Search

Background: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have immunomodulatory and hematopoiesis-supporting properties that could potentially benefit hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) engraftment and decrease the incidence and/or severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)., Methods: Based on our previous pilot study, we established a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy of co-infusing third-party MSC (1.5-3 × 10 6 /kg) versus placebo on the day of HSC transplantation (HCT) to prevent GVHD in recipients of HLA-mismatched unrelated donors after reduced-intensity conditioning., Results: The study planned to include 120 patients to improve 1-year overall survival (OS) from 55 to 77% but was stopped after 9 years for low recruitment (n = 38). One-year OS was 74% in the MSC group and 80% in the placebo group. In multivariate analysis, the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was significantly lower in patients receiving MSC (HR 0.332, 95% CI 0.124-0.890, p = 0.0284). No difference was observed in the incidences of chronic GVHD, infection or relapse, overall or progression-free survival at 1 year or long-term, or hematopoietic and immune reconstitution., Conclusions: Despite premature study closure, the suggested beneficial effect of MSC co-transplantation for the prevention of acute GVHD in HLA-mismatched HCT warrants further investigation., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The protocol “Co-transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells and HLA-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic cells after nonmyeloablative conditioning: a phase II randomized double-blind study” was approved centrally by the “Comité d’Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liège” on 6 July 2010 (file 2010/16) as well as by the ethics committees of all participating centers and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Before participating in the study, all patients (or their legal representatives if minors) signed an informed consent form. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter (MCU) plays crucial role in intramitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, allowing Ca2+-dependent activation of oxidative metabolism. In recent decades, the role of MCU pore-forming proteins has been highlighted in cancer. However, the contribution of MCU-associated regulatory proteins mitochondrial calcium uptake 1 and 2 (MICU1 and MICU2) to pathophysiological conditions has been poorly investigated. Here, we describe the role of MICU2 in cell proliferation and invasion using in vitro and in vivo models of human colorectal cancer (CRC). Transcriptomic analysis demonstrated an increase in MICU2 expression and the MICU2/MICU1 ratio in advanced CRC and CRC-derived metastases. We report that expression of MICU2 is necessary for mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and quality of the mitochondrial network. Our data reveal the interplay between MICU2 and MICU1 in the metabolic flexibility between anaerobic glycolysis and OXPHOS. Overall, our study sheds light on the potential role of the MICUs in diseases associated with metabolic reprogramming., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist, (Copyright: © 2024 Robert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Despite the growing evidence supporting the existence of CNS involvement in acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (CNS-GvHD), the characteristics and course of the disease are still largely unknown. In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical, biological, radiological, and histopathological characteristics, as well as the clinical course of 66 patients diagnosed with possible CNS-GvHD (pCNS-GvHD), selected by predetermined diagnostic criteria. Results were then contrasted depending on whether pCNS-GvHD occurred before or after day 100 following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Median time between hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and pCNS-GvHD onset was 149 days (IQ25-75 48-321), and pCNS-GvHD onset occurred before day 100 following transplantation in 44% of patients. The most frequent findings at presentation were cognitive impairment (41%), paresis (21%), altered consciousness (20%), sensory impairment (18%), and headache (15%). Clinical presentation did not significantly differ between patients with pCNS-GvHD occurring before or after day 100 following transplantation. Brain MRI found abnormalities compatible with the clinical picture in 57% of patients, while CT detected abnormalities in only 7%. Seven patients had documented spinal cord MRI abnormalities, all of them with pCNS-GvHD occurring after day 100 following transplantation. In the cerebrospinal fluid, white blood cell count was increased in 56% of the population (median 18 cells/μL). Histopathological analyses were performed on 12 specimens and were suggestive of pCNS-GvHD in 10. All compatible specimens showed parenchymal and perivascular infiltration by CD3+ and CD163+ cells. Immunosuppressive therapy was prescribed in 97% of patients, achieving complete clinical response in 27%, partial improvement in 47% and stable disease in 6%. Response to immunosuppressive therapy did not significantly differ between patients with pCNS-GvHD occurring before or after day 100 following transplantation. Clinical relapse was observed in 31% of patients who initially responded to treatment. One-year overall survival following pCNS-GvHD onset was 41%. Onset before day 100 following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HR [95%CI]: 2.1 [1.0-4.5]; P=0.041) and altered consciousness at initial presentation (HR [95%CI]: 3.0 [1.3-6.7]; P=0.0077) were associated with a reduced one-year overall survival probability. Among surviving patients, 61% had neurological sequelae. This study supports that immune-mediated CNS manifestations may occur following allo-HSCT. These can be associated with both acute and chronic GvHD and carry a grim prognosis. The clinical presentation as well as the radiological and biological findings appear variable., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

