Search

Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) and rifampicin are mainstays of second-line antiretroviral and multiple anti-TB regimens, respectively. Rifampicin induces CYP3A4, a major enzyme involved in atazanavir metabolism, causing a drug-drug interaction (DDI) which might be exaggerated in pregnancy. Having demonstrated that increasing the dose of ATV/r from once daily (OD) to twice daily (BD) in non-pregnant adults can safely overcome this DDI, we developed a pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to explore the impact of pregnancy. Predicted pharmacokinetic parameters were validated with separate clinical datasets of ATV/r alone (NCT03923231) and rifampicin alone in pregnant women. The pregnancy model was considered validated when the absolute average fold error (AAFE) for C trough and AUC 0-24 of both drugs were <2 when comparing predicted vs. observed data. Thereafter, predicted atazanavir C trough was compared against its protein-adjusted IC 90 (14 ng/mL) when simulating the co-administration of ATV/r 300/100 mg OD and rifampicin 600 mg OD. Pregnancy was predicted to increase the rifampicin DDI effect on atazanavir. For the dosing regimens of ATV/r 300/100 mg OD, ATV/r 300/200 mg OD, and ATV/r 300/100 mg BD (all with rifampicin 600 mg OD), predicted atazanavir C trough was above 14 ng/mL in 29%, 71%, and 100%; and 32%, 73% and 100% of the population in second and third trimesters, respectively. Thus, PBPK modeling suggests ATV/r 300/100 mg BD could maintain antiviral efficacy when co-administered with rifampicin 600 mg OD in pregnancy. Clinical studies are warranted to confirm safety and efficacy in pregnancy., (© 2024 The Author(s). CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Kaposi sarcoma is a rare angioproliferative disease associated with human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8) infection. Kaposi sarcoma is frequent and aggressive in HIV-infected people, whereas the classic form (CKS) generally has an indolent course. Notably, all conventional therapies against Kaposi sarcoma have only temporary efficacy. We have previously shown that indinavir, a HIV protease-inhibitor with direct antiangiogenic and antitumor activity, is safe and effective in patients with early CKS, whereas effects are less prominent in advanced disease, probably due to the larger tumor mass. Therefore, the clinical response to indinavir was assessed in patients with advanced CKS after debulking chemotherapy. This was a monocentric phase 2 trial in elderly with progressive/advanced CKS treated with debulking chemotherapy and indinavir combined, followed by a maintenance phase with indinavir alone. Secondary endpoints included safety and Kaposi sarcoma biomarker evaluation.All evaluable patients (22) responded to debulking therapy. Out of these, 16 entered the indinavir maintenance phase. The overall response rate at end of maintenance was 75% (estimated median response-duration 43 months). Moreover, most responders showed further clinical improvements (lesion number/nodularity) during maintenance and post-treatment follow-up. Notably, after relapse, progressors did not require systemic Kaposi sarcoma therapy and showed clinical improvements (including disease stabilization) remaining on study. Responders also showed immune status amelioration with a consistent B-cell increase and positive changes of other biomarkers, including anti-HHV-8 natural killer activity. In advanced CKS a strategy combining indinavir and chemotherapy is safe and associated with high and durable response rates and it could be rapidly adopted for the clinical management of these patients., Significance: This phase-2 trial showed that the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir may boost and extend the duration of the effects of chemotherapy in elderly with advanced progressive classic Kaposi sarcoma, without additional toxicity. Further, the amelioration of the immune status seen in responders suggests a better control of HHV-8 infection and tumor-cell killing. Thus, indinavir combined with chemotherapy may represent an important tool for the clinical management of classic Kaposi sarcoma in elderly patients., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Atazanavir or ATV is an FDA-approved, HIV-1 protease inhibitor that belongs to the azapeptide group. Over time, it has been observed that ATV can cause multiple adverse side effects in the form of liver diseases including elevations in serum aminotransferase, indirect hyper-bilirubinemia, and idiosyncratic acute liver injury aggravating the underlying chronic viral hepatitis. Hence, there is an incessant need to explore the safe and efficacious method of delivering ATV in a controlled manner that may reduce the proportion of its idiosyncratic reactions in patients who are on antiretroviral therapy for years. In this study, we assessed ATV formulation along with Rosemary oil to enhance the anti-HIV-1 activity and its controlled delivery through self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system or SNEDDS to enhance its oral bioavailability. While the designing, development, and characterization of ATV-SNEDDS were addressed through various evaluation parameters and pharmacokinetic-based studies, in vitro cell-based experiments assured the safety and efficacy of the designed ATV formulation. The study discovered the potential of ATV-SNEDDS to inhibit HIV-1 infection at a lower concentration as compared to its pure counterpart. Simultaneously, we could also demonstrate the ATV and Rosemary oil providing leads for designing and developing such formulations for the management of HIV-1 infections with the alleviation in the risk of adverse reactions., (© 2023. Controlled Release Society.)

Background: Critical drug-drug interactions (DDI) and hepatotoxicity complicate concurrent use of rifampicin and protease inhibitors. We investigated whether dose escalation of atazanavir/ritonavir could safely overcome the DDI with rifampicin., Methods: DERIVE (NCT04121195, EDCTP) was a dose-escalation trial in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on atazanavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Uganda. Four intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) visits were performed: PK1 300/100 mg OD (baseline); PK2 300/100 mg OD with rifampicin 600 mg; PK3 300/100 mg twice a day (BID) with rifampicin 600 mg OD; PK4 300/100 mg BID with rifampicin 1200 mg OD. Dolutegravir 50 mg BID throughout the study period ensured participants remained protected from subtherapeutic atazanavir concentrations. The data were interpreted with noncompartmental analysis. The target minimum concentration was atazanavir's protein-adjusted IC90 (PA-IC90), 0.014 mg/L., Results: We enrolled 26 participants (23 female) with median (range) age 44 (28-61) years and weight 67 (50-75) kg. Compared with PK1, atazanavir Ctau, and AUC were significantly reduced at PK2 by 96% and 85%, respectively. The escalation to BID dosing (PK3) reduced this difference in Ctau, and AUC24 to 18% lower and 8% higher, respectively. Comparable exposures were maintained with double doses of rifampicin. Lowest Ctau during PK1, PK3, and PK4 were 12.7-, 4.8-, and 8.6-fold higher than PA-IC90, respectively, whereas 65% of PK2 Ctau were below the limit of quantification (0.03 mg/L), hence likely below PA-IC90. No participant developed significant elevation of liver enzymes, reported a serious adverse event (SAE) or experienced rebound viraemia., Conclusions: Twice daily atazanavir/ritonavir during rifampicin co-administration was well tolerated and achieved plasma concentrations above the target., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04121195. Registered on 09 October 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04121195., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)