Search

There is an unmet need for safe and efficacious oral therapies for COVID-19 with low potential for drug-drug interactions. Obeldesivir is an orally administered nucleoside prodrug that has shown antiviral potency in nonclinical studies against SARS-CoV-2 and its circulating variants. Obeldesivir is metabolized to the active nucleoside triphosphate (GS-443902), which acts as an inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, thereby inhibiting viral RNA synthesis. Here, we report the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics from a first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I study following oral administration of obeldesivir and a phase I, open-label absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion study following oral administration of [ 14 C]-obeldesivir. Overall, obeldesivir was safe and well tolerated at single and multiple doses between 100 and 1,600 mg, with low potential for QT prolongation as assessed by QT-concentration analysis. The exposures to GS-441524 increased dose proportionally in the 100-900-mg dose range. GS-441524 accumulated by 35% after twice-daily and 12% after once-daily dosing for 5 days. Dose-proportional increases in the intracellular concentration of GS-443902 were also observed in peripheral blood mononuclar cells. Plasma exposure of GS-441524 was not significantly altered by food intake. Following oral administration of [ 14 C]-obeldesivir (500 mg; 100 μCi), the mean cumulative [ 14 C]-dose recovery was 90.7% with 58.5% in urine and 32.2% in feces. GS-441524 was the predominant plasma component (90% of 14 C-area under the concentration-time curve) and was primarily eliminated via renal excretion. Collectively, data from these studies support selection of the obeldesivir 350 mg twice-daily dosing regimen for further evaluation in phase III studies for COVID-19., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease, affecting ∼ 3% of the US population. Although multiple new systemic therapies have been introduced for the treatment of psoriatic skin disease, topical and intralesional glucocorticoids (GCs) continue to be used as effective psoriasis therapies. Their clinical utility, however, has been hampered by significant adverse effects, including skin atrophy and pigmentation as well as elevated blood glucose levels and hypertension. To mitigate these limitations, we have developed a N -(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer-based thermoresponsive dexamethasone (Dex) prodrug (ProGel-Dex) and assessed its therapeutic efficacy and safety in an imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriasis-like (PL) mouse model. ProGel-Dex was intradermally administered once at three dosing levels: 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg/day Dex equivalent at the beginning of the study. PL mice were also treated with daily topical saline or Dex, which were used as control groups. Treatment of PL mice with ProGel-Dex dosed at 0.5 mg/kg/day resulted in a significant reduction in scaling and erythema. Improvement in gross pathology scores, skin histological scores, and serum cytokine levels was also observed. Interestingly, for mice treated with ProGel-Dex at 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg/day Dex equivalent, only improvement in skin erythema was observed. GC-associated side effects, such as elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and amylase levels and body weight loss, were not observed in mice treated with ProGel-Dex at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg/day Dex equivalent. Collectively, these results demonstrate the efficacy and improved safety of ProGel-Dex in treating psoriatic skin lesions when compared to topical Dex treatment, supporting its translational potential for clinical management of lesional skin psoriasis.

Background: Considering the rise of new SARS-CoV-2 variants that have reduced the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, the development of new antiviral medications for the disease has become increasingly necessary. In this study, ASC10, a novel antiviral prodrug, was studied in a phase 1 trial in healthy Chinese participants., Research Design and Methods: Part 1 involved 60 participants, receiving 50-800 mg ASC10 or placebo twice daily for 5.5 days. Part 2, with 12 participants, explored ASC10 dosing in the fed/fasting states., Results: ASC10-A, the main pharmacologically active metabolite, rapidly appeared in plasma (T max : 1.00-2.00 h) and decreased (t 1/2 : 1.10-3.04 h) without accumulation. The C max and area under the plasma concentration - time curve (AUC) of ASC10-A increased dose-dependently (50-800 mg BID) over 5.5 days, with no accumulation. The T max was slightly delayed in the fed state; however, the C max and AUC were similar between the fed and fasting states. Adverse events (AEs) were comparable (ASC10/placebo, 66.7%) and mostly mild (95%)., Conclusion: ASC10 was demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated and exhibited dose-proportional exposure and minimal food effects., Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05523141.

Study Objective: Fospropofol disodium is a propofol prodrug that is water-soluble and has a reduced risk of bacterial contamination and hypertriglyceridemia compared with propofol. Prior to implementing a large randomized trial, we investigated the feasibility, initial efficacy, and safety of fospropofol disodium compared with propofol in long-term mild-to-moderate sedation in intensive care units (ICUs)., Design: Single-centered, prospective, unblind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial., Setting: The general ICU of university-affiliated teaching hospital., Patients: Adult patients (n = 60) expected to have mechanical ventilation for >24 h were enrolled and randomly assigned to the fospropofol or propofol group., Interventions: The fospropofol group received continuous fospropofol disodium infusions and the propofol group received continuous propofol infusions. The sedation goal was a score of -3 to 0 on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS)., Measurements: The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the target sedation range without rescue sedation. Safety outcomes were based on adverse events. Blood samples were collected to measure formate concentration in plasma., Main Results: The median dose was 4.33 (IQR, 3.08-4.94) mg/kg/h in the fospropofol group and 1.96 (IQR, 1.44-2.94) mg/kg/h in the propofol group. The median percentage of time spent in the target RASS range without rescue sedation was identical in both groups, with 83.33% (IQR, 74.43%-100.00%) in the fospropofol group and 83.33% (IQR, 77.45%-100.00%) in the propofol group (p = 0.887). At least one adverse event was identifed in 23 (76.7%) fospropofol patients and 27 (90.0%) propofol patients. The most common adverse events were tachycardia and hypotension. No paresthesia, catheter-related bloodstream infection or propofol infusion syndrome in both groups was reported. Three patients in the fospropofol group had mild hypertriglyceridemia, and nine patients in propofol group had hypertriglyceridemia (mild in eight patients and moderate in one patient) (10% versus 30%, p = 0.104). The formate concentration in plasma was very low, and no significant difference was identified at any time point between the two groups., Conclusions: Fospropofol disodium appears to be a feasible, effective and safe sedative for patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation with long-term sedation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Benfotiamine provides an important novel therapeutic direction in Alzheimer's disease (AD) with possible additive or synergistic effects to amyloid targeting therapeutic approaches., Objective: To conduct a seamless phase 2A-2B proof of concept trial investigating tolerability, safety, and efficacy of benfotiamine, a prodrug of thiamine, as a first-in-class small molecule oral treatment for early AD., Methods: This is the protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 72-week clinical trial of benfotiamine in 406 participants with early AD. Phase 2A determines the highest safe and well-tolerated dose of benfotiamine to be carried forward to phase 2B. During phase 2A, real-time monitoring of pre-defined safety stopping criteria in the first approximately 150 enrollees will help determine which dose (600 mg or 1200 mg) will be carried forward into phase 2B. The phase 2A primary analysis will test whether the rate of tolerability events (TEs) is unacceptably high in the high-dose arm compared to placebo. The primary safety endpoint in phase 2A is the rate of TEs compared between active and placebo arms, at each dose. The completion of phase 2A will seamlessly transition to phase 2B without pausing or stopping the trial. Phase 2B will assess efficacy and longer-term safety of benfotiamine in a larger group of participants through 72 weeks of treatment, at the selected dose. The co-primary efficacy endpoints in phase 2B are CDR-Sum of Boxes and ADAS-Cog13. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability measures; pharmacokinetic measures of thiamine and its esters, erythrocyte transketolase activity as blood markers of efficacy of drug delivery; ADCS-ADL-MCI; and MoCA., Conclusion: The BenfoTeam trial utilizes an innovative seamless phase 2A-2B design to achieve proof of concept. It includes an adaptive dose decision rule, thus optimizing exposure to the highest and best-tolerated dose., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06223360, registered on January 25, 2024. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06223360., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: SDE is a Data Safety Monitoring Board statistician for clinical trials performed by Janssen Research & Development LLC and Suven. For this manuscript, HHF reports grant funding from the National Institute of Aging (R01AG076634) with no personal funds received and all payments to UC San Diego. HHF also discloses grant funding from Annovis (QR Pharma), Vivoryon (Probiodrug), Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, AC Immune, and LuMind Foundation; service agreements for consulting activities with LuMind, Genentech (DSMB), Roche/Banner (DMC), Tau Consortium (SAB), Axon Neuroscience, Biosplice Therapeutics, Janssen Research & Development LLC (DMC), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Samus Therapeutics; Advisory Board activities: Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC), Association for Frontotemporal Dementia, Tau Consortium and Rainwater Charitable Foundation; support for travel from Novo Nordisk, Royal Society of Canada, Tau Consortium, Canadian Consortium for Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA), Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC), World Events Forum (ADDF); and a philanthropic donation for the Epstein Family Alzheimer Research Collaboration. For these activities, no personal funds have been received with all payments to UC San Diego. HHF personally receives royalties for patent: Feldman HH (filed November 26, 2008). Detecting and Treating Dementia Serial Number 12/3-2691 U.S. Patent No. PCT/US2007/07008. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. DMJ reports support from grants to UC San Diego from NIH/NIA, Vivoryon Therapeutics, Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, and the Epstein Family Foundation. SAF reports grant funding from the NIH. GEG reports a pending patent. KJ received funding from BBSRC and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. AK receives funding from the UKRI (MRC & BBSRC), the Wellcome Trust, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and is a paid consultant for the company Juvenescence. JAL was a consultant for Merck KGaA in 2022 (no longer active); receives drug/placebo from EMD Serono, Merck Subsidiary, for another clinical trial; and receives a stipend from Wolters Kluwer as Editor In Chief of the journal Alzheimer’s Disease and Associated Disorders. KEY, PBV, and VV are employed by and have equity interests in C2N Diagnostics. C2N Diagnostics has received support from the NIH (grant No. R44 AG059489), BrightFocus Foundation (grant No. CA2016636), The Gerald and Henrietta Rauenhorst Foundation, and the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (grant No. GC-201711-2013978). HZ has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Acumen, Alector, Alzinova, ALZPath, Amylyx, Annexon, Apellis, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, Cognito Therapeutics, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, Merry Life, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Optoceutics, Passage Bio, Pinteon Therapeutics, Prothena, Red Abbey Labs, reMYND, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Alzecure, Biogen, Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Roche, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program (outside submitted work)., (Copyright: © 2024 Feldman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

