Search

Background and purpose: Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is complex requiring multiple specialized disciplines. In practice, this creates considerable organizational and communicational challenges for healthcare professionals and patients. Thus, an interdisciplinary integrated outpatient clinic for IIH (comprising neurology, neuroophthalmology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery and endocrinology) was established with central coordination and a one‐stop concept. Here, the aim was to evaluate the effects of this one‐stop concept on objective clinical outcome. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, the one‐stop era with integrated care (IC) (1 July 2021 to 31 December 2022) was compared to a reference group receiving standard care (SC) (1 July 2018 to 31 December 2019) regarding visual impairment/worsening and headache improvement/freedom 6 months after diagnosis. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders. Results: Baseline characteristics of the IC group (n = 85) and SC group (n = 81) were comparable (female 90.6% vs. 90.1%; mean age 33.6 vs. 32.8 years; median body mass index 31.8 vs. 33.0; median cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure 32 vs. 34 cmH2O; at diagnosis, visual impairment was present in 71.8% vs. 69.1% and chronic headache in 55.3% vs. 56.8% in IC vs. SC). IC was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving both headache improvement (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–4.33, p < 0.001) and headache freedom (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.11–3.09, p = 0.031). Regarding the risk of visual impairment and visual worsening IC was superior numerically but not statistically significantly (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69–1.16, p = 0.231, and OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41–1.25, p = 0.354). Conclusions: Interdisciplinary integrated care of IIH is favourably associated with headache outcomes and potentially also visual outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is complex requiring contributions from multiple specialized disciplines. In practice, this creates considerable organizational and communicational challenges. To meet those challenges, we established an interdisciplinary integrated outpatient clinic for IIH with a central coordination and a one-stop concept. Here, we aimed to evaluate effects of this one-stop concept on subjective patient satisfaction and economic outcome in patients with IIH. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we compared the one-stop era with integrated care (IC, 1-JUL-2021 to 31-DEC-2022) to a reference group receiving standard care (SC, 1-JUL-2018 to 31-DEC-2019) regarding subjective patient satisfaction (assessed by the Vienna Patient Inventory). Multivariable binary linear regression models were used to adjust for confounders. Results: Baseline characteristics of the IC group (n = 85) and SC group (n = 81) were comparable (female: 90.6% vs. 90.1%; mean age: 33.6 vs. 32.8 years, educational level: ≥9 years of education 60.0% vs. 59.3%; located in Vienna 75.3% vs. 76.5%). Compared to SC, management within IC concept was associated with statistically significantly higher subjective patient satisfaction (beta = 0.93; p < 0.001) with the strongest effects observed in satisfaction with treatment accessibility and availability (beta = 2.05; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses of patients with migration background and language barrier consistently indicated stronger effects of IC in these groups. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary integrated management of IIH statistically significantly and clinically meaningfully improves patient satisfaction – particularly in socioeconomically underprivileged patient groups. Providing structured central coordination to facilitate and improve access to interdisciplinary management provides means to further improve outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is conflicting evidence whether prediabetes is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. We aimed to assess the effect of prediabetes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome on clinical outcomes. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from the ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD trials, including patients with chronic coronary syndrome determined by coronary computed tomography angiography or exercise-stress testing. Participants were assigned to the normoglycemia group (HbA1c < 5.7% [< 39 mmol/mol]), prediabetes group (HbA1c 5.7–6.4% [40–47 mmol/mol]), or diabetes group (HbA1c ≥ 6.5% [≥ 48 mmol/mol]). The primary end point of this study was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events and composites thereof. Results: Overall, the primary endpoint all-cause mortality occurred in 330 (8.4%) of 3910 patients over a median follow-up time of 3.1 years (IQR 2.1–4.1). The primary endpoint all-cause mortality occurred in 37 (5.2%) of 716 patients in the normoglycemia group, in 63 (6.9%) of 911 in the prediabetes group, and in 230 (10.1%) of 2283 in the diabetes group. In the covariate-adjusted Cox model analysis, the estimated adjusted HR (aHR) in the prediabetes group as compared with the normoglycemia group was 1.45 (95%CI, 0.95–2.20). The aHR in the diabetes group as compared with the normoglycemia group was 1.84 (95%CI, 1.29–2.65). Prediabetes, compared with normoglycemia, was associated with an increased risk of stroke (aHR, 3.44, 95%CI, 1.15–10.25). Subgroup analyses suggested an increased risk of all-cause death associated with prediabetes in males and patients under 65 years. Conclusions: In patients with chronic coronary syndrome, diabetes but not prediabetes was associated with significantly increased risk of all-cause death within a median follow-up period of 3.1 years. Trial Registration NCT01471522, BioLINCC ID 13936. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Design Setting Population Methods Main Outcome Measures Results Conclusions To identify factors associated with neonatal respiratory distress (NRD) in early Gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM).Nested case–control analysis of the TOBOGM trial.Seventeen hospitals: Australia, Sweden, Austria and India.Pregnant women, <20 weeks' gestation, singleton, GDM risk factors.Women with GDM risk factors completed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before 20 weeks: those with eGDM (WHO‐2013 criteria) were randomised to immediate or deferred GDM treatment. Logistic regression compared pregnancies with/without NRD, and in pregnancies with NRD, those with/without high‐dependency nursery admission for ≤24 h with those admitted for >24 h. Comparisons were adjusted for age, pre‐pregnancy body mass index, ethnicity, smoking, primigravity, education and site. