Search

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in men over 65 years of age. Male apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE(-/-)) mice infused with angiotensin II (AngII) develop AAA. Although AngII stimulates both JAK/STAT and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling pathways, their involvement in AngII mediated AAA formation is unclear. Here we used the small molecule STAT3 inhibitor, S3I-201, the TLR4 inhibitor Eritoran and ApoE(-/-)TLR4(-/-) mice to evaluate the interaction between STAT3 and TLR4 signaling in AngII-induced AAA formation. ApoE(-/-) mice infused for 28 days with AngII developed AAAs and increased STAT3 activation and TLR4 expression. Moreover, AngII increased macrophage infiltration and the ratio of M1 (pro-inflammatory)/M2 (healing) macrophages in aneurysmal tissue as early as 7-10 days after AngII infusion. STAT3 inhibition with S3I-201 decreased the incidence and severity of AngII-induced AAA formation and decreased MMP activity and the ratio of M1/M2 macrophages. Furthermore, AngII-mediated AAA formation, MMP secretion, STAT3 phosphorylation and the ratio of M1/M2 macrophages were markedly decreased in ApoE(-/-)TLR4(-/-) mice, and in Eritoran-treated ApoE(-/-) mice. TLR4 and pSTAT3 levels were also increased in human aneurysmal tissue. These data support a role of pSTAT3 in TLR4 dependent AAA formation and possible therapeutic roles for TLR4 and/or STAT3 inhibition in AAA., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The negative chronotropic response of the heart to parasympathetic stimulation is mediated via the interaction of M(2) muscarinic receptors, Galpha(i2) and the G-protein coupled inward rectifying K(+) channel, GIRK1. Here TGFbeta(1) is shown to decrease the expression of Galpha(i2) in cultured chick atrial cells in parallel with attenuation of the negative chronotropic response to parasympathetic stimulation. The response to the acetylcholine analogue, carbamylcholine, decreased from a 95+/-2% (+/-SEM, n=8) inhibition of beat rate in control cells to 18+/-2% (+/-SEM,n =8) in TGFbeta(1) treated cells. Data support the conclusion that TGFbeta regulation of Galpha(i2) expression was mediated via an effect on Ras. TGFbeta(1) inhibited Galpha(i2) promoter activity by 56+/-6% (+/-SEM, n=4) compared to control. A dominant activating Ras mutant reversed the effect of TGFbeta on Galpha(i2) expression and stimulated Galpha(i2) promoter activity 1.7 fold above control. A dominant negative Ras mutant mimicked the effect of TGFbeta(1) on Galpha(i2) promoter activity. TGFbeta had no effect on the ratio of GDP/GTP bound Ras, but markedly decreased the level of membrane associated Ras and increased the level of cytoplasmic Ras compared to control. Furthermore, farnesol, a precursor to farnesylpyrophosphate, the substrate for the farnesylation of Ras, not only reversed TGFbeta(1) inhibition of Ras localization to the membrane, but also reversed TGFbeta(1) inhibition of Galpha(i2)promoter activity. FTI-277, a specific inhibitor of the farnesylation of Ras, mimicked the effect of TGFbeta(1) on Ras localization and Galpha(i2) promoter activity. These data suggest a novel relationship between TGFbeta signaling, regulation of Ras function and the autonomic response of the heart.

One of the major side-effects of the use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia is the development of myositis and, in some patients undergoing concomitant immunosuppressive treatment, the development of rhabdomyolysis. Experiments outlined in these studies demonstrate that inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase activity which differ primary in the substitution of a methyl group for a hydroxyl group have differential effects on both cholesterol levels and cell viability in a striated muscle cell model, the mouse C2-C12 myoblast. Thus, concentrations as high as 200 microM of pravastatin had little effect on total cholesterol level while 25 microM of lovastatin decreased cellular cholesterol by over 90%. Simvastatin and lovastatin decreased viability of C2-C12 myoblasts by nearly 50% at concentrations as low as 1 and 5 microM, respectively, and decreased viability by almost 90% at 10 and 15 microM respectively. However, 300 microM of pravastatin decreased cell viability by less than 50%. The order of potency for the effects on cell viability wassimvastatin>lovastatin>>>pravastatin. The possible relationship between effects on cell viability and the development of myositis is discussed.