Search

Neuropathic pain in the upper extremity is a serious problem, commonly involving relatively young patients. The pain causes loss of function and productivity, changes a patient's lifestyle and can progress into a chronic pain syndrome with secondary psychosocial co-morbidities. Treating patients with a painful mononeuropathy remains challenging, with a monodisciplinary approach often having limited treatment efficacy. This narrative review discusses how to deal with this challenge in the treatment of patients with peripheral nerve injury pain, addressing the four important pillars: (1) diagnosing a painful mononeuropathy; (2) clinical pain phenotyping; (3) personalized pain treatment; and (4) using a multidisciplinary team approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: External neurolysis is an important approach to treating symptomatic peripheral nerve entrapment. In cases of recurrent neurolysis or particularly extensive neurolysis, a paucity of overlying soft tissue for closure over the freshly liberated nerve presents a challenge to long-term surgical success as primary closure of this tissue may predispose the patient to recalcitrant epineural scarring. We report the intermediate term outcomes of the use of adipofascial perforator flaps as a means of vascularised tissue resurfacing of nerves in these difficult scenarios. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing external neurolysis for painful peripheral nerve lesions who subsequently had soft tissue reconstruction with local adipofascial flaps. Data with regard to age, gender, limb involved, duration of symptoms, number of prior surgeries, operative time, type of flap, vascular basis of flap, duration of follow-up, visual analogue pain score, monofilament sensory testing and complications were collected. Results: We included six patients (four women) with a minimum follow-up period of 17 months (range: 17–25 months). Age ranged from 39 to 60 years of age. Four cases involved the upper extremity and two the lower extremity. Symptoms had been present between 1 and 10 years. All operations utilised a local adipofascial flap perfused by a named perforating vessel emanating from an adjacent axial vessel. Operative time for flap creation and inset was 74 minutes, on average. There was one minor complication owing to superficial wound dehiscence. All patients reported substantial pain relief (≥five-point reduction on visual analogue scale; scores 0–3 at last follow-up) and objective sensory testing demonstrated improvement. Conclusions: Our report pays particular attention to surgical technique that is applicable to both upper and lower extremities in addition to intermediate term safety and pain outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After an amputation, advanced prosthetic limbs can be used to interface with the nervous system and restore motor function. Despite numerous breakthroughs in the field, many of the recent research advancements have not been widely integrated into clinical practice. This review highlights recent innovations in neuromuscular implants—specifically those that interface with skeletal muscle—which could improve the clinical translation of prosthetic technologies. Skeletal muscle provides a physiologic gateway to harness and amplify signals from the nervous system. Recent surgical advancements in muscle reinnervation surgeries leverage the "bio‐amplification" capabilities of muscle, enabling more intuitive control over a greater number of degrees of freedom in prosthetic limbs than previously achieved. We anticipate that state‐of‐the‐art implantable neuromuscular interfaces that integrate well with skeletal muscle and novel surgical interventions will provide a long‐term solution for controlling advanced prostheses. Flexible electrodes are expected to play a crucial role in reducing foreign body responses and improving the longevity of the interface. Additionally, innovations in device miniaturization and ongoing exploration of shape memory polymers could simplify surgical procedures for implanting such interfaces. Once implanted, wireless strategies for powering and transferring data from the interface can eliminate bulky external wires, reduce infection risk, and enhance day‐to‐day usability. By outlining the current limitations of neuromuscular interfaces along with potential future directions, this review aims to guide continued research efforts and future collaborations between engineers and specialists in the field of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) can fuse severed closely apposed axolemmas and restore axonal continuity. The authors evaluated the effects of PEG fusion on functional recovery in a rodent forelimb model of peripheral nerve injury., Methods: The median nerves of male Lewis rats ( n = 5 per group) were transected and repaired with standard suture repair (SR), SR with PEG (PEG), or SR with PEG and 1% methylene blue (PEG+MB); a sham surgery group was also included. Proximal stimulation produced compound nerve and muscle action potentials recorded distally. The contralateral limb of each animal acted as an internal control for grip strength measurements., Results: Compound nerve and muscle action potentials immediately returned in all PEG and PEG+MB animals, but not in SR animals. The PEG and PEG+MB groups demonstrated earlier return of function by postoperative day (POD) 7 (62.6 ± 7.3% and 50.9 ± 6.7% of contralateral limb grip strength, respectively) compared with the SR group, in which minimal return of function was not measurable until POD 21. At POD 98, the PEG group grip strength recovered to 77.2 ± 2.8% and the PEG+MB grip strength recovered to 79.9 ± 4.4%, compared with 34.9 ± 1.8% recovery in the SR group ( P < 0.05). The PEG and PEG+MB groups reached 50% of the sham group grip strength on POD 3.8 and POD 6.3, respectively, whereas the SR group did not reach 50% grip strength recovery of the sham group throughout the study period., Conclusion: PEG fusion plus neurorrhaphy with or without MB reestablished axonal continuity, shortened recovery time, and augmented functional recovery compared with suture neurorrhaphy alone., Clinical Relevance Statement: PEG fusion with neurorrhaphy may bypass Wallerian degeneration, leading to augmented and shortened functional recovery., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Purpose: Sensory nerve transfers may be performed to restore protective sensation and tactile perception after peripheral nerve injury in the upper extremity. There is a paucity of literature on the available donor-recipient configurations for sensory nerve transfers. This article presents a systematic review of reported sensory nerve transfers in the upper extremity., Methods: Original articles published between 1982 and 2022 were searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Articles describing a sensory nerve transfer were included if patient sensory outcomes were reported. Outcomes were categorized according to the modified British Medical Research Council scale, with an outcome of S3 or better defined as satisfactory., Results: Of 1,049 articles, 39 met inclusion and quality criteria. Twenty-seven articles were primary research studies reporting on 197 patients who underwent 11 unique nondigital sensory donor nerve transfers and 24 unique digital donor nerve transfer procedures. The most reliable recipient nerve for restoring sensation to the ulnar border of the small finger was proper ulnar digital nerve of the small finger (38 patients, 89% satisfactory sensory outcome). The best available donors for transfer into the proper ulnar digital nerve of the small finger were proper ulnar digital nerve of the long finger (16 patients, 87.5% good sensory outcome) and palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (15 patients, 100% good sensory outcome). To restore sensation along the ulnar border of the thumb and radial aspect of the index finger, the best available donor was the superficial branch of the radial nerve, regardless of transfer into common digital nerve 1 (38 patients, success rate 63%) or directly to proper ulnar digital nerve of the thumb or proper radial digital nerve of the index finger (nine patients, success rates 67%)., Conclusions: Outcomes after sensory nerve transfers are generally good. Surgeons should transfer into a digital nerve recipient when attempting to reconstruct sensation., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest Dr Sabit received funding from the Tuffaha Lab for biostatistical analysis. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received by the other authors related directly to this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Neuropathic pain in the upper extremity is a serious problem, commonly involving relatively young patients. The pain causes loss of function and productivity, changes a patient's lifestyle and can progress into a chronic pain syndrome with secondary psychosocial co-morbidities. Treating patients with a painful mononeuropathy remains challenging, with a monodisciplinary approach often having limited treatment efficacy. This narrative review discusses how to deal with this challenge in the treatment of patients with peripheral nerve injury pain, addressing the four important pillars: (1) diagnosing a painful mononeuropathy; (2) clinical pain phenotyping; (3) personalized pain treatment; and (4) using a multidisciplinary team approach., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MR performs consultancy work for Synerkine Pharma, which is not related to the present manuscript.

