Search

With increasing prevalence of obesity and cardiovascular diseases, there is a growing interest in the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) as an adjunct therapy in type 1 diabetes (T1D). The GLP-1RAs are currently not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of T1D in the absence of randomized controlled trials documenting efficacy and safety of these agents in this population. The Diabetes Technology Society convened a series of three consensus meetings of clinicians and researchers with expertise in diabetes technology, GLP-1RA therapy, and T1D management. The project was aimed at synthesizing current literature and providing conclusions on the use of GLP-1RA therapy as an adjunct to automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in adults with T1D. The expert panel members met virtually three times on January 17, 2024, and April 24, 2024, and August 14, 2024, to discuss topics ranging from physiology and outcomes of GLP-1RAs in T1D to limitations of current sensors, algorithms, and insulin for AID systems. The panelists also identified research gaps and future directions for research. The panelists voted to in favor of 31 recommendations. This report presents the consensus opinions of the participants that, in adults with T1D using AID systems, GLP-1RAs have the potential to (1) provide effective adjunct therapy and (2) improve glycemic and metabolic outcomes without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: VNS received research support from Novo Nordisk, Insulet, and Tandem Diabetes Care and received honoraria from LifeScan for advisory board attendance and from Dexcom, Embecta, and Insulet for speaking arrangements. ALP is on the advisory board of Medscape, Vertex, and Lilly; has received research support from Insulin and Abbott; and reports stock options from Omada Health. GEU has received research support (to Emory University) from Abbott, Bayer, Dexcom, and Sanofi. HKA received research support through University of Colorado from Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes, Senseonics, Medtronic, Eli Lilly, REMD Biotherapeutics, IM Therapeutics, and IAFMS and received honoraria through University of Colorado from Senseonics and Mannkind for advisory board attendance. GA has received research support to her institution Northwestern University from Fractyl Health, MannKind, Insulet, Tandem Diabetes, and Welldoc. GA has received consulting fees from Dexcom and Insulet. LB reports having participated in advisory boards of Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Oviva, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, and Ypsomed and received speaker fees from Dexcom, Ypsomed and Oviva. EC is an advisory board member and consultant for Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Adocia, MannKind, Lexicon, Arecor, PortalInsulin, and Proventionbio. EC was also a speaker for Novo Nordisk. KD discloses research support from Dexcom, Sanofi, Viacyte, Abbott, and Insulet; consulting with Eli Lilly, Insulet, Oppenheimer, Dexcom; and honorarium from UptoDate, Medscape, Med Learning Group, Impact Education, and Elsevier. CF receives royalties from Dexcom and Novo Nordisk managed through her institution. PGJ reports receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health, The Leona M. and Harry B. Charitable Trust, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, Dexcom, and the Oregon Health & Science University Foundation; consultancy fees from CDISC; US patents 62/352,939, 63/269,094, 62/944,287, 8810388, 9,480,418, 8,317,700, 61/570382, 8,810,388, 7,976,466, and 6,558,321; and reports stock options from Pacific Diabetes Technologies, outside submitted work. RAL reports consulting fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Deep Valley Labs, Gluroo, PhysioLogic Devices, ProventionBio, and Tidepool. JKM is a member of the advisory board of Abbott Diabetes Care, Becton-Dickinson, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Embecta, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S, Prediktor A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi-Aventis, and Viatris and received speaker honoraria from Abbott Diabetes Care, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Servier, and Ypsomed. JLS has conducted clinical trials for Eli Lilly, Insulet, and Medtronic and has received in-kind support for research studies from Dexcom and Medtronic. She has consulted for Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Medtronic, and Sanofi. She has been a member of advisory boards for Bigfoot Biomedical, Cecelia Health, Eli Lilly, Insulet, the T1D Fund, and Vertex. DCK is a consultant for Afon, Better Therapeutics, Integrity, Lifecare, Nevro, Novo, Samsung, and Thirdwayv. AC, UM, PP, SS, EZ, CNH, ATA, TT, and REA have nothing to disclose.

