Search

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide in men and women. In the metastasized stage, treatment options and prognosis are limited. To address the high medical need of this patient population, we generated a CD276xCD3 bispecific antibody termed CC-3. CD276 is expressed on CRC cells and on tumor vessels, thereby allowing for a "dual" anticancer effect. Methods and analysis: This first-in-human clinical study is planned as a prospective multicenter trial, enrolling patients with metastatic CRC after three lines of therapy. During the dose-escalation part, initially, an accelerated titration design with single-patient cohorts is employed. Here, each patient will receive a fixed dose level (starting with 50 µg for the first patient); however, between patients, dose level may be increased by up to 100%, depending on the decision of a safety review committee. Upon occurrence of any adverse events (AEs) grade ≥2, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), or reaching a dose level of ≥800 µg, the escalation will switch to a standard 3 + 3 dose design. After maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been determined, defined as no more than one of the six patients experiencing DLT, an additional 14 patients receive CC-3 at the MTD level in the dose-expansion phase. Primary endpoints are incidence and severity of AEs, as well as the best objective response to the treatment according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Secondary endpoints include overall safety, efficacy, survival, quality of life, and pharmacokinetic investigations. Ethics and dissemination: The CD276xCD3 study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (P00702). Clinical trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration numbers: ClinicalTrials.cov Registry (NCT05999396) and EU ClinicalTrials Registry (EU trial number 2022-503084- 15-00). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT In a randomized phase II trial (AMLSG 14‐09, NCT00867672) of elderly, newly diagnosed AML patients, ATRA combined with decitabine (DEC) significantly improved the overall response rate (ORR) and survival also in patients with adverse‐risk genetics, without adding toxicity. We performed a post hoc analysis to determine the predictive impact of TP53 status. Despite a nominally higher ORR, the clinically meaningful survival benefit when adding ATRA to DEC was diminished, but not completely negated, in TP53‐mutated patients. Indeed, 2 out of 14 TP53‐mutated patients (14%) randomized to a DEC + ATRA‐containing regimen lived for > 36 months. Further studies of ATRA combined with hypomethylating agents appear warranted in non‐M3 AML patients ineligible for HMA/venetoclax therapy.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00867672 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated response to VEN/HMA in 46 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) characterized by extramedullary disease (EMD). Median age was 65 (range, 19-81) years. Patients had a median of two EMD sites (range, 1-5) and 35 (76%) patients had concurrent bone marrow involvement. Twenty (43%) patients had highrisk genetic features according to the European Leukemia Net 2022 classification. Twenty-nine (63%) were relapsed or refractory after intensive chemotherapy (CTX) including 13 (28%) with prior allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Patients received a median of 2 cycles of VEN/HMA (range, 1-31). Twenty (43%) patients achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) after VEN/HMA and five (11%) achieved a partial remission (PR). Six patients were subsequently consolidated with allo-HCT (CR/CRi, n=4; PR, n=2). Median follow-up was 49.1 months (95%-CI, 26.1 months - not reached) and median overall survival (OS) 6.4 months (95%-CI, 5.1-11 months). One-year and 2-years OS rates were 29.3% (95%-CI, 18.6-46.2%) and 12.3% (95%-CI, 5.5-27.6%), respectively. Age with a cut-off of 60 years had no impact on OS (P=0.90). Relapse occurred in 12 of 20 (60%) patients who achieved CR/CRi after VEN/HMA treatment. Of those, all except one succumbed to their disease. Six (30%) patients were in CR/CRi at last follow-up and 2 (10%) died in CR. In our cohort of patients with AML with EMD with high-risk features, treatment with VEN/HMA resulted in an encouraging ORR of 54% with a CR/CRi rate of 43.5%. However, VEN/HMA alone may not be effective in maintaining disease control.

Not available.

We evaluated 58 patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL; median age 42.5 years; range, 16-69 years), treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) between 2016-2022 and who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) consecutively. Forty-seven (81%) of the 58 patients were heavily pretreated receiving intensive chemotherapy +/- tyrosine kinase inhibitor, blinatumomab in 24 (41%) and allo-HCT at first-line in 11 (19%) patients. Complete remission rate prior to allo-HCT was 84%. Median follow-up was 30.5 months and median overall survival (OS) measured from start of INO was 11.2 months. One- and 2-year OS rates were 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.4-56.1) and 36.7% (95% CI: 25.5-52.9), respectively. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/venous occlusive disease (SOS/ VOD) after allo-HCT occurred in 17 (29%) patients. Of those, nine (53%) patients died due to SOS/VOD and multi-organ failure. Two had received >2 INO cycles (3 cycles, 5 cycles, N=1, each), all others ≤2 INO cycles prior to allo-HCT. Logistic regression analysis revealed conditioning with double alkylators (P=0.038) and allo-HCT during first-line therapy (P=0.050) as significant risk factors for SOS/VOD and in trend allo-HCT ≤60 days from last INO application (P=0.07), whereas number of INO cycles before allo-HCT and time between last INO application and allo-HCT were not significant. Relapse/progressive disease occurred in 20 (34%) patients. Of those, five (25%) patients are still alive, whereas 15 succumbed of their disease. Treatment with INO seems to be an effective approach with successful bridge-to-transplant. However, risk of SOS/VOD is high, necessitating continuous monitoring and recognition of SOS/VOD risk factors.