Search

Background: Without provision of additional intervention, most individuals regain weight after the end of weight-loss programs. Extended-care programs have been demonstrated to improve long-term weight-loss maintenance, but effects are modest., Methods: We proposed to evaluate whether delivering extended-care telephone sessions on an ADAPTIVE (provided when individuals are deemed to be at high-risk for weight regain) versus STATIC (the once-per-month schedule typically used in extended-care programs) schedule improves weight regain after initial weight loss. Adults with obesity were initially recruited for a 16-week lifestyle weight-loss program, and those who lost ≥5 % of their initial weight were eligible for enrollment in the Project STAR maintenance trial., Results: A total of 449 individuals (mean ± SD age = 49.5 ± 11.4 years, BMI = 35.7 ± 4.0 kg/m 2 , 83.5 % female, 23.4 % Black or African American, 9.8 % Hispanic) were recruited for the initial weight-loss program and lost an average of 6.4 ± 4.9 % of their initial body weight; 255 were randomized to the maintenance trial. There were no significant differences between participants randomized to the trial versus those who were not in terms of baseline weight, gender, race/ethnicity, education, or marital status, all ps > 0.05; however, participants who were randomized to the trial were older, p = .014, and reported higher incomes, p < .001., Conclusion: Results from Project STAR will demonstrate whether providing extended-care intervention on an individually adaptable schedule improves long-term weight-loss maintenance. Moreover, the rich longitudinal dataset collected during the trial will serve as a foundation for building future predictive algorithms of weight regain and novel weight-maintenance interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The research described in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, under award number R01DK119244., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is need for interventions that can assist with long-term maintenance of healthy body weight and be sustainably integrated into existing primary care teams. The goal of MAINTAIN PRIME (Promoting Real (World) IMplEmentation) is to evaluate whether a successful electronic health record (EHR)-based weight maintenance intervention can be adapted to a new clinical setting with primary care staff serving as coaches., Methods: EHR tools include tracking tools, standardized surveys, and standardized "SmartPhrases" for coaching. Inclusion criteria were age 18-75 years, voluntary 5% weight loss in the past 2 years with prior BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 , and no bariatric procedures in past 2 years. Participants were randomized 1:1 to tailored online coaching with EHR tracking tools (coaching) or EHR tracking tools alone (tracking)., Results: We screened 405 individuals between September 2021 and April 2023; 269 participants enrolled (134 coaching; 135 tracking). The most common reason for not enrolling was ineligibility (55%). At baseline, participants were 50.3 (SD 15.02) years old, 66.4% female, and 84% White; 83.7% reported moderate physical activity. Average weight and BMI at baseline were 205.0 (SD 48.9) lbs. and 33.2 (6.8) kg/m 2 , respectively. Participants lost an average of 10.7% (SD 5.2) of their body weight before enrolling. We recruited 39 primary care coaches over the same period. Conclusion The study successfully identified and recruited primary care patients with recent intentional weight loss for participation in a weight maintenance program that uses EHR-based tools. We also successfully recruited and trained primary care staff as coaches., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Intensive weight management programs are effective but often have low enrollment and high attrition. Lack of motivation is a key psychological barrier to enrollment, engagement, and weight loss. Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) is a unique imagery technique that increases motivation for behavior change. We describe our study protocol to assess the efficacy and implementation of MCII to enhance the effectiveness of VA's MOVE! or TeleMOVE! weight management programs using a procedure called "WOOP" (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) for Veterans. We hypothesize that WOOP+MOVE! or TeleMOVE! (intervention) will lead to greater MOVE!/TeleMOVE! program engagment and consequently weight loss than MOVE!/TeleMOVE! alone (control)., Method: Veterans are randomized to either the intervention or control. Both arms receive the either MOVE! or TeleMOVE! weight management programs. The intervention group receives an hour long WOOP training while the control group receives patient education. Both groups receive telephone follow up calls at 3 days, 4 weeks, and 2 months post-baseline. Eligible participants are Veterans (ages 18-70 years) with either obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) or overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) and an obesity-associated co-morbidity. At baseline, 6 and 12 months, we assess weight, diet, physical activity in both groups. The primary outcome is mean percent weight change at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in waist circumference, diet, physical activity, and dieting self-efficacy and engagement in regular physical activity. We assess implementation using the RE-AIM framework., Conclusion: If WOOP VA is found to be efficacious, it will be an important tool to facilitate weight management and improve weight outcomes., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05014984., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)