AT-752 is a novel guanosine nucleotide prodrug inhibitor of the dengue virus (DENV) polymerase with sub-micromolar, pan-serotype antiviral activity. This phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ascending single and multiple oral doses of AT-752 in healthy subjects. AT-752 was well tolerated when administered as a single dose up to 1,500 mg or when administered as multiple doses up to 750 mg three times daily (TID). No serious adverse events occurred, and the majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild in severity and resolved by the end of the study. In those receiving single ascending doses of AT-752, no pharmacokinetic sensitivity was observed in Asian subjects, and no food effect was observed. Plasma exposure of the guanosine nucleoside metabolite AT-273, the surrogate of the active triphosphate metabolite of the drug, increased with increasing dose levels of AT-752 and exhibited a long half-life of approximately 15-25 h. Administration of AT-752 750 mg TID led to a rapid increase in plasma levels of AT-273 exceeding the target in vitro 90% effective concentration (EC 90 ) of 0.64 µM in inhibiting DENV replication, and maintained this level over the treatment period. The favorable safety and pharmacokinetic results support the evaluation of AT-752 as an antiviral for the treatment of dengue in future clinical studies.Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04722627)., Competing Interests: This study was funded by Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Xiao-Jian Zhou, Maureen Montrond, Laura Ishak, Keith Pietropaolo, Dayle James, Bruce Belanger, Arantxa Horga, and Janet Hammond are employees of and may own stock in Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boston, MA, USA; Jason Lickliter is an employee of Nucleus Network, Melbourne, Australia, which was contracted by Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc to help perform this research.

PF614, a trypsin-activated abuse protection oxycodone prodrug designed to reduce recreational drug abuse, was compared to OxyContin for safety and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of plasma oxycodone following oral administration. This study was a two-part design including a multi-ascending dose (part A) and a bioequivalence (BE) study (part B) in healthy volunteers. In part A, 24 subjects were randomized 3:1 to receive PF614 (50, 100, or 200 mg, n = 6/cohort) or OxyContin (20, 40, or 80 mg; n = 2/cohort) in ascending cohorts, delivered every 12 h for a total of nine doses. In part B, 60 subjects randomized in a four-way crossover to evaluate BE, received PF614 100 mg and OxyContin 40 mg in fasted and fed (high-fat diet) states. All subjects were naltrexone blocked prior to first study drug administration to protect against opioid-related adverse effects; repeat doses were provided on days 1-5. In part A, PF614 was well-tolerated following twice daily doses of up to 200 mg for 5 days. Plasma oxycodone maximal plasma concentration and area under the concentration time curve increased linearly with increasing doses. Part B showed that plasma oxycodone BE was achieved following 100 mg PF614 or 40 mg OxyContin under both fasted and fed conditions. Additionally, PF614 provided similar oxycodone exposures following both fasted and fed states. This study confirms findings from our single-ascending dose study, showing that PF614 100 mg releases oxycodone with a PK profile comparable to 40 mg OxyContin under both fasted and fed conditions and with a similar safety profile under naltrexone-blocked conditions., (© 2024 Ensysce Biosciences. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have a long history in the healthcare system due to their therapeutic potential. These NSAIDs cause ulcerogenicity, stomach pains, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, mucosa bleeding, and pancreatitis when used moderately and consistently. With researchers, managing the aforementioned adverse effects therapeutically is getting increasingly difficult. One method for creating NSAID moieties with low penetration as well as ulcerogenic properties is the prodrug technique. During the oral consumption of NSAID-prodrugs, ulcerations, intestinal hemorrhage, and mucosa hemorrhage have significantly decreased. Considering this background, this review focussed on NSAID prodrugs as well as their justifications, the pathogenesis of NSAIDs inducing gastrointestinal toxicity, and the role of different antioxidants and spacer groups. Prodrug moieties have more advantages over parent medicines concerning both solubility and lipophilicity. In general, NSAID-class prodrugs can successfully treat both acute and long-term inflammation and aches without causing ulcerotoxicity and related gastrointestinal side effects, which reduces their burden from the pharmacoeconomic perspective., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)