Search

This document assesses the appropriateness of various imaging studies for acute penetrating trauma to the torso. Penetrating trauma most commonly occurs from gunshots and stabbings, although any object can impale the patient. Anatomic location, type of penetrating trauma, and hemodynamic status are among the many important factors when deciding upon if, what, and when imaging is needed to further evaluate the patient. Imaging plays a critical role in the management of these patients. CT, in particular, aids in identifying and predicting internal injuries based upon trajectory of the object. Clinical variants are distinguished by ballistic versus nonballistic injuries, hemodynamic status, and compartment of the body injured. Ballistic trauma trajectory is less predictable, and imaging recommendations are adjusted for this unpredictability. Excluded from this document are penetrating traumatic injuries to pediatric patients and specific recommendations when the genitourinary system is clinically suspected to be injured, the latter of which is more specifically discussed in other Appropriateness Criteria documents. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are documented annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer documented journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer documented literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Traumatic penetrating spinal injuries with wooden objects are rare. A 6-year-old boy presented with history of fall from tree 1 month back. It resulted in a penetrating injury at the lumbosacral area, followed by a discharging sinus without any neurological deficit. Radiological imaging showed a foreign body at the spinous process level traversing L4-5 and is lodged in L3-4 intervertebral body causing listhesis of L3 over L4. The wooden stick was retrieved with a meticulous surgical procedure. Proper imaging and early surgery are necessary to prevent any complications and early recovery., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Penetrating neck injuries are not uncommon, while penetrated foreign bodies involving the larynx are rare, which can be critical and challenging even for experienced physicians. We presented a case of a 64-year-old man with a piece of grinder blade penetrating through the subglottic region, visiting our outpatient department with hoarseness persisting for 3 weeks. The flexible fiberoptic laryngoscope, CT and direct laryngoscope were used to establish the right diagnosis. A cervical incision over the prior scar region was performed to remove the foreign body from the laryngeal box. Clinically, laryngotracheal injuries could lead to severe crisis without proper and prompt treatment. As to penetrated foreign bodies involving the larynx, a proper airway management and surgical approach are crucial for minimizing the morbidity and mortality. An accurate localization and preoperative planning is on the other hand indispensable to a successful removal and recovery., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared that there is no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Transoral penetrating foreign body injury of the neck involving the cervical spine is a rare condition. We present an injury caused by transoral penetration of a broken piece of a wooden plank into the neck with injury to the upper cervical spine in a 31-year-old male patient. The foreign body was removed transorally with the patient making a full recovery under close observation and was discharged and followed up with no complications. This paper highlights the types of neck injuries, the key points to be considered in zone III neck injury in light of existing literature and a discussion on the management of these patients.

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound has long been used in the trauma setting for rapid assessment and diagnosis of critically ill patients. Its utility for diagnosis of pericardial effusion in the setting of penetrating thoracic trauma has more recently been a topic of consideration, given the rapid decompensation that these patients can experience., Objectives: This study aims to identify the diagnostic accuracy of point of care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion among patients with penetrating thoracic trauma., Methods: Retrospective review of 2099 patients brought to the trauma bay between the years 2016 and 2021 were analyzed for diagnosis of pericardial effusion. Patients who were diagnosed with a pericardial effusion were investigated for point of care ultrasound findings. Descriptive statistics were performed to identify sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value., Results: Prevalence was calculated to be 26.7 cases of pericardial effusion per 1000 patients presenting with penetrating thoracic trauma. Incidence was estimated to be 3.8 cases of pericardial effusion per 1000 person-years. Calculation of diagnostic capabilities of ED POCUS revealed a sensitivity of 96.36 ​%, a specificity of 100 ​%, PPV of 100 ​%, and NPV of 99.90 ​%., Conclusions: Point of Care cardiac ultrasonography is a reliable tool for the rapid diagnosis of pericardial effusion in penetrating thoracic trauma patients. Patients with ultrasound suggestive of this condition should receive rapid surgical management to prevent decompensation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Management of penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) has evolved over time, more frequently relying on increased utilization of diagnostic imaging studies. Directed work-up with computed tomography imaging has resulted in increased use of angiography and decreased operative interventions. We sought to evaluate management strategies after directed work-up, hypothesizing increased use of non-operative therapeutic interventions and lower mortality after directed work-up., Methods: Patients with PNI from 2017 to 2022 were identified from a single-center trauma registry. Demographics, injuries, physical exam findings, diagnostic studies and interventions were