Search

ObjectTumors in the temporo-mesial region often extend into the insula and vice versa. The present study investigated the results of a surgical strategy that combines principles of tumor and epilepsy surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 157 consecutive patients with intrinsic brain tumors in the temporo-mesial region, with varying degrees of extensions into the insula (44 patients, 28.0%). The surgical strategy utilized “anatomy-guided resection,” targeting specific anatomical compartments infiltrated by the tumor (e.g., temporal pole, anterior temporo-mesial region = uncus and hippocampal head, posterior temporo-mesial, insula) rather than treating the tumor as a single mass.ResultsThe most frequent histologies were ganglioglioma CNS WHO grade 1 (55 patients, 35.0%) and IDH1 wildtype glioblastoma (36 patients, 22.9%). Tumor infiltration was most commonly found in the anterior temporo-mesial compartment (145 patients, 92.4%). An anterior temporal lobectomy was part of the surgical strategy in 131 cases (83.4%). Seventy-six patients (48.4%) with drug-resistant epilepsy underwent a formal presurgical epilepsy work-up, including depth electrode placement in three cases. Complete resections were achieved in 117 patients (74.5%), with supramarginal resections performed in 89 cases (56.7%). Four patients experienced non-temporary neurological complications (CTCAE grade 3–5). At 6 months, 127 of 147 assessable patients (86.4%) were free from seizures or auras (ILAE class 1), excluding early postoperative seizures (

Introduction: The appropriate surgical management of insular gliomas is controversial. Management strategies vary considerably between centers. Research question: To provide robust resection, functional and epilepsy outcome figures, study growth patterns and tumor classification paradigms, analyze surgical approaches, mapping/monitoring strategies, surgery for insular glioblastoma, as well as molecular findings, and to identify open questions for future research. Material and methods: On behalf of the EANS Neuro-oncology Section we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (using a random-effects model) of the more current (2000–2023) literature in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results: The pooled postoperative motor and speech deficit rates were 6.8% and 3.6%. There was a 79.6% chance for postoperative epilepsy control. The postoperative KPI was 80–100 in 83.5% of cases. Functional monitoring/mapping paradigms (which may include awake craniotomies) seem mandatory. (Additional) awake surgery may result in slightly better functional but also worse resection outcomes. Transcortical approaches may carry a lesser rate of (motor) deficits than transsylvian surgeries. Discussion and conclusions: This paper provides an inclusive overview and analysis of current surgical management of insular gliomas. Risks and complication rates in experienced centers do not necessarily compare unfavorably with the results of routine neuro-oncological procedures. Limitations of the current literature prominently include a lack of standardized outcome reporting. Questions and issues that warrant more attention include surgery for insular glioblastomas and how to classify the various growth patterns of insular gliomas.