Search

Introduction: Very few papers investigated the etiologic breakdown and demographic characteristics of patients with facial nerve (FN) palsy. Our paper aims to present the etiologic breakdown and demographic characteristics of patients with FN palsy, presenting at a private care center between 2014 and 2019, along with the treatment modalities that were offered to them., Methods: Charts of 800 patients with facial palsy (FP) were reviewed. Data included the etiology of their diagnosis, family history, recurrent FP, demographic information, and treatment provided before and after presentation., Results: Seventy-five percent of our study population were females. The average period between diagnosis with FP and presentation at our center was 10.8 years. The most commonly identified etiology was Bell's palsy, followed by acoustic neuroma. Eighty-one percent of the study subjects were prescribed steroids and/or antivirals. Facial neuromuscular retraining, electrical stimulation, chemodenervation, and surgical intervention were also part of some treatment plans for our population., Discussion: Recommendations for the treatment of idiopathic FP include steroids with adjuvant antiviral medications. Data remains uncertain whether the combination therapy of steroids and antivirals has better results compared to steroids alone. Electrical stimulation is still a controversial therapeutic tool for facial paralysis with a potential role in exacerbating synkinesis. The difference in referral patterns between tertiary and private care centers can explain the disparity in the ranking of the etiologies between our study and what has been published., Conclusion: Management of FP is a complex process. The FN community must develop a common database to improve its understanding of the different presentations., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Objective: Acute sensorineural hearing loss represents a spectrum of conditions characterized by sudden onset hearing loss. The "Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Sensorineural Hearing Loss" were issued as the first clinical practice guidelines in Japan outlining the standard diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this article is to strengthen the guidelines by adding the scientific evidence including a systematic review of the latest publications, and to widely introduce the current treatment options based on the scientific evidence., Methods: The clinical practice guidelines were completed by 1) retrospective data analysis (using nationwide survey data), 2) systematic literature review, and 3) selected clinical questions (CQs). Additional systematic review of each disease was performed to strengthen the scientific evidence of the diagnosis and treatment in the guidelines., Results: Based on the nationwide survey results and the systematic literature review summary, the standard diagnosis flowchart and treatment options, including the CQs and recommendations, were determined., Conclusion: The guidelines present a summary of the standard approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of acute sensorineural hearing loss. We hope that these guidelines will be used in medical practice and that they will initiate further research., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this study., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to determine if hypointense cochlear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) signal correlates with hearing outcomes in conservatively managed vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients., Study Design: Retrospective review of 657 cases from 1992 to 2020., Setting: Tertiary academic referral center., Patients: A retrospective review was performed to identify conservatively managed VS patients with appropriate baseline MRI, audiology, and at least 12-month audiological follow-up. Patients were excluded if they progressed to surgery or radiotherapy in less than 12 months, bilateral tumors, or surgery on the contralateral ear., Intervention: Conservatively managed patients with CISS imaging studies and audiology testing., Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measure change in pure-tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS). Secondary outcome measures tumor size, presence of lateral fluid cap, or cystic changes., Results: A total of 92 individuals (47% male, 58 ± 11.6 yr) met the inclusion criteria, with 36 (39%) of patients demonstrating abnormal cochlear CISS signal. At baseline, abnormal cochlear CISS signal was associated with higher intracanalicular (IC) length (7.9 versus 6.6 mm, p = 0.0177) and lower WRS (55.7 versus 78.8 dBHL, p = 0.0054). During follow-up, individuals with abnormal cochlear CISS signal had significantly higher PTA (62.4 versus 46.4 dBHL, p = 0.0010). After adjusting for baseline covariates, abnormal cochlear CISS signal was consistently associated with a greater increase in PTA of 8.3 dBHL (95% confidence interval, 2.9-13.7; p = 0.0032) from baseline when compared with the normal group., Conclusions: Abnormal cochlear signal on MRI CISS sequences is associated with poorer hearing