL. Contrary to Cohen's stress-buffering model, social support showed no moderating effects on the association between WBI and depression severity, HRQOL, and self-esteem., Conclusion: These cross-sectional results may indicate that greater social support is associated with improved well-being, supporting it as a potential coping resource in bariatric surgery. Given the absence of supporting evidence for the buffering effect in the present study, future prospective research may reevaluate the existence of a moderating effect of social support and investigate whether support-focused interventions improve psychological well-being., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)