The IA-DUET study aimed to compare azole-echinocandin combination with azole monotherapy for invasive aspergillosis. Recruitment was hindered by patient ineligibility, competing studies, and guidelines favoring combination therapy when azole resistance was unknown. The low IA-attributable mortality suggests future trials may benefit from cluster randomization or composite endpoints to enhance efficiency., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

In this SFGM-TC registry study, we report the results after stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in 305 myelofibrosis patients, in order to determine potential risk factors associated with outcomes, especially regarding previous treatment with ruxolitinib. A total of 102 patients were transplanted from an HLA-matched-sibling donor (MSD), and 143 patients received ruxolitinib. In contrast with previous studies, our results showed significantly worse outcomes for ruxolitinib patients regarding overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM), especially in the context of unrelated donors (URD). When exploring reasons for potential confounders regarding the ruxolitinib effect, an interaction between the type of donor and the use of ATG was found, therefore subsequent analyses were performed separately for each type of donor. Multivariable analyses did not confirm a significant negative impact of ruxolitinib in transplantation outcomes. In the setting of URD, only age and Fludarabine-Melphalan (FM) conditioning were associated with increased NRM. For MSD, only Karnoksfy <70% was associated with reduced OS. However, a propensity score analysis showed that ruxolitinib had a negative impact on OS but only in non-responding patients, consistent with previous data. To conclude, with all the precautions due to confounders and bias, ruxolitinib itself does not appear to increase mortality after HSCT., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Venous access device-related bloodstream infection (VAD-BSI) with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Standard systemic antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated VAD-BSI with methicillin-resistant CoNS consists of intravenous (IV) vancomycin (vanco). This requires hospitalization, needs new competent venous access, exposes patients to potential toxicity (mainly renal) and increases the risk of commensal flora dysbiosis with selection of vanco-resistant enterococci. Combined with VAD management (removal or antibiotic locks), oral minocycline (mino) has been evaluated as an alternative systemic therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated VAD-BSIs with CoNS at our center, primarily when the reference treatment with IV vanco was not possible (renal failure or allergy) or when hospitalization was refused by patients. Here, we retrospectively report our single center experience with this mino-based approach., Patients and Methods: From January 2012 to December 2020, 24 uncomplicated VAD-BSIs with CoNS in 23 alloHCT patients were treated with oral mino as systemic antibiotic therapy in combination with VAD management. VAD were implantable ports (n = 17), tunneled catheter (n = 1) or PIC-lines (n = 6). Staphylococci were S. epidermidis (n = 21) or S. haemolyticus (n = 3). Mino was administered with a loading dose of 200 mg followed by 100 mg BID for 7-14 days. For 8 VAD-BSIs, patients were initially treated with IV vanco for the first 1-3 days followed by oral mino, while 16 VAD-BSIs were treated with oral mino as the sole antimicrobial agent for systemic therapy. VAD management consisted of catheter removal (for tunneled catheters and PIC-lines, n = 7) or antibiotic locks with vanco (n = 15) or gentamicin (n = 2) administered at least 3 times a week for 14 days (for ports)., Results: Overall, clearance of bacteremia (as assessed by negativity for the same CoNS of surveillance peripheral blood cultures drawn between day+ 3 and +30 after initiation of systemic therapy) was achieved in all but 1 patient (with port) who had persistent bacteremia at day +9. No complication such as suppurative thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, distant foci of infection or BSI-related death was observed in any patient during the 3-month period after initiation of treatment. Regarding the 17 port-BSI cases for which VAD conservative strategy was attempted, failure of 3-month VAD preservation was documented in 7/17 cases and 3-month recurrence of VAD-BSI was observed in 3/17 cases (with 1 patient with cellulitis). Treatment with mino was well tolerated except for a mild skin rash in one patient., Conclusion: Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety of this approach., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Despite modern antimicrobial treatments, bacterial and fungal infections remain major complications in neutropenic patients. Granulocyte transfusions appeared in the 1950s-60s but first clinical trials were limited by the difficulty of transfusing enough viable granulocytes. The refinement of apheresis techniques as well as donor pretreatment with corticosteroids and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (G-CSF) have led to improved collection yield. Despite this, uncertainties remain regarding the real clinical usefulness of granulocyte transfusions. Few studies have been carried out since the G-CSF era and the quality of scientific evidence remains low, mainly because of small case series. The largest prospective randomized controlled study published so far failed to demonstrate any benefit of therapeutic granulocyte transfusions on mortality or infection control. However, the quality of this trial is limited due to its low statistical power (insufficient patient recruitment). Moreover, granulocyte transfusions are complex procedures, burdensome for the donor, expensive and associated with a significant risk of adverse effects. Therefore, the current place of granulocyte transfusion in clinical practice is guided by the experience of each center. With the increasing emergence of multi-resistant germs, it is likely that granulocyte transfusion will become interesting in the coming years. Standardization of collection and administration procedures and the final proof of their (in)effectiveness will remain the challenges for the future.