Search

Purpose of Review: To examine the concept of time in target range for blood pressure (BP) management, exploring its calculation methods, implications for patient outcomes, and potential use in patient care., Recent Findings: Recent post-hoc analyses of clinical trials and observational studies highlight the importance of BP time in target range in predicting cardiovascular outcomes. Higher time in target range correlates with reduced risks of major adverse cardiovascular events including heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Additionally, longer time in target range decreases the risk of incident atrial fibrillation and risk of developing dementia. BP time in target range is a novel metric offering valuable insights into BP control and its impact on clinical outcomes. Higher time in target range is consistently associated with better cardiovascular outcomes across various patient populations. However, the clinical application of BP time in target range requires further investigation through prospective clinical trials and real-world studies. Integrating wearable devices for continuous BP monitoring could enhance the practical utility of BP time in target range in hypertension management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Current epicardial ablation technologies are limited by the inability to create adequate depth lesions and risk of collateral injury to extracardiac structures., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ventricular epicardial ablation with a novel balloon-expandable extreme-low-temperature (XLT) cryoablation catheter with an embedded insulation pontoon for protection of extracardiac structures, which has been specifically designed for epicardial ablation., Methods: Ten healthy swine underwent surgical (n = 6) and subxiphoid percutaneous (n = 4) epicardial access. A total of 3-6 sites were targeted in the right and left ventricular wall for different exposure durations. Ablation was performed with a large footprint (surgical) and smaller footprint (percutaneous) version of the HeartPad (Corfigo Inc., Montclair, NJ) XLT system. The system consists of the balloon-expandable cryoablation catheter and a console. The console vaporizes liquid helium (-269°C) and controls continuous delivery of extremely cold helium gas at high flow rates through a high-efficiency ablation element mounted on an expandable insulation pontoon to protect extracardiac structures. Ablation lesions were assessed by gross pathology and histologic examination., Results: A total of 42 epicardial lesions were created. Mean lesion depth increased progressively with ablation time (surgical catheter: 11 ± 2 mm at ≤30 seconds, 13 ± 4 mm at 60 seconds, 15 ± 3 mm at ≥120 seconds, P = .001; percutaneous catheter: 10 ± 2 mm at 30 seconds, 14 ± 2 mm at 60 seconds, 16 ± 2 mm at 120 seconds, P = .001). Lesion geometry seemed unaffected by presence and thickness of epicardial fat. One episode of ventricular fibrillation occurred after ablation over the atrioventricular groove and 2 adjacent obtuse marginal arteries., Conclusion: Surgical or percutaneous epicardial ablation using the HeartPad XLT cryoablation system is feasible and can efficiently produce deep ventricular lesions in different epicardial locations., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Santangeli has received a research grant from Corfigo Inc.; and is a consultant for Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. Dr Wazni and Dr Saliba have received research grants and/or consultancy fees from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. Dr Hussein has received research grants from Boston Scientific. All other authors have no conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Vascular access site complications are the most frequent complications of percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Whether arterial/venous vascular closure devices (VCDs) prevent vascular complications is unknown., Objective: We investigated the benefit of VCDs in patients undergoing CA of VAs., Methods: Consecutive CA of VAs were included (2018-2022). Vascular accesses were obtained with ultrasound guidance. At the discretion of the operator, arterial and/or venous VCDs were used. Cases were divided into 3 groups: no use of VCDs for any arterial/venous accesses (manual compression [MC]), use of VCDs for some but not all accesses (Partial-VCDs), and use of VCDs for all accesses (Complete-VCDs). Vascular complications were classified as minor if they did not require intervention or major if they required intervention., Results: A total of 1016 procedures were performed in 872 patients (mean age 62 ± 13 years; mean body mass index 30 ± 6 kg/m 2 ; 