Background: Matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP-7) is a novel biomarker for diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA), the most common cholestatic liver disease in infancy. There is a pressing need to determine the utility of MMP-7 levels in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) to avoid unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures in this high-risk population. We investigated the utility of MMP-7 in discriminating BA from non-BA cholestasis in infants with CHD and whether MMP-7 elevation was present in infants requiring treatment for clinically significant PH., Methods: This is a single-center cross-sectional study including infants < 180 days of age with cholestasis and serum MMP-7 levels collected from 2019 to 2023. Demographic data and descriptive statistics were summarized with medians with interquartile ranges and frequencies with percentages. Median MMP-7 levels were assessed via Wilcoxon rank-sum test., Results: A total of 149 patients were included. Patients with CHD had significantly elevated MMP-7 levels relative to the non-CHD cohort (50 vs. 34 ng/mL, p = 0.009). Sub-analysis comparing infants with and without PH revealed significantly elevated median MMP-7 levels in those with clinically significant PH (125 vs. 39 ng/mL, p = 0.010). CHD patients with PH had greater median MMP-7 compared to CHD patients without PH (154 vs 43 ng/mL, p = 0.028)., Conclusion: Serum MMP-7 levels in infants with congenital heart disease with cholestasis (CHD-C) were significantly elevated compared to those with cholestasis alone. MMP-7 may help identify non-BA cholestatic infants who have concurrent clinically significant pulmonary hypertension. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate this finding and establish CHD-specific MMP-7 cut-offs., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: An error grid compares measured versus reference glucose concentrations to assign clinical risk values to observed errors. Widely used error grids for blood glucose monitors (BGMs) have limited value because they do not also reflect clinical accuracy of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs)., Methods: Diabetes Technology Society (DTS) convened 89 international experts in glucose monitoring to (1) smooth the borders of the Surveillance Error Grid (SEG) zones and create a user-friendly tool-the DTS Error Grid; (2) define five risk zones of clinical point accuracy (A-E) to be identical for BGMs and CGMs; (3) determine a relationship between DTS Error Grid percent in Zone A and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) from analyzing 22 BGM and nine CGM accuracy studies; and (4) create trend risk categories (1-5) for CGM trend accuracy., Results: The DTS Error Grid for point accuracy contains five risk zones (A-E) with straight-line borders that can be applied to both BGM and CGM accuracy data. In a data set combining point accuracy data from 18 BGMs, 2.6% of total data pairs equally moved from Zones A to B and vice versa (SEG compared with DTS Error Grid). For every 1% increase in percent data in Zone A, the MARD decreased by approximately 0.33%. We also created a DTS Trend Accuracy Matrix with five trend risk categories (1-5) for CGM-reported trend indicators compared with reference trends calculated from reference glucose., Conclusion: The DTS Error Grid combines contemporary clinician input regarding clinical point accuracy for BGMs and CGMs. The DTS Trend Accuracy Matrix assesses accuracy of CGM trend indicators., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.C.K. is a consultant for Afon, Lifecare, Novo, Samsung, embecta, Glucotrack, SynchNeuro, and Thirdwayv. G.F. is CEO of IfDT. G.F./IfDT has/have received research support, speakers’ honoraria or consulting fees in the last three years from Abbott, Ascensia, Berlin Chemie, Boydsense, Dexcom, Glucoset, i-SENS, Lilly, Menarini, Novo Nordisk, Perfood, Pharmasens, Roche, Sinocare, Terumo, Ypsomed. S.P. is an employee of IfDT. B.P.K. declares patent royalties handled by UVA from: DexCom, J&J, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and research support handled by UVA: Dexcom, Novo Nordisk, Tandem Diabetes Care. D.K. has received research support from Abbott Diabetes Care. M.S.D.A. is currently receiving in kind support (CGM devices) from Dexcom Inc for an investigator-initiated clinical study. K.D. receives research funding from Dexcom, Abbott, Sanofi, Viacyte, Insulet, consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Dexcom, Insulet, Oppenheimer, Elsevier, honoraria from Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning, Med Learning Group, Medscape, Impact Education, and royalties from UptoDate. S.M. is in receipt of an investigator-initiated grant from DexCom, has received speaker fees from Sanofi & Lilly, is funded by a Wellcome Trust (223024/Z/21/Z), and is supported by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. A.S. was supported by the NSF Engineering Research Center for Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Underserved Populations (PATHS-UP) (#1648451). V.N.S. reports receiving personal fees from Sanofi, Embecta, NovoNordisk, Dexcom, Insulet, Tandem Diabetes Care, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Genomelink and LumosFit for consulting, advising or speaking. N.K.T. is a consultant for Roche Diagnostics / Roche Molecular Systems / Radiometer. UC Davis is a Roche Diagnostics Center of Excellence. N.K.T. has received speaking honoraria for Roche Diagnostics, Nova Biomedical, Thermo Fisher, and Radiometer. N.K.T. is also Chair-Elect for the Association for Diagnostic and Laboratory Medicine (ADLM) Critical and Point-of-Care Testing Division, Co-Founder of the Machine Intelligene Learning Optimizer (MILO), Inc, and a member of the International Federation for Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) continuous glucose monitoring workgroup. T.T. is a consultant for Clinical ink. R.E.A. is a consultant for Clinical ink. D.T.A. has received speaker’s honoraria from Abbott, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Insulet, Lilly Diabetes, Mannkind, Novo Nordisk, and Xeris Pharmaceuticals. D.T.A. has received consulting fees from Ascensia Diabetes Care, Lilly Diabetes, and Senseonics. H.K.A. received research grants through University of Colorado from Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes, Medtronic, Mannkind, IM Therapeutics, IAFMS, and received honorarium through University of Colorado for consulting from Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes, and Medtronic. M.E.A.