outcomes in conservatively managed VS patients., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Purpose: While some factors have been well-shown to affect the decision-making in treating patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS), little is known on the role of deprivation. Our objective was to assess the effect of socioeconomic background on the management of patients with VS., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 460 patients with sporadic VS from West of Scotland. The postcode-based, multifactorial Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) was used to assess the socioeconomic background of each patient. We performed a multivariate analysis including tumour size, growth and patient age with management modality (observation, stereotactic radiotherapy, microsurgery) being the main outcome measure and outcome (need for additional treatment) an additional measure., Results: We found no significant difference in the demographics, tumour characteristics and primary treatment choice between patients with different SIMD scores. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the growth occurrence rates following first-line treatment (p = 0.964) and in the second-line treatment choice (p = 0.460)., Conclusions: Multiple deprivation does not affect decision making in patients with VS in the examined cohort. This is probably linked to the centralisation and uniformity of the service and might not necessarily be applicable to other health services without centralisation., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign intracranial tumors posing significant management challenges. This study aims to compare the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and watchful waiting (WW) in the management of newly diagnosed VS, integrating findings from both retrospective and the pioneering V-REX prospective trial. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies directly comparing SRS with WW for newly diagnosed VS were included. Primary outcomes focused on hearing preservation assessed through the AAO-HNS or Gardner-Robertson hearing classification scales and tumor progression, with secondary outcomes focusing on neurological symptoms, and the need for further treatment. Thirteen studies encompassing 1,635 patients (WW: 891; SRS: 744) were included.While no significant difference was found in serviceable hearing loss at last follow-up (RR = 1.51, [95%CI: 0.98, 2.32], p = 0.06), significant differences favoring WW were observed in pure tone audiometry (PTA) (MD = -13.51 [95%CI: -22.66, -4.37], p = 0.004) and word recognition score (WRS) (MD = 20.48 [95%CI: 9.72, 31.25], p = 0.0002). Analysis of tumor progression indicated no overall significant difference in risk between SRS and WW (RR = 0.40, [95%CI 0.07, 2.40], p = 0.32), but subgroup analysis suggested a lower risk with SRS in certain contexts. The need for further treatments favored SRS (RR = 0.24, [95%CI: 0.07, 0.74], p = 0.007). No significant differences were found in tinnitus and imbalance between the two groups. This comprehensive analysis suggests no marked difference in functional hearing preservation between SRS and WW in managing VS. However, untreated tumors commonly necessitate additional interventions. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment decisions and underscore the importance of continued monitoring. The study advocates for further prospective trials to refine management strategies for VS., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) has been extensively studied, but a gap in knowledge exists demonstrating how racial and socioeconomic status influence VS presentation. Our institution has a unique setting with a public safety net hospital (PSNH) and tertiary academic medical center (TAMC) in the same zip code, which we study to evaluate initial VS presentation disparities in patient populations presenting to these hospital settings., Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed of all adult patients (n = 531) presenting 2010 to 2020 for initial VS evaluation at TAMC (n = 462) and PSNH (n = 69). Ethnicity, insurance, maximum tumor size, audiometry, initial treatment recommendation, treatment received, and follow up were recorded and statistical analysis performed to determine differences., Results: Average age at diagnosis (51.7 ± 13.6 TAMC vs 52.3 ± 12.4 PSNH) and gender (58.4% TAMC vs 52.2% PSNH female) were similar. Patients' insurance (TAMC 75.9% privately insured vs PSNH 82% Medicaid) and racial/ethnic profiles (TAMC 67.7% White and 10.0% Hispanic/Latinx, vs PSNH 4.8% White but 59.7% Hispanic/Latinx) were significantly different. Tumor size was larger at PSNH (20.2 ± 13.3 mm) than TAMC (16.6 ± 10.0 mm). Hearing was more impaired at PSNH than TAMC (mean pure tone average 58.3 dB vs 43.9 dB, word recognition scores 52.3% vs 68.2%, respectively). Initial treatment recommendations and treatment received may include more than 1 modality. TAMC patients were offered 66.7% surgery, 31.2% observation, and 5.2% radiation, while PSNH patients offered 50.7% observation, 49.3% surgery, and 8.7% radiation. TAMC patients received 62.9% surgery, 