Search

Abstract Some patients with autism and severe intellectual disability may experience uncontrolled aggression, causing serious injury or harm to others, and the therapeutic ineffectiveness of traditional pharmacological and behavioral treatment may aggravate symptoms. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been tested in patients with little evidence in children and adolescents. Therefore, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of DBS in refractory aggression in pediatric subjects with autism (ASD) and severe intelligence deficit (ID). Methods A meta-analytic review of Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus articles, following Prisma criteria. A total of 555 articles were identified, but after applying the inclusion criteria, only 18 were analyzed. The review of the registries and the extraction of information was performed by 2 independent groups, to reduce the evaluator’s bias. For the description of the results, pediatric patients with ASD or ID present in each registry, with an application of specialized scales (Overt aggression scale, OAS, and THE modified version of the OAS, MOAS) pre and post-DBS, with a clinical follow-up of at least 12 months, were considered valid. Clinical improvement was calculated using tests of aggressiveness. In each registry with available data and then pooling the means of all patients in the OAS and MOAS, the effect size of DBS (overall and per study) was estimated. Finally, the adapted NOS scale was applied to rate the studies’ quality and level of bias. Results In the studies analyzed, 65/100 were pediatric patients, with a mean age of 16.8 years. Most of the studies were conducted in South America and Europe. In all teams, aggressive behavior was intractable, but only 9 groups (53/65) applied specialized scales to measure aggressiveness, and of these, only 51 subjects had a follow-up of at least 12 months. Thus, in 48/51 a clinical improvement of patients was estimated (94.2%), with a considerable overall effect size (OAS: d = 4.32; MOAS: d = 1.46). However, adverse effects and complications were found in 13/65 subjects undergoing DBS. The brain target with the most evidence and the fewest side effects was the posteromedial hypothalamic nuclei (pHypN). Finally, applying the adapted NOS scale, quality, and bias, only 9 studies show the best indicators. Conclusion An optimal level of efficacy was found in only half of the publications. This is mainly due to design errors and irrelevant information in the reports. We believe that DBS in intractable aggressiveness in children and adolescents with ASD and severe ID can be safe and effective if working groups apply rigorous criteria for patient selection, interdisciplinary assessments, objective scales for aggressiveness, and known surgical targets.

La enfermedad de Alzheimer es la principal causa de demencia en todo el mundo y representa un importante problema de salud pública. Si bien las muertes por enfermedades cardiovasculares han disminuido, las atribuidas a la enfermedad de Alzheimer han aumentado en los últimos años y hasta la fecha no existe tratamiento curativo. Por este motivo, el desarrollo de un tratamiento eficaz se ha convertido en una prioridad mundial. Aducanumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-amiloide β humano aprobado para el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Alzheimer en junio de 2021 por la FDA, sin la eficacia clínica esperada en los ensayos de fase III. Esta revisión analiza la historia de su controvertida aceptación, implicaciones y perspectivas para el tratamiento futuro.

Background and importance: The surgical approach to the medulla oblongata poses a significant challenge for neurosurgery, considering the clinical consequences and risks of this procedure. The authors describe a step-by-step technique to safely extirpate a cavernous malformation within the hypoglossal trigone with minimal risk of neurological deficits. Clinical Presentation: In a young 33-year-old patient was identified a lesion in the center of the medulla oblongata. Complete resection of the cavernous malformation through the hypoglossal trigone was performed with an improvement of all symptoms. The key surgical tip is to dissect the lesion between the posterior median sulcus and the sulcus limitans avoiding the vagal trigone. Conclusion: Surgical approach through the hypoglossal trigone appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of medulla oblongata cavernomas. The entry zone through the dorsomedial sulcus of the hypoglossal trigone with a meticulous delicate microsurgical technique is the key to success with these kinds of lesions.