1. When and why do people change their minds in favor of vaccination? Longitudinal analyses of switching COVID-19 vaccination preferences.
- Author
-
Kroese F, van den Boom W, Buskens V, van Empelen P, Hulscher M, Ruiter RAC, Timmermans DRM, de Vries M, de Bruin M, and Lambooij M
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Adult, Longitudinal Studies, Netherlands, Vaccination psychology, Vaccination statistics & numerical data, Aged, Young Adult, SARS-CoV-2, Patient Acceptance of Health Care psychology, Patient Acceptance of Health Care statistics & numerical data, COVID-19 prevention & control, COVID-19 psychology, COVID-19 Vaccines administration & dosage, Vaccination Hesitancy psychology, Vaccination Hesitancy statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: Vaccinations are a cornerstone of public health. However, reluctance to accepting vaccines is common. Using longitudinal data, we investigated which individual and contextual factors were associated with switching preferences from initial hesitancy or unwillingness toward acceptance of a first COVID-19 vaccination., Methods: 12,512 participants of a Dutch cohort study who initially indicated being hesitant or unwilling to get vaccinated were included (December 2020-June 2022). Cox regression was used to determine what sociodemographic factors (e.g., age), vaccination-specific beliefs (e.g., perceived efficacy) and contextual factors (e.g., stringency of COVID-19 measures) were associated with switching toward getting vaccinated. Analyses were stratified into (1) the active campaign phase (over time more people became eligible for vaccination), versus (2) the residual phase (everyone was eligible and could still get vaccinated)., Results: Over time, 86% of initially hesitant and 34% of initially unwilling participants got vaccinated or intended to do so. Switching was less likely for people aged 40-54y (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.76 [95%CI = 0.69-0.84]) in phase 1, while in phase 2 they were more likely to do so (aHR = 1.44; 95%CI = 1.08-1.92). In both phases, people were more likely to switch if they had positive beliefs about its efficacy (phase 1: aHR = 1.76; 95%CI = 1.70-1.83; phase 2: aHR = 1.65; 95%CI = 1.54-1.77), and perceived getting vaccinated as the descriptive norm (phase 1: aHR = 1.30; 95%CI = 1.26-1.34; phase 2: aHR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.13-1.25). During stricter lockdown measures people were also more likely to switch (phase 1: aHR = 1.26; 95%CI = 1.25-1.28; phase 2: aHR = 1.09; 95%CI = 1.08-1.09)., Conclusion: A majority of initially hesitant people changed their minds about vaccination during the pandemic. Preference switches in favor of vaccination were most strongly associated with beliefs about the vaccine's efficacy in preventing illness. This study underlines the importance of providing up-to-date, balanced information and decisional support for people to weigh the benefits and risks of getting vaccinated versus not getting vaccinated., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The cohort study did not meet the requirements for ethical review as laid down in the Dutch Law for Research Involving Human Subjects (WMO) and was therefore exempted by the Centre for Clinical Expertise at RIVM from formal ethical review (Study number G&M-561). Written informed consent was provided by all participants. After completing their first questionnaire, participants were asked for consent to receive follow-up invitations. Participants were informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF