Search

BACKGROUND: Higher allostatic load (AL), a multi-system measure of physiological dysregulation considered a proxy for chronic stress exposure, is associated with poorer global cognition (GC) in older non-Hispanic white adults. However, evidence of these associations in middle-aged and older US-based Hispanic/Latino adults is limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of AL with level of cognition, performance in cognition 7 years later, and change in cognition over 7 years among middle-aged and older US-based Hispanic/Latino adults. METHODS: We used data (n = 5,799, 45-74 years at baseline) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) and SOL-Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging (SOL-INCA). The AL score comprised 16 biomarkers representing cardiometabolic, glucose, cardiopulmonary, parasympathetic, and inflammatory systems (higher scores = greater dysregulation). Cognitive outcomes included GC and individual tests of verbal learning and memory, world fluency (WF), Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS), and Trail Making (Parts A & B). Survey-linear regressions assessed associations of AL with performance in cognition at baseline, 7 years later, and via 7-year cognitive change scores adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Higher AL was associated with lower baseline performance in GC and WF; and lower 7-year follow-up performance in these same measures plus DSS and Trail Making Parts A & B. Higher AL was associated with more pronounced 7-year change (reduction) in GC and on WF and DSS tests. CONCLUSIONS: Findings extend previous evidence in predominantly older non-Hispanic white cohorts to show that AL is related to level of and change in GC (as well as WF and DSS) among middle-aged and older US-based Hispanic/Latino adults.

Background Despite the importance of early detection for lung cancer outcomes, staging disparities among the growing US Hispanic population remain underexplored. This population-based study aimed to identify racial/ethnic disparities among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic (including specific subgroups) patients in stage at diagnosis for potentially curable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Incident NSCLC cases (2005-2018) were extracted from the Florida cancer registry. Stage was categorized as early (localized/regional) or advanced (distant). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between race/ethnicity and stage at diagnosis, adjusting for socioeconomic status, smoking, and clinical factors. Results Among 157 034 NSCLC patients, 47.8% were diagnosed at an advanced stage. Multivariable models showed higher odds of advanced-stage diagnosis for non-Hispanic Blacks (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17 to 1.26) and Hispanics (ORadj = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.08) compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Regional differences were stark for Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic Whites: ORadj = 0.96 (95% CI = 0.91 to 1.01) in South Florida vs 1.12 (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.19) in the rest of Florida. In South Florida, Central Americans (ORadj = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.85) were the only Hispanic group showing a staging disadvantage compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Conclusion Pronounced disparities in NSCLC staging among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, with notable regional variations within Florida's Hispanic communities, indicate that targeted interventions could significantly enhance early detection. The relative advantage observed in nearly all minority groups in multicultural South Florida compared with the rest of Florida underscores the need for future research exploring how specific Hispanic and multiracial sociocultural contexts can positively influence the landscape of cancer early detection across the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine whether the endometrial cancer (EC) survival disadvantage among Black populations is US-specific, a comparison between African-descent populations from different countries with a high development index is warranted. We analyzed 28 213 EC cases from cancer registries in Florida (2005-2018) and the French Caribbean islands of Martinique (2005-2018) and Guadeloupe (2008-2018) combined. Kaplan-Meier and all-cause Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival. Models were stratified by EC histology type and the main predictor examined was race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White [NHW] and no-Hispanic Black [NHB] women in the United States versus Black women residing in the Caribbean). For endometrioid and nonendometrioid EC, after adjusting for age, histology, stage at diagnosis, receipt of surgery, period of diagnosis, and poverty level, US NHB women and Caribbean Black women had a higher risk of death relative to US NHW women. There was no difference between US NHB and Caribbean Black women (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88-1.30) with endometrioid EC. However, Caribbean Black women with nonendometrioid carcinomas had a 40% higher risk of death (HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.13-1.74) than US NHB women. The low EC survival among US Black women extends to foreign populations of African descent. For the aggressive nonendometrioid ECs, survival among Caribbean Black women outside of the United States is considerably worse. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Cancer-specific psychological interventions like cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) demonstrate distress (e.g., anxiety/depression) and quality of life (QoL) benefits. Digital formats can expand access. Method: Patients (80.6% female; 76.5% White; 25–80 years) with Stage I–III cancer and elevated anxiety within 6 months of treatment (surgery/chemotherapy/radiation/immunotherapy) receipt were randomized 1:1 to a 10-module CBSM or health education control digital app and completed questionnaires at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12. Primary outcomes of greater group-level anxiety (PROMIS-A) and depression symptom (PROMIS-D) reductions for CBSM were met and published; this secondary report evaluates individual-level response results for these outcomes and outcomes beyond anxiety and depression. Chi-square tests compared responder proportions using PROMIS-A/PROMIS-D symptom categories and two levels (≥5/≥7.5) of T-score point reductions. Changes across conditions over time for stress (Perceived Stress Scale), cancer-specific distress (Impact of Event Scale–Intrusions), and QoL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General) were analyzed using repeated measures linear mixed-effects modeling (N = 449). Patient Global Impression of Change–Well-being was also examined. Results: At Week 12, a greater proportion of CBSM (vs. control) participants reported normal-to-mild (vs. moderate-to-severe) PROMIS-A and PROMIS-D, and a greater proportion of CBSM participants at Week 8 or 12 had a ≥7.5 T-score reduction in PROMIS-A and a ≥5 T-score reduction in PROMIS-D (ps <.05). CBSM participants (vs. control) showed significantly greater reductions in Perceived Stress Scale and Impact of Event Scale-Intrusions and increases in Patient Global Impression of Change–Well-being and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy emotional and physical well-being (ps <.05), but not functional or social/family well-being. Conclusion: Digitized CBSM benefits distress and QoL. What is the public health significance of this article?: Digitized cognitive behavioral stress management can positively impact distress and quality of life in patients with cancer. Digital therapeutics are a promising solution for making evidence-based psychosocial care more broadly accessible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to describe patterns, sources, and reasons for cannabis use among cancer patients during active treatment (+CDTX) compared to no‐use during active treatment (−CDTX). Methods: Data are from 385 surveys collected via REDCap during phase I of an ongoing study among adult cancer patients seen at an NCI‐designated comprehensive cancer center within the last 5 years of treatment. A harmonized survey was created with 11 other NCI centers to assess cannabis use patterns, sources, and reasons for use. Sociodemographics and cancer details were also collected via self‐report. Descriptive statistics were calculated and stratified by +/−CDTX. Chi‐squared tests were conducted to compare proportions between groups. Results: Among the sample [49.5 years (SD 15.9); 53.0% male; and 41.6% Hispanic/Latino], 41.0% + CDTX and 59.0% −CDTX. A majority (71.8%) of +CDTX initiated use before diagnosis versus 44.1% in −CDTX (p < 0.0001); patients diagnosed with stage 4 cancer had a statistically significant higher prevalence of +CDTX (60.0%; p = 0.003); 53.3% in radiation reported +CDTX compared to 42.8% in chemotherapy, and 36.4% in immunotherapy. Dispensaries and local dealers were the top sources of cannabis in both groups. Among +CDTX, 44.3% consumed cannabis at least once a day DTX, dominant cannabinoids used were CBD (35.2%), Delta‐8‐THC (18.3%), and CBD + THC ratio (14.1%); 12.7% were unsure what they consumed. Joints were the most common inhalation method (61.5%), and store‐bought candy was the most common edible (39.2%). Depression/mood, pain, and enjoyment were the top three reasons for +CDTX compared to enjoyment, depression/mood, and nausea/upset stomach in −CDTX (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Patterns, sources, and reasons for cannabis use varied between +CDTX and ‐CDTX. Future studies should examine the impacts of cannabis and specific cannabinoids on cancer treatment, drug interactions, survival outcomes, and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cancer survivors experienced poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and greater psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic than those without cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms that may explain how negative experiences during the pandemic are associated with distress and HRQoL remain unknown. We examined whether psychosocial risk factors (i.e., healthcare disruption, disruption to daily activities and social interaction [DDASI], and financial hardship) mediated the relationship between negative COVID-19-related experiences and cancer survivors' HRQoL and psychological distress (i.e., depressive symptoms, and anxiety) and whether the mediating effects were moderated by psychosocial protective factors (i.e., stress management ability and social support). Methods: A total of 9,651 cancer survivors completed a questionnaire assessing negative COVID-19-related experiences, psychosocial and practical experiences, and HRQoL. Conditional process analysis was used to evaluate the proposed moderated mediation models. Results: Participants had a mean age of 63.8 years (SD = 12.3) and were mostly non-Hispanic White (82.3%). DDASI and financial hardship mediated the relationship between negative COVID-19-related experiences and cancer survivor's HRQoL and psychological distress. Stress management ability buffered the indirect effect of DDASI on cancer survivors' HRQoL and psychological distress. Social support buffered the indirect effect of financial hardship on HRQoL and depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Financial resources and social interactions may buffer negative effects of major disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies should assess the longitudinal impact of these associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Avanzando Caminos (Leading Pathways): The Hispanic/Latino Cancer Survivorship Cohort Study aims to examine the influence of sociocultural, medical, stress-related, psychosocial, lifestyle, behavioral, and biological factors on symptom burden, health-related quality of life, and clinical outcomes among Hispanics/Latinos who have been previously treated for cancer. Avanzando Caminos is a prospective, cohort-based study of 3000 Hispanics/Latinos who completed primary cancer treatment within the past 5 years that is representative of the general Hispanic/Latino population in the United States. Participants will complete self-report measures at baseline (time [T] 1), 6 months (T2), 1 year (T3), 2 years (T4), 3 years (T5), 4 years (T6), and 5 years (T7). Blood samples drawn for assessment of leukocyte gene expression, cardiometabolic markers, and genetic admixture will be collected at baseline (T1), 1 year (T3), 3 years (T5), and 5 years (T7). Medical and cancer characteristics and clinical outcomes will be extracted from the electronic medical record and/or state cancer registry at each time point. Data analysis will include general