18 results on '"Shaffrey, Mark E."'
Search Results
2. Impact of Educational Background on Preoperative Disease Severity and Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
- Author
-
Agarwal, Nitin, DiGiorgio, Anthony, Michalopoulos, Giorgos D., Letchuman, Vijay, Chan, Andrew K., Shabani, Saman, Lavadi, Raj Swaroop, Lu, Daniel C., Wang, Michael Y., Haid, Regis W., Knightly, John J., Sherrod, Brandon A., Gottfried, Oren N., Shaffrey, Christopher I., Goldberg, Jacob L., Virk, Michael S., Hussain, Ibrahim, Glassman, Steven D., Shaffrey, Mark E., Park, Paul, Foley, Kevin T., Pennicooke, Brenton, Coric, Domagoj, Upadhyaya, Cheerag, Potts, Eric A., Tumialán, Luis M., Fu, Kai-Ming G., Asher, Anthony L., Bisson, Erica F., Chou, Dean, Bydon, Mohamad, and Mummaneni, Praveen V.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Impact of educational background on preoperative disease severity and postoperative outcomes among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Quality Outcomes Database study.
- Author
-
Agarwal, Nitin, Chan, Andrew K., Bisson, Erica F., Glassman, Steven D., Foley, Kevin T., Shaffrey, Christopher I., Gottfried, Oren N., Tumialán, Luis M., Potts, Eric A., Shaffrey, Mark E., Coric, Domagoj, Knightly, John J., Ibrahim, Sufyan, Mitha, Rida, Michalopoulos, Giorgos, Park, Paul, Wang, Michael Y., Kai-Ming Fu, Slotkin, Jonathan R., and Asher, Anthony L.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and driving abilities: defining the prevalence and long-term postoperative outcomes using the Quality Outcomes Database
- Author
-
Agarwal, Nitin, primary, Johnson, Sarah E., additional, Bydon, Mohamad, additional, Bisson, Erica F., additional, Chan, Andrew K., additional, Shabani, Saman, additional, Letchuman, Vijay, additional, Michalopoulos, Giorgos D., additional, Lu, Daniel C., additional, Wang, Michael Y., additional, Lavadi, Raj Swaroop, additional, Haid, Regis W., additional, Knightly, John J., additional, Sherrod, Brandon A., additional, Gottfried, Oren N., additional, Shaffrey, Christopher I., additional, Goldberg, Jacob L., additional, Virk, Michael S., additional, Hussain, Ibrahim, additional, Glassman, Steven D., additional, Shaffrey, Mark E., additional, Park, Paul, additional, Foley, Kevin T., additional, Pennicooke, Brenton, additional, Coric, Domagoj, additional, Slotkin, Jonathan R., additional, Upadhyaya, Cheerag, additional, Potts, Eric A., additional, Tumialán, Luis M., additional, Chou, Dean, additional, Fu, Kai-Ming G., additional, Asher, Anthony L., additional, and Mummaneni, Praveen V., additional
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Does the number of social factors affect long-term patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction in those with cervical myelopathy? A QOD study
- Author
-
Park, Christine, primary, Shaffrey, Christopher I., additional, Than, Khoi D., additional, Bisson, Erica F., additional, Sherrod, Brandon A., additional, Asher, Anthony L., additional, Coric, Domagoj, additional, Potts, Eric A., additional, Foley, Kevin T., additional, Wang, Michael Y., additional, Fu, Kai-Ming, additional, Virk, Michael S., additional, Knightly, John J., additional, Meyer, Scott, additional, Park, Paul, additional, Upadhyaya, Cheerag, additional, Shaffrey, Mark E., additional, Buchholz, Avery L., additional, Tumialán, Luis M., additional, Turner, Jay D., additional, Agarwal, Nitin, additional, Chan, Andrew K., additional, Chou, Dean, additional, Chaudhry, Nauman S., additional, Haid, Regis W., additional, Mummaneni, Praveen V., additional, Michalopoulos, Georgios D., additional, Bydon, Mohamad, additional, and Gottfried, Oren N., additional
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. What predicts the best 24-month outcomes following surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A QOD prospective registry study.
