Search

BackgroundTraditional prognostic models for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have limitations in statistical methods and usability.ObjectiveWe aimed to develop a machine-learning (ML) based risk score to predict in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% (LVEF

Coronary artery blood flow is influenced by various factors including vessel geometry, hemodynamic conditions, timing in the cardiac cycle, and rheological conditions. Multiple patterns of disturbed coronary flow may occur when blood flow separates from the laminar plane, associated with inefficient blood transit, and pathological processes modulated by the vascular endothelium in response to abnormal wall shear stress. Current simulation techniques, including computational fluid dynamics and fluid–structure interaction, can provide substantial detail on disturbed coronary flow and have advanced the contemporary understanding of the natural history of coronary disease. However, the clinical application of these techniques has been limited to hemodynamic assessment of coronary disease severity, with the potential to refine the assessment and management of coronary disease. Improved computational efficiency and large clinical trials are required to provide an incremental clinical benefit of these techniques beyond existing tools. This contemporary review is a clinically relevant overview of the disturbed coronary flow and its associated pathological consequences. The contemporary methods to assess disturbed flow are reviewed, including clinical applications of these techniques. Current limitations and future opportunities in the field are also discussed.

Background: High-grade atrioventricular block (HGAVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), often necessitating permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Delayed HGAVB has varying definitions but typically refers to onset 48 hours after TAVI or following discharge and may cause syncope and sudden cardiac death. This review estimates the incidence of delayed HGAVB and identifies limitations of current literature. Methods: A systematic review was performed of the following online databases: Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies that labelled the outcome of “delayed” or “late” atrioventricular block after TAVI were included; patients with previous PPM or aortic valve surgery were excluded. Initial search yielded 775 studies, which, after screening, was narrowed to 19 studies. Results: Nineteen studies with 14,898 patients were included. Mean age was 81.7 years, and 46.3% were male. Mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 5.6%, and 31.3% of patients had known atrial fibrillation. The most common access site was transfemoral (84.8%), whereas balloon-expandable valves were used in 62.1%, self-expanding valves in 34.0%, and mechanically expanding valves in 3.9% of cases. The incidence of delayed HGAVB ranged from 1.7% to 14.6%, with significant methodologic heterogeneity noted among the included studies. Conclusions: Delayed HGAVB is a common and potentially serious complication of TAVI, with similar risk factors to acute HGAVB. With a move toward an early discharge strategy post-TAVI, further prospective study of delayed HGAVB is warranted to improve understanding of predisposing factors, incidence, timing, and implications. Résumé: Contexte: L’apparition d’un bloc atrioventriculaire de haut degré (BAVHD) est fréquente après l’implantation valvulaire aortique par cathéter (IVAC), ce qui nécessite souvent l’implantation d’un stimulateur cardiaque permanent. Les définitions d’un BAVHD tardif varient, mais elles font habituellement référence à l’apparition du bloc 48 heures après l’IVAC ou après le congé de l’hôpital. Le bloc peut alors provoquer une syncope et une mort subite d’origine cardiaque. Cette analyse vise à estimer l’incidence de la formation d’un BAVHD tardif et à définir les lacunes dans les publications actuelles. Méthodologie: Une analyse des études publiées dans les bases de données en ligne suivantes a été menée : Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science et Scopus. Les études dont le libellé comprenait l’issue du bloc atrioventriculaire tardif ou éloigné (« delayed » ou « late ») ont été retenues. Les patients qui avaient antérieurement reçu un stimulateur cardiaque permanent ou subi une intervention chirurgicale de la valve aortique ont été exclus. La recherche initiale a permis de recenser 775 études, nombre qui a été réduit à 19 après l’application des critères de sélection. Résultats: Dix-neuf études totalisant 14 898 patients ont été retenues. L’âge moyen était 81,7 ans, et 46,3 % des patients étaient des hommes. Le score STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) moyen était de 5,6 %, et 31,3 % des patients avaient une fibrillation auriculaire. Le point d’accès le plus fréquent était par l’artère fémorale (84,8 %). Des valves expansibles par ballonnet ont été utilisées dans 62,1 % des cas, des valves auto-expansibles dans 34,0 % des cas et des valves expansibles mécaniquement dans 3,9 % des cas. L’incidence du BAVHD tardif variait de 1,7 % à 14,6 %, mais la méthodologie était très hétérogène d’une étude à l’autre. Conclusions: Le BAVHD tardif est une complication fréquente et potentiellement grave de l’IVAC, et ses facteurs de risque sont comparables à ceux du BAVHD aigu. Étant donné la volonté d’adopter une stratégie de congé précoce après une IVAC, une autre étude prospective sur le BAVHD tardif s’impose pour mieux comprendre les facteurs prédisposants, l’incidence, la chronologie et les implications.

