Search

SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has contributed to implement telemedicine, allowing clinicians to follow the patient remotely, therefore minimizing the risk of any exposure to positive COVID-19 patients. We summarize the approaches adopted to treat and monitor severe asthmatic patients during the lockdown phase of the pandemic. Our experience supports the strategy that every effort should be made to minimize patient contact with the health-care system, planning a pathway that allows patients to receive appropriate medical care and continue the biological therapies, thus preventing the loss of disease control and acute severe exacerbations., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has changed the health-care systems around the world in a remarkable way. We describe the strategies adopted to cope with the limitations imposed by the pandemic to the access to health care by patients diagnosed with idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)., Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis including IPF patients under antifibrotic drugs (nintedanib and pirfenidone) that accessed to the Outpatient clinic of the University of Palermo, Italy. Patients received a phone number and an email address in case of any urgency and a virtual meeting was settled up monthly., Results: 40 patients (M/F: 30/10) were followed up, 33 under nintedanib treatment, 7 under pirfenidone. Among patients under nintedanib, 1 patient reported high fever (T max 39 °C) and purulent sputum with no sign of infections, 1 had hemoptysis that was spontaneously resolved. 2 patients accessed to the emergency department for the worsening of dyspnea; 5 patients had diarrhea that resolved with symptomatic drugs in few days. 3 patients had an increase of alkaline phosphatase levels, leading to the withdrawal of the antifibrotic drug for 15 days, and subsequent normalization of the plasmatic levels. Among patients under pirfenidone, one subject had an increase of ferritin serum levels with no symptoms. The remaining subjects were in stable clinical conditions. None of the patients reported hospitalization or exacerbations, and did not experience antifibrotic withdrawal., Conclusions: We were able to demonstrate that by implementing alternative ways to monitor the disease, patients did not incur in increased rates of acute exacerbations or higher frequency of side effects and antifibrotic treatment withdrawal., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the bronchi with a complicated and largely unknown pathogenesis. In this context, an emerging role is attributed to the apolipoproteins which serve as structural components of plasma lipoproteins. Low density lipoproteins (LDL) may be involved in the inflammatory pathways of the asthmatic airways; in particular, small dense LDL (sdLDL) particles were associated with increased oxidative susceptibility compared to medium and large sized LDL. In our previous study, we found a positive correlation between forced expiratory volume 1 s (FEV 1 ) % predicted and larger LDL particles (LDL-1), and an inverse correlation between FEV 1 % predicted and sdLDL (LDL-3) in mild, untreated asthmatics. Although LDL appear to be important modulators of inflammation, data on their clinical implications are still lacking., Objective: The aim of the study is to investigate whether LDL subclasses correlate with the severity of asthma, assuming that the atherogenic and most pro-inflammatory LDL contribute to ignite and perpetuate the airway inflammatory processes., Methods: The study was conducted in one visit, and included clinical and lung functional assessments, as well as measurements of serum concentrations of the LDL subclasses. Non-denaturing, linear polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to separate and measure LDL subclasses, with the LipoPrint © System (Quantimetrix Corporation, Redondo Beach, CA, USA). LDL subclasses were distributed as seven bands (LDL-1 to LDL-7), LDL-1 and -2 being defined as large LDL (least pro-inflammatory), and LDL-3 to 7 defined as sdLDL (most pro-inflammatory)., Results: 70 asthmatics under inhaled treatment (M/F: 35/35) were enrolled; 10 healthy subjects (M/F: 3/7) served as controls. In the asthmatic group, FEV 1 % predicted was 81 ± 22% (mean ± SD), vital capacity (VC) % predicted was 97 ± 18%, and FEV 1 /FVC was 0.68 ± 0.1. The mean asthma control test (ACT) score was 18 ± 5. LDL-1 were significantly lower in asthmatics as compared to controls (18 ± 4% vs. 22 ± 4%, p = 0.008). On the contrary, LDL-2 (12 ± 4% vs. 12 ± 5%) and LDL-3 (3 ± 3% vs. 2 ± 2%) were not statistically different between the two groups; smaller subclasses were undetectable. To comply with the design of the study, subjects were classified according to their degree of severity into the 5 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps: Step 1 (M/F: 4/3, 44 ± 12 yrs), Step 2 (M/F: 1/2, 37 ± 11 yrs), Step 3 (M/F: 12/7, 47 ± 12 yrs), Step 4 (M/F: 8/15, 54 ± 12 yrs), and Step 5 (M/F: 7/9, 56 ± 9 yrs). None of the LDL subclasses showed significant differences between classes of severity: LDL-1 were 16.1 ± 5.6% in Step 1, 18 ± 2.8% in Step 2, 16.7 ± 3.7% in Step 3, 18 ± 3.3% in Step 4, and 19.5 ± 3.2% in Step 5 (p = NS); LDL2 were 14 ± 3.6%, 15 ± 3.4%, 12.4 ± 5.3%, 12.7 ± 4.4% and 11.3 ± 4.2%, respectively (p = NS); LDL3 were 5 ± 5.2%, 4.4 ± 2.6%, 3.3 ± 3.6%, 3.2 ± 2.6% and 2.4 ± 1.8%, p = NS. Finally, no relationship was detected between LDL subclasses and lung function parameters as well as the ACT scores., Conclusions: The current findings confirm a role of LDL as a potential biomarker in the diagnostic process for asthma, and suggest that LDL cannot be used as marker of severity of the disease., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Asthma and COPD are under-diagnosed and undertreated in adult populations, mainly due to the discrepancy between guideline recommendations and clinicians' practices. One of the reasons of this discrepancy is the difficulty encountered in real life in sharing the management of chronic respiratory diseases between general practitioners (GPs) and respiratory physicians., Methods: An explorative, population-based investigation was performed to test whether, and to what extent, an active collaboration between GPs and pulmonologists increases the diagnosis and proper treatment of chronic obstructive airway diseases. The "COPD action" involved an in-house intervention by pulmonologists who trained GPs on how to diagnose the disease and interpret the spirometry, yielding a final agreed diagnosis., Results: A total of 210 subjects (M/F: 156/54; age: 62.5 ± 13.8, mean ± SD) were consecutively invited by 20 GPs and classified in a) healthy, b) symptomatic with no airway obstruction, and 3) affected by chronic respiratory diseases. 