Search

Objectives: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a noninvasive tool in ulcerative colitis (UC), but scoring systems have mostly been developed for adults, Crohn's disease, and flaring UC. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of bowel wall thickness (BWT) and four IUS scores in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed UC., Methods: Patients <18 years old with suspected UC were prospectively enrolled. Baseline IUS was done, and ulcerative colitis intestinal ultrasound score (UC-IUS), Milan criteria, simple pediatric activity ultrasound score (SPAUSS), and Civatelli Index were calculated. Mayo endoscopic segment subscore, pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index (PUCAI), and biomarkers were correlated with IUS using nonparametric and receiver operating characteristic analyses., Results: Fifty-two patients (56% male, median age 13.9 years, interquartile range [IQR] 11.2-16.3) with 206 colon segments were included. Patients who needed hospitalization (n = 27/52) had significantly worse IUS (BWT and all scores) compared to those not hospitalized. For all patients, IUS scores and BWT significantly correlated with baseline endoscopic, clinical, and biochemical disease activity (p = 0.32-0.67, p < 0.05). BWT (τ b  = 0.53), UC-IUS (τ b  = 0.55), and Milan (τ b  = 0.52) had the strongest endoscopic correlations. For differentiating between endoscopic disease severity, BWT, UC-IUS, and Milan, had the highest areas under the curve (0.89-0.93). Using BWT alone, a thinner cut-off had improved sensitivity while maintaining high specificity: ≥2.5 mm for moderate/severe endoscopic inflammation (sensitivity 66%; specificity 94%) and ≥3.5 mm for severe endoscopic inflammation (sensitivity 92%; specificity 86%)., Conclusions: BWT and all four IUS scores correlated well with endoscopic, clinical, and biochemical disease activity, and was another useful marker of severity in identifying patients needing hospitalization. Pediatric patients needed a thinner BWT cut-off, which should be accounted for when developing pediatric-specific scores. BWT alone may be just as clinically useful as composite US scores., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Background & Aims: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly used to assess Crohn's disease (CD) activity in clinical practice. However, application in clinical trials has been limited by heterogeneous scoring methods and concerns about reliability. We aimed to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of locally and centrally read IUS parameters for evaluating CD using prospectively performed scans., Methods: Twenty-four participants with CD and 6 gastroenterologists participated in a 2-day workshop where each participant underwent 6 IUS scans in total. Eight IUS parameters (bowel wall thickness [BWT], bowel wall stratification [BWS], color Doppler signal [CDS], inflammatory mesenteric fat [i-fat], submucosal prominence, submucosal layer thickness, haustra coli/peristalsis, and affected segment length) and an overall measure of sonographic disease activity were blindly assessed by the 6 local readers and 4 central gastroenterologist-sonographers. Reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Institutional review board approval was granted for this study (12938)., Results: Five IUS parameters demonstrated at least moderate (ICC ≥0.41) inter- and intra-rater reliability when local and central reading was performed (BWT, CDS, i-fat, submucosal prominence, and affected segment length). Reliability was generally better with central, in distinction to local, reading. ICCs for BWS and i-fat were highest when evaluated as binary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that IUS parameters are most reliable when evaluated in the worst affected segment. Fair reliability was observed when local readers identified the worst affected segment., Conclusions: Local and central reading of IUS demonstrated at least moderate inter- and intra-rater reliability for several parameters. This study supports refining existing activity indices and incorporating IUS central reading into clinical trials., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite a growing armamentarium of medical therapies for ulcerative colitis, colectomy remains an important therapeutic option. To better inform shared decision-making about surgery, we estimated the contemporary risk of mortality after colectomy., Methods: Mortality rates were estimated using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020). Factors associated with postcolectomy death were evaluated in multivariable regression., Results: Postcolectomy mortality occurred in 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8%, 1.9%) of hospitalizations. Comorbidity burden, emergent laparotomy, and delays to surgery >5 days after admission were associated with mortality., Discussion: Colectomy may be associated with mortality; however, this risk is heterogeneous based on patient- and procedural-related factors., (Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: To address the increasing demands for gastroenterology specialty care and increasing wait times, centralized access and triage (CAT) systems, telephone support, and clinical care pathways were implemented to streamline referrals and support management of low-risk gastrointestinal (GI) conditions in the primary care medical home. This study aimed to understand primary care providers (PCPs) and GI specialists' perceptions of