latent variable modeling and latent growth modeling. Avanzando Caminos will fill critical gaps in knowledge in order to guide future secondary and tertiary prevention efforts to mitigate cancer disparities and optimize health-related quality of life among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite more women living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), this population is underrepresented in cancer survivorship research. Few studies have assessed how women with MBC cope with their cancer experience. This qualitative study describes the coping strategies and psychosocial resources utilized by women living with MBC.Methods: Twenty-two women with MBC participated in four focus groups. Transcripts were analyzed using a general inductive approach. Codes derived from participants' responses were subsequently condensed into themes.Results: We identified 12 coping strategies and psychosocial resources and grouped them into five themes: Behavioral Coping Strategies (i.e. stress management, active coping and planning); Cognitive Coping Strategies and Psychological Resources (i.e. cognitive reappraisal, optimism, mindfulness, positive thinking, and religious coping); Existential Approach-Oriented Coping (i.e. acceptance, values-based living, and identity integration); Avoidance (i.e. avoidant coping); and Interpersonal Resources and Seeking Social Support (i.e. social support).Conclusions: Women living with MBC utilize several engagement and disengagement coping strategies, as well as intrapersonal and interpersonal resources. This study provides useful perspectives of women living with MBC that may inform the development of psychosocial interventions. Further research is needed to assess coping strategies and psychosocial resources across different subgroups of MBC patients and determine their impact on cancer outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was designed to examine (1) whether ovarian cancer (OC) survivors would have greater well-being vs. elevated distress compared to community members during a universal health stressor (COVID-19) and (2) how resources and risk factors at diagnosis predicted vulnerability to a subsequent health-related stressor. One hundred seventeen OC survivors were recruited from two academic medical centers and compared to a community-based sample on COVID-related distress and disruption. Latent class analysis identified differentially impacted groups of survivors. Survivors reported lower distress than community members. Predictors of higher distress included shorter-term survivorship, greater disruption, and poorer emotional well--being (EWB) at diagnosis. Survivors were divided into high- and low-COVID-19-impact subgroups; high-impact individuals endorsed higher perceived stress and lower EWB at diagnosis. Survivors reported lower COVID-related distress than community participants. While depression at diagnosis did not predict later distress, EWB was a strong predictor of response to a novel health-related stressor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Latinos in the USA are 1.5 times more likely to develop Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) than non-Latino Whites. This systematic review aims to summarize current understanding of the perceptions, knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about ADRD and brain health of Latinos to inform public health efforts addressing disparities. Searches were completed across six databases (Medline, PsycINFO, WoS, LILACS, ProQUEST, and CINAHL). Studies were required to capture attitudes and/or knowledge of ADRD or brain health among US-based Latino adults who were not cognitively impaired and were not caregivers or healthcare providers. Results were synthesized narratively. A total of 5528 unique records were identified. Following de-duplication and screening, 24 articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. Overall, knowledge about brain health and ADRD among Latinos is quite mixed. A consistent finding was that participants recognized memory loss as a symptom of cognitive impairment, but demonstrated limited recognition of other signs of impairment. The studies also highlighted variable knowledge of protective factors for maintaining brain health. Opportunities exist to increase knowledge of ADRD signs and symptoms, and awareness of risk and protective factors. Given the heterogeneity of Latinos in the USA, more research is warranted to better elucidate nuances in conceptualizations of brain health and aging among diverse Latino subgroups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Therapeutic alliances (TAs) between oncologists and patients are bonds characterized by mutual caring, trust, and respect. We here relate oncologist characteristics and behaviors to TA among Latino and non-Latino patients with advanced cancer. Methods Participants included non-Latino oncologists (n = 41) and their Latino (n = 67) and non-Latino White (n = 90) patients with advanced cancer who participated in Coping with Cancer III, a multisite, US-based prospective cohort study of Latino/non-Latino disparities in end-of-life cancer care, conducted 2015-2019. Oncologist characteristics included age, sex, race, institution type, Spanish language proficiency, familismo practice style (emphasis on family) and clinical etiquette behaviors. Patient-reported TA was assessed using the average score of six items from The Human Connection scale. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) estimated effects of oncologist characteristics on TA. Results Of 157 patients, a majority were female (n = 92, 58.6%) and age younger than 65 years (n = 95, 60.5%). Most oncologists were male (n = 24, 58.5%), non-Latino White (n = 25, 61%), and age 40 years and older (n = 25, 61%). An adjusted HLM in the full sample showed that Latino patient ethnicity was associated with significantly lower TA (β = −.25; P < .001). In an adjusted stratified HLM for TA, among Latino patients, oncologist familismo practice style (β = .19; P = .012), preference using first names (β = .25; P = .023), and greater Spanish fluency (β = .11; P < .001) were positively associated with TA. In contrast, familismo practice style had no impact on TA for non-Latino White patients. Conclusion Latino patients with advanced cancer had worse TAs with their oncologists versus non-Latino patients. Modifiable oncologist behaviors may be targeted in an intervention designed to improve the