- Author
-
Chan, Andrew K., Park, Christine, Shaffrey, Christopher I., Gottfried, Oren N., Than, Khoi D., Bisson, Erica F., Bydon, Mohamad, Asher, Anthony L., Coric, Domagoj, Potts, Eric A., Foley, Kevin T., Wang, Michael Y., Kai-Ming Fu, Virk, Michael S., Knightly, John J., Meyer, Scott, Park, Paul, Upadhyaya, Cheerag D., Shaffrey, Mark E., and Buchholz, Avery L.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Does diabetes affect outcome or reoperation rate after lumbar decompression or arthrodesis? A matched analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database data set.
- Author
-
Mooney, James, Nathani, Karim Rizwan, Zeitouni, Daniel, Michalopoulos, Giorgos D., Wang, Michael Y., Coric, Domagoj, Chan, Andrew K., Lu, Daniel C., Sherrod, Brandon A., Gottfried, Oren N., Shaffrey, Christopher I., Than, Khoi D., Goldberg, Jacob L., Hussain, Ibrahim, Virk, Michael S., Agarwal, Nitin, Glassman, Steven D., Shaffrey, Mark E., Park, Paul, and Foley, Kevin T.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. What factors influence surgical decision-making in anterior versus posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy? A QOD analysis.
- Author
-
Park, Christine, Shaffrey, Christopher I., Than, Khoi D., Michalopoulos, Giorgos D., El Sammak, Sally, Chan, Andrew K., Bisson, Erica F., Sherrod, Brandon A., Asher, Anthony L., Coric, Domagoj, Potts, Eric A., Foley, Kevin T., Wang, Michael Y., Kai-Ming Fu, Virk, Michael S., Knightly, John J., Meyer, Scott, Park, Paul, Upadhyaya, Cheerag, and Shaffrey, Mark E.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Incidence of revision surgery and patient-reported outcomes within 5 years of the index procedure for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis data.
- Author
-
Birlingmair J, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Mummaneni PV, Asher A, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Chan AK, Chou D, Coric D, Foley KT, Fu KM, Haid R, Knightly JJ, Le VP, Park P, Potts EA, Shaffrey CI, Shaffrey ME, Slotkin JR, Virk MS, Wang MY, and Glassman SD
- Abstract
Objective: Some patients treated surgically for grade 1 spondylolisthesis require revision surgery. Outcomes after revision surgery are not well studied. The objective of this study was to determine how revision surgery impacts patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing decompression only or decompression and fusion (D+F) for grade 1 spondylolisthesis within 5 years of the index surgery., Methods: Patients in the 12 highest Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) enrolling sites with a diagnosis of grade 1 spondylolisthesis were identified and the incidence of revision surgery between the decompression-only and D+F patients were compared. PROs were compared between cohorts requiring revision surgery versus a single index procedure., Results: Of 608 patients enrolled, 409 had complete 5-year data available for this study. Eleven (13.3%) of 83 patients underwent revision in the decompression-only group as well as 32 (9.8%) of 326 in the D+F group. For the entire cohort, patients requiring revision had significantly worse PROs at 5 years: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 27.4 versus 19.4, p = 0.008; numeric rating scale for back pain (NRS-BP) 4.1 versus 3.0, p = 0.013; and NRS for leg pain (NRS-LP) 3.4 versus 2.1, p = 0.029. In the decompression-only group, the change in 5-year PROs was not impacted by revision status: ODI 31.9 versus 24.2, p = 0.287; NRS-BP 1.9 versus 2.9, p = 0.325; and NRS-LP 6.2 versus 3.7, p = 0.011. In the D+F group, the change in 5-year PROs was diminished if patients required revision: ODI 19.1 versus 29.1, p = 0.001; NRS-BP 3.0 versus 4.0, p = 0.170; and NRS-LP 2.3 versus 4.6, p = 0.001., Conclusions: The most common reasons for reoperation within 5 years in the decompression-only group were repeat decompression and instability, whereas in the D+F group the most common reason was adjacent-segment disease. The need for revision resulted in modestly diminished benefit compared with patients with no revisions. These differences were greater in the fusion cohort compared with the decompression-only cohort. The mean PRO improvement still far exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds for all measures for patients who underwent a revision surgery.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Do obese patients undergoing surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis have worse outcomes at 5 years' follow-up? A QOD study.
