Search

Abstract Background Cancer‐related pain is one of the common priority symptoms in advanced lung cancer patients at the end‐of‐life (EOL). Alleviating pain is undoubtedly a critical component of palliative care in lung cancer. Our study was initiated to examined trends in opioid prescription‐level outcomes as potential indicators of undertreated pain in China. Methods This study used data on 1330 patients diagnosed with lung cancer of urban city medical insurance in China who died between 2014 and 2017. Opioid prescription‐level outcomes were determined by annual trends of the proportion of patients filling an opioid prescription, the total dose of opioids filled by decedents, and morphine milligram equivalents per day (MMED) at the EOL (defined as the 60 days before death). We further analyzed monthly changes in the number of opioid prescriptions filled, MMED, and mean daily dose of opioids per prescription (MDDP) of the last 60 days of life by year at death and age, respectively. Results A total of 959 patients with exact dates of death were included, with 432 cases (45.06%; 95% CI: 44.36%–45.77%) receiving at least one opioid prescription at the EOL. The declining trends were shown in the proportion of patients filling any opioid prescription, the total dose of opioids filled by decedents and MMED, with an annual decrease of 0.341% (p = 0.01), 104.23 mg (p = 0.011) and 2.84 mg (p = 0.014), respectively. Within the 31–60 days to the 0–30 days of life, the MMED declined 6.08 mg (95% CI: −7.14 to −5.03; p = 0.000351), while the number of opioid prescriptions rose 0.66 (95% CI: 0.160–1.16; p = 0.025). Like the MMED, the MDDP fell 4.11 mg (95% CI: −5.86 to −2.37; p = 0.005) within the last month before death compared to the previous month. Conclusion Terminal lung cancer populations in urban China have experienced reduced access to opioids at the EOL. The clinicians did not prescribe a satisfactory dose of opioids per prescription, while the patients suffered increasing pain in the last 30 days of life. Sufficient opioid analgesic administration should be advocated for lung cancer patients during the EOL period.

Abstract There remains an unmet need for targeted therapies against advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with HER2 mutations. To improve the antitumor activity of single anti‐HER2 agent, this prospective, single‐arm clinical trial (NCT05016544) examined the safety profile and efficacy of anti‐HER2 antibody inetetamab and pan‐HER TKI pyrotinib in HER2‐posivite advanced NSCLC patients. Enrolled patients received inetetamab every 3 weeks and pyrotinib once per day (pyrotinib, dose‐escalation part, 240 mg, 320 mg; dose‐expansion part, 320 mg). Primary endpoints were dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) dosage and safety. Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). A total of 48 patients were enrolled. During the dose‐escalation period, no DLT occurred. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported treatment‐related adverse event (TRAE). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in seven patients. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4–8.6 months]. The confirmed ORR and DCR reached 25% (11/44) and 84.1% (37/44), respectively. Responses were shown in patients with distinct HER2 aberrations. In summary, inetetamab in combination with pyrotinib demonstrated acceptable safety and antitumor activity among patients with advanced HER2‐mutant NSCLC.

Background: The feasibility and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) for treating lung nodules remain unclear. Methods and Materials: A total of 409 patients with lung tumors treated at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from August 2020 to May 2023 were enrolled. Perioperative data, including baseline characteristics, operation time, postoperative pain score (visual analog scale [VAS]), hospitalization expenses, postoperative complications, total hospital stay, and patient satisfaction, were observed and recorded. Results: No perioperative mortality occurred in either group and complete ablation was achieved in all patients. Patients in the ERAS group had significantly shorter hospital stays (P < 0.001), reduced operation times (P = 0.047), lower hospitalization expenses (P < 0.001), lower VAS scores (P < 0.001), and fewer complications (P = 0.047) compared with the traditional group. Conclusions: ERAS for percutaneous CT-guided MWA (ERAA) is safe, effective, and feasible for the treatment of lung nodules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]