patient-physician relationship between oncologists and their Latino patients with advanced cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusions Plain Language Summary Patient navigation (PN) is a promising yet underused approach to address Hispanic/Latino (H/L) cancer survivors' unmet supportive care needs. The authors conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a culturally tailored PN program with the LIVESTRONG Foundation's Cancer Navigation Services (PN‐LCNS) on reducing unmet needs in H/L survivors.From 2012 to 2015 at two US sites, 288 H/L survivors diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer were randomized to a PN‐LCNS program or to standard PN. Participants assigned to the PN‐LCNS program received 3‐month PN services; access to phone‐based, bilingual, one‐on‐one support; and additional resources (i.e., guidebook, health journal, and care plan). Participants completed assessments at baseline and at 3, 9, and 15 months post‐baseline. The Supportive Care Needs Survey was used to assess unmet needs across five domains: psychological, health system and information, physical and daily living, patient care and support, and sexuality. Intervention effects were tested by using separate multilevel growth models for women and men.Women randomized to the PN‐LCNS program, relative to those who received standard PN, had a statistically significant reduction in unmet needs (i.e., overall and for the health systems and information, physical and daily living, and patient care and support domains). Among men, younger age was associated with greater unmet needs at baseline. Prostate cancer survivors reported greater unmet sexual health needs compared with colorectal cancer survivors. There was no significant change in unmet needs among H/L men.A culturally tailored PN program can reduce unmet supportive care needs among H/L women cancer survivors. However, interventions specifically targeting unmet needs in H/L men and sexual health are still necessary (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02275754). Hispanic/Latino (H/L) cancer survivors often report concerns or needs that are not adequately addressed by the health care team, which could be related to psychological, health system and information, patient care and support, physical and daily living, and sexuality issues. In this randomized controlled trial of 288 H/L survivors diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, women assigned to a culturally tailored patient navigation program experienced a reduction in unmet needs compared with those who received standard patient navigation. H/L men did not experience a change in unmet needs. Hispanic/Latino (H/L) cancer survivors often report concerns or needs that are not adequately addressed by the health care team, which could be related to psychological, health system and information, patient care and support, physical and daily living, and sexuality issues.In this randomized controlled trial of 288 H/L survivors diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, women assigned to a culturally tailored patient navigation program experienced a reduction in unmet needs compared with those who received standard patient navigation.H/L men did not experience a change in unmet needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To date, no studies have examined adherence to the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAGA) in real-world longitudinal settings using objectively measured activity monitoring data. This study addresses this gap by using commercial activity monitoring (Fitbit) data from the All of Us dataset., Objective: The primary objectives were to describe the prevalence of adherence to the 2018 PAGA and identify associated sociodemographic determinants. Additionally, we compared 3 distinct methods of processing physical activity (PA) data to estimate adherence to the 2008 PAGA., Methods: We used the National Institutes of Health's All of Us dataset, which contains minute-level Fitbit data for 13,947 US adults over a 7-year time span (2015-2022), to estimate adherence to PAGA. A published step-based method was used to estimate metabolic equivalents and assess adherence to the 2018 PAGA (ie, ≥150 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA per week). We compared the step-based method, the heart rate-based method, and the proprietary Fitbit-developed algorithm to estimate adherence to the 2008 PAGA., Results: The average overall adherence to the 2018 PAGA was 21.6% (3006/13,947; SE 0.4%). Factors associated with lower adherence in multivariate logistic regression analysis included female sex (relative to male sex; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.60-0.72; P<.001); BMI of 25.0-29.9 kg/m 2 (AOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.60; P<.001), 30-34.9 kg/m 2 (AOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.25-0.36; P<.001), or ≥35 kg/m 2 (AOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.10-0.16; P<.001; relative to a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ); being aged 30-39 years (AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.77; P<.001), 40-49 years (AOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; P=.005), or ≥70 years (AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87; P<.001; relative to being 18-29 years); and non-Hispanic Black race or ethnicity (AOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.79; P<.001; relative to non-Hispanic White race or ethnicity). The Fitbit algorithm estimated that a larger percentage of the sample (10,307/13,947, 73.9%; 95% CI 71.2-76.6) adhered to the 2008 PAGA compared to the heart rate method estimate (4740/13,947, 34%; 95% CI 32.8-35.2) and the step-based method (1401/13,947, 10%; 95% CI 9.4-10.6)., Conclusions: Our results show significant sociodemographic differences in PAGA adherence and notably different estimates of adherence depending on the algorithm used. These findings warrant the need to account for these disparities when implementing PA interventions and the need to establish an accurate and reliable method of using commercial accelerometers to examine PA, particularly as health care systems begin integrating wearable device data into patient health records., (©Rujul Singh, Macy K Tetrick, James L Fisher, Peter Washington, Jane Yu, Electra D Paskett, Frank J Penedo, Steven K Clinton, Roberto M Benzo. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 10.12.2024.)