32.5% observation, and 5.3% radiation, while PSNH patients received 36.2% surgery, 59.4% observation, and 14.5% radiation. Follow up and treatment at the same facility was not significantly different between hospitals., Conclusions: Hearing was worse and tumor size larger in patients presenting to PSNH. Despite worse hearing status and larger tumor size, the majority of PSNH patients were initially offered observation, compared to TAMC where most patients were initially offered surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Vestibular Schwannoma (VS), previously known as acoustic neuroma, constitutes the majority of tumours found in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Most guidelines for managing CPA tumours have been developed by high-income countries (HICs). However, these guidelines often fall short in addressing the unique challenges encountered in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as Pakistan. In LMICs, issues related to a limited healthcare workforce, inadequate infrastructure, and constrained financial resources hinder the effective implementation of these HIC-derived guidelines. Additionally, it has been observed that VS tends to present at a larger size in LMICs compared to HICs. Given that VS is the predominant type of CPA tumour and other types are covered under separate guidelines, this article aims to provide practical, contextspecific recommendations for the screening, diagnosis, and management of Vestibular Schwannoma in LMIC settings. Our focus is to bridge the gap in care strategies and adapt them to the resource constraints and clinical realities of LMICs.

Introduction: Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking into account the characteristics of the tumour, the symptoms and the age of the patient, three therapeutic strategies have been proposed: observation, surgery or radiotherapy. Choosing the most appropriate for each patient is a frequent source of controversy., Material and Methods: This paper includes an exhaustive literature review of issues related to VS that can serve as a clinical guide in the management of patients with these lesions. The presentation has been oriented in the form of questions that the clinician usually asks himself and the answers have been written and/or reviewed by a panel of national and international experts consulted by the Otology Commission of the SEORL-CCC., Results: A list has been compiled containing the 13 most controversial thematic blocks on the management of VS in the form of 50 questions, and answers to all of them have been sought through a systematic literature review (articles published on PubMed and Cochrane Library between 1992 and 2023 related to each thematic area). Thirty-three experts, led by the Otology Committee of SEORL-CCC, have analyzed and discussed all the answers. In Annex 1, 14 additional questions divided into 4 thematic areas can be found., Conclusions: This clinical practice guideline on the management of VS offers agreed answers to the most common questions that are asked about this tumour. The absence of sufficient prospective studies means that the levels of evidence on the subject are generally medium or low. This fact increases the interest of this type of clinical practice guidelines prepared by experts., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

The treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VS) has always posed a challenge for physicians. Three essential treatment principles are available: wait-and-scan, surgery, and stereotactic radiotherapy. In addition to the type of treatment, decisions must be made regarding the optimal timing of therapy, the combination of different treatment modalities, the potential surgical approach, and the type and intensity of radiation. Factors influencing the therapy decision include tumor location and size or stage, patient age, comorbidities, symptoms, postoperative hearing rehabilitation options, patient preferences, and, not least, the experience of the surgeons and the personnel and technical capabilities of the clinical site. This article begins with a brief overview of vestibular schwannomas, then outlines the fundamental interdisciplinary treatment options, and finally discusses the ENT (ear, nose, and throat)-relevant factors in the therapy decision., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Socioeconomic variables including race, education, and income have been shown to affect vestibular schwannoma incidence, treatment, and outcomes. We sought to determine the impact of socioeconomic factors on quality of life at the time of vestibular schwannoma diagnosis., Methods: Retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary academic center. All patients evaluated for vestibular schwannoma from March 1, 2010 to December 31, 2021 who completed at least one Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) questionnaire at presentation or prior to any intervention were included. PANQOL scores were compared across income quintiles, racial groups, and health insurance categories., Results: Two-hundred and ninety-six patients who had non-missing information on