Search

Background: Acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) carries a significant risk of inpatient mortality compared with AMI alone, although it is unclear what the longer-term outcomes of AMI-CS survivors is, and whether the inpatient quality of care received influences this., Methods: Using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, linked to Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analyzed 330,517 UK AMI patients; 3330 (1 %) with CS. Patients dying within thirty-days of admission were excluded. Median follow-up for patients included was 1642 days. Cox regression models were fitted, adjusting for demographics and management strategy., Results: AMI-CS survivors were younger (median years) (67 vs. 69, p < 0.001), less often female (29 % vs. 32 %, p < 0.001) and more likely to present with STEMI (81 % vs. 37 %, p < 0.001). Mortality risk was highest at one-year for AMI-CS survivors compared to patients that did not suffer CS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.85; 95 % CI; 1.68-2.04, p < 0.001), and remained elevated at five-years (HR 1.55; 95 % CI; 1.43-1.68, p < 0.001). 'Excellent-care' according to mean opportunity-based quality indicator (OBQI) score compared to 'Poor-care', showed reduced risk of long-term mortality with AMI-CS (HR: 0.46, CI; 0.39-0.54, P < 0.001). Of patients that received "Excellent-care", AMI-CS survivors had elevated risk of long-term mortality (HR 1.45, 95 % CI; 1.34-1.57, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: AMI-CS survivors have elevated risk long-term mortality risk when compared with AMI patients, which persists beyond five years. AMI-CS patients that receive higher-quality inpatient care have better longer-term survival compared to those with poorer inpatient care., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: NW's research fellowship is funded by Abbot Vascular., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to investigate how diabetes mellitus affects longer term outcomes in individuals presenting to hospital with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)., Methods: We analysed data from 456,376 adults hospitalised between January 2005 and March 2019 with NSTEMI from the UK Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, linked with Office for National Statistics death reporting. We compared outcomes and quality of care by diabetes status., Results: Individuals with diabetes were older (median age 74 vs 73 years), were more often of Asian ethnicity (13% vs 4%) and underwent revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) (38% vs 40%) less frequently than those without diabetes. The mortality risk for those with diabetes compared with those without was significantly higher at 30 days (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15, 1.23), 1 year (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.26, 1.31), 5 years (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.34, 1.38) and 10 years (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.36, 1.42). In individuals with diabetes, higher quality inpatient care, assessed by opportunity-based quality indicator (OBQI) score category ('poor', 'fair', 'good' or 'excellent'), was associated with lower mortality rates compared with poor care (good: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.73, 0.76; excellent: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.68, 0.71). In addition, compared with poor care, excellent care in the diabetes group was associated with the lowest mortality rates in the diet-treated and insulin-treated subgroups (diet-treated: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.61, 0.68; insulin-treated: HR 0.69, CI 0.66, 0.72)., Conclusion/interpretation: Individuals with diabetes experience disparities during inpatient care following NSTEMI. They have a higher risk of long-term mortality than those without diabetes, and higher quality inpatient care may lead to better long-term survival., Competing Interests: Data availability: The data underlying this article were provided by the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR). Data will be shared on request to the corresponding author with the permission of NICOR. Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Authors’ relationships and activities: The authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work. Contribution statement: All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data; and drafting or reviewing the article critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version to be published. MAM is responsible for the integrity of the work as a whole., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than patients with higher SES; however, how sex modifies socioeconomic differences is unclear. Using the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, alongside Office of National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analyzed 736,420 AMI patients between 2005 and 2018, stratified by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score Quintiles (most affluent [Q1] to most deprived [Q5]). There was no significant difference in probability of in-hospital mortality in our adjusted model according to sex. The probability of 30-day mortality in our adjusted model was similar between men and women throughout Quintiles, ((Q5; Men 7.6%; 95% CI 7.3-7.8% ( P < .001), Women; 7.0%; 95% CI 6.8-7.3%, P < .001)) ((Q1; Men 7.1%; 95% CI 6.8-7.4%, P < .001, Women; 6.9%; 95% CI 6.6-7.1%, P < .001)). The probability of one-year mortality in our adjusted model was higher in men throughout all Quintiles (Q1; Men 15.0%; 95% CI 14.8-15.6%), P < .001, Women; 14.5%; 95% CI 14.2-14.9%, P < .001) (Q5; Men 16.9%; 95% CI 16.5-17.3%, P < .001, Women; 15.5%; 95% CI 15.1-15.9 by %, P < .001). Overall, female sex did not significantly influence the effect of deprivation on AMI processes of care and outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Trials suggest patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without 'standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors' (SMuRFs) have poorer outcomes, but the role of ethnicity has not been investigated. We analyzed 118,177 STEMI patients using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression models; patients with ≥1 SMuRF (n = 88,055) were compared with 'SMuRFless' patients (n = 30,122), with subgroup analysis comparing outcomes of White and Ethnic minority patients. SMuRFless patients had higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (odds ratio, OR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16) and in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18) after adjusting for demographics, Killip classification, cardiac arrest, and comorbidities. When additionally adjusting for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafts surgery (CABG)), results for in-hospital mortality were no longer significant (OR 1.05, 95% CI .97-1.13). There were no significant differences in outcomes according to ethnicity. Ethnic minority patients were more likely to undergo revascularisation with ≥1 SMuRF (88 vs 80%, P < .001) or SMuRFless (87 vs 77%, P < .001. Ethnic minority patients were more likely undergo ICA and revascularisation regardless of SMuRF status., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: A growing population of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, although little is known about their longer-term mortality., Methods and Results: Using the MINAP (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project) registry, linked to Office for National Statistics mortality data, we analyzed 363 559 UK patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, with or without CKD. Cox regression models were fitted, adjusting for baseline demographics. Compared with patients without CKD, patients with CKD were less frequently prescribed P2Y12 inhibitors (89% versus 86%, P <0.001) less likely to undergo invasive angiography (67% versus 41%, P <0.001) or percutaneous coronary intervention (41% versus 25%, P <0.001), and were less often referred to cardiac rehabilitation (80% versus 66%, P <0.001). Following non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, patients with CKD had higher risk of 30-day (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.20-1.29], 1-year 1.47 [95% CI, 1.44-1.51]) and 5-year mortality 1.55 (95% CI, 1.53-1.58) than patients without CKD (all P <0.001). Risk of mortality over the entire study period was highest in CKD Stage 5 (HR, 2.98 [95% CI, 2.87-3.10]), even after excluding mortality ≤30 days (HR, 3.03 [95% CI, 2.90-3.17]) ( P <0.001). There was no significant difference in proportion of deaths attributable to cardiovascular disease at 30 days (CKD; 76% versus no CKD; 76%), or 1 -year (CKD; 62% versus no CKD; 62%)., Conclusions: Patients with CKD were significantly less likely to receive invasive investigation or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and had significantly higher risk of short- and longer-term mortality. Risk of mortality increased with reducing CKD stage. Cardiovascular disease was the main cause of mortality in patients with CKD, but at comparable rates to the general population with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.

