Search

Background: Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is a rare cancer for which the cornerstone of treatment is surgery with high complication rates. The unmet need is a less radical and more effective treatment for VSCC., Primary Objectives: To investigate the impact of mono-immunotherapy pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant treatment for primary resectable VSCC patients., Study Hypothesis: Some primary VSCC patients display a specific immune profile which is associated with better survival. In other tumors, this profile is associated with a better response to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint blockade which may reinvigorate tumor-specific T cells. This potentially results in a reduced tumor load and less radical surgery and/or adjuvant treatment in patients with this immune profile., Trial Design: This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial., Inclusion Criteria: Patients with VSCC clinical stage International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) I-III (2021) eligible for primary surgery, with at least one measurable lesion of at least one dimension ≥10 mm in the largest diameter, are included in this study., Main Exclusion Criteria: Patients not suitable for surgery and/or previously treated with immunomodulatory agents, and/or who suffer from comorbidities that may interfere with PD-1 blockade, are excluded from the study., Endpoints: The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in VSCC is measured by an objective change in tumor size according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and documented by calipers using standardized digital photography with a reference ruler. In addition, the activation, proliferation, and migration of T cells in the tumor will be studied. The secondary endpoints are pathological complete responses at the time of surgery, feasibility, and safety., Sample Size: 40 patients with FIGO I-III (2021) primary VSCC will be enrolled., Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: The intervention phase started in July 2023 and will continue until July 2025. The expected completion of the entire study is July 2026., Trial Registration Number: NCT05761132., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) arises after an HPV infection or the mutation of p53 or other driver genes and is treated by mutilating surgery and/or (chemo) radiation, with limited success and high morbidity. In-depth information on the immunological make up of VSCC is pivotal to assess whether immunotherapy may form an alternative treatment., Methods: A total of 104 patient samples, comprising healthy vulva (n = 27) and VSCC (n = 77), were analyzed. Multispectral immunofluorescence (15 markers) was used to study both the myeloid and lymphoid immune cell composition, and this was linked to differences in transcriptomics (NanoString nCounter, 1258 genes) and in survival (Kaplan-Meier analyses)., Results: Healthy vulva and VSCC are both well infiltrated but with different subpopulations of lymphoid and myeloid cells. In contrast to the lymphoid cell infiltrate, the density and composition of the myeloid cell infiltrate strongly differed per VSCC molecular subtype. A relative strong infiltration with epithelial monocytes (HLADR - CD11c - CD14 + CD68 - CD163 - CD33 - ) was prognostic for improved survival, independent of T cell infiltration, disease stage or molecular subtype. A strong infiltration with T cells and/or monocytes was associated with drastic superior survival: 5-year survival > 90% when either one is high, versus 40% when both are low (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: A hot myeloid and/or lymphoid infiltrate predicts excellent survival in VSCC. Based on the response of similarly high-infiltrated other tumor types, we have started to explore the potential of neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade in VSCC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) often causes immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Since irAEs resemble autoimmune diseases, autoantibodies might play a role and could potentially be used to identify patients at risk. Therefore, we investigated the association between autoantibody-positivity and toxicity as well as clinical response in patients with melanoma treated with anti-PD-1., Materials and Methods: This two-center, retrospective study included 143 patients with melanoma treated with anti-PD-1. Toxicities grade ≥2 and recurrences/responses were captured until 6 months after treatment initiation. Autoantibody measurements were performed at baseline and 3 months after treatment initiation, including IgM-rheumatoid factor (RF), antinuclear antibodies (ANA), extractable nuclear antigen, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP2) and anti-thyroid antibodies., Results: 169 irAEs were experienced by 86/143 patients (137 grades 1-2, 32 grades 3-4), the most common being thyroiditis (n=25), dermatitis (n=24), and sicca problems (n=19). Patients with autoantibodies