Search

Introduction: Subgroups with a poorer prognosis exist among patients with human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-positive OPSCC). This study aims to identify histological and genetic differences within HPV-positive OPSCC and correlate these findings with patient outcomes., Methods: The study included 102 OPSCC patients, all tested positive for high-risk HPV DNA and p16INK4a expression. Based on histomorphological classification (HPV Prediction Classification, HPV PC), all cases were categorized as either classic HPV-positive OPSCC (cHPV) or non-classic HPV-positive OPSCC (non-cHPV). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of selected genes was performed on 55 tumor samples, correlating results with morphological status and survival., Results: Of all cases, 49 % (n = 50/102) were categorized as non-cHPV, histomorphologically resembling HPV-negative OPSCC, and showed significantly poorer overall survival (p = 0.004) and five-year survival rate (5YS: 83.9 % vs. 58.4 %). Multivariate analyses identified HPV PC as an independent prognostic marker (p = 0.027). NGS revealed loss-of-Function (LOF) mutations in TP53 in three non-cHPV samples. Additionally, PIK3CA/PTEN mutations were found in 35.7 % (10/28) of non-cHPV cases. The cumulative burden of gene mutations was higher in the non-cHPV subgroup compared to the cHPV subgroup (n = 53, p = 0.1)., Conclusion: HPV PC distinguished two histomorphological subgroups within HPV-positive OPSCCs: cHPV with excellent prognosis and non-cHPV with poorer overall survival. Non-cHPV tumors also exhibited higher overall mutation rates, notably LOF-TP53 and PIK3CA/PTEN mutations. These morphological subtypes, along with their corresponding mutational profiles, warrant further investigation as potential biomarkers for de-escalation intervention trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background/objectives: The primary aim of this study was to characterize athletes approaching an outpatient interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary consultation structure for athletes with a suspected relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) cross-sectionally and longitudinally to prove treatment efficacy., Methods: Data of 58 athletes suspected of REDs were collected at the onset (t 0 ) and completion (t 1 ) of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary REDs treatment (clinical practice) between January 2019 and December 2022. The data included extracted information from medical records, anthropometric characteristics, physical performance diagnostics, laboratory values, dietary records, and partially gynecological and psychosomatic diagnostics., Results: The sample primarily consisted of female athletes (97%) under 18 years of age (66%) who were underweight with a body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m 2 and BMI percentile below the 10th percentile for their age and gender-specific norms (59%), and experienced menstrual disorders (93%). The dietary behavior is characterized by plant-based and low-energy-dense foods. Eating disorders (anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa) were diagnosed in 40% of the athletes according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11th revision criteria. During the program, 64% of the athletes exhibited a mean weight gain of 7 (±6) kg ( p < 0.001), excluding those still undergoing treatment (36%)., Conclusions: The proposed interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary treatment approach proved effective and holds promise for future evidence-based developments in REDs treatment.