Background: Young adult (YA) cancer survivors frequently report unmet health information and peer support needs, as well as poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). YAs also have expressed a desire that behavioral interventions be convenient. In response to this, our team has developed a 10-week, group-based, supportive care intervention titled TOGETHER to improve YA cancer survivors' HRQOL. TOGETHER is delivered via videoconference and has shown initial feasibility, acceptability, and promise for improving HRQOL among YA survivors., Objective: In an effort to increase convenience, the goal of this 2-part study was to design and test a website to host the TOGETHER intervention for YA cancer survivors aged 18-39 years at the time of participation and aged 15-39 years at the time of initial cancer diagnosis., Methods: In part 1, we leveraged an existing web-based platform and adapted it to meet the needs of TOGETHER. We conducted 3 iterative waves of usability testing with 3 YAs per wave to refine the website. In part 2, we conducted a single-group feasibility trial of TOGETHER using the website. Primary outcomes were feasibility (ie, recruitment, retention, and attendance) and acceptability (ie, satisfaction)., Results: Usability testing participants (n=9) indicated that the TOGETHER website was easy to use (mean 5.9, SD 1.3) and easy to learn (mean 6.5, SD 0.9; possible ranges 1-7). Qualitative feedback identified needed revisions to the aesthetics (eg, images), content (eg, session titles), function (eg, clarity of functionality), and structure (eg, expandable sections), which were implemented. In the feasibility trial, participants (n=7) were an average of 25 (SD 4.7) years old and mostly non-Hispanic White (n=4, 57%). Recruitment (58%) and retention (71%) rates and average session attendance (mean 7.1 , SD 4.2) supported feasibility. Participant agreement with positive statements about TOGETHER and average satisfaction ratings (mean 5.06, SD 1.64; possible range: 1-7) demonstrated acceptability., Conclusions: Results supported the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of the TOGETHER program and website. By providing the content digitally, the program effectively addresses YAs' expressed preference for convenience. Future studies are needed to increase TOGETHER's efficiency and explore its efficacy for improving targeted outcomes., (© Rina S Fox, Tara K Torres, Terry A Badger, Emmanuel Katsanis, DerShung Yang, Stacy D Sanford, David E Victorson, Betina Yanez, Frank J Penedo, Michael H Antoni, Laura B Oswald. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org).)

Background: Despite the importance of early detection for lung cancer outcomes, staging disparities among the growing US Hispanic population remain underexplored. This population-based study aimed to identify racial/ethnic disparities among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic (including specific subgroups) patients in stage at diagnosis for potentially curable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Incident NSCLC cases (2005-2018) were extracted from the Florida cancer registry. Stage was categorized as early (localized/regional) or advanced (distant). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between race/ethnicity and stage at diagnosis, adjusting for socioeconomic status, smoking, and clinical factors., Results: Among 157 034 NSCLC patients, 47.8% were diagnosed at an advanced stage. Multivariable models showed higher odds of advanced-stage diagnosis for non-Hispanic Blacks (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17 to 1.26) and Hispanics (ORadj = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.08) compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Regional differences were stark for Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic Whites: ORadj = 0.96 (95% CI = 0.91 to 1.01) in South Florida vs 1.12 (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.19) in the rest of Florida. In South Florida, Central Americans (ORadj = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.85) were the only Hispanic group showing a staging disadvantage compared with non-Hispanic Whites., Conclusion: Pronounced disparities in NSCLC staging among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, with notable regional variations within Florida's Hispanic communities, indicate that targeted interventions could significantly enhance early detection. The relative advantage observed in nearly all minority groups in multicultural South Florida compared with the rest of Florida underscores the need for future