Search

Objective: The imbalanced nature of real-world datasets is an ongoing challenge in the field of machine and deep learning. In medicine and in dentistry, most data samples represent patients not affected by pathologies, and on imagery, pathologic image areas are often smaller than healthy ones. Selecting suitable loss functions during deep learning is essential and may help to overcome the resulting imbalance. We assessed six different loss functions for one exemplary task, tooth structure segmentation on bitewing radiographs, for their performance., Methods: Six different loss functions (Focal Loss, Dice Loss, Tversky Loss and hybrid losses of Cross-Entropy and Dice Loss, Focal and Dice Loss, Focal and Generalized Dice Loss) were compared on a tooth structure segmentation task of 1,625 bitewing radiographs. Training was performed using three different model architectures (U-Net, Linknet, DeepLavbV3+) over a 5-fold cross-validation. Tooth structures consisted of the classes (occurrence in% of samples/captures areas measured on pixel level) enamel (100 %/25 %), dentin (100 %/50 %), root canal (100 %/10 %), filling (81 %/8 %) and crown (28 %/5 %)., Results: Hybrid loss functions significantly outperformed standalone ones and provided robust results over the different architectures for the classes enamel, dentin, root canal and filling. Specifically, the Dice Focal loss reached high performance to conquer both image level and pixel level class imbalance, respectively., Clinical Significance: In dental use cases it is often important to predict minority classes such as pathologies accurately. Using specific loss function may be an effective strategy to overcome data imbalance when training deep learning models., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest FS and JK are co-founders of the startup dentalXrai GmbH. dentalXrai GmbH did not have any role in conceiving, conducting or reporting this study. The authors are solely responsible for the contents of this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Given the current state of medical artificial intelligence (AI) and perceptions towards it, collaborative systems are becoming the preferred choice for clinical workflows. This work aims to address expert interaction with medical AI support systems to gain insight towards how these systems can be better designed with the user in mind. As eye tracking metrics have been shown to be robust indicators of usability, we employ them for evaluating the usability and user interaction with medical AI support systems. We use expert gaze to assess experts' interaction with an AI software for caries detection in bitewing x-ray images. We compared standard viewing of bitewing images without AI support versus viewing where AI support could be freely toggled on and off. We found that experts turned the AI on for roughly 25% of the total inspection task, and generally turned it on halfway through the course of the inspection. Gaze behavior showed that when supported by AI, more attention was dedicated to user interface elements related to the AI support, with more frequent transitions from the image itself to these elements. When considering that expert visual strategy is already optimized for fast and effective image inspection, such interruptions in attention can lead to increased time needed for the overall assessment. Gaze analysis provided valuable insights into an AI's usability for medical image inspection. Further analyses of these tools and how to delineate metrical measures of usability should be developed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: To propose a framework for consistently applying the 2018 periodontal status classification scheme to epidemiological surveys (Application of the 2018 periodontal status Classification to Epidemiological Survey data, ACES)., Proposed Framework: We specified data requirements and workflows for either completed or planned epidemiological surveys, utilizing commonly collected measures of periodontal status (clinical attachment levels [CAL], probing depths, bleeding on probing), as well as additional necessary variables for the implementation of the 2018 periodontal status classification (tooth loss due to periodontitis and complexity factors). Following detailed instructions and flowcharts, survey participants are classified as having periodontal health, gingivitis or periodontitis. Rates of edentulism must also be reported. In cases of periodontitis, instructions on how to compute the stage and extent are provided. Assessment of grade can be derived from CAL measurements (or from radiographic alveolar bone loss data) in relation to root length and the participant's age., Conclusions: ACES is a framework to be used in epidemiological studies of periodontal status that (i) have been completed, and in which stage and grade according to the 2018 classification are inferred retroactively, or (ii) are being planned. Consistent use of the proposed comprehensive approach will facilitate the comparability of periodontitis prevalence estimates across studies., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)