variables of interest were included. Compared to White/Caucasian patients (84.5 %), Black/African American patients (4.7 %) had significantly lower PANQOL total scores (b = -12.8[-21.7, -4.0], p = 0.005). Compared to patients with Commercial insurance (53 %), patients who were Uninsured/ Self-pay (1.7 %) had significantly lower PANQOL total scores (b = -16.7[-31.4, -1.9], p = 0.027). Patients in higher income quintiles had significantly higher PANQOL total scores (b = 11.7[3.9, 19.5], p = 0.004 comparing highest income quintile to lowest). After controlling for potential confounders, income quintile (b = 9.6[1.3, 17.9], p = 0.023 comparing highest quintile to lowest) and insurance (b = -17.0[-31.9, -21], p = 0.025 comparing Uninsured/Self-pay to Commercial insurance) remained predictors of total PANQOL score., Conclusions: Socioeconomic factors including race, health insurance, and income appear to contribute to quality of life at the time of vestibular schwannoma diagnosis. These variables are interrelated and the effects of race may be mediated in part by differences in income and health insurance coverage., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background Acoustic neuromas (ANs) are consistently associated with decreased quality of life (QOL) related to the physical and psychosocial impacts of symptoms experienced from the tumour and its treatment. This study explored patient-reported experiences of ANs in New Zealand, with a focus on the impact on QOL and the provision of information, support and services. Methods A mixed methods approach was taken, conducting an online community survey that included the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life Scale (N  = 52). Those who indicated interest were offered semi-structured interviews after the survey (N  = 17), which were analysed using content analysis. Results A negative impact on QOL was found, highlighting five key themes in the experiences of people: (1) ongoing physical, social and psychological impacts; (2) information and support from the medical system; (3) autonomy and decision-making; (4) the importance of peer support; and (5) remaining positive - life goes on. Conclusions Our findings indicate areas for improvement that may benefit people's healthcare experience and QOL. Both quantitative and qualitative results identified gaps associated with person-centred care and the need for information, education, emotional support and access to services. Recommendations include a need for more information (verbal and written) during all stages of diagnosis and treatment, shared decision-making and increased access to allied health, including psychological services and support groups.

Importance: Over the past decades, the number of patients, especially in the older adult patient group, diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma (VS) has increased. Assuming that older adult patients have more comorbidities, a longer recovery period after surgery, a higher rate of surgical complications, and a higher mortality rate after VS surgery, a treatment strategy for this group of patients is warranted, based on clinical evidence on postsurgical survival., Objective: To evaluate the survival after diagnosis of a VS in patients 70 years and older, treated with either observation or surgery, and to compare these findings with the life span of an age-matched background population in Denmark., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study of 624 patients 70 years and older diagnosed with VS in Denmark from 1976 to 2016. Since 1976, all patients with a VS have been registered in a national database, which contains 3637 patients. Of the included patients in this study, 477 were treated conservatively with the "wait-and-scan" strategy, and 147 were treated surgically with removal of the tumor. The survival of the patients was compared with a matched background population in Denmark. Data analysis was performed from January 1976 to January 2017., Exposures: Surgery, radiotherapy, or none., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was survival among the patients and compared with the matched background population., Results: A total of 624 patients were included (317 female patients [50.8%] and 307 male patients [49.2%]). The mean (SD) survival in the observed patients was 9.2 (4.7) years after diagnosis, whereas for the background population, the expected survival was 11 years from the mean age at diagnosis. For the surgically treated patients, the mean (SD) survival was 11.8 (6.6) years, and expected survival was 11 years for the matched background population. The mean (SD) survival was 10.7 (5.5) years in female patients and 8.9 (5.0) years in male patients. There was no significant difference in survival between treatment modalities, irrespective of tumor size., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, survival after diagnosis of a VS in patients 70 years and older was similar in the surgical group compared with the age-matched background population. In the wait-and-scan group, the survival after diagnosis was marginally shorter, which may be associated with increased comorbidity.