Search

Background: Brain metastases (BM) from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are considered a rare and unfavourable event. There is no consensus regarding the best management of these patients., Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with BM from EOC treated between 1997 and 2014 in 18 institutions of the MITO (Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer) group was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed., Results: A total of 174 women were identified as having BM from EOC. The median time interval between primary diagnosis of EOC and occurrence of BM was 26months (range 2-129months). The median overall survival from primary EOC diagnosis was 48months (95% CI 39.5-56.4months) and from diagnosis of BM was 12months (95% CI 9.6-14.3months). The majority of enrolled women (81.7%) were classified as sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy. Four variables were significantly associated with poor overall survival in multivariate analysis: multiple BM [HR: 1.86 (95% CI: 1.22-2.84)], presence of extracranial disease [HR: 1.77 (95% CI: 1.11-2.83)] age [HR: 1.74 (95% CI: 1.17-2.59)], and monotherapy [HR: 2.57 (95% CI: 1.64-3.86)]. On the contrary, residual tumor at primary surgery, FIGO stage at primary diagnosis and platinum sensitivity were found to have no significant impact on survival from diagnosis of brain lesions., Conclusions: Our results suggest that BM is a rare and late manifestation of EOC, with a 12-month life-span expectation. Multiple approach is a positive independent prognostic factor and should be proposed to carefully selected patients., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The recombinant fusion protein, aflibercept binds and neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A, B and placental growth factor (PlGF). Aflibercept inhibits ascites formation and reduces tumor burden in an ovarian cancer model. This open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of aflibercept in patients with advanced chemo-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer and symptomatic malignant ascites., Methods: Patients who required ≥3 previous paracenteses at 1-4 paracenteses per month received intravenous aflibercept 4mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was repeat paracentesis response rate (RPRR), with response defined as at least a two-fold increase in time to repeat paracentesis compared with the baseline interval., Results: Ten out of 16 enrolled patients achieved a response; the RPRR was 62.5% (95% CI 35.4%-84.8%). Aflibercept was considered effective based on a hypothesis that the RPRR was ≥60%. Median time to repeat paracentesis was 76.0 (95% CI 64.0-178.0) days, which was 4.5 times longer than the baseline interval (16.8 days). Median progression-free survival was 59.5 (95% CI 41.0-83.0) days. Twelve patients experienced adverse events considered related to aflibercept treatment including hypertension (7 patients), headache, anorexia, and dysphonia (3 patients each). Two patients experienced Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (Grade 3 hypertension and weight loss in one patient, Grade 3 intestinal perforation in one patient)., Conclusion: Aflibercept 4mg/kg every 2 weeks was effective at controlling malignant ascites, reducing the interval between repeat paracenteses. The safety profile was consistent with that reported for anti-VEGF agents., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of the present report is to support the feasibility and the safety of a new fertility-sparing treatment in young women affected by bulky cervical cancer., Methods: Between February 2007 and October 2010, seven patients presenting large IB-IIA1 tumors (30-45 mm) were scheduled for conservative treatment. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT)., Results: One patient presented hematological toxicity during NACT (grade 3). All patients showed complete disappearance of tumor (n=4/7) or partial response (a 50% or more decrease in total tumor size, n=3/7) to neoadjuvant treatment, and they were all treated with pelvic lymphadenectomy and VRT. Additional treatment (interstitial brachytherapy) was offered to only one woman because of a persistent parametrial tumoral lesion. After a mean follow up of 22 months (range 5-49), no relapse was observed. To date, only one woman in our study attempted to conceive and she is currently pregnant., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for fertility sparing treatment is an innovative approach which is potentially quite interesting for many young women affected by bulky cervical cancer. These women, i.e. those with tumors larger than 2 cm (2-5 cm), are traditionally not offered fertility sparing treatment, thus the preliminary data we report here might have a promising impact. Nevertheless, for these patients it may be suitable to use the more radical, and time-tested, conservative surgical approach to allow for a complete and conservative excision of the residual tumor after neoadjuvant treatment. Studies with a larger number of patients and adequate follow-up are required to validate this conservative approach and to define clearly the good indications for this treatment., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