- Author
-
Zammar SG, Ambati VS, Yee TJ, Patel A, Le VP, Alan N, Coric D, Potts EA, Bisson EF, Knightly JJ, Fu KM, Foley KT, Shaffrey ME, Bydon M, Chou D, Chan AK, Meyer S, Asher AL, Shaffrey CI, Slotkin JR, Wang M, Haid R, Glassman SD, Park P, Virk M, and Mummaneni PV
- Abstract
Objective: The long-term effects of increased body mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes are unknown for patients who undergo surgery for low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. The goal of this study was to assess long-term outcomes in obese versus nonobese patients after surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis., Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the Quality Outcomes Database's 12 highest enrolling sites (SpineCORe group) were identified. Long-term (5-year) outcomes were compared for patients with BMI ≥ 35 versus BMI < 35., Results: In total, 608 patients (57.6% female) were included. Follow-up was 81% (excluding patients who had died) at 5 years. The BMI ≥ 35 cohort (130 patients, 21.4%) was compared to the BMI < 35 cohort (478 patients, 78.6%). At baseline, patients with BMI ≥ 35 were more likely to be younger (58.5 ± 11.4 vs 63.2 ± 12.0 years old, p < 0.001), to present with both back and leg pain (53.8% vs 37.0%, p = 0.002), and to require ambulation assistance (20.8% vs 9.2%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the cohort with BMI ≥ 35 had worse baseline patient-reported outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS) back (7.6 ± 2.3 vs 6.5 ± 2.8, p < 0.001) and leg (7.1 ± 2.6 vs 6.4 ± 2.9, p = 0.031) pain, disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (53.7 ± 15.7 vs 44.8 ± 17.0, p < 0.001), and quality of life on EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire (0.47 ± 0.22 vs 0.56 ± 0.22, p < 0.001). Patients with BMI ≥ 35 were more likely to undergo fusion (85.4% vs 74.7%, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in 30- and 90-day readmission rates (p > 0.05). Five years postoperatively, there were no differences in reoperation rates or the development of adjacent-segment disease for patients in either BMI < 35 or ≥ 35 cohorts who underwent fusion (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, BMI ≥ 35 was a significant risk factor for not achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for VAS leg pain (OR 0.429, 95% CI 0.209-0.876, p = 0.020), but BMI ≥ 35 was not a predictor for achieving MCID for VAS back pain, ODI, or EQ-5D at 5 years postoperatively., Conclusions: Both obese and nonobese patients benefit from surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis. At the 5-year time point, patients with BMI ≥ 35 have similarly low reoperation rates and achieve rates of satisfaction and MCID for back pain (but not leg pain), disability (ODI), and quality of life (EQ-5D) that are similar to those in patients with a BMI < 35.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Do class III obese patients achieve similar outcomes and satisfaction to nonobese patients following surgery for cervical myelopathy? A QOD study.
- Author
-
Park C, Bhowmick DA, Shaffrey CI, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Asher AL, Coric D, Potts EA, Foley KT, Wang MY, Fu KM, Virk MS, Knightly JJ, Meyer S, Park P, Upadhyaya C, Shaffrey ME, Schupper AJ, Uribe JS, Tumialán LM, Turner JD, Chan AK, Chou D, Haid RW, Mummaneni PV, and Gottfried ON
- Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the rate of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction between cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with and without class III obesity who underwent surgery., Methods: The authors analyzed patients from the 14 highest-enrolling sites in the prospective Quality Outcomes Database CSM cohort. Patients were dichotomized based on whether or not they were obese (class III, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). PROs including visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), EQ-5D, and North American Spine Society patient satisfaction scores were collected at baseline and 24 months after cervical spine surgery., Results: Of the 1141 patients with CSM who underwent surgery, 230 (20.2%) were obese and 911 (79.8%) were not. The 24-month follow-up rate was 87.4% for PROs. Patients who were obese were younger (58.1 ± 12.1 years vs 61.2 ± 11.6 years, p = 0.001), more frequently female (57.4% vs 44.9%, p = 0.001), and African American (22.6% vs 13.4%, p = 0.002) and had a lower education level (high school or less: 49.1% vs 40.8%, p = 0.002) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (2.7 ± 0.5 vs 2.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Clinically at baseline, the obese group had worse neck pain (VAS score: 5.7 ± 3.2 vs 5.1 ± 3.3), arm pain (VAS score: 5.4 ± 3.5 vs 4.8 ± 3.5), disability (NDI score: 42.7 ± 20.4 vs 37.4 ± 20.7), quality of life (EQ-5D score: 0.54 ± 0.22 vs 0.56 ± 0.22), and function (mJOA score: 11.6 ± 2.8 vs 12.2 ± 2.8) (all p < 0.05). At the 24-month follow-up, however, there was no difference in the change in PROs between the two groups. Even after accounting for relevant covariates, no significant difference in achievement of MCID and satisfaction was observed between the two groups at 24 months., Conclusions: Despite the class III obese group having worse baseline clinical presentations, the two cohorts achieved similar rates of satisfaction and MCID in PROs. Class III obesity should not preclude and/or delay surgical management for patients who would otherwise benefit from surgery for CSM.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Predictors of patient satisfaction after surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 5-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
