Search

Purpose: Evaluation of anterior segment parameters using the Scheimpflug corneal topography 1 year after surgery in patients who underwent sutureless scleral fixation intraocular lens (SFIOL) implantation using the modified Yamane technique and retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens (RPIOL) implantation. Methods: A total of 60 eyes from 57 patients who underwent sutureless SFIOL implantation and 57 eyes from 52 patients who underwent RPIOL implantation were included. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber angle (ACA), anterior chamber volume (ACV), anterior–posterior corneal astigmatism, and keratometric values were assessed using the Scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam HR, Germany). Results: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative UCVA and BCVA between the sutureless SFIOL and the RPIOL group (p = 0.236, p = 0.293, respectively). While there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative IOP between the two groups (p = 0.223), a statistically significant decrease in IOP was observed in both groups (p < 0.001). While there was no statistical difference between the sutureless SFIOL group and the RPIOL group in terms of spherical value (p = 0.441) and spherical equivalence (p = 0.237), there was a statistically significant difference in cylindrical value (p < 0.001). While there was a statistical difference in anterior astigmatism (p < 0.001), there was no statistical difference in posterior astigmatism (p = 0.405). There was no statistical difference in terms of ACV, ACD, and ACA between the sutureless SFIOL and the RPIOL group (p = 0.812, p = 0.770, p = 0.401, respectively). Conclusion: In this study, although there was a statistical difference in cylindrical value and anterior corneal astigmatism between the sutureless SFIOL and RPIOL groups, vision was not affected. According to this study, sutureless SFIOL and RPIOL are two successful methods in terms of visual acuity, anterior segment, and keratometry outcomes in aphakic patients after phacoemulsification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A subluxated lens is often associated with zonular weakness, which makes surgery with lens extraction and implantation of an intraocular lens particularly challenging. A 40-year-old healthy male presented with idiopathic partial anterior subluxation of lens without any signs of pupillary block glaucoma, corneal endothelial damage, or uveitis. Due to the absence of adequate zonular support, lens extraction with anterior vitrectomy and retropupillary iris claw lens implantation was done in this patient with good visual outcome. Lens extraction with anterior vitrectomy and retropupillary iris claw implantation can be a good surgical option in such cases.

Bimanual phacoemulsification has been established as a safe and efficacious means of nuclear emulsification in the past. This case report presents the use of this technique in a man in his early forties, who had subluxated cataractous lenses in both eyes. The technique allowed for effective nuclear emulsification within a closed chamber, providing better control over intraocular events. The report emphasizes the safety and effectiveness of bimanual phacoemulsification in cataract extraction, even in challenging cases like a subluxated lens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aphakia is a condition in which the eye's crystalline lens is not in its proper position because of a perforating injury, surgical removal, dislocation of the lens, or congenital anomaly. The management of aphakia can be either conservative or surgical. Various surgical techniques could be used, including retro pupillary-fixated iris-claw intraocular lenses (IOLs) and anterior-fixated iris-claw IOLs. One of the challenges faced by ophthalmologists is the optical rehabilitation of pediatric aphakic patients because a child's eye is still growing, resulting in fundamental variations in their refractive elements, and the immature visual system faces the risks of amblyopia development in the case of defocus or inequality of visual input between both eyes. There is also the risk of the incidence of side effects that can be accepted in adults but not in children. Finally, accurate postoperative supervision and optical rehabilitation in pediatrics will be more complex than that in adults. This review showed that it is possible to place, replace, and exchange the Artisan IOL with minor surgical trauma. Hence, this procedure can be an acceptable therapeutic method for correcting the developmental refractive changes of the growing aphakic eye. However, some worries are still caused by probable long-term side effects, including endothelial cell loss. Finally, a significant attempt at visual rehabilitation is to treat pediatric aphakia with Artisan IOL., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Akbari et al.)

Purpose: To present the outcomes of a patient with anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL) related endothelial decompensation who underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the capsular bag (so-called triple DMEK) combined with ACIOL removal ( quadruple DMEK) in both eyes., Methods: Case report., Results: A 58-year-old female patient was referred due to decreased visual acuity within the last 18 months. She had a history of iris-claw ACIOL implantation 17 years before. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/40 in both eyes. Due to low endothelial cell density and increased corneal thickness, ACIOL removal combined with triple DMEK (as quadruple DMEK) was performed for both eyes. Despite a graft detachment that was successfully managed with re-bubbling in the first eye, both eyes showed an increase in the CDVA (20/25 and 20/32, respectively) without any other significant complications in the follow-up of the patient. The corneas of both eyes were clear postoperatively., Conclusion: This case report demonstrated that quadruple DMEK may provide feasible management for chronic endothelial cell decompensation secondary to iris-claw ACIOL implantation., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.