Distal nerve transfer is a refined surgical technique involving the redirection of healthy sacrificable nerves from one part of the body to reinstate function in another area afflicted by paralysis or injury. This approach is particularly valuable when the original nerves are extensively damaged and standard repair methods, such as direct suturing or grafting, may be insufficient. As the nerve coaptation is close to the recipient muscles or skin, distal nerve transfers reduce the time to reinnervation. The harvesting of nerves for transfer should usually result in minimal or no donor morbidity, as any anticipated loss of function is compensated for by adjacent muscles or overlapping cutaneous territory. Recent years have witnessed notable progress in nerve transfer procedures, markedly enhancing the outcomes of upper limb reconstruction for conditions encompassing peripheral nerve, brachial plexus and spinal cord injuries.

Background: External neurolysis is an important approach to treating symptomatic peripheral nerve entrapment. In cases of recurrent neurolysis or particularly extensive neurolysis, a paucity of overlying soft tissue for closure over the freshly liberated nerve presents a challenge to long-term surgical success as primary closure of this tissue may predispose the patient to recalcitrant epineural scarring. We report the intermediate term outcomes of the use of adipofascial perforator flaps as a means of vascularised tissue resurfacing of nerves in these difficult scenarios. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing external neurolysis for painful peripheral nerve lesions who subsequently had soft tissue reconstruction with local adipofascial flaps. Data with regard to age, gender, limb involved, duration of symptoms, number of prior surgeries, operative time, type of flap, vascular basis of flap, duration of follow-up, visual analogue pain score, monofilament sensory testing and complications were collected. Results: We included six patients (four women) with a minimum follow-up period of 17 months (range: 17-25 months). Age ranged from 39 to 60 years of age. Four cases involved the upper extremity and two the lower extremity. Symptoms had been present between 1 and 10 years. All operations utilised a local adipofascial flap perfused by a named perforating vessel emanating from an adjacent axial vessel. Operative time for flap creation and inset was 74 minutes, on average. There was one minor complication owing to superficial wound dehiscence. All patients reported substantial pain relief (≥five-point reduction on visual analogue scale; scores 0-3 at last follow-up) and objective sensory testing demonstrated improvement. Conclusions: Our report pays particular attention to surgical technique that is applicable to both upper and lower extremities in addition to intermediate term safety and pain outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).