research exploring how specific Hispanic and multiracial sociocultural contexts can positively influence the landscape of cancer early detection across the United States., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Young adult (YA) cancer survivors aged 18-39 frequently report unmet health information and peer support needs, as well as poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Our team has developed a supportive care intervention, titled TOGETHER-YA, to improve YA cancer survivors' stress management skills. TOGETHER-YA is delivered via videoconference and has shown initial feasibility, acceptability, and promise for improving HRQOL among YA survivors., Objective: The purpose of this two-part study was to design and test a website to host the TOGETHER-YA intervention for YA cancer survivors aged 18-39. TOGETHER-YA is a 10-week, group-based program designed to promote health-related quality of life., Methods: In Part 1, we leveraged an existing online platform and adapted it to meet the needs of TOGETHER-YA. We conducted three iterative waves of usability testing with three YAs per wave to refine the website. In Part 2, we conducted a single-group feasibility trial of TOGETHER-YA using the website. Primary outcomes were feasibility (i.e., recruitment, retention, attendance) and acceptability (i.e., satisfaction)., Results: Usability testing participants (N=9) indicated that the TOGETHER-YA website was easy to use (M=5.9, SD=1.3) and easy to learn (M=6.5, SD=0.9) (possible ranges: 1-7). Qualitative feedback identified needed revisions to the aesthetics (e.g., images), content (e.g., session titles), function (e.g., clarity of functionality), and structure (e.g., expandable sections), which were implemented. In the feasibility trial, participants (N=7) were an average of 25 years old (SD=4.7) and mostly non-Hispanic White (57%). Recruitment (70%) and retention (71%) rates and average session attendance (M=7.1, SD=4.2) supported feasibility. Participant agreement with positive statements about TOGETHER-YA and average satisfaction ratings (M=5.06, SD=1.64; possible range: 1-7) demonstrated acceptability., Conclusions: Results supported the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of the TOGETHER-YA program and website. By hosting the content online, the program effectively addresses YAs' expressed preference for convenience. Future studies are needed to increase TOGETHER-YA's efficiency and explore its efficacy for improving targeted outcomes., Clinicaltrial: NCT05597228, October 24, 2022.

Introduction: Cancer survivors experienced poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and greater psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic than those without cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms that may explain how negative experiences during the pandemic are associated with distress and HRQoL remain unknown. We examined whether psychosocial risk factors (i.e., healthcare disruption, disruption to daily activities and social interaction [DDASI], and financial hardship) mediated the relationship between negative COVID-19-related experiences and cancer survivors' HRQoL and psychological distress (i.e., depressive symptoms, and anxiety) and whether the mediating effects were moderated by psychosocial protective factors (i.e., stress management ability and social support)., Methods: A total of 9,651 cancer survivors completed a questionnaire assessing negative COVID-19-related experiences, psychosocial and practical experiences, and HRQoL. Conditional process analysis was used to evaluate the proposed moderated mediation models., Results: Participants had a mean age of 63.8 years (SD = 12.3) and were mostly non-Hispanic White (82.3%). DDASI and financial hardship mediated the relationship between negative COVID-19-related experiences and cancer survivor's HRQoL and psychological distress. Stress management ability buffered the indirect effect of DDASI on cancer survivors' HRQoL and psychological distress. Social support buffered the indirect effect of financial hardship on HRQoL and depressive symptoms., Conclusion: Financial resources and social interactions may buffer negative effects of major disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies should assess the longitudinal impact of these associations., Competing Interests: Antoni and Penedo are paid consultants for Blue Note Therapeutics. Antoni is a paid consultant for Atlantis Healthcare. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Noriega Esquives, Natori, Antoni, Otto, Prinsloo, Wagner, Gomez, Hathaway, Ulrich, Peoples, Cohen and Penedo.)

