Search

Background: Within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), infants frequently receive packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions. Although medically necessary, potential negative long- and short-term outcomes exist following PRBC transfusions in very low birth-weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g). Synthesis of the literature demonstrates that the use of a restrictive PRBC transfusion policy can lead to a decreased number of transfusions administered with no increase in long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Blood transfusions have also been linked to the diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in VLBW infants., Purpose: For this quality improvement project, a restrictive PRBC transfusion policy was implemented in a level IV NICU to promote consistent care and evaluate changes in PRBC administration., Methods: The data were collected both pre- and post-policy implementation including: the number of blood transfusions, diagnosis of NEC, and diagnosis of IVH among infants <1500 g., Results: The data showed no significant change in the number of PRBC transfusions administered. Likewise, few infants were diagnosed with NEC or IVH during this same time period with minimal change between pre- and post-policy implementation data., Implications for Practice and Research: Following policy implementation, there was a significant improvement in communication among providers regarding transfusion ordering and the inclusion of hematocrit thresholds in daily progress notes. This unintended outcome has helped to promote sustainability and enhance patient care within the NICU where this policy was implemented. Continued data collection may be beneficial in indicating whether a standardized PRBC transfusion policy will impact the administration of transfusions and diagnosis of NEC or IVH., Competing Interests: Competing Interests:The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by The National Association of Neonatal Nurses.)

Background: Advanced neonatal resuscitation events are high-risk, low-volume critical situations. Healthcare systems have placed emphasis on improving resuscitation skills for advanced providers based on evidence showing that it can directly impact patient outcomes. Neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) renewal is only required every 2 years. This gap and low usage of skills can result in lack of competency and expertise leading to an increased risk of poor patient outcomes., Purpose: This project aimed to provide simulation education based on NRP curriculum for a large group of advanced providers at multiple level II, III, and IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to improve confidence and knowledge in advanced resuscitation., Methods: A high-fidelity mannequin was used to simulate a reproducible, critical scenario that spanned the entire NRP algorithm. NRP knowledge and the effectiveness of simulation on confidence and knowledge in neonatal resuscitation were measured., Results: The average knowledge score from the pretest to the posttest improved by 7%. Based on the simulation evaluation tool-modified (SET-M), debriefing was the most effective in improving confidence and knowledge. The neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs) with the most years of clinical experience had the largest improvement in knowledge., Implications for Practice and Research: With the most experienced NNPs providing majority of coverage in the Level II NICUs, a correlation may be drawn that the effect of simulations on NRP knowledge has a greater impact on these groups due to the low exposure of advanced resuscitation events at these sites. Debriefing stood out as the most critical component of simulation., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by The National Association of Neonatal Nurses.)