Search

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve health status in heart failure (HF) across the left ejection fraction ejection spectrum. However, the effects of SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibition on health status are unknown. These prespecified analyses of the SOLOIST-WHF (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Post Worsening Heart Failure) trial examined the effects of sotagliflozin vs placebo on HF-related health status. SOLOIST-WHF randomized patients hospitalized or recently discharged after a worsening HF episode to receive sotagliflozin or placebo. The primary endpoint was total number of HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and cardiovascular death. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) score was a prespecified secondary endpoint. This analysis evaluated change in the KCCQ-12 score from baseline to month 4. Of 1,222 patients randomized, 1,113 (91%) had complete KCCQ-12 data at baseline and 4 months. The baseline KCCQ-12 score was low overall (median: 41.7; Q1-Q3: 27.1-58.3) and improved by 4 months in both groups. Sotagliflozin vs placebo reduced the risk of the primary endpoint consistently across KCCQ-12 tertiles (P trend = 0.54). Sotagliflozin-treated patients vs those receiving placebo experienced modest improvement in KCCQ-12 at 4 months (adjusted mean change: 4.1 points; 95% CI: 1.3-7.0 points; P = 0.005). KCCQ-12 improvements were consistent across prespecified subgroups, including left ventricular ejection fraction <50% or ≥50%. More patients receiving sotagliflozin vs those receiving placebo had at least small (≥5 points) improvements in KCCQ-12 at 4 months (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.06-1.80; P = 0.017). Sotagliflozin improved symptoms, physical limitations, and quality of life within 4 months after worsening HF, with consistent benefits across baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Post Worsening Heart Failure [SOLOIST-WHF]; NCT03521934) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Sodium glucose cotransporter inhibitors may increase beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) in insulin-requiring patients. We determined factors associated with BHB changes from baseline (ΔBHB) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) receiving sotagliflozin as an insulin adjunct. Research Design and Methods: This post hoc analysis compared ΔBHB levels in adults with T1D receiving sotagliflozin 400 mg or placebo for 6 months. We evaluated clinical and metabolic factors associated with ΔBHB and used logistic regression models to determine predictors associated with BHB values >0.6 and >1.5 mmol/L (inTandem3 population; N = 1402) or with DKA events in a pooled analysis (inTandem1–3; N = 2453). Results: From baseline (median, 0.13 mmol/L), median fasting BHB increased by 0.04 mmol/L (95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.05; P < 0.001) at 24 weeks with sotagliflozin versus placebo; 67% of patients had no or minimal changes in BHB over time. Factors associated with on-treatment BHB >0.6 or >1.5 mmol/L included baseline BHB and sotagliflozin use. Age, insulin pump use, sotagliflozin use, baseline BHB, and ΔBHB were significantly associated with DKA episodes. Independent of treatment, DKA risk increased by 18% with each 0.1-mmol/L increase in baseline BHB and by 8% with each 0.1-mmol/L increase from baseline. Conclusion: Incremental increases in baseline BHB and ΔBHB were associated with a higher DKA risk independent of treatment. Adding sotagliflozin to insulin increased median BHB over 24 weeks in patients with T1D and was associated with increased DKA events. These results highlight the importance of BHB testing and monitoring and individualizing patient education on DKA risk, mitigation, identification, and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety evidence of sotagliflozin, the first approved dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1 and SGLT2, in heart failure (HF) management. Data sources: A literature search of studies published between January 2012 and September 2023 were identified using PubMed, MEDLINE, and clinicaltrials.gov with search terms of "sotagliflozin," "Inpefa," or "LX4211." Study selection and data extraction: All available studies in English were considered. Studies were included if they investigated drug pharmacology, efficacy, or safety information. Data synthesis: Two phase 3 trials of sotagliflozin, SOLOIST-WHF and SCORED, evaluated sotagliflozin compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). SOLOIST-WHF reported a statistically decreased rate of cardiovascular and HF events with sotagliflozin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52-0.85), while SCORED found a statistically significant decrease in incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients in the sotagliflozin group (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.63-0.88). Relevance to patient care and clinical practice in comparison to existing agents: While approval of sotagliflozin expands treatment options for patients with HF, the SGLT2 inhibitors, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, have more data supporting their use in HF, additional risk reduction benefits in patients with CKD, and approval for use in T2DM. Landmark trials of sotagliflozin required a previous diagnosis of T2DM, despite the broader approved indication. Where sotagliflozin will be adopted into the treatment of HF is unclear due to the evidence and benefits of already established SGLT2 inhibitors and the need for comparison with SGLT2 inhibitors. Conclusion: Given the limitations of currently available evidence, including difficulty in fully interpreting the trial results due to changes in primary endpoints, not adjudicating the events, and not reaching the original power calculations, more investigation is warranted to determine the benefit of sotagliflozin compared with SGLT2 inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sotagliflozin is the first dual SGLT1/2 inhibitor antidiabetic drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of heart failure. SGLT1/2 inhibition is observed to potentiate the secretion of the incretin hormone, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1). The current preclinical research sought to investigate the effect of sotagliflozin on the secretion of fat‐regulating peptides such as GLP‐1, glucagon and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and their prospective association with sotagliflozin's potential beneficial effects on dyslipidaemia. During an oral fat tolerance test in mice, sotagliflozin substantially increased GLP‐1 and insulin concentrations. Although sotagliflozin alone did not ameliorate postprandial lipemia, its combination with linagliptin (DPP‐IV inhibitor) significantly improved lipid tolerance comparable to orlistat (lipase inhibitor). In a triton‐induced hypertriglyceridemia model, sotagliflozin, along with other medications (fenofibrate, exenatide and linagliptin) reduced fat excursion; however, co‐administration with linagliptin provided no extra advantage. Furthermore, sotagliflozin stimulated glucagon secretion in the alpha TC1.6 cells and healthy mice, which resulted in an increased circulating FGF21 and β‐hydroxybutyrate concentration. Finally, chronic treatment of sotagliflozin in high‐fat diet (HFD)‐fed obese mice resulted in reduced body weight gain, liver triglyceride, cholesterol, interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) levels compared with the placebo group. However, the addition of linagliptin did not provide any additional benefit. In conclusion, sotagliflozin was found to have an effect on GLP‐1 and also stimulate the release of glucagon and FGF21, which are important for regulating fat metabolism. Therefore, sotagliflozin might represent a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia and steatohepatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aim: Dapagliflozin inhibits the sodium-glucose cotransporter protein 2 (SGLT-2), while sotagliflozin, belonging to a new class of dual-acting SGLT-1/SGLT-2 inhibitors, has garnered considerable attention due to its efficacy and safety. Both Dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin play a significant role in treating worsening heart failure in diabetes/nondiabetes patients with heart failure. Therefore, this article was to analyze and compare the cost per outcome of both drugs in preventing one event in patients diagnosed with diabetes-related heart failure. Method: The Cost Needed to Treat (CNT) was employed to calculate the cost of preventing one event, and the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) represents the anticipated number of patients requiring the intervention treatment to prevent a single adverse event, or the anticipated number of patients needing multiple treatments to achieve a beneficial outcome. The efficacy and safety data were obtained from the results of two published clinical trials, DAPA-HF and SOLOISTWHF. Due to the temporal difference in the drugs' releases, we temporarily analyzed the price of dapagliflozin to calculate the price of sotagliflozin within the same timeframe. The secondary analyses aimed to assess the stability of the CNT study and minimize differences between the results of the RCT control and trial groups, employing one-way sensitivity analyses. Result: The final results revealed an annualized Number Needed to Treat (aNNT) of 4 (95% CI 3-7) for preventing one event with sotagliflozin, as opposed to 23 (95% CI 16-55) for dapagliflozin. We calculated dapagliflozin's cost per prevented event (CNT) to be $109,043 (95% CI $75,856-$260,755). The price of sotagliflozin was set below $27,260, providing a favorable advantage. Sensitivity analysis suggests that sotagliflozin may hold a cost advantage. Conclusion: In this study, sotagliflozin was observed to exhibit a price advantage over dapagliflozin in preventing one events, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myocardial infarction (MI) and depression are leading causes of mortality and morbidity globally, and these conditions are increasing recognized as being fundamentally interconnected. The recently recognized gut-heart-brain axis offers insights into depression following MI, but effective treatments for this comorbidity remain lacking. To address this medical need, we employed an animal model of MI to investigate the potential repurposing of sotagliflozin (SOTA), an approved sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 and 2 (SGLT1/2) inhibitor for diabetes, for managing depression following MI and identifying potential SOTA-associated microbial mechanisms. SOTA treatment improved cardiac dysfunction and alleviated depression-like behaviors induced by MI, accompanied by alterations in gut microbiota composition, such as changes in the Prevotellaceae NK3B31 group, Alloprevotella, and Prevotellaceae UCG-001. Moreover, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using fecal samples from SOTA-treated MI mice demonstrated that gut microbiota contributed to the beneficial effects of SOTA on cardiac dysfunction and depression-like behaviors in MI mice. Intriguingly, FMT-based intervention and concordance analysis of gut microbiota before and after FMT suggested that Prevotellaceae NK3B31 group, Alloprevotella, and Prevotellaceae UCG-001 were associated with the beneficial effects of SOTA. Furthermore, functional prediction of gut microbiota and correlation analysis support the significance of these dynamic microbial communities. In conclusion, these findings suggest that SOTA could serve as a potential drug to ameliorate cardiac dysfunction and depressive symptoms in MI patients via through the gut-heart-brain axis.