11% of previously defined "healthy" subjects were diagnosed with COPD, and symptomatic subjects were diagnosed with asthma (20%) or COPD (23%). In addition, in those who already carried a diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases as judged by GPs, the diagnosis of COPD decreased significantly after respiratory specialist intervention (p = 0.001), in favor of asthma and chronic bronchitis. Furthermore, following the clinical and lung function assessments performed by the respiratory physicians, changes in inhaled treatments were statistically significant for each therapeutic category (test-retest reliability: r = 0.42; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In conclusion, the collaboration between GPs and pulmonologists based on a pro-active approach to the individuals attending the primary care offices followed by an in-house intervention by specialists may largely improve the diagnosis and management of chronic respiratory diseases., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Asthma considerably impairs patients' quality of life and increases healthcare costs. Severity, morbidity, and degree of disease control are the major drivers of its clinical and economic impact. National scientific societies are required to monitor the application of international guidelines and to adopt strategies to improve disease control and better allocate resources., Aim: to provide a detailed picture of the characteristics of asthma patients and modalities of asthma management by specialists in Italy and to develop recommendations for the daily management of asthma in a specialist setting., Method: A quantitative research program was implemented. Data were collected using an ad hoc questionnaire developed by a group of specialists selected by the Italian Pneumology Society/Italian Respiratory Society., Results: The records of 557 patients were analyzed. In the next few years, specialists are expected to focus their activity patients with more severe disease and will be responsible for selection of patients for personalized biological therapy; however, only 20% of patients attending Italian specialist surgery can be considered severe. In 84.4% of cases, the visit was a follow-up visit requested in 82.2% of cases by the specialist him/herself. The Asthma Control Test is used only in 65% of patients. When available, a significant association has been observed between the test score and asthma control as judged by the physician, although concordance was only moderate (κ = 0.68). Asthma was considered uncontrolled by the specialist managing the case in 29.1% of patients; nevertheless, treatment was not stepped up in uncontrolled or partly controlled patients (modified in only 37.2% of patients)., Conclusions: The results of this survey support re-evaluation of asthma management by Italian specialists. More resources should be made available for the initial visit and for more severely ill patients. In addition, more extensive use should be made of validated tools, and available drugs should be used more appropriately., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Inhalation is the preferred route of drug administration in chronic respiratory diseases because it optimises delivery of the active compounds to the targeted site and minimises side effects from systemic distribution. The choice of a device should be made after careful evaluation of the patient's clinical condition (degree of airway obstruction, comorbidities), as well as their ability to coordinate the inhalation manoeuvre and to generate sufficient inspiratory flow. These patient factors must be aligned with the specific advantages and limitations of each inhaler when making this important choice. Finally, adherence to treatment is not the responsibility of the patient alone, but should be shared also by clinicians. Clinicians have access to a wide selection of pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) that can be used effectively when matched to the needs of individual patients; this should be perceived as an opportunity rather than a limitation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We hypothesized that changes in the levels of sexual hormones during the menstrual cycle influence the concentration of nitric oxide in the exhaled air (FeNO) and alveolar exhaled nitric oxide (CANO)., Methods: Twelve healthy, non allergic women in their reproductive age (age range 25-37 years) were recruited. Subjects were studied, on alternate days, over the course of their menstrual cycle. At each visit, measurements of FeNO and CANO were performed. Progesterone and 17-β-estradiol concentrations were measured in salivary samples., Results: Eight subjects completed the study. The levels of FeNO and CANO were 13 ± 4.7 pbb and 3.5 ± 1.9 pbb, respectively (mean ± SD). The mean salivary concentration of progesterone was 65.1 ± 16.2 pg/ml (mean ± SD), with a range of 32.4-107.7 pg/ml, and the concentration of 17 β-estradiol was 6.0 ± 1.6 pg/ml, with a range of 3.1-12.9 pg/ml. The Generalized Estimating Equations procedure demonstrated that levels of progesterone influenced both FeNO and CANO (Wald χ2 = 11.60, p = 0.001; and Wald χ2 = 87.55, p = 0.001, respectively). On the contrary, the salivary levels of 17 β-estradiol were not significantly associated with FeNO (Wald χ2 = 0.087, p = 0.768) or CANO (Wald χ2 = 0.58, p = 0.448)., Conclusion: In healthy women, the menstrual cycle-associated hormonal fluctuations selectively influence the levels of bronchial and alveolar NO. The current findings may have important clinical implications for the interpretation of eNO levels, by identifying a patient-related factor that influences the eNO measurements., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)