- Author
-
Dru A, Johnson SE, Linzey JR, Foley KT, Digiorgio A, Alan N, Coric D, Potts EA, Bisson EF, Knightly JJ, Fu KM, Shaffrey ME, Weaver J, Bydon M, Chou D, Meyer SA, Asher AL, Shaffrey CI, Slotkin JR, Wang MY, Haid RW, Glassman SD, Virk MS, Mummaneni PV, and Park P
- Abstract
Objective: Lumbar decompression and/or fusion surgery is a common operation for symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis refractory to conservative management. Multiyear follow-up of patient outcomes can be difficult to obtain but allows for identification of preoperative patient characteristics associated with durable pain relief, improved functional outcome, and higher patient satisfaction., Methods: A query of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) low-grade spondylolisthesis module for patients who underwent surgery for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis (from July 2014 to June 2016 at the 12 highest-enrolling sites) was used to identify patient satisfaction, as measured with the North American Spine Society (NASS) questionnaire, which uses a scale of 1-4. Patients were considered satisfied if they had a score ≤ 2. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify baseline demographic and clinical predictors of long-term satisfaction 5 years after surgery., Results: Of 573 eligible patients from a cohort of 608, patient satisfaction data were available for 81.2%. Satisfaction (NASS score of 1 or 2) was reported by 389 patients (83.7%) at 5-year follow-up. Satisfied patients were predominantly White and ambulation independent and had lower baseline BMI, lower back pain levels, lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and greater EQ-5D index scores at baseline when compared to the unsatisfied group. No significant differences in reoperation rates between groups were reported at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, patients who were independently ambulating at baseline had greater odds of long-term satisfaction (OR 1.12, p = 0.04). Patients who had higher 5-year ODI scores (OR 0.99, p < 0.01) and were uninsured (OR 0.43, p = 0.01) were less likely to report long-term satisfaction., Conclusions: Lumbar surgery for the treatment of grade 1 spondylolisthesis can provide lasting pain relief with high patient satisfaction. Baseline independent ambulation is associated with a higher long-term satisfaction rate after surgery. Higher ODI scores at 5-year follow-up and uninsured status are associated with lower postoperative long-term satisfaction.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Predictors of patient satisfaction in the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
- Author
-
Schupper AJ, DiDomenico J, Farber SH, Johnson SE, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Asher AL, Coric D, Potts EA, Foley KT, Wang MY, Fu KM, Virk MS, Shaffrey CI, Gottfried ON, Park C, Knightly JJ, Meyer S, Park P, Upadhyaya C, Shaffrey ME, Chan AK, Tumialán LM, Chou D, Haid RW, Mummaneni PV, Uribe JS, and Turner JD
- Abstract
Objective: Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) experience progressive neurological impairment. Surgical intervention is often pursued to halt neurological symptom progression and allow for recovery of function. In this paper, the authors explore predictors of patient satisfaction following surgical intervention for CSM., Methods: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the multicenter Quality Outcomes Database. Patients who underwent surgical intervention for CSM with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Patient-reported satisfaction was defined as a North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction score of 1 or 2. Patient demographics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were assessed as related to patient satisfaction. Patient quality of life scores were measured at baseline and 24-month time points. Univariate regression analyses were performed using the chi-square test or Student t-test to assess patient satisfaction measures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess for factors predictive of postoperative satisfaction at 24 months., Results: A total of 1140 patients at 14 institutions with CSM who underwent surgical intervention were included, and 944 completed a patient satisfaction survey at 24 months postoperatively. The baseline modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score was 12.0 ± 2.8. A total of 793 (84.0%) patients reported satisfaction (NASS score 1 or 2) after 2 years. Male and female patients reported similar satisfaction rates (female sex: 47.0% not satisfied vs 48.5% satisfied, p = 0.73). Black race was associated with less satisfaction (26.5% not satisfied vs 13.2% satisfied, p < 0.01). Baseline psychiatric comorbidities, obesity, and length of stay did not correlate with 24-month satisfaction. Crossing the cervicothoracic junction did not affect satisfactory scores (p = 0.19), and minimally invasive approaches were not associated with increased patient satisfaction (p = 0.14). Lower baseline numeric rating scale neck pain scores (5.03 vs 5.61, p = 0.04) and higher baseline mJOA scores (12.28 vs 11.66, p = 0.01) were associated with higher satisfaction rates., Conclusions: Surgical treatment of CSM results in a high rate of patient satisfaction (84.0%) at the 2-year follow-up. Patients with milder myelopathy report higher satisfaction rates, suggesting that intervention earlier in the disease process may result in greater long-term satisfaction.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Cost-effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis: a 5-year Quality Outcomes Database study.
