Search

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: In early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the presence of a ground-glass opacity (GGO) component in the primary lesion on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is recognized as a favorable prognostic factor. Even in NSCLC with a GGO component, lymph node metastases are occasionally detected during or after surgery. However, the prognostic impact of GGO components in these patients has not been clarified. We aimed to examine the prognostic significance of GGO components as radiological findings of primary lesions of completely resected NSCLC with pathological nodal involvement., Methods: This study included 290 patients (11%) with pathological nodal involvement among 2,546 patients who underwent complete resection of NSCLC at our institution. Patients with an unknown primary lesion (T0) or centrally located lung cancer were excluded. The 290 patients were divided into two groups [i.e., the part-solid ("PS") and "Solid" groups] according to the radiological findings of the primary lesion, and their clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses were compared. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to examine the factors affecting the overall survival (OS)., Results: The OS in the PS group (n=58) was significantly longer than that in the Solid group (n=232; P=0.039). However, multivariate analysis only revealed age [hazard ratio (HR) =1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-2.72] and the clinical T factor (HR =1.58; 95% CI: 1.01-2.47), but not the radiological findings of primary lesions, as the independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, the OS did not differ significantly between the PS and Solid groups matched for the clinical T and N factors (n=58 patients each)., Conclusions: GGO components in the primary lesion, considered a decisive prognostic factor in early-stage NSCLC, did not affect the prognosis of patients with NSCLC and pathological nodal involvement., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-144/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether ex-vivo MRI enables accurate estimation of the invasive component of lung adenocarcinoma., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent lung lobectomy. The specimens underwent MRI at 1.5T. The boundary between the lesion and the normal lung was evaluated on a 5-point scale in each three MRI sequences, and a one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc tests were performed. The invasive component size was measured histopathologically. The maximum diameter of each solid component measured on CT and MR T1-weighted (T1W) images and the maximum size obtained from histopathologic images were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)., Results: T1W images were determined to be optimal for the delineation of the lesions (P < 0.001). The histopathologic invasive area corresponded to the area where the T1W ex-vivo MR image showed a high signal intensity that was almost equal to the intravascular blood signal. The maximum diameter of the solid component on CT was overestimated compared with the maximum invasive size on histopathology (mean, 153%; P < 0.05), while that on MRI was evaluated mostly accurately without overestimation (mean, 108%; P = 0.48). The interobserver reliability of the measurements using CT and MRI was good (ICC = 0.71 on CT, 0.74 on MRI)., Conclusion: Ex-vivo MRI was more accurate than conventional CT in delineating the invasive component of lung adenocarcinoma.