Search

Animal personalities are differences in behaviour among individuals of the same species that are consistent over time and contexts. The integration of animal personality into conservation actions is hampered by limited understanding of personality traits in non‐model organisms. We estimated repeatabilities and correlations between behaviours in Nannoperca vittata (western pygmy perch), a threatened freshwater fish species endemic to south‐western Australia, and, for comparative purposes, in Poecilia reticulata (guppy), a species frequently used in personality research. Each fish was measured four times for each of seven behavioural variables, presumed to reflect five underlying personality traits. Track length (TL) was used as a measure of activity; time spent in a risky zone (RZ) and time to emergence (ET) for boldness; latency to approach a novel object (LA) and time spent close to the object (TS) for exploration; time spent close to a mirror (CV) for sociability and number of attacks at the mirror (AT) for aggression. Four behavioural variables (TL, RZ, ET and CV) were significantly repeatable in N. vittata and also in P. reticulata. There was a lack of concordance in phenotypic and among‐individual correlations between variables in both species, emphasising the importance of partitioning trait covariances to infer behavioural syndromes. Significant among‐individual correlations were found between activity, boldness and sociability variables in N. vittata, consistent with a proactive‐reactive personality axis, but not in P. reticulata. Personality variation should be considered in conservation actions for N. vittata, particularly with respect to unintended consequences of domestication selection in captive breeding and release. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A graphene oxide (GO)-based humidity sensor is reported in this work wherein the influence of the substrate on its humidity-sensing properties is compared by depositing a GO film on two different substrates: glass and wearable fabric. While the GO film exhibits sensitivity to humidity for both substrates, its response varies from 35% for the glass substrate to 74% for wearable fabric at 60% relative humidity (RH), clearly indicating the superiority of the wearable fabric over glass. The sensors (on both substrates) show almost no sensitivity to several common volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and gases, suggesting their high selectivity towards humidity. In both cases, the sensor can detect humidity with high repeatability over several cycles and exhibits fast response and recovery times of 6 s/10 s and 7 s/12 s for glass and wearable fabric, respectively. The sensing mechanism is explained in terms of pre-adsorbed surface oxygen ions, as measured by the change in water signal upon exposure of the GO film to humidity using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Thus, we demonstrate that the developed GO film on wearable fabric can act as a low-cost, flexible, and wearable humidity sensor with good sensitivity, reproducibility, and selectivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biocompatibility evaluation of medical devices often relies on chemical testing according to ISO 10993–18 as a critical component for consideration. However, the precision associated with these non–targeted chemical characterization assessments has not been well established. Therefore, we have conducted a study to characterize intra–laboratory (repeatability) and inter–laboratory (reproducibility) variability associated with chemical testing of extractables from polymeric materials. To accomplish this, this study focused on two polymers, each with nine chemicals that were intentionally compounded into the materials. Eight different laboratories performed extraction testing in two solvents and subsequently characterized the extracts using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography methods. Analysis of the resulting data revealed the central 90 % range for the repeatability and reproducibility relative standard deviations are (0.09, 0.22) and (0.30, 0.85), respectively, for the participating laboratory methods. This finding implies that if the same sample was tested by two different laboratories using the same extraction conditions, there is 95 % confidence for 95 % of systems that the test results could exhibit differences up to 240 %. While the study was not designed to evaluate the relative impact of specific underlying factors that may contribute to variability in quantitation, the data obtained suggest the variability associated with analytical method alone is a substantial contribution to the overall variability. The relatively large reproducibility limits we observed may have significant implications where variability in extraction measurements can impact aspects of biocompatibility risk evaluation, such as exposure dose estimation and chemical equivalence assessments. • Established repeatability and reproducibility in medical device extraction studies. • Differences in quantitation ranged from 0.5 to 1 orders of magnitude. • Between laboratory variability 4x higher than within laboratory variability. • Differences in analytical methods are a major contributor to overall variability. • Non-targeted analytes inconsistently reported, but chemically similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doppler ultrasound can be used to evaluate leg blood flow (Q̇ leg ), especially of interest when investigating peripheral vascular limitations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the within-session repeatability, a subdomain of test-retest reliability, of this method remains unknown. This study aimed to provide within-session repeatability estimates of Doppler ultrasound-based Q̇ leg at rest and during single-leg knee-extensor exercise (KEE) in patients with COPD, and to compare these estimates to matched healthy controls. In this case-controlled study, 16 participants with COPD were matched based on sex and age with 16 healthy controls. All participants underwent measurement of Q̇ leg using Doppler ultrasound in a KEE setup at various intensities with the same measurement being performed again separated by 10 s. Smallest real difference (SRD) was lowest at rest in both groups and increased during exercise, reaching values ranging from 164 to 231 mL in COPD and 122-180 mL in the control group. The coefficient of variance (CV) was highest at rest and decreased during exercise to values ranging from 4.0% to 5.0% in COPD and 2.6%-3.2% in the control group. The CV was significantly lower in the control group during 0 watt and exercise at 20% of max watt, but apart from that, no reliability estimates were different between groups. To conclude, Doppler ultrasound showed nearly equal within-session repeatability when evaluating Q̇ leg in COPD patients and healthy individuals with a CV not exceeding 5% during exercise for both groups., (© 2024 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine.)