-S. has served on the advisory boards for Abbott, Medtronic, Insulet, VitalAire, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Dexcom; has received honoraria for speaking from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, VitalAire, and Eli Lilly; and received research support from Medtronic and Sanofi. T.S.B. has received research support from Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, Biolinq, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Medtrum, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Senseonics, and vTv Therapeutics and consulting honoraria from Abbott Diabetes, Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, ACON, CeQur, HagarTech, Intuity Medical, Lifescan, Mannkind, Medtronic, Novo, Perspirion, Sanofi, Sequel Med Tech, and Ypsomed. M.B. currently participates on the Hospital Advisory board with Dexcom and has received research support from Dexcom. L.B. has received research/product support from Dexcom, Ypsomed, and Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker honoraria from Dexcom and Oviva; and participated in advisory boards of Dexcom, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Ypsomed, Oviva, and Roche Diabetes Care. Y.M.B. has received honoraria for lectures and scientific advisory from Roche and AstraZeneca in the past 12 months. J.E.B. is on the Speaker’s bureau for Insulet and on the Advisory Board for Cardinal Health and Lifescan. J.E.B. is a consultant for Embecta. J.E.B. receives research support from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. E.C. is on the scientific advisory board for Novo Nordisk, Eli-Lilly, Adocia, Arecor, Proventionbio, Portal Insulin, and MannKind. D.C. was a Dexcom employee from August 2018 to May 2024. D.C. is a shareholder of Dexcom, Lilly, Abbott and Tandem. M.C. has received consulting fees from Glooko and research support from Dexcom and Abbott Diabetes Care. G.L.C. is a shareholder of BioTex, Inc., Basepair Biotechnologies Inc., Coordination Centric, Inc., and Shape Memory Medical, Inc. G.L.C. is supported by the NSF Engineering Research Center for Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Underserved Populations (PATHS-UP) (#1648451). K.K.D. has received honoraria, travel, or fees for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Abbott Diabetes, Menarini, and Sanofi in the last 12 months. J.E. receives federal funding from FDA, NIMHD, and NCATS and is a consultant for Sanofi. C.F. receives royalties from Dexcom and Novo Nordisk managed through her institution. G.A.F. is an advisor for 180 Life Sciences, 89bio, Adocia, Abbott, AdipoPharma, Aerami, Amolyt, Carthera, Catalyst, Cohen Global, CMC Magnetics, Diasome, Eleos, Entera Bio, Enterin, Glyscend, Hagar, Hogan Lovells, IM Therapeutics, Innoneo, Intarcia, Levicure, Lilly Asia Ventures, Lumos, Mars Symbioscience, Melior, metaLead Therapeutics, Microbiotix, MMD, Modular Medical, New Amsterdam, Northwestern, NuSirt, NuVox, Oramed, Pano, Pasithea, PhylloPharma, Pleiogenix, Recordati, Regor, Remodeless, Renaissance, RenovoRx, Rivus, RxMP, Sera Biopharma, Seraxis, Serpin, SFC Fluidics, Skinject, SROne, Stalicla, Surf Bio, TIXiMED, Veroscience, Verthermia, WaveBreak, Zealand Pharma, and Zucara. M.A.L.G. is a consultant for Abbott, Medtronic, Novonordisk, and Roche. R.J.G. received research support from Novo Nordisk, Dexcom and Eli Lilly and consulting fees/advisory fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Aztra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Medtronic, outside of this work. R.J.G. is partially supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers P30DK111024, K23DK123384, R03DK138255, and U2CD137135. A.M.G.-M. reports speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Elli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott, and Medtronic. L.H. is a consultant for a number of companies that are developing innovative solutions for the treatment of people with diabetes. N.H. reports Advisory Board member fees from Abbott Diabetes Care and Insulet as well as honoraria for lectures from Berlin-Chemie AG, Becton Dickenson, Sanofi Germany, Roche Diabetes Care, and Dexcom Germany. T.H. serves on the advisory board for Acella and Horizons Therapeutics (no financial compensation). S.H. has served on the advisory board for Tandem, Dexcom, and Medtronic, and received honoraria for nonpromotional educational and/or consultancy work from Abbott, Insulet, Dexcom, Roche, and Sanofi. P.G.J. is a shareholder of Pacific Diabetes Technologies Inc. and serves on the advisory board for Eli Lilly. P.G.J. received grant support from SFC Fluidics and research support from Eli Lilly and Dexcom. J.J. has received fees from lectures and or advisory boards from Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Boeringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Nordic Infucare, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. S.R.J is a consultant for USV, Marico, Glenmark, Franco Indian, Twin Health, Biocon, and Zydus Lifesciences. S.R.J. received speaking honoraria from Abbott, Novo Nordisk, MSD, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Lupin, Bayer Zydus, USV, DRL, Meyer Organics, Servier, Natco. R.A.L. is a consultant for Abbott Diabetes Care, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Deep Valley Labs, Gluroo, PhysioLogic Devices, Portal Insulin, Sanofi, and Tidepool. R.A.L. has served on advisory boards for. ProventionBio and Lilly. R.A.L. receives research support through his institution from Insulet, Medtronic, Tandem, and Sinocare. L.A.L. has received research funding from, has provided CME on behalf of, and/or has acted as an advisor to Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Sanofi. M.L. has been a consultant or received honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Nordic InfuCare, and Novo Nordisk, and has received research grants from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, all outside of the submitted work. J.K.M. is a member of advisory boards of Abbott Diabetes Care, Becton-Dickinson, Biomea Fusion, Eli Lilly, Embecta, Medtronic, NovoNordisk A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi-Aventis, and Viatris and received speaker honoraria from A. Menarini Diagnostics, Abbott Diabetes Care, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Medtrust, MSD, NovoNordisk A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Viatris, and Ypsomed. J.K.M. is a shareholder of decide Clinical Software GmbH and elyte Diagnostics. A.M. reports speaker fees from Novo Nordisk. M.M. has an existing research & development relationship with Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc and has been a consultant for Abbott. S.-J.M. is a consultant for Abbott, Curestream, Daewoong, EOFlow, G2e, Huons, iSense, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. D.N.O. has served on advisory boards for Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and Sanofi; received research support from Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Eli Lilly and Company, and Sanofi; and received travel support from Novo Nordisk and Merck Sharp & Dohme. F.J.P. has received research support (to Emory University) from Dexcom, Insulet, Novo Nordisk, Tandem, and Ideal Medical Technologies, and has received consulting fees from Dexcom. A.L.P. is on the advisory board of Medscape, Vertex, and Lilly; receives research support from Insulin and Abbott; and has stock options in Omada Health. R.P.-B. receives grant support from Novo Nordisk, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, and Medtronic and received consulting fees from Bayer, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, and Roche. C.M.R. has received honoraria and/or grant support from AstraZeneca, Dexcom, Fresenius, and Vifor. D.B.S. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health. S.S. was a Novo Nordisk employee from 2022-2023. S.S. has served as advisor for Novo Nordisk and has received speaker fees from Novo Nordisk and Nordic Infucare within the past three years. G.D.S’s employer, nonprofit International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, has received educational grant funds from Abbott Diabetes Care, Medscape, and Sanofi-Aventis Groupe. G.D.S receives no personal income/honorarium from these activities. K.S. received grant supports from Arkray, Terumo, and Dexcom. E.K.S. is partly supported by the VA Merit Award (1I01CX001825) from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Sciences Research and has received unrestricted research support from Dexcom and Tandem Diabetes (to Baltimore VA Medical Center and to University of Maryland) for the conduction of clinical trials. N.L.S. received funding from Novo Nordisk for an investigator-initiated research grant unrelated to the current project. G.E.U. is partly supported by research grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH/NATS UL 3UL1TR002378-05S2) from the Clinical and Translational Science Award program, and from National Institutes of Health and National Center for Research Resources (NIH/NIDDK 2P30DK111024-06). G.E.U. has received research support (to Emory University) from Abbott, Bayer, and Dexcom; and has participated in advisory boards for Dexcom and GlyCare. E.W. has received consulting fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Ascensia, Bayer, Boehringer, Ingelheim, Embecta, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Medtronic, Renalytix, and Sanofi. E.W. has received honoraria from Abbott Diabetes Care, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Medtronic, Renalytix, and Sanofi. E.W. is on the Speakers’ Bureau from Abbott Diabetes Care, Bayer, Boehringer, Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Renalytix, and Sanofi. M.Z. is a consultant for DexCom, Inc. M.A.K. is Chief Medical Officer of QuesGen, Inc. C.T., C.L., B.V.H., J.S.K., W.A.L., S.Y.R., J.J.S., K.W., C.W., K.R., C.N.H., A.T.A., A.A., R.R.B., E.M.B., J.G.C., K.Y.C., A.D., N.E., S.K.K., U.M., N.M., C.M., J.H.N., A.P., P.R., S.M.S., B.S., M.V., H.W.V., J.W., A.H.B.W., and S.Y. have nothing to disclose.

Background : Connected insulin pens capture data on insulin dosing/timing and can integrate with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices with essential insulin and glucose metrics combined into a single platform. Standardization of connected insulin pen reports is desirable to enhance clinical utility with a single report. Methods : An international expert panel was convened to develop a standardized connected insulin pen report incorporating insulin and glucose metrics into a single report containing clinically useful information. An extensive literature review and identification of examples of current connected insulin pen reports were performed serving as the basis for creation of a draft of a standardized connected insulin pen report. The expert panel participated in three virtual standardization meetings and online surveys. Results : The Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) Report: Connected Insulin Pen brings all clinically relevant CGM-derived glucose and connected insulin pen metrics into a single simplified two-page report. The first page contains the time in ranges bar, summary of key insulin and glucose metrics, the AGP curve, and detailed basal (long-acting) insulin assessment. The second page contains the bolus (mealtime and correction) insulin assessment periods with information on meal timing, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, average bolus insulin dose, and number of days with bolus doses recorded. The report's second page contains daily glucose profiles with an overlay of the timing and amount of basal and bolus insulin administered. Conclusion : The AGP Report: Connected Insulin Pen is a standardized clinically useful report that should be considered by companies developing connected pen technology as part of their system reporting/output.