27% female) during the study period. Femoral arterial access was obtained in 887 procedures (875 single access: 7.4 ± 1.5 F size; 12 two accesses: 7.3 ± 3 and 6.9 ± 1.8 F). Femoral venous access was obtained in 1014 procedures (unilateral in 17%; bilateral in 83%; mean number of access sites per patient 2.6 ± 0.7; mean size 8.4 ± 1.3 F). Hemostasis was achieved with MC in 192 procedures (19%), with Partial-VCD in 275 (27%), and with Complete-VCD in 549 (54%). A vascular complication occurred in 52 procedures (5.1%), including a minor hematoma in 3.9% and/or a major complication in 1.7%. The rate of vascular complications was 6.8% (5.2% minor and 1.6% major) in the MC group, 7.6% (5.1% minor and 3.3% major) in the Partial-VCD group, and 3.3% (2.9% minor and 0.9% major) in the Complete-VCD group (P = .014 for comparison). In multivariable analysis, Complete-VCD remained independently associated with a lower risk of vascular complications (odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.96; P = .036)., Conclusion: In patients undergoing CA of VAs, Complete-VCD is associated with lower rates of vascular-related complications compared with MC or Partial-VCD., Competing Interests: Disclosures Drs Santangeli, Wazni, and Saliba have received research grants and/or consultancy fees from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. Dr Hussein has received research grants from Boston Scientific. The other authors have no disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Comparative efficacy and safety data on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus pulsed field ablation (PFA) for common idiopathic left ventricular arrhythmia (LV-VAs) locations are lacking., Objectives: This study sough to compare RFA with PFA of common idiopathic LV-VAs locations., Methods: Ten swine were randomized to PFA or RFA of LV interventricular septum, papillary muscle, LV summit via distal coronary sinus, and LV epicardium via subxiphoid approach. Ablations were delivered using an investigational dual-energy (RFA/PFA) contact force (CF) and local impedance-sensing catheter. After 1-week survival, animals were euthanized for lesion assessment., Results: A total of 55 PFA (4 applications/site of 2.0 KV, target CF ≥10 g) and 36 RFA (CF ≥10 g, 25-50 W targeting ≥50 Ω local impedance drop, 60-second duration) were performed. LV interventricular septum: average PFA depth 7.8 mm vs RFA 7.9 mm (P = 0.78) and no adverse events. Papillary muscle: average PFA depth 8.1 mm vs RFA 4.5 mm (P < 0.01). Left ventricular summit: average PFA depth 5.6 mm vs RFA 2.7 mm (P < 0.01). Steam-pop and/or ventricular fibrillation in 4 of 12 RFA vs 0 of 12 PFA (P < 0.01), no ST-segment changes observed. Epicardium: average PFA depth 6.4 mm vs RFA 3.3 mm (P < 0.01). Transient ST-segment elevations/depressions occurred in 4 of 5 swine in the PFA arm vs 0 of 5 in the RFA arm (P < 0.01). Angiography acutely and at 7 days showed normal coronaries in all cases., Conclusions: In this swine study, compared with RFA, PFA of common idiopathic LV-VAs locations produced deeper lesions with fewer steam pops. However, PFA was associated with higher rates of transient ST-segment elevations and depressions with direct epicardium ablation., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was funded by the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and supported by Boston Scientific. Drs Santangeli, Wazni, Nakagawa, and Saliba have received research grants and/or consultancy fees from Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. Dr Hussein has received research grants from Boston Scientific. Dr Nakagawa has received consultancy fees from Galaxy Medical. Mr Kleve, Dr Garrott, Ms Lehn, and Mr Buck are employees of Boston Scientific. Drs Younis and Tabaja have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) improves clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of CA on clinical and quality-of-life outcomes across HF subtypes., Methods: All patients undergoing AF ablation at a tertiary center were enrolled in a prospective registry and included in this study (2013-2021). The primary end point was AF recurrence. Secondary end points included AF-related hospitalizations and quality-of-life outcomes. Patients were categorized according to their HF status: no HF, HFrEF, HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)., Results: A total of 7020 patients were included (80% no HF, 8% HFrEF, 7% HFmrEF, and 5% HFpEF). Over 3 years, the cumulative incidence of AF recurrence after ablation was as follows: HFpEF (53%), HFmrEF (41%), HFrEF (41%), and no HF (34%); P <0.01. Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed these findings using no HF group as reference (HFpEF: hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.21-1.78]; HFmrEF: hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.04-1.45]; and HFrEF: hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.01-1.37]; P <0.05 for all). In all groups, CA resulted in a significant reduction of AF-related hospitalization (mean rate per 1 patient-years [before and after CA]; HFpEF [1.8 versus 0.3], HFmrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], HFrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], and no HF [1 versus 0.1]; P <0.01 for each comparison) and significant improvement in quality of life as measured by both the AF symptom severity score and the AF burden score ( P <0.01 for the comparison between baseline and follow-up for each score when tested separately)., Conclusions: AF recurrence rates after CA were higher in patients with HF compared with those without HF, with patients with HFpEF being at the highest risk of recurrence. Nonetheless, CA was associated with a significant reduction in AF symptoms, AF-related hospitalization, and HF symptoms in most patients irrespective of HF subtypes., Competing Interests: Dr Hussein receives research grant support from Boston Scientific. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) risk increases with age. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the older population., Methods: All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2021) at our institution were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Patients were divided into 3 groups: non-elderly (< 65 years), elderly (65-75 years), and very elderly (> 75 years). Patient surveys at baseline and during follow-up were used to calculate quality of life (QoL) metrics: the AF severity score as well as the AF burden., Results: A total of 7020 patients were included (42% non-elderly, 42% elderly, and 16% very elderly). Periprocedural major complications were low (< 1.5%) and similar in all groups besides pericardial effusion which was more frequent with older age and similar between the elderly and very elderly. At 3 years, AF recurrence for persistent AF (PersAF) was highest in the very elderly group (48%), followed by the elderly group (42%), and was the lowest in the non-elderly group (36%). In paroxysmal AF (PAF), there was no difference in AF recurrence between the elderly and non-elderly, while the very elderly remained associated with a significantly increased risk. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed these findings (PersAF; elderly: HR = 1.23, P = 0.003; very elderly: HR = 1.44, P < 0.001) (PAF; elderly: HR = 1.04, P = 0.62; very elderly: HR = 1.30, P = 0.01). Catheter ablation resulted in a significant improvement in quality of life, irrespective of age group., Conclusion: Catheter ablation in elderly and very elderly patients is safe, efficacious, and associated with QoL benefits. Overall, major complications were minimal and did not differ significantly between age groups, with the exception of pericardial effusions which were higher in the elderly and very elderly compared to non-elderly adults. Very elderly patients had a higher rate of AF recurrence when compared with elderly or non-elderly patients. Nevertheless, ablation resulted in a remarkable improvement in QoL and a reduction of AF burden and AF symptoms with a similar magnitude, irrespective of age., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Reports of comparison with procedural outcomes for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and pacemaker (PM) transvenous lead extraction (TLE) are old and limited. We sought to compare the safety, efficacy, and procedural properties of ICD and PM TLE and assess the impact of lead age., Methods: The study cohort included all consecutive patients with ICD and PM TLE in the Cleveland Clinic Prospective TLE Registry between 2013 and 2022. Extraction success, complications, and failure employed the definitions described in the HRS 2017 TLE guidelines., Results: A total of 885 ICD leads, a median implant duration of 8 (5-11) years in 810 patients, and 1352 PM leads of 7 (3-13) years in 807 patients were included. Procedural success rates in ICD patients were superior to those of PM in >20 years leads but similar in ≤20 years leads. In the PM group, the complete success rate of TLE decreased significantly according to the increase of lead age, but not in the ICD group. ICD TLE required more extraction tools compared with PM TLE but cases with older leads required non-laser sheath extraction tools in both groups. The most common injury site in major complication cases differed between ICD and PM TLE, although major complication rates showed no difference in both groups (2.7% vs. 1.6%, p = .12)., Conclusion: The procedural success rate by TLE is greater for ICD patients than PM patients with leads >20 years old but requires more extraction tools. Common vascular complication sites and the impact of lead age on procedural outcomes and required tools differed between ICD and PM TLE., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Heart failure patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) are known to have worse outcomes. However, there are limited data on the temporal relationship between development of these arrhythmias and the risk of subsequent congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation and death., Methods: The study cohort comprised 5511 patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in landmark clinical trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-RISK, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, and RAID) who were in sinus rhythm at enrollment. Multivariate cox analysis was performed to evaluate the time-dependent association between development of in-trial device detected AF and VT/VF with subsequent CHF exacerbation and death., Results: Multivariate analysis showed that AF occurrence and VT/VF occurrence were both associated with a similar magnitude of risk for subsequent CHF exacerbation (HR = 1.73 and 1.87 respectively, p < .001 for both). In contrast, only in-trial VT/VF was associated with a significant > two-fold increase in the risk of subsequent mortality (HR = 2.13, p < .001) whereas AF occurrence was not associated with a significant mortality increase after adjustment for in-trial VT/VF (HR = 1.36, p = .096)., Conclusion: Our findings from a large cohort of ICD recipients enrolled in landmark clinical trials show that device detected AF and VT/VF can be used to identify patients with increased risk for CHF exacerbation and mortality. These findings suggest a need for early intervention in CHF patients who develop device-detected atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Conventional focal radiofrequency catheters may be modified to enable multiple energy modalities (radiofrequency or pulsed field [PF]) with the benefit of contact force (CF) feedback, providing greater flexibility in the treatment of arrhythmias. Information on the impact of CF on lesion formation in PF ablations remains limited., Methods: An in vivo study was performed with 8 swine using an investigational dual-energy CF focal catheter with local impedance. Experiment I: To evaluate atrial lesion formation, contiguity, and width, a point-by-point approach was used to create an intercaval line. The distance between the points was prespecified at 4±1 mm. Half of the line was created with radiofrequency energy, whereas the other half utilized PF (single 2.0 kV application with a proprietary waveform). Experiment II: To evaluate single application lesion dimensions with a proprietary waveform, discrete ventricular lesions were performed with PFA (single 2.0 kV application) with targeted levels of CF: low, 5 to 15 g; medium, 20 to 30 g; and high, 35 to 45 g. Following 1 week of survival, animals underwent endocardial/epicardial remapping, and euthanasia to enable histopathologic examination., Results: Experiment I: Both energy modalities resulted in a complete intercaval line of transmural ablation. PF resulted in significantly wider lines than radiofrequency: minimum width, 14.9±2.3 versus 5.0±1.6 mm; maximum width, 21.8±3.4 versus 7.3±2.1 mm, respectively; P <0.01 for each. Histology confirmed transmural lesions with both modalities. Experiment II: With PF, lesion depth, width, and volume were larger with higher degrees of CF (depth: r=0.82, P <0.001; width: r=0.26, P =0.052; and volume: r=0.55, P <0.001), with depth increasing at a faster rate than width. The mean depths were as follows: low (n=17), 4.3±1.0 mm; medium (n=26), 6.4±1.2 mm; and high (n=14), 9.1±1.4 mm., Conclusions: Using the same focal point CF-sensing catheter, a novel PF ablation waveform with a single application resulted in transmural atrial lesions that were significantly wider than radiofrequency. Lesion depth showed a significant positive correlation with CF with depths of 6.4 mm at moderate CF., Competing Interests: Disclosures Drs Santangeli, Nakagawa, Saliba, and Wazni have received research grants and consultancy fees from Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. Dr Hussein has received research grants from Boston Scientific. Dr Nakagawa has received consultancy fees from Galaxy Medical. Dr Garrott, E. Buck, L. Lehn, and R. Kleve are employees of Boston Scientific. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Data are lacking on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We sought to evaluate QoL and clinical outcomes of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation only (CRYO-PVI-ONLY) versus RFA with PVI and posterior wall isolation (RF-PVI+PWI) in a large prospective PRO registry., Methods: Patients who underwent AF ablation (2013-2016) at our institution were enrolled in an automated, prospectively maintained PRO registry. CRYO-PVI-ONLY patients were matched (1:1) with RF-PVI+PWI patients based on age, gender, and type of AF (paroxysmal vs. persistent). QoL and clinical outcomes were assessed using PRO surveys at baseline and at 1-year. The atrial fibrillation symptom severity scale (AFSSS) was the measure for QoL. Additionally, we assessed patient-reported clinical improvement, arrhythmia recurrence, and AF burden (as indicated by AF frequency and duration scores)., Results: A total of 296 patients were included (148 in each group, 72% paroxysmal). By PRO, a significant improvement in QoL was observed in the overall study population and was comparable between CRYO-PVI-ONLY and RF-PVI+PWI (baseline median AFSSS of 11.5 and 11; reduced to 2 and 4 at 1 year, respectively; p = 0.44). Similarly, the proportion of patients who reported improvement in their overall QoL and AF related symptoms was high and similar between the study groups [92% (CRYO-PVI-ONLY) vs. 92.8% (RF-PVI+PWI); p = 0.88]. Arrhythmia recurrence was significantly more common in the CRYO-PVI-ONLY group (39.7%) compared to RF-PVI+PWI (27.7 %); p = 0.03. Comparable results were observed in paroxysmal and persistent AF., Conclusion: CRYO-PVI-ONLY and RF-PVI+PWI resulted in comparable improvements in patient reported outcomes including QoL and AF burden; with RF-PVI+PWI being more effective at reducing recurrences., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The efficacy of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for redo procedures is unknown., Objectives: In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PFA when performing PFA over chronic RFA (redo environment)., Methods: This was a 3-step in vivo study. In step 1 (creation of redo environment), 6 swine underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with a local impedance measuring catheter and a contact force-enabled catheter in 3 different sites: the right atrium (RA) (intercaval line with intentional gaps), the left atrium (LA) (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] with intentional gaps and superficial posterior wall ablations), and the left ventricle (LV) (short RFA applications [chronic RFA]). In step 2 (re-ablation), following a survival period of ≈5 weeks, animals were retreated as follows: in the RA, a focal PFA catheter over the prior intercaval line; in the LA, PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter; and in the LV, animals were randomized to focal PFA or RFA. In each arm, 2 types of lesions were performed: acute or acute over chronic. In step 3 (remapping and euthanization), following an additional 3 to 5 days, all animals were remapped and sacrificed., Results: In the RA, re-ablation with PFA resulted in a complete intercaval block in all animals, expanding and homogenizing the disparate chronic RFA lesions from a width of 4 to 7 mm (chronic RFA) to a width of 16 to 28 mm (PFA over chronic RFA). In the LA, re-ablation with PFA resulted in complete PVI and transmural ablation of the PW. In the LV, the mean depth for acute RFA (post 2-5 days survival) was 7.6 ± 1.3 mm vs 3.9 ± 1.6 mm in the acute over chronic RFA lesions (P < 0.01). In contrast, the mean depth for acute PFA was 7.0 ± 1.6 mm, similar to when ablating with PFA over RFA (7.1 ± 1.3 mm; P = 0.94)., Conclusions: PFA is highly efficient for ablation following prior RFA, which may be beneficial in patients presenting for redo procedures. In the ventricle, PFA resulted in lesions that are deeper than RFA when ablating over chronic superficial RFA lesions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Boston Scientific. Mr Buck is an employee of Boston Scientific. Dr Santangeli has received research grants and/or consultancy fees from Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. Dr Garrott is an employee of Boston Scientific. Ms Lehn is an employee of Boston Scientific. Dr Hussein has received research grants from Boston Scientific. Dr Nakagawa has received research grants and/or consultancy fees from Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific; and has received consultancy fees from Galaxy Medical. Dr Saliba has received research grants and/or consultancy fees from Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. Dr Wazni has received research grants and/or consultancy fees from Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)