Search

Bacterial-based antitumor immunity has become a promising strategy to activate the immune system for fighting cancer. However, the potential application of bacterial therapy is hindered by the presence of instability and susceptibility to infections within bacterial populations. Furthermore, monotherapy is ineffective in completely eliminating complex cancer with multiple contributing factors. In this study, based on our discovery that spore shell (SS) of Bacillus coagulans exhibits excellent tumor-targeting ability and adjuvant activity, we develop a biomimetic spore nanoplatform to boost bacteria-mediated antitumor therapy, chemodynamic therapy and antitumor immunity for synergistic cancer treatment. In detail, SS is separated from probiotic spores and then attached to the surface of liposome (Lipo) that was loaded with hemoglobin (Hb), glucose oxidase (GOx) and JQ1 to construct SS@Lipo/Hb/GOx/JQ1. In tumor tissue, highly toxic hydroxyl radicals (•OH) are generated via sequential catalytic reactions: GOx catalyzing glucose into H2O2 and Fe2+ in Hb decomposing H2O2 into •OH. The combination of •OH and SS adjuvant can improve tumor immunogenicity and activate immune system. Meanwhile, JQ1-mediated down-regulation of PD-L1 and Hb-induced hypoxia alleviation synergistically reshape immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and potentiate immune response. In this manner, SS@Lipo/Hb/GOx/JQ1 significantly suppresses tumor growth and metastasis. To summarize, the nanoplatform represents an optimum strategy to potentiate bacteria-based cancer immunotherapy.

Objective: To evaluate and compare the image quality of T2-weighted abdominal scans using a respiratory belt trigger (RBT) and frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW)-trigger (FT) techniques and to explore the feasibility of FT in abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods: The study prospectively included 28 subjects, each undergoing abdominal scans with both RBT and FT. The analysis focused on 64 inconsistent trigger segments from the respiratory curves triggered by RBT and FMCW. Parameters such as inconsistent trigger type (ITT), number of inconsistent trigger points (ITPs), ratio of ITP (ITR), and single-segment ITR (SITR) were derived from these curves. Image quality was evaluated by two observers using subjective scoring, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The assessments classified image quality as either “good” or “poor.” Consistency in image quality assessment between observers was determined using the kappa test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The chi-square test, Student’s t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U test were employed to compare the categorical and continuous variables between the RBT and FT groups.Results: The observers showed a high level of agreement in image quality assessment. There were no significant differences in ITR, SITR, acquisition time, SNR, and CNR between the RBT and FT groups (all p > 0.05). Both subjective and objective evaluations indicated no notable difference in image quality between the two groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion: The FMCW trigger technique is a viable alternative to the traditional respiratory belt trigger in scenarios of relatively stable breathing. It offers potential benefits, such as reducing operational demands on technicians and improving MRI workflow efficiency.