Background: Matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP-7) is a novel biomarker for diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA), the most common cholestatic liver disease in infancy. There is a pressing need to determine the utility of MMP-7 levels in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) to avoid unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures in this high-risk population. We investigated the utility of MMP-7 in discriminating BA from non-BA cholestasis in infants with CHD and whether MMP-7 elevation was present in infants requiring treatment for clinically significant PH., Methods: This is a single center cross sectional study including infants <180 days of age with cholestasis and serum MMP-7 levels collected from 2019-2023. Demographic data and descriptive statistics were summarized with medians with interquartile ranges and frequencies with percentages. Median MMP-7 levels were assessed via Wilcoxon rank-sum test., Results: A total of 149 patients were included. Patients with CHD had significantly elevated MMP-7 levels relative to the non-CHD cohort (50 vs. 34 ng/mL, p=0.009). Sub-analysis comparing infants with and without PH revealed significantly elevated median MMP-7 levels in those with clinically significant PH (125 vs. 39 ng/mL, p=0.010). CHD patients with PH had greater median MMP-7 compared to CHD patients without PH (154 vs 43 ng/mL, p=0.028)., Conclusions: Serum MMP-7 levels in infants with CHD-C were significantly elevated compared to those with cholestasis alone. MMP-7 may help identify non-BA cholestatic infants who have concurrent clinically significant pulmonary hypertension. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate this finding and establish CHD-specific MMP-7 cutoffs., Competing Interests: Additional Declarations: No competing interests reported.

Aims: The aim was to evaluate the effect of extended use of the Omnipod® 5 automated insulin delivery (AID) system in adults with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control., Materials and Methods: Following an 8-week single-arm, multicentre, outpatient trial of AID in adults with type 2 diabetes and baseline ≥ 64 mmol/mol, participants were given the opportunity to continue use of the AID system in a 26-week (~6 month) extension phase. The primary safety endpoints were percentage of time with sensor glucose ≥ 250 mg/dL and < 54 mg/dL. Additional glycaemic measures, including percentage of time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) and HbA1c, were evaluated. The use of non-insulin anti-hyperglycaemic medications was permitted throughout the entire study., Results: During the initial 8-week study, participants (N = 22) achieved a decrease in percentage of time ≥ 250 mg/dL from 27.4% ± 21.0% to 10.5% ± 8.8% (p < 0.0001), which further decreased to 9.7% ± 9.2% during the extension phase (p = 0.0002 vs. standard therapy). Percentage of time < 54 mg/dL remained low from standard therapy through extension (median [interquartile range] 0.00% [0.00%, 0.06%] vs. 0.02% [0.00%, 0.05%], p > 0.05). HbA1c decreased by 1.6% ± 1.2% (15.5 ± 13.1 mmol/mol, p < 0.0001) and TIR increased by 22.4% ± 19.2% (p < 0.0001) from standard therapy through extension with no significant change in body mass index and without an observed increase in total daily insulin requirements., Conclusions: These longer-term findings of Omnipod 5 AID system use demonstrate the potential value of AID in helping people with type 2 diabetes reach glycaemic targets., (© 2024 Insulet Corporation and The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Abstract: The number of people facing mental health issues continues to grow in the aftermath of COVID-19. Nurses are challenged with providing care for an increasing number of patients, including veterans, with complex mental health needs across healthcare settings. Of concern, many students transitioning into practice feel they lack the necessary confidence, education, and skills to competently care for patients with mental health illness. This article discusses an innovative mental health immersion experience strategically integrated within a new-nurse residency program., Competing Interests: The authors have declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 National League for Nursing.)

Background: The Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) was introduced as a single value derived from the ambulatory glucose profile that identifies patients who need attention. This study describes participants in each of the five GRI zones and examines the percentage of variation in GRI scores that is explained by sociodemographic and clinical variables among diverse adults with type 1 diabetes., Methods: A total of 159 participants provided blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data over 14 days (mean age [SD] = 41.4 [14.5] years; female = 54.1%, Hispanic = 41.5%). Glycemia Risk Index zones were compared on CGM, sociodemographic, and clinical variables. Shapley value analysis examined the percentage of variation in GRI scores explained by different variables. Receiver operating characteristic curves examined GRI cutoffs for those more likely to have experienced ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia., Results: Mean glucose and variability, time in range, and percentage of time in high, and very high, glucose ranges differed across the five GRI zones ( P values < .001). Multiple sociodemographic indices also differed across zones, including education level, race/ethnicity, age, and insurance status. Sociodemographic and clinical variables collectively explained 62.2% of variance in GRI scores. A GRI score ≥84.5 reflected greater likelihood of ketoacidosis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.848), and scores ≥58.2 reflected greater likelihood of severe hypoglycemia (AUC = 0.729) over the previous six months., Conclusions: Results support the use of the GRI, with GRI zones identifying those in need of clinical attention. Findings highlight the need to address health inequities. Treatment differences associated with the GRI also suggest behavioral and clinical interventions including starting individuals on CGM or automated insulin delivery systems., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: Health care systems have historically struggled to provide adequate care for patients with complex care needs that often result in overuse of hospital and emergency department resources. Patients with complex care needs generally have increased expenses, longer length of hospital stays, an increased