Background: In the past 2 decades, melanoma incidence among Hispanic individuals has risen by 20%. The mortality rate of Hispanic individuals is higher than that for non-Hispanic White individuals. Skin cancer can largely be prevented with regular sun protection, and skin cancer outcomes can be improved through early detection, for example, by skin self-examination. Alarmingly, Hispanic individuals are less aware of the symptoms and harms of skin cancers, tend to have misperceptions regarding the risks and benefits of skin cancer prevention behaviors, and engage in less sun protection behaviors than non-Hispanic White individuals., Objective: This study aimed to use a community-engaged approach and conduct both group and individual interviews among Hispanic individuals and relevant key stakeholders to explore the potential design of a mobile-based skin cancer prevention intervention for Hispanic individuals., Methods: This study used a qualitative design (focus groups and individual interviews). Participants were recruited from local community organizations' social media, local events, and contact lists (eg, email). Zoom interviews were conducted to examine whether Hispanic individuals would be interested in a mobile-based skin cancer intervention and to explore their preferences and suggestions to inform skin cancer prevention intervention design., Results: Five focus groups (2 in Spanish and 3 in English) among self-identified Hispanic individuals (n=34) and 15 semistructured, in-depth individual interviews among key stakeholders (health care providers and community leaders; eg, dermatologist, nurse practitioner, licensed social worker, and church leader) were conducted. The main themes and subthemes emerging from the group discussions and individual interviews were organized into the following categories: intervention platform, delivery frequency and format, message design, engagement plan, and activities. WhatsApp and Facebook were identified as suitable platforms for the intervention. Messages including short videos, visuals (eg, images and photographs), and simple texts messages were preferred. Recommendations for message design included personalized messages, personal stories and narratives, culturally relevant design (eg, incorporating family values), and community-trusted sources. Potential engagement and retention recommendations were also discussed. Additional details and exemplar quotes of each theme and subtheme are described., Conclusions: This study provides important insights and directions for the design of a mobile, digital skin cancer intervention to modify Hispanic individuals' sun protection and skin self-examination behaviors to help improve skin cancer outcomes. Insights gathered from community leaders and health care providers provided valuable additions to the community-derived data. Leveraging popular digital platforms among Hispanic individuals such as WhatsApp or Facebook could be a promising approach to skin cancer prevention. Recommendations from the community included the use of concise videos, illustrative images, clear text messages, tailored communications, narratives featuring personal experiences, designs that reflect cultural significance, and information from sources that are trusted by the community, which provided useful strategies for future intervention design among Hispanic individuals., (©Zhaomeng Niu, Yonaira M Rivera, Carolina Lozada, Shawna V Hudson, Frank J Penedo, Sharon L Manne, Carolyn J Heckman. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 12.09.2024.)

Study Objectives: Sex differences are related to both biological factors and the gendered environment. We constructed measures to model sex-related differences beyond binary sex., Methods: Data came from the baseline visit of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). We applied the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized logistic regression of male versus female sex over sociodemographic, acculturation, and psychological factors jointly. Two "gendered indices," the gendered index of sociodemographic environment (GISE) and gendered index of psychological and sociodemographic environment, summarizing the sociodemographic environment (GISE) and psychosocial and sociodemographic environment (GIPSE) associated with sex, were calculated by summing these variables, weighted by their regression coefficients. We examined the association of these indices with insomnia, a phenotype with strong sex differences, in sex-adjusted and sex-stratified analyses., Results: The distribution of GISE and GIPSE differed by sex with higher values in male individuals. In an association model with insomnia, male sex was associated with a lower likelihood of insomnia (odds ratio [OR] = 0.60, 95% CI [0.53, 0.67]). Including GISE in the model, the association was slightly weaker (OR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.56, 0.70]), and weaker when including instead GIPSE in the association model (OR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.69, 0.88]). Higher values of GISE and of GIPSE, more common in the male sex, were associated with a lower likelihood of insomnia, in analyses adjusted for sex (per 1 standard deviation of the index, GISE OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.87, 0.99], GIPSE OR = 0.65, 95% CI [0.61, 0.70])., Conclusions: New measures such as GISE and GIPSE capture sex-related differences beyond binary sex and have the potential to better model and inform research studies of sleep health., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society.)

The central premise of this article is that a portion of the established relationships between social determinants of health and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality are mediated through differences in rates of biological aging processes. We further posit that using knowledge about aging could enable discovery and testing of new mechanism-based pharmaceutical and behavioral interventions ("gerotherapeutics") to differentially improve the health of minoritized cancer survivors and reduce cancer disparities. These hypotheses are based on evidence that lifelong differences in adverse social determinants of health contribute to disparities in rates of biological aging ("social determinants of aging"), with minoritized groups having accelerated aging (ie, a steeper slope or trajectory of biological aging over time relative to chronological age) more often than non-minoritized groups. Acceleration of biological aging can increase the risk, age of onset, aggressivity and/or stage of many adult cancers. There are also documented negative feedback loops whereby the cellular damage caused by cancer and its therapies act as drivers of additional biological aging. Together, these dynamic intersectional forces can contribute to differences in cancer outcomes between minoritized vs non-minoritized survivor populations. We highlight key targetable biological aging