these supports, factors that affect support implementation and identify barriers and facilitators for implementing supports from both PCP and GI specialists' perspectives., Methods: We conducted a mixed method study including surveys and interviews with PCPs and GI specialists. Online surveys and semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted from July 2022 to September 2022. All interviews were transcribed and coded to perform a thematic analysis. Survey data were analyzed in SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize and describe the data collected. Inferential statistics were used to identify associations and relationships within the dataset. T -test and chi-square tests were applied at 95% confidence level, with a p value <0.05 (two-sided) considered statistically significant., Results: A total of 36 PCPs responded to the survey. Most respondents were working full-time (73.5%, n  = 25) and were female (73.5%, n  = 25). Overall, 42% used the pathways regularly, 48% ( n  = 16) used them occasionally, and very few (9.1%, n  = 3) said they were aware but had not used pathways. Overall, PCPs were satisfied with CAT processes and the use of primary care pathways, recognizing the importance of fair and equitable access to specialty care. Specific processes in CAT for vulnerable populations and patients using walk-in clinics were recognized as a limitation, given the lack of ease in completing the required testing and follow-up needed when utilizing the care pathway. Of the 112 GI specialists who received the survey, 28 (25%) completed it, with males (50.0%, n  = 14) and females (39.2%, n  = 11), remainder no response. Most participate in CAT (73.9%, n  = 17) and were remunerated by an alternative relationship plan (ARP) (53.6%, n  = 15). Overall, GIs were satisfied with central triaging and primary care pathways, reducing unnecessary time and resource expenditure for referrals. There were statistically significant differences in perceptions among fee for service and alternative relationship plan GI specialists regarding the effectiveness of CAT in improving access and use of health system resources., Conclusion: Overall, PCPs and GI specialists believe utilizing CAT and primary care pathways improves referral quality, reduces resource expenditure, and provides fair and equitable access to GI specialty services. Improvement in CAT processes with improved pathway awareness may reduce unnecessary referrals., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Mubashir Arain et al.)

Background: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are effective for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, this class of medications is not recommended during pregnancy or breastfeeding based on animal data suggesting teratogenesis and recent reports of transmammary transfer after maternal ingestion, raising concerns for immune system development in babies exposed to these drugs., Methods: We present the case of a patient with IBD treated with a JAK inhibitor who decided to continue the medication throughout her pregnancy and during breastfeeding. This is the first reported case of a detailed immunologic profile in a baby exposed to tofacitinib in utero and during lactation., Results: A 30-year-old female with ulcerative colitis with previous exposure to vedolizumab and infliximab achieved complete remission with tofacitinib therapy. The patient became pregnant after 5 months of JAK inhibitor therapy and decided to continue tofacitinib during pregnancy and while breastfeeding. The patient delivered a healthy offspring with no congenital malformations, a normal detailed immunologic profile, and subsequent safe provision of the live oral rotavirus vaccine., Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of individualized counseling for patients of childbearing age who are candidates for JAK inhibition. Those who are pregnant or breastfeeding with refractory disease may have limited medical therapeutic options. Ongoing effective therapy for IBD resulted in complete disease remission in the mother and favorable outcomes in the infant. Further, an in-depth infant immunological assessment can lead to specific vaccination recommendations in exposed infants., Competing Interests: K.E.-S.: Consultant, advisor, and speaker for Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda. L.E.M.-F.: Honoraria: The Academy for Continuing Advancement in Healthcare Education. K.L.N.: Consultancy and/or speaking honoraria: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Satisfai Health, Takeda; Research funding: Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda and the Helmsley Trust. R.P.: Consultant for: Abbott, AbbVie, Abbivax, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, Trellus, Viatris, Ventyx, UCB. Speaker’s Fees for: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Advisory Boards for: AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, SandozShire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ventyx. C.C.: No conflicts of interest. C.H.S. MBBS (Hons), MSc, FRACP: Advisory Boards: Janssen, Abbvie, Takeda, Pfizer, Fresenius Kabi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmascience, Lilly; Speaker: Janssen, Abbvie, Takeda, Pfizer, Fresenius Kabi, Lilly; Funding: ACHRI (Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute), Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research), Calgary Health Trust; DSMB: New South Wales Government Health., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)