Search

The publication of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's guideline H62 has provided the flow cytometry community with much-needed guidance on development and validation of flow cytometric assays (CLSI, 2021). It has also paved the way for additional exploration of certain topics requiring additional guidance. Flow cytometric analysis of rare matrices, or unique and/or less frequently encountered specimen types, is one such topic and is the focus of this manuscript. This document is the result of a collaboration subject matter experts from a diverse range of backgrounds and seeks to provide best practice consensus guidance regarding these types of specimens. Herein, we define rare matrix samples in the setting of flow cytometric analysis, address validation implications and challenges with these samples, and describe important considerations of using these samples in both clinical and research settings., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Clinical Cytometry Society.)

Background: Mass spectrometry methods are emerging as tools to detect M-proteins in the serum of multiple myeloma patients with increased sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional electrophoretic methods., Methods: A liquid handling system, the Agilent AssayMAP Bravo, with liquid chromatography high-resolution quadrupole-time-of-flight (LC-QTOF) mass spectrometry to analyze intact light chains was compared to immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) for M-protein analysis. 210 patient serum samples were analyzed in a split sample comparison (LC-QTOF vs. IFE). LC-QTOF and IFE were interpreted by different individuals in a blinded fashion and results were grouped into four categories: IFE+/QTOF+, IFE+/QTOF-, IFE-/QTOF+, or IFE-/QTOF-., Results: The LC-QTOF method is able to determine the isotype of M-proteins in a similar fashion to IFE. The estimated limit of detection was ∼ 35 mg/L for adalimumab. For split patient samples, 168 were QTOF+/IFE+, 25 were QTOF-/IFE-, 14 were QTOF+/IFE-, and three were QTOF-/IFE + . Excluding the QTOF+/IFE- results due to the improved sensitivity of the LC-QTOF method, the concordance of LC-QTOF with IFE was ∼ 98 %. The LC-QTOF method also offers improved specificity compared to electrophoretic methods due to inclusion of the accurate mass of the light chains., Conclusions: The LC-QTOF method was deemed fit for clinical use as a qualitative test with increased sensitivity and specificity compared to IFE. The LC-QTOF can also better resolve therapeutic and multiple myeloma IgG-kappa M-proteins, which present a challenge for electrophoretic methods. Future work will determine suitability of this method as an assessment of minimal residual disease status., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. All rights reserved.)