collected. Patients were stratified by presence of hard signs and management strategy [directed work-up (DW) and immediate operative intervention (OR)] and compared. Outcomes included therapeutic non-operative intervention [endovascular stent, embolization, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or anticoagulation (AC)], non-therapeutic neck exploration, length of stay (LOS), and mortality., Results: Of 436 patients with PNI, 143 (33%) patients had vascular and/or aerodigestive injuries. Of these, 115 (80%) patients underwent DW and 28 (20%) patients underwent OR. There were no differences in demographics or injury severity score between groups. Patients in the DW group were more likely to undergo vascular stent or embolization (p = 0.040) and had fewer non-therapeutic neck explorations (p = 0.0009), compared to the OR group. There were no differences in post-intervention stroke, leak, or mortality. Sixty percent of patients with vascular hard signs and 78% of patients with aerodigestive hard signs underwent DW., Conclusions: Directed work-up in select patients with PNI is associated with fewer non-therapeutic neck explorations. There was no difference in mortality. Selective use of endovascular management, AC and DAPT is safe., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We encountered a case in which emergency surgery was performed for a penetrating lung injury complicated by a hemodynamic cerebral infarction. A 45-year-old man sustained a chest injury due to a scattered piece of metal and was admitted to a nearby hospital. He was confirmed to have hemorrhagic shock due to a right hemopneumothorax, and a chest tube was inserted he was transferred to our hospital. Chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) revealed a metal fragment in the right lung and confirmed the diagnosis of a penetrating lung injury due to a foreign body. The patient also presented with total blindness of an unknown etiology. Emergency surgery was performed to treat the injury and remove the foreign body. A large amount of blood and hematoma were removed from the right thoracic cavity, and a metal fragment was found in the lower lobe of the right lung. After removing the foreign body, pulmonary suturing was performed. On the following day, head magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple cerebral infarctions in the bilateral occipital lobes, left frontal lobe, and left cerebellar hemisphere. However, no vascular occlusion or thrombus was found, and the patient was diagnosed with hemodynamic cerebral infarction due to hemorrhagic shock.

Background: This systematic review investigates the diagnostic value of ultrasound in the evaluation of torso injuries following a penetrating trauma., Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and WOS databases for related original articles until May 7, 2023, and extracted data related to diagnostic performance. The bivariate model and hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) approach were used to calculate pooled diagnostic values. Cochrane Q test and I-squared were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed heterogeneity with meta-regression., Results: Seventeen studies were included, which involved a total number of 1866 patients. According to meta-analysis, sonography demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 56% (45-67%) and specificity of 96% (94-97%), positive likelihood ratio (LR +) of 13.66 (8.03-23.23), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.45 (0.35-0.59) for detecting abdominal injuries. In pericardial penetrating trauma, pooled sensitivity was 100% (45-100%), pooled specificity was 99% (96-100%), LR + was 136.7 (24.8-752.3), and LR- was 0.00 (0.00-1.22). For thoracic penetrating trauma, pooled sensitivity was 99% (93-100%) and specificity was 100% (98-100%)., Conclusions: Sonography demonstrated promising diagnostic value in the initial assessment of torso penetrating trauma, particularly in the thoracic and pericardial regions. However, the sensitivity of sonography is limited in abdominal penetrating trauma and a combination with other imaging modalities should be considered in these cases., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Abstract: Diagnostic evaluation of penetrating neck trauma has evolved considerably over the last several decades. The contemporary approach to these injuries is based primarily on clinical signs of injury and multidetector computed tomographic angiography. The neck is evaluated as a unit, rather than relying on the surface anatomy zones in which external injuries are seen to guide the workup of internal injuries. This "no-zone" approach safely spares many patients from negative explorations and unnecessary invasive tests. The purpose of this review is to describe an evidence-based approach to the diagnostic evaluation of penetrating neck trauma, including indications for adjunctive testing beyond physical examination and multidetector computed tomographic angiography., Level of Evidence: Literature Synthesis and Expert Opinion; Level V., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This multicenter study examines the contemporary management of penetrating carotid artery injury (PCAI) to identify trends in management, outcomes, and to determine prognostic factors for stroke and death., Methods: Data from three large urban trauma centers in South Africa were retrospectively reviewed for patients who presented with PCAI from 2012 to 2020., Results: Of 149 identified patients, 137 actively managed patients were included. Twenty-four patients (17.9%) presented in coma and 12 (9.0%) with localizing signs (LS). CT angiography was performed on admission for 120 (87.6%) patients. Thirty patients (21.9%) underwent nonoperative management, 87 (63.5%) open surgery, and 20 (14.6%) endovascular stenting. Eighteen patients (13.1%) died, and 15 (12.6%) surviving patients had strokes. Ligation was significantly related to death and reperfusion to survival. A mechanism of gunshot wound, occlusive injuries, a threatened