Search

Abstract Adjuvant oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) therapy is recommended for patients with curatively resected colon cancer. However, prospective data on its practical application in Japanese patients are limited. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a long-term clinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant XELOX in patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer (MCSCO-1024). This prospective, multi-center, open-label, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer. The treatment protocol consisted of a 120-minute intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and two divided doses oral capecitabine (2000 mg/m2/day) for 14 days in a 3-week cycle, totaling eight cycles (24 weeks). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were 5-year overall survival and long-term prognosis of peripheral sensory neuropathy. A total of 196 patients were enrolled between November 2011 and August 2014 (34 months). The 3-year DFS rate was 73%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 87%. The overall incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy was 17%, with a 1% rate of grade 3 neuropathy after 5 years. Adjuvant XELOX demonstrated utility and safety in the clinical management of Japanese patients with stage III colon cancer.

Abstract Background Robotic three-dimensional magnified visual effects and field of view stabilization have enabled precise surgical operations. Intracorporeal anastomosis in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery is expected to shorten operation times, avoid paralytic ileus, and shorten wound lengths; however, there are few reports of intracorporeal anvil fixation for intestinal anastomosis in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. Herein, we introduce a simple, novel procedure for using robotic purse-string suture (RPSS) in intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique in rectal and sigmoid cancer surgery and report short-term outcomes. Methods From September 2022 to April 2024, 105 consecutive patients underwent robotic surgery with double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer at our institution. Their data were retrospectively analyzed. Intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique using RPSS was performed in 26 patients (the RPSS group), while the double-stapling technique anastomosis with extracorporeal anvil fixation was performed in 79 patients (the EC group). A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed (matching criteria: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location and tumor size) using a caliper 0.3. In the RPSS group, after tumor-specific or total mesorectal excision, specimens were extracted from the umbilical wound with simultaneous anvil placement in the body cavity. The oral colonic stump was robotically excised and robotically circumferentially stitched with 3–0 Prolene in all layers. After anvil insertion into the stump, the bowel wall of the colon was completely sewn onto the central rod of the anvil. Reconstructions were anastomosed using the double-stapling technique. Results The matched cohort contained 23 patients in each group. The RPSS group had significantly less bleeding than the EC group (p = 0.038). Super-low anterior resection (SLAR) in the RPSS group had shorter total operative times than those in the EC group (p = 0.045). The RPSS group experienced no perioperative complications greater than Clavien–Dindo grade III or any anastomosis-related complications. Conclusions The RPSS technique can be performed safely without any anastomosis-related complications and reduces the total operative times in SLAR and blood loss through total robotic surgery. This may be a useful modality for robotic colorectal surgery.

Background: Spatial and temporal heterogeneities of RAS and other molecular genes should be considered in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); acquired RAS mutation is sometimes observed at disease progression of treatment with the anti-EGFR mAb. At the same time, discrepancy of RAS status from tissues and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the same patient is sometimes observed. Based on this, we commenced two observational studies to clarify these heterogeneities of RAS and BRAF in mCRC, using next generation sequencing from liquid biopsy. Methods/Design: RAS-trace study is an observational study to monitor ctDNA RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA status every 4-12 weeks using the Plasma-SeqSensei™ CRC RUO Kit (Sysmex Inostics GmbH) in mCRC with RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) on tumor tissue. The primary endpoint was the time to the acquired RAS mutations. A total of 42 patients has been accrued. RAS-trace-2 study is also an observational study aimed at comparing the efficacy of the anti-EGFR mAb in ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt with ctDNA RAS or BRAF mutant mCRC patients, whose RAS/BRAF are wt in tumor tissue. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in patients with ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt and RAS or BRAF mutant. A total of 240 patients will be accrued over 2 years. Discussion: These trials will help us understanding the clinical significance of spatial and temporal heterogeneities of RAS, BRAF and other genes, while optimizing the anti-EGFR mAb treatment strategies in mCRC.