Search

Introduction: Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be performed using systemic anticoagulation or regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). The 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines support the use of RCA as the first-line strategy in patients requiring CRRT, with and without bleeding risk. Implementing RCA in the intensive care unit (ICU) implies involving all medical and nursing staff. The primary objective of this study was to report and describe the various anticoagulation strategies for CRRT in French ICUs. The secondary objectives were to determine the rate of RCA use and to identify the factors limiting its implementation., Methods: An online questionnaire containing 40 questions was sent to attending physicians and fellows practicing in French ICUs between May and September 2021. The questionnaire was sent via several networks: mailing list from the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine and mailing lists of RRT manufacturers., Results: A total of 597 responses were analyzed. RCA was used by most of the participants for patients with (81%) and without (80%) increased bleeding risk. The preferred CRRT modality of the participants while using RCA was continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (48%). The clinical situations frequently reported as an absolute contraindication to RCA were uncontrolled shock associated with liver failure and drug poisoning impairing citrate metabolism (62% and 52%, respectively). In case of a higher risk of citrate accumulation, most participants claimed to perform closer biological monitoring (57%) or to modify the CRRT protocol (61%). Among the participants who did not prescribe RCA as a first-line strategy, the main factors limiting its implementation were the lack of nurse (50%) or physician (34%) training., Conclusion: RCA is the main anticoagulation strategy prescribed for CRRT in France. Providing medical and nursing staff easy access to training may facilitate the understanding and use of RCA as the first-line anticoagulation strategy for CRRT., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Despite advances in surgical techniques and care, pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) continues to have high morbidity and mortality rates. Complications such as sepsis, hemorrhage, pulmonary issues, shock, and pancreatic fistula are common postoperative challenges. A key concern in PD outcomes is the high incidence of infectious complications, especially surgical site infections (SSI) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Bacteriobilia, or bile contamination with microorganisms, significantly contributes to these infections, increasing the risk of early postoperative complications. The occurrence of SSI in patients who undergo hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgeries such as PD is notably higher than that in patients who undergo other surgeries, with rates ranging from 20 to 55%. Recent research by D'Angelica et al. revealed that, compared to cefoxitin, piperacillin/tazobactam considerably lowers the rate of postoperative SSI. However, these findings do not indicate whether extending the duration of antibiotic treatment is beneficial for patients at high risk of bacterial biliary contamination. In scenarios with a high risk of SSI, the specific agents, doses and length of antibiotic therapy remain unexplored. The advantage of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis following PD has not been established through prospective studies in PD patients following biliary drainage., Methods: This is an intergroup FRENCH-ACHBT-SFAR multicenter, open-labelled randomized, controlled, superiority trial comparing 2 broad-spectrum antibiotic (piperacillin/tazobactam) treatment modalities to demonstrate the superiority of 5-day postoperative antibiotic therapy to antibiotic prophylaxis against the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSI) following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with preoperative biliary stents. The primary endpoint of this study is the overall SSI rate, defined according to the ACS NSQIP, as a composite of superficial SSI, deep incisional SSI, and organ/space SSI. In addition, we will analyze overall morbidity, antibiotic resistance profiles, the pathogenicity of bacteriological and fungal cocontamination, the impact of complications after bile drainage and neoadjuvant treatment on the bacteriological and fungal profile of biliculture and cost-effectiveness., Conclusion: This FRENCH24-ANIS study aims to evaluate 5-day post-operative antibiotic therapy combined with antibiotic prophylaxis on the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSI) following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with preoperative biliary stents., Trial Registration: ClinicaTrials.gov number, NCT06123169 (Registration Date 08-11-2023); EudraCT number 2021-006991-18; EUCT Number: 2024-515181-14-00., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

High volume hemofiltration (HVHF) could remove from plasma inflammatory mediators involved in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI). The IVOIRE trial did not show improvements of outcome and organ dysfunction using HVHF. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the biological effects of plasma of patients treated by HVHF or standard volume hemofiltration (SVHF). We evaluated leukocyte adhesion, apoptosis and functional alterations of endothelial cells (EC) and tubular epithelial cells (TEC). In vitro data were correlated with plasma levels of TNF-α, Fas-Ligand (FasL), CD40-Ligand (CD40L), von Willebrand Factor (vWF) and endothelial-derived microparticles. An experimental model of in vitro hemofiltration using LPS-activated blood was established to assess cytokine mass adsorption during HVHF or SVHF. Plasma concentrations of TNF-ɑ, FasL, CD40L and von Willebrand Factor (vWF) were elevated at the start (d1h0) of both HVHF and SVHF, significantly decreased after 6 h (d1h6), remained stable after 12 h (d1h12) and then newly increased at 48 h (d3h0). Plasma levels of all these molecules were similar between HVHF- and SVHF-treated patients at all time points considered. In addition, the levels of endothelial microparticles remained always elevated, suggesting the presence of a persistent microvascular injury. Plasma from septic patients induced leukocyte adhesion on EC and TEC through up-regulation of adhesion receptors. Moreover, on EC, septic plasma induced a cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic effect. On TEC, septic plasma exerted a direct pro-apoptotic effect via Fas up-regulation and caspase activation, loss of polarity, altered expression of megalin and tight junction molecules with an impaired ability to internalize albumin. The inhibition of plasma-induced cell injury was concomitant to the decrease of TNF-α, Fas-Ligand and CD40-Ligand levels. The protective effect of both HVHF and SVHF was time-limited, since a further increase of circulating mediators and plasma-induced cell injury was observed after 48 h (d3h0). No significant difference of EC/TEC damage were observed using HVHF- or SVHF-treated plasma. The in vitro hemofiltration model confirmed the absence of a significant modulation of cytokine adsorption between HVHF and SVHF. In comparison to SVHF, HVHF did not increase inflammatory cytokine clearance and did not reverse the detrimental effects of septic plasma-induced EC and TEC injury. Further studies using adsorptive membranes are needed to evaluate the potential role of high dose convective therapies in the limitation of the harmful activity of plasma soluble factors involved in SA-AKI.Trial registration IVOIRE randomized clinical trial; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00241228) (18/10/2005)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)