1. Anti-CD20 Therapies in Drug-Naive Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Multicenter Real-Life Study.
- Author
-
Hay M, Rollot F, Casey R, Kerbrat A, Edan G, Mathey G, Labauge P, De Sèze J, Vukusic S, Laplaud DA, Papeix C, Moreau T, Thouvenot E, Defer G, Lebrun-Frénay C, Ciron J, Berger E, Stankoff B, Clavelou P, Maillart E, Heinzlef O, Zéphir H, Ruet A, Casez O, Moulin S, Al-Khedr A, Bourre B, Pelletier J, Magy L, Neau JP, Camdessanché JP, Doghri I, Wahab A, Tchikviladzé M, Labeyrie C, Hankiewicz K, Le Page E, and Michel L
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Disease Progression, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Registries, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, France epidemiology, Treatment Outcome, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive drug therapy, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive diagnostic imaging, Rituximab therapeutic use, Immunologic Factors therapeutic use, Antigens, CD20 immunology
- Abstract
Background and Objectives: Although rituximab failed to demonstrate a significant effect on disability progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), ocrelizumab succeeded. Our main objective was to analyze confirmed disability progression (CDP) in a cohort of patients with PPMS treated with anti-CD20 therapies compared with a weighted untreated control cohort., Methods: This was a retrospective study using data from the French MS registry (Observatoire Français de la Sclérose En Plaques). We included patients with PPMS treated or never treated with anti-CD20 therapies from 2016 to 2021, with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of ≤6.5 at baseline. The primary outcome was time to first CDP. The secondary outcomes were time to first relapse, MRI activity at 2 years, identification of risk factors associated with CDP, and serious infection incidence rates (IIRs). Each outcome was studied using an inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The outcomes were modeled using a weighted proportional Cox model for the time-to-event outcomes and by a logistic regression regarding the MRI activity., Results: A total of 1,184 patients (426 treated and 758 untreated) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median age (Q1-Q3) was 56 years (49.3-63.8), and 52.7% were female. Among treated patients, 295 received rituximab, whereas 131 received ocrelizumab. At baseline, anti-CD20-treated patients were younger (median 51.9 vs 58.6 years, Cohen d = 0.683) and had more active disease (54.5 vs 27.8%, Cohen d = 0.562). 91.6% were drug-naive at inclusion. In time to first CDP analysis, no statistical significance was observed (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI 0.93-1.36, p = 0.2113). In time to first relapse analysis, a nonsignificant trend toward fewer patients relapsing in the treated group was observed (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.48-1.28, p = 0.0809). For MRI activity, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. Risk factors associated with CDP in the treated group were male sex and MS duration. IIR was 6.67 (95% CI 3.12-14.25) per 100 person-years in the treated group vs 2.67 (95% CI 0.80-8.86) in the untreated group., Discussion: Time to first CDP was not different between anti-CD20 treated and untreated patients with PPMS. Although our study is retrospective and mainly included patients treated by rituximab, our results indicate that there should be a constant evaluation of all available data to ascertain the best risk/benefit ratio for patients with PPMS., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that anti-CD20 therapy of previously untreated patients with PPMS was not superior to no therapy in delaying time to first CDP.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF