1. Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2- mutant refractory/relapsed AML.
- Author
-
Alhajahjeh A, Patel KK, Shallis RM, Podoltsev NA, Kewan T, Stempel JM, Mendez L, Huntington SF, Stahl M, Goshua G, Bewersdorf JP, and Zeidan AM
- Abstract
In the randomized phase III IDHENTIFY trial, the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib (ENA) showed improvement in event-free but not overall survival compared with conventional care regimens (CCR) among patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R), IDH2 -mutant AML. We constructed a partitioned survival model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enasidenib for the treatment of older patients with R/R, and IDH2 -mutant AML. In the base-case scenario, ENA exhibited an incremental effectiveness of 0.234quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared to CCR, and an incremental cost of $126,800, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $540,300/QALY(95% CI: $197,800-$4,777,000/QALY). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, CCR was favored in 99.8% of simulations. The cost of ENA would need to be decreased by 72% to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. Our findings suggest that ENA is unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment for older patients with IDH2- mutant R/R AML under current pricing.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF