Search

Modulating immune function is a critical strategy in cancer and atherosclerosis treatments. For cancer, boosting or maintaining the immune system is crucial to prevent tumor growth. However, in vascular disease, mitigating immune responses can decrease inflammation and slow atherosclerosis progression. Anti-inflammatory therapy, therefore, presents a unique dilemma for cancer survivors: while it may decrease cardiovascular risk, it might also promote cancer growth and metastasis by suppressing the immune response. Senescence presents a potentially targetable solution to this challenge; senescence increases the risk of both cancer therapy resistance and vascular disease. Exercise, notably, shows promise in delaying this premature senescence, potentially improving cancer outcomes and lowering vascular disease risk post-treatment. This review focuses on the long-term impact of cancer therapies on vascular health. We underscore the importance of modulating senescence to balance cancer treatment's effectiveness and its vascular impact, and we emphasize investigating the role of exercise-mediated suppression of senescence in improving cancer survivorship., Competing Interests: J.L. Kirkland has a financial interest related to this research, including patents and pending patents covering senolytic drugs and their uses that are held by Mayo Clinic. This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and was conducted in compliance with the conflict of interest policies of Mayo Clinic. N.M.J. Hanssen has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk. A. Deswal is a consultant for Bayer. The other authors report no conflicts.

Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), formerly recognized as marantic endocarditis, represents a rare cardiovascular pathology intricately linked with hypercoagulable states, notably malignancy and autoimmune disorders. Characterized by the development of sterile vegetations comprised of fibrin and platelets on cardiac valves, NBTE poses a diagnostic challenge due to its resemblance to infective endocarditis. Therapeutic endeavours primarily revolve around addressing the underlying aetiology and instituting anticoagulant regimens to forestall embolic events, with surgical intervention seldom warranted. Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis frequently coexists with malignancies and autoimmune conditions, such as lupus and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and, more recently, has been associated with COVID-19. Its pathogenesis is underpinned by a complex interplay of endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulability, hypoxia, and immune complex deposition. Clinical manifestations typically manifest as embolic phenomena, particularly cerebrovascular accidents, bearing substantial mortality rates. Diagnosis necessitates a high index of suspicion and meticulous exclusion of infective endocarditis, often facilitated by advanced cardiac imaging modalities. Anticoagulation, typically employing low molecular weight heparin or warfarin, constitutes the cornerstone of pharmacological intervention. Surgical recourse may be warranted in instances of refractory heart failure or recurrent embolic events. Given its multifaceted nature, the management of NBTE mandates a multidisciplinary approach, with prognosis contingent upon individual clinical intricacies. Future endeavours should prioritize further research to refine therapeutic strategies and enhance patient outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)