Search

The preparation phase of earthquakes (EQs) has been investigated by making full use of multi-parameter and multi-layer observations of EQ precursors, in order to better understand the lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling (LAIC) process. For this purpose, we chose a specific target EQ, the huge EQ of Fukushima-ken-oki EQ on 13 February 2021 (magnitude Mj = 7.3). We initially reported on EQ precursors in different physical parameters not only of the lithosphere, but also of the atmosphere and ionosphere (Hayakawa et al. followed by Akhoondzadeh et al. and Draz et al., both based on satellite observations). Our first two papers dealt with seven electromagnetic precursors in the three layers (with emphasis on our own ground-based observations in the atmosphere and lower ionosphere), while the second paper dealt with Swarm satellite observations of magnetic field, electron density, and GPS TEC in the ionosphere, and the third paper dealt only with climatological parameters on and above the Earth's surface (together with GPS TEC). We have extensively reviewed all of these results, and have coordinated the temporal evolutions of various physical parameters relevant to the LAIC system; we have sought to understand which hypothesis is more plausible in explaining the LAIC process. Then, we came to a conclusion that two possible LAIC channels seem to exist simultaneously for this EQ: a fast channel (nearly simultaneous responses on the ground and ionosphere), and a slow channel (or diffusion-type), with a time delay of a few to several days, in which the agent effects in the lithosphere and lowest atmosphere seem to propagate up to the ionosphere with a definite time delay. Finally, we have suggested some research directions for the future elucidation of LAIC channels, and also made some comments on an early EQ warning system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of National University of Defense Technology / Guofang Keji Daxue Xuebao is the property of NUDT Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Comprehensive simulation of a number of main processes induced in all geospheres by the fall and explosion of the Kyiv meteoroid on April 19, 2023, have been conducted. Magnetic, electrical, electromagnetic, ionospheric, and seismic effects and the effects of acoustic gravity waves have been assessed. The magnetic effect of the ionospheric currents and the current in the wake of the meteoroid could be considerably large (approximately 0.4–0.7 nT). Owing to the capture of electrons in the atmospheric gravity wave field, the magnetic effect can reach the levels of 0.6–6 nT. Under the influence of an external electric field, a transient current pulse with a current strength of up to approximately 102–103 A can arise. The electrostatic effect can be accompanied by the accumulation of an electric charge of approximately 1–6 mC, which produces the electric field strength of approximately 10 MV/m. The flow of the electric current in the meteoroid wake can give rise to generation of an electromagnetic pulse in the 10–100 kHz band with an electric field strength in the range of 1–10 V/m. The electromagnetic effect of infrasound could be substantial (approximately 0.6–6 V/m and approximately 2–20 nT). The absorption of the shock wave at the ionospheric dynamo region altitudes (approximately 100–150 km) can generate secondary atmospheric gravity waves with a relative amplitude of approximately 0.1%. The fall of the meteoroid produced a plasma wake not only in the lower atmosphere but also in the upper atmosphere at altitudes of not less than 1000 km. The possibility of the appearance of an electrophonic effect is unlikely. The possibilities of generating the ion and magnetic sound by infrasound and generating gradient drift and drift dissipative instabilities seem to be unlikely as well. The magnetic, electrical, and electromagnetic effects dealt with in this study partially fill up gaps in the theory of physical effects produced by meteoroids in the Earth–atmosphere–ionosphere–magnetosphere system. The magnitudes of magnetic, electrical, electromagnetic, ionospheric, and acoustic effects are significant. The magnitude of the earthquake caused by the meteoroid explosion did not exceed one. The mean rate of recurrence of the fall of celestial bodies similar to the Kyiv meteoroid equals 32.3 yr–1, i.e., one event in 11 days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-temporal Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (MT-InSAR) is the only geodetic technique allowing to measure ground deformation down to mm/yr over continuous areas. Vegetation cover in equatorial regions favors the use of L-band SAR data to improve interferometric coherence. However, the electron content of ionosphere, affecting the propagation of the SAR signal, shows particularly strong spatio-temporal variations near the equator, while the dispersive nature of the ionosphere makes its effect stronger on low-frequencies, such as L-band signals. To tackle this problem, range split-spectrum method can be implemented to compensate the ionospheric phase contribution. Here, we apply this technique for time-series of ALOS-PALSAR data, and propose optimizations for low-coherence areas. To evaluate the efficiency of this method to retrieve subtle deformation rates in equatorial regions, we compute time-series using four ALOS-PALSAR datasets in contexts of low to medium coherence, showing slow deformation rates (mm/yr to cm/yr). The processed tracks are located in Ecuador, Trinidad and Sumatra, and feature 15 to 19 acquisitions including very high, dominating ionospheric noise, corresponding to equivalent displacements of up to 2 m. The correction method performs well and allows to reduce drastically the noise level due to ionosphere, with significant improvement compared with a simple plane fitting method. This is due to frequent highly non-linear patterns of perturbation, characterizing equatorial TEC distribution. We use semivariograms to quantify the uncertainty of the corrected time-series, highlighting its dependence on spatial distance. Thus, using ALOS-PALSAR-like archive, one can expect a detection threshold on the Line-of-Sight velocity ranging between 3 and 6 mm/yr, depending on the spatial wavelength of the signal to be observed. These values are consistent with the accuracy derived from the comparison of velocities between two tracks in their overlapping area. In the case studies that we processed, the time-series corrected from ionosphere allows to retrieve accurately fault creep and volcanic signal but it is still too noisy for retrieving tiny long-wavelength signals such as slow (mm/yr) interseismic strain accumulation.

The preparation phase of earthquakes (EQs) has been investigated by making full use of multi-parameter and multi-layer observations of EQ precursors, in order to better understand the lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling (LAIC) process. For this purpose, we chose a specific target EQ, the huge EQ of Fukushima-ken-oki EQ on 13 February 2021 (magnitude Mj = 7.3). We initially reported on EQ precursors in different physical parameters not only of the lithosphere, but also of the atmosphere and ionosphere (Hayakawa et al. followed by Akhoondzadeh et al. and Draz et al., both based on satellite observations). Our first two papers dealt with seven electromagnetic precursors in the three layers (with emphasis on our own ground-based observations in the atmosphere and lower ionosphere), while the second paper dealt with Swarm satellite observations of magnetic field, electron density, and GPS TEC in the ionosphere, and the third paper dealt only with climatological parameters on and above the Earth’s surface (together with GPS TEC). We have extensively reviewed all of these results, and have coordinated the temporal evolutions of various physical parameters relevant to the LAIC system; we have sought to understand which hypothesis is more plausible in explaining the LAIC process. Then, we came to a conclusion that two possible LAIC channels seem to exist simultaneously for this EQ: a fast channel (nearly simultaneous responses on the ground and ionosphere), and a slow channel (or diffusion-type), with a time delay of a few to several days, in which the agent effects in the lithosphere and lowest atmosphere seem to propagate up to the ionosphere with a definite time delay. Finally, we have suggested some research directions for the future elucidation of LAIC channels, and also made some comments on an early EQ warning system.