need for care management resources during hospitalization, and high readmission rates. Mayo Clinic in Arizona aimed to ensure successful transitions for hospitalized patients with complex care needs to the community by developing a complex care transition team (CCTT) program. With typical care management models, patients are assigned to registered nurse case managers and social workers according to the inpatient nursing unit rather than patient care complexity. Patients with complex care needs may not receive the amount of time needed to ensure an efficient and effective transition to the community setting. Furthermore, after transitioning to the community, patients with complex care needs often do not have access to care management resources if further care coordination needs arise., Primary Practice Setting: Acute care hospital in the US Southwest., Methodology and Sample: The CCTT was composed of a registered nurse case manager, social worker, and care management assistant, with physician advisor support. The CCTT followed patients with complex care needs during their hospitalization and transition to the community for 90 days after discharge. The number of inpatient admissions and hospital readmission rates were compared between 6 months before and after enrollment in the CCTT program. Cost savings for decreased hospital length of stay, emergency department visits, and hospital readmissions were also determined., Results: The CCTT selected patients according to a complex care algorithm , which identified patients who required high use of the health care system. The CCTT then followed this cohort of patients for an average of 90 days after discharge. A total of 123 patients were enrolled in the CCTT program from July 1, 2019, to April 30, 2021, and 80 patients successfully graduated from the program. Readmission rates decreased from 51.2% at 6 months before the intervention to 22.0% at 6 months after the intervention. This reduced readmission rate resulted in a cost savings of more than $1 million., Implications for Case Management Practice: The outcomes resulting from implementation of the multidisciplinary CCTT highlight the need for a patient-specific approach to transitioning care to the outpatient setting. The patient social determinants of health that often contributed to overuse of health care resources included poor access to outpatient specialists, difficulty navigating the health care system due to illness or poor health literacy, and limited social support. The success of the CCTT program prompted the implementation of other specialty-specific pilot programs at Mayo Clinic in Arizona. The investment of time and resources, including dedicated personnel to follow patients with high hospital service usage, allows health care systems to reduce emergency department visits and hospital admissions and to provide patients with the best opportunity for success as they transition from the inpatient to outpatient setting., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: People with clinically diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) but positive anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA), referred to here as latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), may experience more rapid glycemic deterioration than those with T2D and may benefit from effective diabetes treatment with additional metabolic benefits., Objective: Assess glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight (BW) changes associated with tirzepatide in GADA-positive versus GADA-negative participants with clinical T2D diagnosis., Design: Post hoc analyses based on pooled data from SURPASS 2-5, using mixed-model repeated measures from the efficacy analysis set, adjusting for study and baseline covariates including age, sex, baseline values, body mass index (BMI), and GADA status., Setting: N/A., Patients: N = 3791., Intervention: Tirzepatide (5, 10, 15 mg)., Main Outcome Measure(s): Change from baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 40 (SURPASS-2, -3, -5) and 42 (SURPASS-4)by GADA status., Results: In participants with confirmed GADA status, 3671 (96.8%) were GADA-negative and 120 (3.2%) were GADA-positive (76 [63.3%] with low and 44 [36.7%] with high GADA levels). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for slightly lower BMI in GADA-positive versus GADA-negative participants (mean [SD] BMI 32.2 [6.1] versus 33.6 [6.3] kg/m2). At Week 40/42, both groups achieved robust reductions in HbA1c (-2.11% versus -2.32%) and BW (9.2 kg versus -9.6 kg) (p < 0.001, both groups). HbA1c reductions were greater in GADA-negative participants (estimated difference [95% CI]: 0.21% [0.03, 0.39]; p = 0.024) and BW reductions did not differ between groups (0.38 kg [-0.99, 1.75]; p = 0.588)., Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, tirzepatide was associated with substantial reductions in HbA1c and BW irrespective of GADA status in adults diagnosed with T2D, suggesting that tirzepatide may improve glycemic control in individuals with LADA., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.)

Introduction: The Oncotype DX Breast RS test has been adopted in Scotland and has been the subject of a large population-based study by a Scottish Consensus Group to assess the uptake of the recurrence score (RS), evaluate co-variates associated with the RS and to analyse the effect it may have had on clinical practice., Materials & Methods: Pan-Scotland study between August 2018-August 2021 evaluating 833 patients who had a RS test performed as part of their diagnostic pathway. Data was extracted retrospectively from electronic records and analysis conducted to describe change in chemotherapy administration (by direct comparison with conventional risk assessment tools), and univariate/multivariate analysis to assess relationship between covariates and the RS., Results: Chemotherapy treatment was strongly influenced by the RS (p < 0.001). Only 30 % of patients received chemotherapy treatment in the intermediate and high risk PREDICT groups, where chemotherapy is considered. Additionally, 55.5 % of patients with a high risk PREDICT had a low RS and did not receive chemotherapy. There were 17 % of patients with a low risk PREDICT but high RS who received chemotherapy. Multivariate regression analysis showed the progesterone receptor Allred score (PR score) to be a strong independent predictor of the RS, with a negative PR score being associated with high RS (OR 4.49, p < 0.001). Increasing grade was also associated with high RS (OR 3.81, p < 0.001). Classic lobular pathology was associated with a low RS in comparison to other tumour pathology (p < 0.01). Nodal disease was associated with a lower RS (p = 0.012) on univariate analysis, with menopausal status (p = 0.43) not influencing the RS on univariate or multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Genomic assays offer the potential for risk-stratified decision making regarding the use of chemotherapy. They can help reduce unnecessary chemotherapy treatment and identify a subgroup of patients with more adverse genomic tumour biology. A recent publication by Health Improvement Scotland (HIS) has updated guidance on use of the RS test for NHS Scotland. It suggests to limit its use to the intermediate risk PREDICT group. Our study shows the impact of the RS test in the low and high risk PREDICT groups. The implementation across Scotland has resulted in a notable shift in practice, leading to a significant reduction in chemotherapy administration in the setting of high risk PREDICT scores returning low risk RS. There has also been utility for the test in the low risk PREDICT group to detect a small subgroup with a high RS. We have found the PR score to have a strong independent association with high risk RS. This finding was not evaluated by the key RS test papers, and the potential prognostic information provided by the PR score as a surrogate biomarker is an outstanding question that requires more research to validate., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr Adam L Peters has received a travel grant to attend the Royal College of Radiology Clinical Oncology academic training day from the Beatson Cancer Charity. Miss Beatrix Elsberger has had an advisor role with Exact Sciences, and has received a travel grant to attend a meeting in London. The funds received were put back into the departmental pot to help fund a research nurse., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To identify and distinguish between racial and socioeconomic disparities in age at hepatology care, diagnosis, access to surgical therapy, and liver transplant-free survival in patients with biliary atresia (BA)., Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 69 BA patients from 2010 to 2021. Patients were grouped into White and non-White cohorts. The socioeconomic milieu was analyzed utilizing neighborhood deprivation index, a census tract-based calculation of six socioeconomic variables. The primary outcomes of this study were timing of the first hepatology encounter, surgical treatment with hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE), and survival with native liver (SNL) at 2 years., Results: Patients were 55% male and 72% White. White patients were referred at a median of 34 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 17-65) vs. 67 days (IQR: 42-133; p = 0.001) in non-White patients. White infants were more likely to undergo HPE (42/50 patients; 84%) compared to non-White (10/19; 53%), odds ratio (OR) 4.73 (95% confidence interval: 1.46-15.31; p = 0.01). Independent of race, patients exposed to increased neighborhood-level deprivation were less likely to receive HPE (OR: 0.49, p = 0.04) and achieve SNL (OR: 0.54, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Racial and socioeconomic disparities are independently associated with timely BA diagnosis, access to surgical treatment, and transplant-free survival. Public health approaches to improve screening for pathologic jaundice in infants of diverse racial backgrounds and to test and implement interventions for socioeconomically at-risk families are needed., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Importance: The effect of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in men with hypogonadism on the risk of progression from prediabetes to diabetes or of inducing glycemic remission in those with diabetes is unknown., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of TRT in preventing progression from prediabetes to diabetes in men with hypogonadism who had prediabetes and in inducing glycemic remission in those with diabetes., Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested substudy, an intention-to-treat analysis, within a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (Testosterone Replacement Therapy for Assessment of Long-Term Vascular Events and Efficacy Response in Hypogonadal Men [TRAVERSE]) was conducted at 316 trial sites in the US. Participants included men aged 45 to 80 years with hypogonadism and prediabetes or diabetes who were enrolled in TRAVERSE between May 23, 2018, and February 1, 2022., Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1.62% testosterone gel or placebo gel until study completion., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the risk of progression from prediabetes to diabetes, analyzed using repeated-measures log-binomial regression. The secondary end point was the risk of glycemic remission (hemoglobin A1c level <6.5% [to convert to proportion of total hemoglobin, multiply by 0.01] or 2 fasting glucose measurements <126 mg/dL [to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0555] without diabetes medication) in men who had diabetes., Results: Of 5204 randomized participants, 1175 with prediabetes (mean [SD] age, 63.8 [8.1] years) and 3880 with diabetes (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [7.8] years) were included in this study. Mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c level in men with prediabetes was 5.8% (0.4%). Risk of progression to diabetes did not differ significantly between testosterone and placebo groups: 4 of 598 (0.7%) vs 8 of 562 (1.4%) at 6 months, 45 of 575 (7.8%) vs 57 of 533 (10.7%) at 12 months, 50 of 494 (10.1%) vs 67 of 460 (14.6%) at 24 months, 46 of 359 (12.8%) vs 52 of 330 (15.8%) at 36 months, and 22 of 164 (13.4%) vs 19 of 121 (15.7%) at 48 months (omnibus test P = .49). The proportions of participants with diabetes who experienced glycemic remission and the changes in glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels were similar in testosterone- and placebo-treated men with prediabetes or diabetes., Conclusions and Relevance: In men with hypogonadism and prediabetes, the incidence of progression from prediabetes to diabetes did not differ significantly between testosterone- and placebo-treated men. Testosterone replacement therapy did not improve glycemic control in men with hypogonadism and prediabetes or diabetes. These findings suggest that TRT alone should not be used as a therapeutic intervention to prevent or treat diabetes in men with hypogonadism., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03518034.

Introduction: Positional changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) have been described in humans when measured over minutes or hours in a static posture, with ICP higher when lying supine than when sitting or standing upright. However, humans are often ambulant with frequent changes in position self-generated by active movement., Research Question: We explored how ICP changes during movement between body positions., Material and Methods: Sixty-two patients undergoing clinical ICP monitoring were recruited. Patients were relatively well, ambulatory and of mixed age, body habitus and pathology. We instructed patients to move back and forth between sitting and standing or lying and sitting positions at 20 s intervals after an initial 60s at rest. We simultaneously measured body position kinematics from inertial measurement units and ICP from an intraparenchymal probe at 100 Hz., Results: ICP increased transiently during movements beyond the level expected by body position alone. The amplitude of the increase varied between participants but was on average ∼5 mmHg during sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit and sit-to-lie movements and 10.8 mmHg [95%CI: 9.3,12.4] during lie-to-sit movements. The amplitude increased slightly with age, was greater in males, and increased with median 24-h ICP. For lie-to-sit and sit-to-lie movements, higher BMI was associated with greater mid-movement increase (β = 0.99 [0.78,1.20]; β = 0.49 [0.34,0.64], respectively)., Discussion and Conclusion: ICP increases during movement between body positions. The amplitude of the increase in ICP varies with type of movement, age, sex, and BMI. This could be a marker of disturbed ICP dynamics and may be particularly relevant for patients with CSF-diverting shunts in situ., Competing Interests: This study was funded by the National Brain Appeal. MJB's research time was funded by the National Brain Appeal. EMM's research fellowship is sponsored by B. Braun. LD’A is supported by an 10.13039/501100000272NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship and was the recipient of a research fellowship sponsored by B. Braun. LDW has received honoraria from and served on advisory boards for Medtronic, B. Braun and Codman. AKT's research time was supported by the 10.13039/501100000272National Institute for Health Research 10.13039/501100012621University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. The other authors have no disclosures to report., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of EUROSPINE, the Spine Society of Europe, EANS, the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies.)

Aims: Patients with breast cancer who have positive lymph nodes are currently recommended axillary node clearance (ANC) or regional nodal irradiation (RNI). ANC is associated with complications such as lymphoedema, brachial plexopathy and shoulder stiffness. The AMAROS Group showed RNI to be non-inferior to ANC with regards to survival and recurrence, and with a better quality of life. We conducted a large real-world population study to show our centre's experience with the use of RNI and to contribute to the current discussion around the management of node-positive breast cancer., Materials and Methods: We evaluated patients who received RNI as opposed to ANC between 2006 and 2009 (n = 190). Patients had a range of cancer subtypes/grades. All had positive axillary disease, identified by axillary node sampling or sentinel lymph node biopsy. Systemic therapy was given as per standard protocol. Our data were compared with those of patients who had RNI (n = 681) in AMAROS. Patients were followed up retrospectively and overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional recurrence and toxicity were recorded, including lymphoedema, brachial plexopathy and shoulder stiffness. Survival analysis was performed on R via the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed. Toxicity data were reported as percentages. Patients meeting POSNOC trial criteria (one to two positive sentinel lymph nodes, macrometastasis, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy) including if oestrogen receptor-positive (stratified POSNOC) were identified for subgroup analysis in the regression model., Results: Locoregional recurrence was 3.16% versus AMAROS RNI of 1.82%. Overall survival was slightly lower in our population, but cancer-specific survival was higher than AMAROS. Lymphoedema rates were 5.8% versus AMAROS 11% in RNI and 23% in ANC arms, respectively. Brachial plexopathy was 1.6% and arm/shoulder stiffness 7.4%. AMAROS conducted a quality of life survey pertaining to arm/shoulder stiffness, mobility and function, which seemed to affect about 18% in the RNI arm. Univariate analysis revealed POSNOC status, especially if also oestrogen receptor-positive, to be a low risk group with hazard ratio 0.42 (0.20-0.83, P = 0.015). Extracapsular extension of lymph node metastasis was a poor prognostic factor; hazard ratio 4.39 (1.45-14.0, P = 0.009)., Conclusion: We support the conclusion of the AMAROS trial with survival and recurrence following RNI being non-inferior to ANC, and with similarly favourable toxicity data. We support the continuing use of RNI as a treatment option for patients with node-positive breast cancer. Further research is required to answer the key questions regarding personalised management for node-positive breast cancer, with regards to de-escalation and also intensification for the patients exhibiting adverse tumour biology., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objectives: The Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation identified optimizing immunosuppression (IS) as a priority practice improvement area for patients, families, and providers. We aimed to evaluate associations between clinical characteristics, early IS, and outcomes., Methods: We analyzed pediatric liver transplant (LT) data from 2013 to 2018 in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registries., Results: We included 2542 LT recipients in UNOS and 1590 in SPLIT. IS choice varied between centers with steroid induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use each ranging from 0% to 100% across centers. Clinical characteristics associated with early IS choice were inconsistent between the two data sets. T-cell depleting antibody use was associated with improved 1-year graft (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.76) and patient (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.79) survival in UNOS but decreased 1-year patient survival (HR 4.12, 95% CI 1.31-12.93) and increased acute rejection (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.07-2.34) in SPLIT. Non-T-cell depleting antibody use was not associated with differential risk of survival nor rejection. MMF use was associated with improved 1-year graft survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99) in UNOS only., Conclusions: Variation exists in center choice of early IS regimen. UNOS and SPLIT data provide conflicting associations between IS and outcomes in multivariable analysis. These results highlight the need for future multicenter collaborative work to identify evidence-based IS best practices., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)