Search

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are poorly understood disorders characterised by diffuse damage to the lung parenchyma, with inflammation and fibrosis. Some manifest a progressive fibrotic phenotype with high fatality and limited treatment options, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)., Summary: The degree to which inflammation plays a role in fibrosis progression is unknown. However, wound healing and fibrosis are intricate processes influenced by various inflammatory factors. Extracellular nucleosides and nucleotides, including adenosine triphosphate (ATP), activate pro-inflammatory responses of innate immunity and are widely implicated in tissue fibrosis across different organs. The pro-inflammatory effects of extracellular nucleotides occur via P1 and P2 purinergic receptors, expressed across the lung and immune system, and have been implicated in various pulmonary diseases including pulmonary fibrosis. This review amalgamates available data on the complex role of P1 and P2 purinergic receptor signalling in pulmonary fibrosis and discusses perspectives for novel treatments., Key Messages: Purinergic signalling plays a complex and pivotal role in pulmonary fibrosis, warranting further study. The intricate interplay between P1 and P2 receptor pathways necessitates a comprehensive approach to understand their collective impact. While evidence from preclinical models is promising, human studies are essential for further understanding in pulmonary fibrosis. Advances in receptor-specific agonists and antagonists provide novel avenues for research and may ultimately lead to new therapies for patients., (The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is emerging as a tool in the diagnosis and evaluation of pulmonary sarcoidosis, however, there is limited consensus regarding its diagnostic performance and prognostic value., Method: A meta-analysis was conducted with PubMed, Science Direct, MEDLINE, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases searched up to and including September 2023. 1355 studies were screened, with seventeen (n = 708 patients) suitable based on their assessment of the diagnostic performance or prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Forest plots of pooled sensitivity and specificity were generated to assess diagnostic performance. Pooled changes in SUVmax were correlated with changes in pulmonary function tests (PFT)., Results: FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis (six studies, n = 400) had a pooled sensitivity of 0.971 (95%CI 0.909-1.000, p = < 0.001) and specificity of 0.873 (95%CI 0.845-0.920)(one study, n = 169). Eleven studies for prognostic analysis (n = 308) indicated a pooled reduction in pulmonary SUVmax of 4.538 (95%CI 5.653-3.453, p = < 0.001) post-treatment. PFTs displayed improvement post-treatment with a percentage increase in predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) of 7.346% (95%CI 2.257-12.436, p = 0.005) and 3.464% (95%CI -0.205-7.132, p = 0.064), respectively. Reduction in SUVmax correlated significantly with FVC (r = 0.644, p < 0.001) and DLCO (r = 0.582, p < 0.001) improvement., Conclusion: In cases of suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis, FDG-PET/CT demonstrated good diagnostic performance and correlated with functional health scores. FDG-PET/CT may help to guide immunosuppression in cases of complex sarcoidosis or where treatment rationalisation is needed., Clinical Relevance Statement: FDG-PET/CT has demonstrated a high diagnostic performance in the evaluation of suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis with radiologically assessed disease activity correlating strongly with clinically derived pulmonary function tests., Key Points: In diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis, FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.971 and 0.873, respectively. Disease activity, as determined by SUVmax, reduced following treatment in all the included studies. Reduction in SUVmax correlated with an improvement in functional vital capacity, Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide, and subjective health scoring systems., (© 2024. The Author(s).)