Evidence for reducing cardiovascular and renal events with sotagliflozin is uncertain among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. To gather more evidence, this meta-analysis assesses the beneficial effects of sotagliflozin, a dual sodium--glucose cotransporter 1 and 2 inhibitor, in reducing the cardiovascular and renal events in diabetic patients with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD). Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed were the databases used to search. The studies published from January 1, 2018, to January 30, 2022, were considered. The eligibility of studies was assessed independently. The data were collected in a modified Cochrane data extraction form. The included studies' quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The quality of evidence for renal and cardiovascular outcomes was evaluated using GRADEpro software. The number of events of urgent visits to the hospital and requiring hospitalization was reduced (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.78; P value <0.00001). The mortality rate because of cardiovascular events was decreased with sotagliflozin (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.80; P value <0.00001). Patients taking sotagliflozin had a drastic decline in the number of deaths due to stroke and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Yet, there is no difference between the groups in terms of changes in mortality due to other causes or the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Sotagliflozin demonstrated effectiveness in reducing the mortality rate related to heart failure and cardiovascular events when the dose was increased from 200 mg to 400 mg. Despite this, evidence is still needed to prove the renal protective action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the renal safety profile of sotagliflozin, a novel sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐1 and ‐2 inhibitor, in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, with or without renal impairment, as well as its efficacy in decreasing the risk of further renal events, with an emphasis on those with previous renal impairment. Methods: Embase, Medline, CENTRAL and Scopus were searched from their inception until 24 April 2023 for randomized controlled trials that reported estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary albumin excretion or composite renal events (CRE). The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool was used. Mean difference, relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated (PROSPERO: CRD42023425583). Results: Fourteen studies were included in this review (n = 17 574 participants; intervention n = 9312, control n = 8262). The median follow‐up was 24.5 (Q1 = 15.25, Q3 = 28) months. Four studies recruited participants with renal impairment; baseline eGFR ranged from 23.8 to 50.5 mL/min/1.73m2. The change in eGFR for studies (n = 6) with a follow‐up of 52 weeks or longer was −1.23 (−1.45, −1.01) mL/min/1.73m2. Sotagliflozin did not significantly alter urinary albumin excretion. No change was observed in the risk of CRE (n = 6 studies; RR = 0.82 [0.61, 1.12]), including in participants with renal impairment. High risk of bias was a limitation of this review. Conclusions: Sotagliflozin did not adversely affect renal function or change the risk of key renal outcomes, including for participants with pre‐existing renal impairment. Therefore, sotagliflozin was safe; however, further research is needed to determine its efficacy in reducing the risk of diabetic kidney disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assesses the cost–effectiveness of sotagliflozin for the treatment of patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes. Materials & methods: A de novo cost–effectiveness model with a Markov structure was created for patients hospitalized for heart failure with comorbid diabetes. Outcomes of interest included hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and all-cause mortality measured over a 30-year time horizon. Baseline event frequencies were derived from published real-world data studies; sotagliflozin’s efficacy was estimated from SOLOIST-WHF. Health benefits were calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs included pharmaceutical costs, rehospitalization, emergency room visits and adverse events. Economic value was measured using the incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results: Sotagliflozin use decreased annualized rehospitalization rates by 34.5% (0.228 vs 0.348, difference: -0.120), annualized emergency department visits by 40.0% (0.091 vs 0.153, difference: -0.061) and annualized mortality by 18.0% (0.298 vs 0.363, difference: -0.065) relative to standard of care, resulting in a net gain in QAYs of 0.425 for sotagliflozin versus standard of care. Incremental costs using sotagliflozin increased by $19,374 over a 30-year time horizon of the patient, driven largely by increased pharmaceutical cost. Estimated ICER for sotagliflozin relative to standard of care was $45,596 per QALY. Conclusion: Sotagliflozin is a cost-effective addition to standard of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes.