From June 1990 to October 1994, 111 advanced ovarian cancer patients with minimal (less than 2 cm) residual disease after platinum-based front-line chemotherapy and second-look laparotomy entered a cooperative randomized study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and the toxicity of the addition of interferon-alpha2 to carboplatin, both intraperitoneally (ip) administered. Patients were randomized to receive either 3 courses of ip Carboplatin 400 mg/m2 Day 1 q 28 days (54 pts) (CBDCA) or ip interferon-alpha 25 x 10(6) U Day 1 + ip carboplatin 400 mg/m2 Day 2 q 28 days (57 pts) (CBDCA + IFN). Patients treated with interferon experienced more severe (WHO grade 3-4) leukopenia (28% vs 17.1%) and anemia (14% vs 4.2%). Fever (P = 0.000) and flu-like syndrome (P = 0.02) were significantly more frequent in the combination arm. No difference in gastroenteric, neurologic, or renal toxicity was observed. At a median follow-up time of 13 months (range 1-72) 71 patients showed a disease progression (31 CBDCA, 40 CBDCA + IFN) and 44 patients died (21 CBDCA, 23 CBDCA + IFN). Median progression-free survival was 11 months in the CBDCA group and 10 months in the CBDCA + IFN arm. Median survival was 22 and 29 months in CBDCA and CBDCA + IFN arm, respectively. In conclusion, intraperitoneal interferon-alpha does not seem to improve the results achievable with intraperitoneal carboplatin in this subset of patients, while the toxicity and the costs of the combination are consistently higher than with chemotherapy alone.

An incidence of cerebral metastases secondary to epithelial ovarian cancer as high as 11.6% has been reported in small series and related to the prolonged survival of ovarian cancer patients treated with platinum compounds (Hardy, J. R., and Harvey, V. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 33, 296-300, 1989). A review of the histories of 413 ovarian cancer patients, treated from 1981 to 1989 with platinum-based combination chemotherapy according to the protocols of the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) (North West Oncology Group), showed that only 9 patients (2.2%) developed clinical evidence of cerebral metastases. Six of 9 patients had FIGO Stage IIIc disease and 1 each with FIGO Stages Ic, IIc, and IV. All these patients had received cisplatin or carboplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Clinical response to initial cytotoxic therapy was as follows: complete response, 3 patients; partial response, 4 patients; stable disease, 1 patient; progressive disease, 1 patient. Cerebral metastases occurred at a median of 19 months (range 3-36) from diagnosis and median survival of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastasis was 26 months (range 10-81) from diagnosis of primary disease and 8 months (range 1-45) from diagnosis of CNS involvement. The incidence of CNS metastases in our series is similar to that reported in the past and significantly lower than figures reported by the above mentioned paper. On the basis of our data we do not agree with Hardy and Harvey about the relationship possibly existing between prolonged survival and incidence of CNS metastases and, particularly, about the need for prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Fifty-seven patients who had progressed during or relapsed after randomized first-line combination chemotherapy containing cisplatin or carboplatin were entered into a crossover study in which the analog not previously assigned was administered alone as salvage treatment. Carboplatin and cisplatin were administered at doses of 400 and 100 mg/m2, respectively, every 28 days. Among the 24 patients enrolled in the cisplatin arm, 6 (25%) objective responses (ORs) (3 complete, 3 partial) were observed, whereas 3 partial responses were obtained in the 33 carboplatin-treated patient (9%). Analysis of results, according to response to first-line chemotherapy, demonstrated that the patients who progressed were sensitive only to cisplatin second-line treatment (OR: 3/12), with no responders among carboplatin-treated patients (OR: 0/11). All patients were treated on an outpatient basis and therapy-related toxic effects were mild, consisting chiefly of myelosuppression, and more frequent in the carboplatin group. In our opinion, carboplatin 400 mg/m2 per cycle is scarcely effective in patients with refractory or relapsed ovarian cancer pretreated with cisplatin regimens, whereas cisplatin 100 mg/m2 per cycle appears to be an effective salvage therapy even in patients not responding to carboplatin. The dose of carboplatin should be further escalated especially in refractory patients.