airway, a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, hard signs of vascular injury, a low GCS, coma, a CT brain demonstrating infarct, a high injury severity score and shock index, a low pH or HCO3, and an elevated lactate were significant independent prognostic factors for death. Ligation was unsurvivable in all patients with severe neurological deficits, whereas reperfusion procedures resulted in survival in 63% (12/19) patients with coma and 78% (7/9) with LS although with high stroke rates (coma: 25.0%, LS: 85.7%)., Conclusions: Outcomes in PCAI, including patients with severe neurological deficit and stroke, are better when reperfused. Reperfusion holds the best promise of survival and ligation should be reserved for technically inaccessible bleeding injuries., (© 2024 The Author(s). World Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Background: Routine evaluation with CTA for patients with isolated lower extremity penetrating trauma and normal ankle-brachial-indices (ABI) remains controversial. While prior literature has found normal ABI's (≥0.9) and a normal clinical examination to be adequate for safe discharge, there remains concern for missed injuries which could lead to delayed surgical intervention and unnecessary morbidity. Our hypothesis was that routine CTA after isolated lower extremity penetrating trauma with normal ABIs and clinical examination is not cost-effective., Methods: We performed a decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obtaining a CTA routinely compared to clinical observation and ABI evaluation in hemodynamically normal patients with isolated penetrating lower extremity trauma. Our base case was a patient that sustained penetrating lower extremity trauma with normal ABIs that received a CTA in the trauma bay. Costs, probability, and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were generated from published literature., Results: Clinical evaluation only (no CTA) was cost-effective with a cost of $2056.13 and 0.98 QALYs gained compared to routine CTA which had increased costs of $7449.91 and lower QALYs 0.92. Using one-way sensitivity analysis, routine CTA does not become the cost-effective strategy until the cost of a missed injury reaches $210,075.83., Conclusions: Patients with isolated, penetrating lower extremity trauma with normal ABIs and clinical examination do not warrant routine CTA as there is no benefit with increased costs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no disclosures. This study was accepted for full podium presentation at the February 2023 Pacific Coast Surgical Association (PCSA) Annual Meeting., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To report a unique case of incomplete CES following a rebar penetrating injury in perineal region with retro-pulsed fragment, which was treated with anterior approach and discuss suitable surgical approach., Methods: Incomplete cauda equina syndrome caused by non-missile penetrating injury is extremely rare. A 26-year-old male patient presented incomplete cauda equina syndrome due to a penetrating rebar wound from his perineal region to the lumbosacral spine. Computed tomography demonstrated a bony fragment broken from S1 body compressing into the spinal canal., Results: By anterior approach, we performed partial corpectomy of L5, decompression by retrieving the bony fragment and L5-S1 interbody fusion. The patient had a significant recovery, and no clinical complication was found after over 2-year follow-up., Conclusion: It is challenging to determine the optimal strategy of surgical treatment for penetrating spinal injuries with retained foreign bodies, here we suggest an anterior approach situation that has the advantage of being able to effectively perform decompression and prevent iatrogenic damages of thecal sac and nerve rootlets., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The liver, spleen, and kidneys are the commonest injured solid organs in blunt and penetrating trauma. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scale (OIS) is the most widely accepted system for categorizing traumatic injuries. Grading systems allow clear communication of findings between clinical teams and assign a measurable severity of injury, which directly correlates with morbidity and mortality. The 2018 revised AAST OIS emphasizes reliance on CT for accurate grading; in particular regarding vascular injuries. Dual-Energy CT (DECT) has emerged as a promising tool with multiple clinical applications already demonstrated. In this review article, we summarize the basic principles of CT attenuation to refresh the minds of our readers and we scrutinize DECT's technology as opposed to conventional Single-Energy CT (SECT). This is followed by outlining the benefits of various DECT postprocessing techniques, which authors of this article refer to as the 3Ms (Mapping of Iodine, Material decomposition, and Monoenergetic virtual imaging), in aiding radiologists to confidently assign an OIS as well as problem solve complex injury patterns. In addition, a thorough discussion of changes to the revised AAST OIS focusing on definitions of key terms used in reporting injuries is described., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Penetrating neck injury is associated with significant morbidity due to the several structures (neurological, vascular and aerodigestive) within close proximity to one another. This case highlights an uncommon presentation of an embedded foreign body following penetrating neck trauma and the decision-making required during management., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Penetrating neck injuries (PNIs), defined as deep to the platysma, can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Management has evolved from a zone-based approach to a 'no zone' algorithm, resulting in reduced non-therapeutic neck exploration rates. The aim of this study was to examine PNIs and its management trends in an Australian tertiary trauma centre, to determine if a 'no zone' approach could be safely implemented in this population, as has been demonstrated internationally., Methodology: This was a retrospective observational study at a level 1 adult Australian tertiary trauma centre using prospectively collated data from January 2008 to December 2018. Observed data included age, gender, mechanism of injury, computed tomography angiography (CT-A) use and operative intervention. Patients were examined based on zone of injury and presenting signs - 'hard', 'soft' or 'asymptomatic'. Major outcomes were CT-A usage, positive CT-A correlation with therapeutic neck explorations and negative neck exploration rates., Results: This study identified 238 PNI patients, with 204 selected for review. Most injuries occurred in zone 2 (71.6%), with soft signs accounting for 53.4% of cases. Over 10 years, CT-A utilization increased from 55% to 94.1%, with positive CT-As being more likely to yield therapeutic neck explorations. There was a general decreased trend in operative intervention but without a clear reduction in non-therapeutic neck explorations., Conclusion: Our data suggests similarities with results from around the world, demonstrating that the 'no zone' approach should be considered when managing PNIs, but with clinician discretion in individual cases., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Evaluating patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury can be complicated by other injuries. In this case, a 24-year-old woman injured by a needlefish presented with combined motor and sensory defects, cranial nerve deficits, and a blunt vascular injury. This case highlights the importance of neurologic and vascular localizations and an understanding of spinal cord injuries involving various ascending and descending tracts. Appreciation of these anatomical considerations through this case illustrates the diagnostic approach to neurologic evaluation. While we present a traumatic etiology for multiple neurologic syndromes, this case gives readers an opportunity to develop a comprehensive differential diagnosis and tailor investigations for other relevant etiologies. Readers walking through this stepwise process will ultimately arrive at several distinct but related diagnoses.

Penetrating cardiac injuries usually require emergent surgical intervention. Our patient presented to the trauma centre with multiple stab wounds to the neck, chest, epigastric region and abdomen. She arrived haemodynamically stable, and her initial Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma exam was negative. Her chest X-ray did not show any evident pneumothorax or haemothorax. Due to her injury pattern, she was taken to the operating room for exploratory laparotomy and neck exploration. Postoperatively, she was taken for CT and found to have a contained cardiac rupture. The injury was contained within previous scar tissue from her prior cardiac surgery. Further evaluation revealed that the injury included a penetrating stab wound to the right ventricle and a traumatic ventricular septal defect (VSD). She subsequently underwent a redo sternotomy with the repair of the penetrating stab wound and the VSD. Cardiology, intensive care, trauma surgery and cardiothoracic surgery coordinated her care from diagnosis, management and recovery. This case highlights the challenges in the management of cardiac injuries and the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to care for complex cardiac injuries., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Penetrating spinal injuries are generally extremely rare and are seldom encountered in pediatric patients. The non-compliance of pediatric patients with physical examination can sometimes delay diagnosis and treatment. Here, we present a case of a child who had a fall and suffered penetrating spinal trauma due to a small glass fragment., Case Report: A penetrating foreign body was detected in the lumbar spinal region of a 2-year-old patient with complaints of increased restlessness on physical activity followed by difficulty in walking. The patient was operated on and followed up without any complications in the perioperative and late postoperative periods., Conclusion: A detailed physical examination is necessitated in the pediatric age group because of insufficient anamnesis. The high number of patients per physician, especially in societies having a low socioeconomic standard, prevents detailed examinations, and unnecessary examinations may cause delays in diagnosis. However, one must note that the skin findings of pediatric patients can be very helpful, especially in pediatric neurosurgery, and examination should not be neglected., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Trauma remains one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality and a threat to attainment of sustainable development goal 11. Genital urinary trauma is reported in about 10% of patients presenting with trauma worldwide, and in about 6.6% of patients in Sub-Saharan Africa. If not careful enough, one may miss the foreign body in the vagina and this may be associated with morbidity, and although  rare, mortality., Case Presentation: We report a case of a 7-year-old Black Ugandan that had suffered vagina trauma 6 months prior to presentation at our facility and presented with chronic vagina pus discharge for 6 months. Prior examinations had failed to recognize the foreign body and so did the two abdominal pelvic ultrasound scans. During examination under anesthesia, we were able to locate the cassava stick that had caused penetrating vagina injury and we were able to dislodge it. It was a blunt cassava stick with length of 22 cm and diameter of 2 cm. Although it had gone through the peritoneal cavity, we did not do a laparotomy., Conclusion: This case emphasizes the need for a thorough vaginal exam including the need to do it under anesthesia with good lighting even when ultrasound scan findings are normal. It presents an opportunity for one to manage penetrating peritoneal injury without a laparotomy in highly selected cases. Gynecologists should be keen as well to rule out child molestation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)