A hyperdominant left anterior descending coronary artery variation is a rare but important diagnosis because of the risk for large-territory ischemia. We describe a very rare presentation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in the distal portion of a hyperdominant left anterior descending coronary artery. No similar cases have been described.

Background Large observational studies have demonstrated a clear inverse association between renal function and risk of aortic stenosis (AS). Whether this represents a causal, reverse causal or correlative relationship remains unclear. We investigated this using a bidirectional 2‐sample Mendelian randomization approach. Methods and Results We collected summary statistics for the primary analysis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and AS from genome‐wide association study meta‐analyses including 480 698 and 653 867 participants, respectively. We collected further genome‐wide association study summary statistics from up to 1 004 040 participants for sensitivity analyses involving estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from creatinine, eGFR derived from cystatin C, and serum urea nitrogen. Inverse‐variance weighted was the primary analysis method, with weighted‐median, weighted‐mode, Mendelian randomization‐Egger, and Mendelian randomization‐Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier as sensitivity analyses. We did not find evidence of a causal relationship between genetically predicted CKD liability as the exposure and AS as the outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.94 per unit increase in log odds of genetic liability to CKD [95% CI, 0.85–1.04], P=0.26) nor robust evidence of AS liability as the exposure and CKD as the outcome (OR, 1.04 per unit increase in log odds of genetic liability to AS [95% CI, 0.97–1.12], P=0.30). The sensitivity analyses were neutral overall, as were the analyses using eGFR derived from creatinine, eGFR derived from cystatin C, and serum urea nitrogen. All positive controls demonstrated strong significant associations. Conclusions The present study did not find evidence of a substantial effect of genetically predicted renal impairment on risk of AS. This has important implications for research efforts that attempt to identify prevention and treatment targets for both CKD and AS.

Background: CT coronary angiography (CTCA) is a guideline-endorsed assessment for patients with stable angina and suspected coronary disease. Although associated with excellent negative predictive value in ruling out obstructive coronary disease, there are limitations in the ability of CTCA to predict hemodynamically significant coronary disease. The CAPTivAte study aims to assess the utility of Aggregated Plaque Burden (APB) in predicting ischemia based on Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who had a CTCA and invasive FFR of the LAD were included. The entire length of the LAD was analyzed using semi-automated software which characterized total plaque burden and plaque morphological subtype (including Low Attenuation Plaque (LAP), Non-calcific plaque (NCP) and Calcific Plaque (CP). Aggregated Plaque Burden (APB) was calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the association between these CT-derived parameters and invasive FFR. Results: There were 145 patients included in this study. 84.8 % of patients were referred with stable angina. There was a significant linear association between APB and FFR in both univariate and multivariate analysis (Adjusted R-squared = 0.0469; p = 0.035). Mean Agatston scores are higher in FFR positive vessels compared to FFR negative vessels (371.6 (±443.8) vs 251.9 (±283.5, p = 0.0493). Conclusion: CTCA-derived APB is a reliable predictor of ischemia assessed using invasive FFR and may aid clinicians in rationalizing invasive vs non-invasive management strategies. Vessel-specific Agatston scores are significantly higher in FFR-positive vessels than in FFR-negative vessels. Associations between HU-derived plaque subtype and invasive FFR were inconclusive in this study.