Search

The risk of bias is widely noticed in the entire process of generative artificial intelligence(generative AI) systems. To protect the rights of the public and improve the effectiveness of AI regulations, feasible measures to address the bias problem in the context of large data should be proposed as soon as possible. Since bias originates in every part and various aspects of AI product lifecycles, laws and technical measures should consider each of these layers and take different causes of bias into account, from data training, modeling, and application design. The Interim Measures for the Administration of Generative AI Service(the Interim Measures), formulated by the Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission(CAC) and other departments have taken the initiatives to govern AI. However, it lacks specific details on issues such as how to prevent the risk of bias and reduce the effect of bias in decision-making. The Interim Measures also fail to take causes of bias into account, and several principles must be further interpreted. Meanwhile, regulations on generative AI at the global level are still in their early stages. By forming a governance framework, this paper could provide the community with useful experiences and play a leading role. The framework includes at least three parts: first, determining the realm of governance and unifying related concepts; second, developing measures for different layers to identify the causes and specific aspects of bias; third, identifying parties with the skills to take responsibility for detecting bias intrusions and proposing a program for the allocation of liabilities among the large-scale platform developers.

The exploration of religious beliefs within the confines of Chinese prisons presents a nuanced inquiry into the intersection of faith, correctional policies, and human rights. This study delves into the underexplored domain of how religious practices and beliefs are navigated within the Chinese penal system. Despite constitutional assurances for religious freedom, practical applications within prison walls reveal a nuanced tapestry of control, accommodation, and, at times, suppression. This paper aims to shed light on these complexities through interviews with prison officers, offering a rare glimpse into the 'hidden corners' of religious observance in Chinese prisons. It critically examines the balance between state control, the rehabilitation agenda, and the individual's right to spiritual belief and practice, proposing a more inclusive approach to fostering religious diversity and freedom within the correctional environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]