- Author
-
Yee TJ, Liles C, Johnson SE, Ambati VS, DiGiorgio AM, Alan N, Coric D, Potts EA, Bisson EF, Knightly JJ, Fu KG, Foley KT, Shaffrey ME, Bydon M, Chou D, Chan AK, Meyer S, Asher AL, Shaffrey CI, Slotkin JR, Wang MY, Haid RW, Glassman SD, Virk MS, Mummaneni PV, and Park P
- Abstract
Objective: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), referred to as "PLIF/TLIF," is a commonly performed operation for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Its long-term cost-effectiveness has not been well described. The aim of this study was to determine the 5-year cost-effectiveness of PLIF/TLIF for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using prospective data collected from the multicenter Quality Outcomes Database (QOD)., Methods: Patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter QOD grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis module were included if they underwent single-stage PLIF/TLIF. EQ-5D scores at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and 60 months were used to calculate gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with surgery relative to preoperative baseline. Healthcare-related costs associated with the index surgery and related reoperations were calculated using Medicare reimbursement-based cost estimates and validated using price transparency diagnosis-related group (DRG) charges and Medicare charge-to-cost ratios (CCRs). Cost per QALY gained over 60 months postoperatively was assessed., Results: Across 12 surgical centers, 385 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 60.2 (95% CI 59.1-61.3) years, and 38% of patients were male. The reoperation rate was 5.7%. DRG 460 cost estimates were stable between our Medicare reimbursement-based models and the CCR-based model, validating the focus on Medicare reimbursement. Across the entire cohort, the mean QALY gain at 60 months postoperatively was 1.07 (95% CI 0.97-1.18), and the mean cost of PLIF/TLIF was $31,634. PLIF/TLIF was associated with a mean 60-month cost per QALY gained of $29,511. Among patients who did not undergo reoperation (n = 363), the mean 60-month QALY gain was 1.10 (95% CI 0.99-1.20), and cost per QALY gained was $27,591. Among those who underwent reoperation (n = 22), the mean 60-month QALY gain was 0.68 (95% CI 0.21-1.15), and the cost per QALY gained was $80,580., Conclusions: PLIF/TLIF for degenerative grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis was associated with a mean 60-month cost per QALY gained of $29,511 with Medicare fees. This is far below the well-established societal willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, suggesting long-term cost-effectiveness. PLIF/TLIF remains cost-effective for patients who undergo reoperation.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Predictors of Delayed Clinical Benefit Following Surgical Treatment for Low Grade Spondylolisthesis.