at baseline experienced more irAEs (p=0.001), predominantly associated with anti-thyroid antibodies and thyroid dysfunction. No association was observed between any irAE and anti-CCP2, RF or ANA. In women, baseline and on-treatment anti-thyroid antibody-positivity as well as seroconversion during treatment was associated with thyroid dysfunction. In men, this association was only observed on-treatment. The presence of autoantibodies was not associated with melanoma recurrence (p=0.776) or response (p=0.597)., Conclusion: The presence of autoantibodies prior to anti-PD-1 therapy is associated with irAEs in patients with melanoma. Both baseline positivity and seroconversion of anti-thyroid antibodies were strongly associated with thyroid dysfunction. This association was stronger in women, with all women who were baseline positive developing thyroid dysfunction., Competing Interests: Competing interests: EK has consultancy/advisory relationships with Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Immunocore and Lilly, and received research grants not related to this paper from Bristol Myers Squibb, Delcath, Novartis and Pierre-Fabre. Not related to current work and paid to the institute. JH received compensation for advisory roles for Achilles Therapeutics, AZ, BioNTech, BMS, CureVac, Eisai, Gadeta, Imcyse, Immunocore, Instil Bio, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Ipsen, MSD, Merck Serono, Molecular Partners, Neogene Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Scenic, Third Rock Ventures, and T-knife, and has received grants (all paid to the institute) from Amgen, Asher Bio, BioNTech, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Neogene Therapeutics and Sastra Cell Therapy. All other authors declare to have no competing interest with respect to this manuscript., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

CD4 + T cells can "help" or "license" conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s) to induce CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) anticancer responses, as proven in mouse models. We recently identified cDC1s with a transcriptomic imprint of CD4 + T-cell help, specifically in T-cell-infiltrated human cancers, and these cells were associated with a good prognosis and response to PD-1-targeting immunotherapy. Here, we delineate the mechanism of cDC1 licensing by CD4 + T cells in humans. Activated CD4 + T cells produce IFNβ via the STING pathway, which promotes MHC-I antigen (cross-)presentation by cDC1s and thereby improves their ability to induce CTL anticancer responses. In cooperation with CD40 ligand (L), IFNβ also optimizes the costimulatory and other functions of cDC1s required for CTL response induction. IFN-I-producing CD4 + T cells are present in diverse T-cell-infiltrated cancers and likely deliver "help" signals to CTLs locally, according to their transcriptomic profile and colocalization with "helped/licensed" cDCs and tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells. In agreement with this scenario, the presence of IFN-I-producing CD4 + T cells in the TME is associated with overall survival and the response to PD-1 checkpoint blockade in cancer patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Reovirus type 3 Dearing (Reo), manufactured for clinical application as pelareorep, is an attractive anticancer agent under evaluation in multiple phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors. It elicits its anticancer efficacy by inducing both oncolysis and intratumoral T-cell influx. Because most people have been preexposed to Reo, neutralizing antibodies (NAb) are prevalent in patients with cancer and might present a barrier to effective Reo therapy. Here, we tested serum of patients with cancer and healthy controls (n = 100) and confirmed that Reo NAbs are present in >80% of individuals. To investigate the effect of NAbs on both the oncolytic and the immunostimulatory efficacy of Reo, we established an experimental mouse model with Reo preexposure. The presence of preexposure-induced NAbs reduced Reo tumor infection and prevented Reo-mediated control of tumor growth after intratumoral Reo administration. In B cell-deficient mice, the lack of NAbs provided enhanced tumor growth control after Reo monotherapy, indicating that NAbs limit the oncolytic capacity of Reo. In immunocompetent mice, intratumoral T-cell influx was not affected by the presence of preexposure-induced NAbs and consequently, combinatorial immunotherapy strategies comprising Reo and T-cell engagers or checkpoint inhibitors remained effective in these settings, also after a clinically applied regimen of multiple intravenous pelareorep administrations. Altogether, our data indicate that NAbs hamper the oncolytic efficacy of Reo, but not its immunotherapeutic capacity. Given the high prevalence of seropositivity for Reo in patients with cancer, our data strongly advocate for the application of Reo as part of T cell-based immunotherapeutic strategies., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)