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) are reported.NRD definition: ≥4 h of respiratory support (supplemental oxygen or supported ventilation) postpartum. Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS): Supported ventilation and ≥24 h nursery stay.Ninety‐nine (12.5%) of 793 infants had NRD; incidence halved (0.50, 0.31–0.79) if GDM treatment was started early. NRD was associated with Caesarean section (2.31, 1.42–3.76), large for gestational age (LGA) (1.83, 1.09–3.08) and shorter gestation (0.95, 0.93–0.97 per day longer). Among NRD infants, >24 h nursery‐stay was associated with higher OGTT 1‐h glucose (1.38, 1.08–1.76 per mmol/L). Fifteen (2.0%) infants had RDS.Identifying and treating eGDM reduces NRD risk. NRD is more likely with Caesarean section, LGA and shorter gestation. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms behind this eGDM complication and any long‐term effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We evaluated associations between early-pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose and complications in the Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) cohort to inform prognostic OGTT thresholds., Research Design and Methods: Individuals with risk factors for hyperglycemia were recruited for an international, multicenter, randomized controlled gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (World Health Organization 2013 criteria) treatment trial. A 2-h 75-g OGTT was performed at <20 weeks' gestation. Individuals with early treated hyperglycemia in pregnancy were excluded from the primary analysis. Early OGTT glucose concentrations were analyzed continuously and in glycemic categories (normal, low band, and high band)., Results: Overall, 3,645 individuals had an OGTT at (mean ± SD) 15.6 ± 2.5 weeks. For each 1-SD increase in fasting, 1-h, and 2-h glucose values, there were continuous positive associations with late GDM: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.04 (95% CI 1.82-2.27), 3.05 (2.72-3.43), and 2.21 (1.99-2.45), respectively. There were continuous positive associations between 1-h and 2-h glucose and the perinatal composite (birth <37 + 0 weeks, birth trauma, birth weight ≥4,500 g, respiratory distress, phototherapy requirement, stillbirth/neonatal death, and shoulder dystocia), with aOR 1.15 (95% CI 1.04-1.26) and 1.14 (1.04-1.25), respectively, and with large-for-gestational-age offspring, with aOR 1.18 (1.06-1.31) and 1.26 (1.01-1.25), respectively. Significant associations were also observed between 1-h glucose and cesarean section and between fasting and 2-h glucose and neonatal hypoglycemia. In categorical analysis, only the high-band 1-h glucose (≥10.6 mmol/L [191 mg/dL]) predicted the perinatal composite., Conclusions: There is a continuous positive association between early-pregnancy OGTT glucose and complications. In individuals with hyperglycemia risk factors, only the high-glycemic-band 1-h glucose corresponded to increased risk of major perinatal complications., (© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Objective: To compare pregnancy outcomes among women with a normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before 20 weeks' gestation (early) and at 24-28 weeks' gestation (late) (no gestational diabetes mellitus, or No-GDM), those with early GDM randomized to observation with a subsequent normal OGTT (GDM-Regression), and those with GDM on both occasions (GDM-Maintained)., Research Design and Methods: Women at <20 weeks' gestation with GDM risk factors who were recruited for a randomized controlled early GDM treatment trial were included. Women with treated early GDM and late GDM (according to the World Health Organization's 2013 criteria) were excluded from this analysis. Logistic regression compared pregnancy outcomes., Results: GDM-Regression (n = 121) group risk factor profiles and OGTT results generally fell between the No-GDM (n = 2,218) and GDM-Maintained (n = 254) groups, with adjusted incidences of pregnancy complications similar between the GDM-Regression and No-GDM groups., Conclusions: Women with early GDM but normal OGTT at 24-28 weeks' gestation had pregnancy outcomes that were similar to those of individuals without GDM. Identifying early GDM likely to regress would allow treatment to be avoided., (© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Objective: In most gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) studies, cohorts have included women combined into study populations without regard to whether hyperglycemia was present earlier in pregnancy. In this study we sought to compare perinatal outcomes between groups: women with early GDM (EGDM group: diagnosis before 20 weeks but no treatment until 24-28 weeks if GDM still present), with late GDM (LGDM group: present only at 24-28 weeks), and with normoglycemia at 24-28 weeks (control subjects)., Research Design and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled treatment trial where we studied, among women with risk factors, early (<20 weeks' gestation) GDM defined according to World Health Organization 2013 criteria. Those receiving early treatment for GDM treatment were excluded. GDM was treated if present at 24-28 weeks. The primary outcome was a composite of birth before 37 weeks' gestation, birth weight ≥4,500 g, birth trauma, neonatal respiratory distress, phototherapy, stillbirth/neonatal death, and shoulder dystocia. Comparisons included adjustment for age, ethnicity, BMI, site, smoking, primigravity, and education., Results: Women with EGDM (n = 254) and LGDM (n = 467) had shorter pregnancy duration than control subjects (n = 2,339). BMI was lowest with LGDM. The composite was increased with EGDM (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.12)) but not LGDM (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.94-1.50). Induction of labor was higher in both GDM groups. In comparisons with control subjects there were higher birth centile, higher preterm birth rate, and higher rate of neonatal jaundice for the EGDM group (but not the LGDM group). The greatest need for insulin and/or metformin was with EGDM., Conclusions: Adverse perinatal outcomes were increased with EGDM despite treatment from 24-28 weeks' gestation, suggesting the need to initiate treatment early, and more aggressively, to reduce the effects of exposure to the more severe maternal hyperglycemia from early pregnancy., (© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.)