- Author
-
Djurasovic M, Carreon LY, Bisson EF, Chan AK, Bydon M, Mummaneni PV, Foley KT, Shaffrey CI, Potts EA, Shaffrey ME, Coric D, Knightly JJ, Park P, Wang MY, Fu KM, Slotkin JR, Asher AL, Virk MS, Chou D, Haid RW, and Glassman SD
- Abstract
Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data., Objective: To investigate what factors predict delayed improvement after surgical treatment of low grade spondylolisthesis., Summary of Background Data: Lumbar surgery leads to clinical improvement in the majority of patients with low grade spondylolisthesis. Most patients improve rapidly after surgery, but some patients demonstrate a delayed clinical course., Methods: The Quality and Outcomes Database (QOD) was queried for grade 1 spondylolisthesis patients who underwent surgery who had patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-months, including back and leg pain numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Patients were stratified as "Early responders" reaching MCID at 3 months and maintaining improvement through 12 months and "Delayed responders" not reaching MCID at 3 months but ultimately reaching MCID at 12 months. These two groups were compared with respect to factors which predicted delayed improvement., Results: Of 608 patients enrolled, 436 (72%) met inclusion criteria for this study. Overall, 317 patients (72.7%) reached MCID for ODI at 12 months following surgery. Of these patients, 249 (78.5%) exhibited a rapid clinical improvement trajectory and had achieved ODI MCID threshold by the 3-month postop follow-up. 68 patients (21.4%) showed a delayed trajectory, and had not achieved ODI MCID threshold at 3 months, but did ultimately reach MCID at 12-month follow-up. Factors associated with delayed improvement included impaired preoperative ambulatory status, better baseline back and leg pain scores, and worse 3-month leg pain scores (P<0.01)., Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing surgery for low grade spondylolisthesis reach ODI MCID threshold rapidly, within the first three months after surgery. Factors associated with a delayed clinical course include impaired preoperative ambulation status, relatively better preoperative back and leg pain, and persistent leg pain at 3 months., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Novel method of iliac accessory rods for rod fracture prevention in adult deformity surgery: a case series of 82 patients with outcomes and complications.
- Author
-
Berlin C, Ben-Israel D, Sardi JP, Park BJ, Yen CP, Shaffrey ME, Ibrahim S, and Smith JS
- Abstract
Objective: Primary rod fracture after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a leading cause of revision, with recent prospective multicenter fracture rates reported at 11%-14% by 2 years. Consequently, the addition of supplemental rods has been explored to reduce fractures. Here the authors describe their experience with a novel iliac accessory rod technique in which each accessory rod anchors to an independent iliac bolt caudally via lateral connector, and attaches to the primary rod rostrally via side-to-side connector., Methods: This retrospective, single-center case series included patients who underwent thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion for ASD between March 2019 and August 2023. Data on baseline demographics, radiographic parameters, surgical characteristics, complications, rod fracture, and revision rates were collected. Paired, 2-tailed t-tests were used to compare pre- and postoperative radiographic outcomes. Rod fracture rates were compared to prior investigations via chi-square goodness of fit testing. The technique for iliac accessory rod placement is described., Results: The study consisted of 82 patients (mean age 66 years, 51% female, 26% with prior fusion) with a median follow-up of 2 years (IQR 28-104 weeks). A total of 50 patients (61%) had ≥ 2-year follow-up. Each surgery involved an average of 4 posterior column osteotomies and 8 segments. Iliac accessory rods were cobalt chromium and were placed bilaterally in 87% of constructs. Postoperative alignment improved significantly in the following parameters: maximum coronal Cobb angle, fractional curve, sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Of 50 patients with ≥ 2-year follow-up, rod fracture occurred in 1 (2.0%), which was incidentally found and required no intervention. The present rod fracture rate was significantly lower than the authors' historically reported institutional rate of 21% for traditional dual-rod constructs, and the 11%-14% reported in recent prospective multicenter studies that used traditional and supplemental rod constructs (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Reoperation occurred in 12 patients (14.6%); 7 (8.5%) for proximal junctional kyphosis and 5 (6.1%) for wound complication., Conclusions: Here the authors describe their experience with a novel iliac accessory rod technique to prevent rod fracture in patients undergoing surgery for ASD. The 2-year rod fracture rate (2.0%) in this study is significantly lower than the authors' historical dual-rod fracture rate, and other prospective multicenter investigations. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the durability of this technique.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Use of Patient-Specific Interbody Cages Through a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Unstable Lumbar Spondylodiskitis.