Background: ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) is typically associated with increased age, but there is an important group of patients who suffer from STEMI under the age of 50 who are not well characterized in studies., Methods and Results: We analysed results from Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (MINAP) from the United Kingdom (UK) between 2010 and 2017 and the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from the United States of America (USA) between 2010 and 2018. After exclusion criteria, there were 32 719 STEMI patients aged ≤50 from MINAP, and 238 952 patients' ≤50 from the NIS. We analysed temporal trends in demographics, management, and mortality. The proportion of females increased, 15.6% (2010-2012) to 17.6% (2016-2017) (UK) and 22.8% (2010-2012) to 23.1% (2016-2018) (USA). The proportion of white patients decreased, from 86.7% (2010) to 79.1% (2017) (UK) and 72.1% (2010) to 67.1% (2017) (USA). Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) rates increased in UK (2010-2012: 89.0%, 2016-2017: 94.3%), while decreased in USA (2010-2012: 88.9%, 2016-2018: 86.2% (USA). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and management strategies, there was no difference in all-cause mortality in the UK in 2016-2017 compared to 2010-2012 (OR:1.21, 95% CI:0.60-2.40), but there was a decrease in the USA in 2016-2018 compared to 2010-2012 (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79-0.90)., Conclusion: The demographics of young STEMI patients have temporally changed in the UK and USA, with increased proportions of females and ethnic minorities. There was a significant increase in the frequency of diabetes mellitus over the respective time periods in both countries., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: The long-terms outcomes of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors are not well known., Methods: Using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, linked to Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analysed 661 326 England, Wales and Northern-Ireland AMI patients; 14 127 (2%) suffered OHCA and survived beyond thirty-days of hospitalisation. Patients dying within thirty-days of admission were excluded. Mean follow-up for patients included was 1 500 days. Cox regression models were fitted, adjusting for demographics and management strategy., Results: OHCA survivors were younger (in years) (64 (interquartile range [IQR] 54-72) vs. 70 (IQR 59-80), P < 0.001), more often underwent invasive coronary angiography (88% vs. 71%, P < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (72% vs. 45%, P < 0.001). Overall, risk of mortality for OHCA patients that survived past 30-days was lower than patients that did not suffer cardiac arrest (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.91; 95% CI; 0.87-0.95, P < 0.001). 'Excellent care' according to the mean opportunity-based quality indicator (OBQI) score compared to 'Poor care', predicted reduced risk of long-term mortality post OHCA, for all-patients (HR: 0.77, CI; 0.76-0.78, P < 0.001), more for STEMI patients (HR: 0.73, CI; 0.71-0.75, P < 0.001), but less significantly in NSTEMI patients (HR: 0.79, CI; 0.78-0.81, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients remain at significant risk of mortality in-hospital. However, if surviving over thirty-days post arrest, OHCA survivors have good longer-term survival up to ten-years compared to the general AMI population. Higher quality inpatient care appears to improve long-term survival in all OHCA patients, more so in STEMI., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Contemporary studies demonstrate that non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) processes of care vary according to sex. Little is known regarding variation in practice between geographical areas and centers., Methods: We identified 305 014 NSTEMI admissions in the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP), 2010-2017, including female sex (110 209). Hierarchical, multivariate logistic regression models were fitted assessing for differences in primary outcomes according to sex. Risk standardized mortality rates (RSMR) were calculated for individual hospitals to illustrate correlation with variables of interest. 'Heat-maps' were plotted to show regional and sex-based variation in opportunity-based quality-indicator score (surrogate for optimal processes of care)., Results: Women presented older (77y vs. 69y, P < 0.001) and were more often Caucasian (93% vs. 91%, P < 0.001). Women were less frequently managed with an invasive coronary angiogram (ICA) (58% vs. 75%, P < 0.001) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (35% vs. 49%, P < 0.001)). In our hospital-clustered analysis, we show positive correlation between the RSMR and increasing proportion of women treated for NSTEMI (R2 = 0.17, P < 0.001). There was clear negative correlation between proportion of women who had an optimum OBQI score during their admission and RSMR (R2 = 0.22, P < 0.001), with weaker correlation in men (R2 = 0.08, P < 0.001). Heat-maps according to clinical commissioning group (CCG) demonstrate significant regional variation in OBQI score, with women receiving poorer quality care throughout the UK., Conlusion: There was a significant in variation of the management of patients with NSTEMI according to sex, with widespread geographical variation. Structural changes are required to enable improved care for women., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)