Myocardial infarction (MI) and depression are leading causes of mortality and morbidity globally, and these conditions are increasing recognized as being fundamentally interconnected. The recently recognized gut-heart-brain axis offers insights into depression following MI, but effective treatments for this comorbidity remain lacking. To address this medical need, we employed an animal model of MI to investigate the potential repurposing of sotagliflozin (SOTA), an approved sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 and 2 (SGLT1/2) inhibitor for diabetes, for managing depression following MI and identifying potential SOTA-associated microbial mechanisms. SOTA treatment improved cardiac dysfunction and alleviated depression-like behaviors induced by MI, accompanied by alterations in gut microbiota composition, such as changes in the Prevotellaceae NK3B31 group , Alloprevotella , and Prevotellaceae UCG-001. Moreover, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using fecal samples from SOTA-treated MI mice demonstrated that gut microbiota contributed to the beneficial effects of SOTA on cardiac dysfunction and depression-like behaviors in MI mice. Intriguingly, FMT-based intervention and concordance analysis of gut microbiota before and after FMT suggested that Prevotellaceae NK3B31 group , Alloprevotella , and Prevotellaceae UCG-001 were associated with the beneficial effects of SOTA. Furthermore, functional prediction of gut microbiota and correlation analysis support the significance of these dynamic microbial communities. In conclusion, these findings suggest that SOTA could serve as a potential drug to ameliorate cardiac dysfunction and depressive symptoms in MI patients via through the gut-heart-brain axis. • Sotagliflozin ameliorated cardiac function and depression-like behaviors induced by myocardial infarction (MI). • Sotagliflozin restored the altered composition of the gut microbiota in an animal model of MI. • Gut microbiota contributed to the beneficial effects of sotagliflozin on MI mice. • Sotagliflozin improved the condition of mice with MI through the gut-heart-brain axis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the risk of atherosclerosis has progressively declined over the past few decades, subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) continue to experience substantial excess of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)-related events. Therefore, there is urgent need to treat ASCVD disease in T2DM earlier, more intensively, and with greater precision. Many factors concur to increase the risk of atherosclerosis, and multifactorial intervention remains the basis for effective prevention or reduction of atherosclerotic events. The role of anti-hyperglycemic medications in reducing the risk of ASCVD in subjects with T2DM has evolved over the past few years. Multiple cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) with new and emerging glucose-lowering agents, namely SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), have demonstrated significant reductions of major cardiovascular events and additional benefits. This robust evidence has changed the landscape for managing people with T2DM. In addition to glycemic and ancillary extra-glycemic properties, SGLT2i and GLP1-RA might exert favorable effects on subclinical and clinical atherosclerosis. Therefore, the objective of this review is to discuss the available evidence supporting anti-atherosclerotic properties of SGLT2i and GLP1-RA, with a quick nod to sotagliflozin and tirzepatide. [Display omitted] • Subjects with type 2 diabetes have a substantial excess of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)-related events. • The understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of atherosclerosis is critical for improving clinical outcomes. • Multiple CVOTs with GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i have demonstrated significant reduction of the risk of ASCVD in type 2 diabetes. • Early use of these drugs offers the opportunity to rate CV events closer to nondiabetic subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sodium-glucose co-transporters (SGLTs) mediate sodium and glucose transport across cell membranes. SGLT2 inhibitors have a recognized place within heart failure (HF) guidelines. We evaluated the effect of sotagliflozin on HF and cardiovascular outcomes in participants with type 2 diabetes. Scopus, Medline, Embase and Central were searched from inception until 2 June 2023. Randomized controlled trials evaluating sotagliflozin in type 2 diabetes participants and reporting HF events were selected. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and systolic blood pressure were evaluated. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used. Pooled mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals and the number needed to treat (NNT) were estimated (PROSPERO: CRD42023432732). We selected nine studies (n = 15 320 participants: n = 8040 intervention and n = 7280 control). The median follow-up was 13.4 months (Q1 = 13, Q3 = 21). One study recruited participants with HF at baseline. After a follow-up of >52 weeks, sotagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of HF [n = 8 studies; RR = 0.66 (0.64, 0.69)], stroke [n = 6 studies; RR = 0.75 (0.58, 0.97)] and MACE [n = 8 studies; RR = 0.73 (0.66, 0.81)]. The NNT was 20 and 26 for HF and MACE, respectively. Sotagliflozin lowered systolic blood pressure [n = 7; MD = -2.38 mmHg (-2.79, -1.97)]. No dose-dependent effect was identified for HF [200 mg: RR = 0.38 (0.16, 0.89), 400 mg: RR = 0.57 (0.39, 0.85), P-value = 0.22]. The high risk of bias was a limitation of this review. Sotagliflozin reduced HF and cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes participants. Research exploring its effects in HF and comparisons with SGLT2 inhibitors is warranted to determine if dual SGLT inhibition surpasses selective inhibition., (© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aim: To assesses the cost-effectiveness of sotagliflozin for the treatment of patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes. Materials & methods: A  de novo cost-effectiveness model with a Markov structure was created for patients hospitalized for heart failure with comorbid diabetes. Outcomes of interest included hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and all-cause mortality measured over a 30-year time horizon. Baseline event frequencies were derived from published real-world data studies; sotagliflozin's efficacy was estimated from SOLOIST-WHF. Health benefits were calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs included pharmaceutical costs, rehospitalization, emergency room visits and adverse events. Economic value was measured using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results: Sotagliflozin use decreased annualized rehospitalization rates by 34.5% (0.228 vs 0.348, difference: -0.120), annualized emergency department visits by 40.0% (0.091 vs 0.153, difference: -0.061) and annualized mortality by 18.0% (0.298 vs 0.363, difference: -0.065) relative to standard of care, resulting in a net gain in QAYs of 0.425 for sotagliflozin versus standard of care. Incremental costs using sotagliflozin increased by $19,374 over a 30-year time horizon of the patient, driven largely by increased pharmaceutical cost. Estimated ICER for sotagliflozin relative to standard of care was $45,596 per QALY. Conclusion: Sotagliflozin is a cost-effective addition to standard of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes.

Background and Aim: Dapagliflozin inhibits the sodium-glucose cotransporter protein 2 (SGLT-2), while sotagliflozin, belonging to a new class of dual-acting SGLT-1/SGLT-2 inhibitors, has garnered considerable attention due to its efficacy and safety. Both Dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin play a significant role in treating worsening heart failure in diabetes/nondiabetes patients with heart failure. Therefore, this article was to analyze and compare the cost per outcome of both drugs in preventing one event in patients diagnosed with diabetes-related heart failure., Method: The Cost Needed to Treat (CNT) was employed to calculate the cost of preventing one event, and the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) represents the anticipated number of patients requiring the intervention treatment to prevent a single adverse event, or the anticipated number of patients needing multiple treatments to achieve a beneficial outcome. The efficacy and safety data were obtained from the results of two published clinical trials, DAPA-HF and SOLOIST-WHF. Due to the temporal difference in the drugs' releases, we temporarily analyzed the price of dapagliflozin to calculate the price of sotagliflozin within the same timeframe. The secondary analyses aimed to assess the stability of the CNT study and minimize differences between the results of the RCT control and trial groups, employing one-way sensitivity analyses., Result: The final results revealed an annualized Number Needed to Treat (aNNT) of 4 (95% CI 3-7) for preventing one event with sotagliflozin, as opposed to 23 (95% CI 16-55) for dapagliflozin. We calculated dapagliflozin's cost per prevented event (CNT) to be $109,043 (95% CI $75,856-$260,755). The price of sotagliflozin was set below $27,260, providing a favorable advantage. Sensitivity analysis suggests that sotagliflozin may hold a cost advantage., Conclusion: In this study, sotagliflozin was observed to exhibit a price advantage over dapagliflozin in preventing one events, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Yu and Cheng.)