- Author
-
Yen CP, Ben-Israel D, Desai B, Vollmer D, Shaffrey ME, and Smith JS
- Abstract
Background and Objectives: Patients with diskitis/osteomyelitis who do not respond to medical treatment or develop spinal instability/deformity may warrant surgical intervention. Irregular bony destruction due to the infection can pose a challenge for spinal reconstruction. The authors report a lateral approach using patient-specific interbody cages combined with posterior or lateral instrumentation to achieve spinal reconstruction for spinal instability/deformity from spondylodiskitis., Methods: This is a retrospective review of 4 cases undergoing debridement, lateral lumbar interbody fusion using patient-specific interbody cages, and supplemental lateral or posterior instrumentation for spinal instability/deformity after spondylodiskitis. The surgical technique is reported, as are the clinical and imaging outcomes., Results: Four male patients with a mean age of 69 years comprised this study. One had lateral lumbar interbody fusion at L2/3 and 3 at L4/5. The mean hospital stay was 5.8 days. The mean follow-up was 8.5 months (range 6-12 months). There were no approach-related neurological injuries or complications. The mean visual analog scale back pain scores improved from 9.5 to 1.5, and the mean Oswestry disability index improved from 68.5 to 23 at the end of the follow-up. The mean lumbar lordosis increased from 18° to 51°. The segmental angle increased from 6.5° to 18°. The coronal shift was 2.8 cm preoperatively and 0.9 cm postoperatively. The coronal Cobb angle reduced from 8.8° preoperatively to 2.8° postoperatively. On postoperative computed tomography, all patients had interval development of bridging bone across the surgical level through or around the cage. None of them developed cage migration or subsidence., Conclusion: Patients with irregular bony destruction due to diskitis/osteomyelitis may benefit from patient-specific cages for spinal reconstruction to address spinal instability and deformity., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Comparing posterior cervical foraminotomy with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in radiculopathic patients: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.
- Author
-
Mummaneni PV, Bisson EF, Michalopoulos G, Mualem WJ, El Sammak S, Wang MY, Chan AK, Haid RW, Knightly JJ, Chou D, Sherrod BA, Gottfried ON, Shaffrey CI, Goldberg JL, Virk MS, Hussain I, Agarwal N, Glassman SD, Shaffrey ME, Park P, Foley KT, Pennicooke B, Coric D, Slotkin JR, Potts EA, Fu KG, Asher AL, and Bydon M
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Databases, Factual, Aged, Adult, Reoperation, Neck Pain surgery, Length of Stay, Radiculopathy surgery, Spinal Fusion methods, Diskectomy methods, Foraminotomy methods, Cervical Vertebrae surgery, Patient Satisfaction
- Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between posterior foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients presenting with cervical radiculopathy., Methods: The Quality Outcomes Database was queried for patients who had undergone ACDF or posterior foraminotomy for radiculopathy. To create two highly homogeneous groups, optimal individual matching was performed at a 5:1 ratio between the two groups on 29 baseline variables (including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms, patient-reported scores, underlying pathologies, and levels treated). Outcomes of interest were length of stay, reoperations, patient-reported satisfaction, increase in EQ-5D score, and decrease in Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores for arm and neck pain as long as 1 year after surgery. Noninferiority analysis of achieving patient satisfaction and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in PROs was performed with an accepted risk difference of 5%., Results: A total of 7805 eligible patients were identified: 216 of these underwent posterior foraminotomy and were matched to 1080 patients who underwent ACDF. The patients who underwent ACDF had more underlying pathologies, lower EQ-5D scores, and higher NDI and neck pain scores at baseline. Posterior foraminotomy was associated with shorter hospitalization (0.5 vs 0.9 days, p < 0.001). Reoperations within 12 months were significantly more common among the posterior foraminotomy group (4.2% vs 1.9%, p = 0.04). The two groups performed similarly in PROs, with posterior foraminotomy being noninferior to ACDF in achieving MCID in EQ-5D and neck pain scores but also having lower rates of maximal satisfaction at 12 months (North American Spine Society score of 1 achieved by 65.2% posterior foraminotomy patients vs 74.6% of ACDF patients, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: The two procedures were found to be offered to different populations, with ACDF being selected for patients with more complicated pathologies and symptoms. After individual matching, posterior foraminotomy was associated with a higher reoperation risk within 1 year after surgery compared to ACDF (4.2% vs 1.9%). In terms of 12-month PROs, posterior foraminotomy was noninferior to ACDF in improving quality of life and neck pain. The two procedures also performed similarly in improving NDI scores and arm pain, but ACDF patients had higher maximal satisfaction rates.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.