Search

Purpose: Many publications address the epidemiology of secondary osteosarcomas following retinoblastoma. Treatment- and outcome-related information is, however, scarce. We used a large cooperative group’s database to study this issue. Patients and methods: The database Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group COSS was searched for patients with osteosarcoma following a previous retinoblastoma. Patients were then analyzed for demographic factors, local/systemic treatments received, and outcomes. Results: 28 eligible patients were identified. Median age at retinoblastoma was .5 years, 89% occurred bilaterally. Retinoblastoma-therapy was by surgery in 26/27, radiotherapy in 26/27, chemotherapy in 10/26 (rest unknown). Osteosarcoma was diagnosed after 13.7 (3.1 – 36.1) years, extremities and head/neck affected in 14/28, each. Four/28 patients had primary metastases. Osteosarcoma treatment included chemotherapy in all cases, local therapy surgery in 27/28. Histological response was good in 9/16 evaluable cases. Surgery of all sites was macroscopically complete in 23/27 operated tumors and microscopically complete in 17/26 (1 unknown). Radiotherapy was administered to 3 craniofacial tumors. Median follow-up was 3.5 (.4 – 30.1) years from osteosarcoma diagnosis, 8/28 patients remaining event-free. Altogether, five patients suffered further secondary malignancies. Actuarial overall and event-free survival at 2 and 5 years from osteosarcoma were 73% (standard error: 8%) / 50% (10%) and 47% (10%) / 22% (9%), respectively. Conclusion: This comparatively large cohort of osteosarcomas after retinoblastoma proves that the latter may be treated curatively. While their prognosis is far worse than that of primary osteosarcomas, partly due to a predilection for craniofacial involvement, selected patients may still become long-term survivors with appropriate therapies.

Abstract Purpose Prognostic factors have been well described for osteosarcoma, but analyses evaluating the further course of long‐term survivors are lacking. We used the large database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS) to perform such an analysis. Patients and Methods The COSS database 1980‐04/2019 was searched for 5‐year survivors of primary high‐grade central osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk. Identified patients were analyzed for their further survival outcomes, assessing potentially prognostic and predictive factors already evident at initial disease presentation and treatment as well as their disease course during the first 5 years of follow‐up. Results Two thousand and nine former eligible patients were identified (median age at initial diagnosis 15.1 (2.5–63.0) years; male vs. female 1149 (57.2%) vs. 860 (42.8%); extremities vs. trunk 1927 (95.9%) vs. 82 (4.1%); extremity primaries

Purpose: Osteosarcoma may arise as a secondary cancer following leukemias or lymphomas. We intended to increase the knowledge about such rare events. Patients and methods: We searched the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group’s database for individuals who developed their osteosarcoma following a previous hematological malignancy. The presentation and treatment of both malignancies was investigated, and additional neoplasms were noted. Outcomes after osteosarcoma were analyzed and potential prognostic factors were searched for. Results: A total of 33 eligible patients were identified (male: 23, female: 10; median age: 12.9 years at diagnosis of hematological cancer; 20 lymphomas, 13 leukemias). A cancer predisposition syndrome was evident in one patient only. The hematological cancers had been treated by radiotherapy in 28 (1 unknown) and chemotherapy in 26 cases, including bone-marrow transplantation in 9. The secondary bone sarcomas (high-grade central 27, periosteal 2, extra-osseous 2, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone 2) arose after a median lag-time of 9.4 years, when patients were a median of 19.1 years old. Tumors were considered radiation-related in 26 cases (1 unknown). Osteosarcoma-sites were in the extremities (19), trunk (12), or head and neck (2). Metastases at diagnosis affected eight patients. Information on osteosarcoma therapy was available for 31 cases. All of these received chemotherapy. Local therapy involved surgery in 27 patients, with a good response reported for 9/18 eligible patients. Local radiotherapy was given to three patients. The median follow-up was 3.9 (0.3–12.0) years after bone tumor diagnosis. During this period, 21 patients had developed events as defined, and 15 had died, resulting in 5-year event-free and overall survival rates of 40% (standard error: 9%) and 56% (10%), respectively. There were multiple instances of additional neoplasms. Several factors were found to be of prognostic value (p < 0.05) for event-free (osteosarcoma site in the extremities) or overall (achievement of a surgical osteosarcoma-remission, receiving chemotherapy for the hematologic malignancy) survival. Conclusions: We were able to prove radiation therapy for hematological malignancies to be the predominant risk factor for later osteosarcomas. A resulting overrepresentation of axial and a tendency towards additional neoplasms affects prognosis. Still, selected patients may become long-term survivors with appropriate therapies, which is an argument against therapeutic negligence.

Background: To evaluate patient and tumour characteristics, treatment, and their impact on survival in patients with multi-systemic metastases at initial diagnosis of high-grade osteosarcoma. Precedure: Eighty-three consecutive patients who presented with multi-systemic metastases at initial diagnosis of high-grade osteosarcoma were retrospectively reviewed. In cases of curative intent, the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group recommended surgical removal of all detectable metastases in addition to complete resection of the primary tumour and chemotherapy. Results: Eighty-three eligible patients (1.8%) were identified among a total of 4605 individuals with high-grade osteosarcoma. Nine (10.8%) of these achieved complete surgical remission, of whom seven later had recurrences. The median follow-up time was 12 (range, 1–165) months for all patients. Actuarial event-free survival after 1, 2, and 5 years was 9.6 ± 3.2%, 1.4 ± 1.4%, and 1.4 ± 1.4%, and overall survival was 54.0 ± 5.6%, 23.2 ± 4.9%, and 8.7 ± 3.3%. In univariate analyses, elevated alkaline phosphatase before chemotherapy, pleural effusion, distant bones as metastatic sites, and more than one bone metastasis were negative prognostic factors. Among treatment-related factors, the microscopically complete resection of the primary tumour, a good response to first-line chemotherapy, the macroscopically complete resection of all affected tumour sites, and local treatment (surgery ± radiotherapy) of all bone metastases were associated with better outcomes. Tumour progression under first-line treatment significantly correlated with shorter survival times. Conclusion: The outlook for patients with multi-systemic primary metastases from osteosarcoma remains very poor. The utmost importance of surgical resection of all tumour sites was confirmed. For unresectable bone metastases, radiotherapy might be considered. In the patient group studied, standard chemotherapy was often insufficiently effective. In the case of such advanced disease, alternative treatment options are urgently required.