mechanisms with potential applications to reducing cancer disparities and discuss methodological considerations for pre-clinical and clinical testing of the impact of gerotherapeutics on cancer outcomes in minoritized populations. Ultimately, the promise of reducing cancer disparities will require broad societal policy changes that address the structural causes of accelerated biological aging and ensure equitable access to all new cancer control paradigms., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: This study aims to describe patterns, sources, and reasons for cannabis use among cancer patients by ethnic group., Methods: Data are from a cross-sectional study of 416 surveys collected via RedCap anonymously from adult cancer patients seen at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center within the last 5 years. A harmonized survey was created with 11 other National Cancer Institute centers to assess cannabis use patterns, sources, and reasons for use. Sociodemographics and cancer details were also collected via self-report. Descriptive statistics by ethnic group were compared using χ2 and Fisher exact tests., Results: Among the sample (age mean = 50.4 [15.7] years; 53% male; 8.3% lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer; 46.7% Hispanic and Latinx individuals), 69.6% reported lifetime use of cannabis, 33.7% began cannabis use after cancer diagnosis, 48.1% of those consuming cannabis did not have a prescription for cannabis, and 29.4% of cannabis users consumed daily. The frequency of cannabis use (P = .04) and reasons for cannabis use (P = .02) varied by ethnic group. Sleep and pain were the most prevalent reasons for use among the Hispanics and Latinx populations; pain, mental health management, and neuropathy were the most prevalent reasons for cannabis use among non-Hispanic White individuals., Conclusions: Patterns and reasons for cannabis use differed among cancer patients by ethnic group in this exploratory cross-sectional study aimed to provide data for more rigorous study. Understanding these distinctions are pivotal in conducting more rigorous studies that address the unique needs of diverse populations utilizing cannabis for managing cancer-related symptoms., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Chemotherapy treatment-related side-effects are common and increase the risk of suboptimal outcomes. Exercise interventions during cancer treatment improve self-reported physical functioning, fatigue, anxiety, and depression, but it is unclear whether these interventions improve important clinical outcomes, such as chemotherapy relative dose intensity (RDI). The National Cancer Institute funded the Exercise and Nutrition to Improve Cancer Treatment-Related Outcomes (ENICTO) Consortium, to address this knowledge gap. This paper describes the mechanisms hypothesized to underpin intervention effects on clinically-relevant treatment outcomes, briefly outlines each project's distinct research aims, summarizes the scope and organizational structure of ENICTO, and provides an overview of the integrated common data elements used to pursue research questions collectively. In addition, the paper includes a description of consortium-wide activities and broader research community opportunities for collaborative research. Findings from the ENICTO Consortium have the potential to accelerate a paradigm shift in oncology care such that cancer patients could receive exercise and nutrition programming as the standard of care in tandem with chemotherapy to improve RDI for a curative outcome., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Receiving a diagnosis of cancer is a profound and often very stressful experience. Few studies have prospectively recruited patients prior to receiving a new diagnosis of cancer and included spouses or partners., Objective: The aim of the Couples Cope Study is to understand the impact of undergoing a diagnostic biopsy and receiving a new cancer diagnosis on quality of life (QoL) in both patients and their spouses or partners, as well as on the quality of their relationship. This protocol paper describes the study design and assesses the feasibility of recruitment and retention., Methods: Study staff reviewed the schedules of collaborating physicians using specific encounter codes to identify patients scheduled for breast or prostate biopsies. Potential participants were prescreened via the electronic health record and sent a recruitment letter at least 2 to 3 weeks prior to their biopsy procedure. Patients subsequently underwent a phone screening to determine eligibility. Patients who enrolled provided study staff with contact information for their spouses or partners. All consent forms were completed online. Surveys were completed online prior to receiving the biopsy results (baseline), and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after the biopsy. Study staff engaged in ongoing, personalized contact with participants and sent assessment completion reminders via phone and email., Results: A total of 2294 patients undergoing a breast or prostate biopsy were identified and 69% (n=1582) were eligible for phone screening following electronic health record prescreening. Of the 431 patients who underwent phone screening, 75% (n=321) were eligible to participate. Of the eligible patients, 72% (n=231) enrolled and 82% (n=190) of enrolled patients had an accompanying partner or spouse who also enrolled. A total of 77% (34/44) of patients who received a cancer diagnosis and 72% (26/36) of their spouses or partners were retained through 9 months, while 80% (53/66) of patients who received a benign diagnosis and 68% (42/62) of their partners were retained., Conclusions: Prospective recruitment of patients undergoing diagnostic biopsy and their partners is feasible and requires both strategic collaboration with providers and concerted prescreening and recruitment efforts by study staff. Importantly, this study was able to conduct all study activities online without disrupting clinical workflow and without requiring patients and their spouses or partners to come into the laboratory. Consideration should be given to the ratio of biopsies to cancer diagnoses, which can vary significantly by cancer type. Prospective studies are needed and can inform our ability to provide effective support earlier to couples facing a possible cancer diagnosis. Future studies should examine other tumor types that have received less attention in QoL studies, include behavioral and neurobiological assessments beyond self-report measures, and follow couples beyond 9 months in order to examine long-term effects on QoL., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/52361., (©Patricia I Moreno, Sarah M Worch, Jessica L Thomas, Rebecca L Nguyen, Heidy N Medina, Frank J Penedo, Judith T Moskowitz, Betina Yanez, Sheetal M Kircher, Shilajit D Kundu, Sarah C Flury, Elaine O Cheung. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 18.06.2024.)