Search

Existing reinforced concrete building structures have low lateral resistance capacities due to seismically deficient details. Since these building structures suffer an increase in axial loads to the main structural elements due to green retrofits (e.g., installation of energy equipment/devices, roof gardens) as one of the sustainable building solutions and/or vertical extensions, their capacities can be reduced. This paper aims to propose a rapid estimation method incorporating a previously developed machine-learning model to find an allowable range of axial loads for reinforced concrete columns using simple structural details for enhancement in the sustainability performance of existing buildings in structural and energy fields. The methodology consists of two steps: (1) a machine-learning-based failure detection model, and (2) column damage limits proposed by previous researchers. To demonstrate this proposed method, an existing building structure built in the 1990s was selected, and the allowable range for the target structure was computed for both exterior and interior columns. A machine-learning-based method showed that axial loading could be increased by a factor of 1.35. Additionally, nonlinear time-history analysis for the target structure was performed to compare the seismic responses before and after applying the maximum allowable axial load. Based on the dynamic responses, the increased axial loads from green retrofits and/or vertical extensions could degrade structural performance and change its failure mode. The proposed methodology can rapidly estimate the allowable axial load range for existing reinforced concrete buildings without repeated modeling and computing processes. In addition, nonlinear time-history analysis is needed to accurately evaluate the impact of the increased axial loads from green retrofits/vertical extensions on structural performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most challenging elements of modeling the behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) walls is combining realistic material models that can capture the observable behaviour of the physical system. Experiments with realistic loading rates and pressures reveal that steel and concrete display complicated nonlinear behaviour that is challenging to represent in a single constitutive model. To investigate the response of a reinforced concrete structure subjected to dynamic loads, this paper's study is based on many different material models to assess the advantages and disadvantages of the models on 2D and 3D RC walls using the LS-DYNA program. The models consisted of the KCC model and the CDP model, which represented plasticity and distinct tensile/compressive damage models, and the Winfrith model, which represented plasticity and the smeared crack model. Subsequently, the models' performances were assessed by comparing them to experimental data from reinforced concrete structures, in order to validate the accuracy of the overall behaviour prediction. The Winfrith model demonstrated satisfactory results in predicting the behaviour of 2D and 3D walls, including maximum strength, stiffness deterioration, and energy dissipation. The method accurately predicted the maximum strength of the Winfrith concrete model for the 2D wall with an error of 9.24% and for the 3D wall with errors of 3.28% in the X direction and 5.02% in the Y direction. The Winfrith model demonstrated higher precision in predicting dissipation energy for the 3D wall in both the X and Y directions, with errors of 6.84% and 6.62%, correspondingly. Additional parametric analyses were carried out to investigate structural behaviour, taking into account variables such as concrete strength, strain rate, mesh size, and the influence of the element type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]