Search

Introduction: Racial and ethnic disparities in gynecologic cancer care have been documented. Treatment at academic facilities is associated with improved survival, yet no study has examined independent associations between race and ethnicity with facility type among gynecologic cancer patients., Materials & Methods: We used the National Cancer Database and identified 484,455 gynecologic cancer (cervix, ovarian, uterine) patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2020. Facility type was dichotomized as academic vs. non-academic, and we used logistic regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between race and ethnicity and facility type. Secondarily, we examined joint effects of race and ethnicity and facility type on overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression., Results: We observed higher odds of treatment at academic (vs. non-academic) facilities among American Indian/Alaska Native (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.28-1.57), Asian (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.59-1.70), Black (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.65-1.72), Hispanic (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.66-1.75), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.57-1.93), and other race (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.20-1.40) patients compared with White patients. In the joint effects survival analysis with White, academic facility-treated patients as the reference group, Asian, Hispanic, and other race patients treated at academic or non-academic facilities had improved overall survival. Conversely, Black patients treated at academic facilities [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.07-1.12] or non-academic facilities (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.16-1.21) had worse survival., Discussion: Minoritized gynecologic cancer patients were more likely than White patients to receive treatment at academic facilities. Importantly, survival outcomes among patients receiving care at academic institutions differed by race, requiring research to investigate intra-facility survival disparities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Plascak reports honoraria payments from National Comprehensive Cancer Network and North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Dr. Backes reports personal fees from Agenus, CEC Oncology, Clovis, Eisai, Merck, AstraZeneca, GSK, ImmunoGen, BioNTech, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, and Myriad and research funding from Clovis, Eisai, Immunogen, Merck, Beigene, Tempus, and Natera. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Endometrial cancer stage is a strong prognostic factor; however, the current stage classification does not incorporate transtubal spread as determined by intraluminal tumor cells (ILTCs). We examined relationships between ILTCs and survival outcomes according to histological subtype and stage and examined whether identification of ILTCs improves prognostic accuracy of endometrial cancer staging., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer at five academic hospitals between 2007 and 2012. Pathologists determined ILTC presence (no vs. yes) and location (free in lumen vs. attached to epithelial surface) based on pathology review of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of fallopian tubes. Associations between ILTCs with time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were examined with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for other prognostic factors. Model discrimination metrics were used to assess the addition of ILTCs to stage for prediction of 5-year TTR and OS., Results: In the overall study population (N = 1303), ILTCs were not independently associated with TTR (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.69-1.32) or OS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.72-1.31). Among 805 women with stage I disease, ILTCs were independently associated with worse TTR (HR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.06-5.05) and OS (HR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.14-4.11). Upstaging early-stage cases with ILTCs present did not increase model discrimination., Conclusion: While our data do not suggest that endometrial cancer staging guidelines should be revised to include ILTCs, associations between ILTCs and reduced survival observed among stage I cases suggest this tumor feature holds clinical relevance for subgroups of endometrial cancer patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Drs. Felix, Sinnott, and Suarez reported grants from the National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study. Dr. Sherman receives research support from Exact Sciences. Dr. Cohn reports his positions of UpToDate author and Gynecologic Oncology Editor in Chief. Ms. Meade, Ms. Hall and Drs. Duggan, Havrilesky, Olawaiye, Mariani, Rodriquez, Brett, Dinoi, Goldfeld, and Elishaev have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine associations between adoption of Medicaid expansion (ME) and changes in insurance status, early stage diagnosis, and cancer survival among women with endometrial carcinoma (EC)., Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with EC between the age 40-64 from 2004 to 2015. Difference-in-differences analysis quantified the impact of ME on the proportion of new EC diagnoses with insurance (vs. uninsured), the proportion diagnosed with stage I (vs. II-IV), and overall survival., Results: 156,253 patients were included. Among 65,019 women living in ME states, ME is associated with an increase in the percent of EC cases who are insured of 1.4% (95% CI 0.9-2.0%, p < 0.0001), with strongest effects among Hispanic women, women in the lowest income quartile, and women in the second age quartile (age 53-57). There was no overall impact of ME on stage, though an increase of early stage diagnoses by 2.4% (95% CI 0.3-4.5%, p = 0.022) was observed among women age 53-57. There was a trend towards improved overall survival with ME, which was strongest in women age 53-57 (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, p = 0.037)., Conclusions: Among women with EC, ME positively impacted insurance coverage, an important hurdle in accessing health care. In women aged 53-57, ME was associated with earlier stage at diagnosis and improved survival, suggesting that the magnitude of the improvement in insurance coverage may correlate with important clinical outcomes. Efforts should continue to understand the complexity of barriers to health care access and to develop effective strategies to surmount them., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Stage is a critical determinant of prognosis and treatment for endometrial cancer (EC) patients. Women who have had a tubal ligation for sterilization have improved EC survival, secondary to lower stage at presentation, suggesting that transtubal spread may represent an important route of metastasis. We evaluated detection of intraluminal tumor cells (ILTCs) in relation to tumor characteristics and survival., Methods: One pathologist retrospectively evaluated hematoxylin and eosin sections of routinely collected fallopian tubes for ILTCs from 295 EC patients, masked to outcome. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between demographic (age, race) and clinical [FIGO 2009 stage, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), histological subtype] characteristics and ILTCs. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for associations between ILTCs and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and EC-specific survival, overall and stratified by histological subtype or stage., Results: In univariable logistic regression models, age (55-64 vs. ≥65: OR = 3.41, 95% CI = 1.48-7.84), stage (stage IV vs. stage I OR = 14.58, 95% CI = 5.27-40.35), LVSI (OR = 2.93, 95% CI = 1.42-6.04), and histological subtype (serous vs. low-grade endometrioid OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.08-9.58), were associated with ILTCs. Only age and stage remained significantly associated with ILTCs in adjusted models. ILTCs were significantly associated with lower EC-specific survival among women with serous EC or stage I disease; however, adjustment for age, stage, and histology attenuated these associations., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that ILTCs are associated with adverse EC prognostic features and reduced survival in cases of early stage or serous histology., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Women with endometrial cancer (EC) are the second largest population of female cancer survivors in the United States. However, the outcomes of EC survivors, from the patient perspective, are not well-understood. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following an EC diagnosis., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, and reference lists to identify published observational studies that examined PROs among women with EC. Reviewers independently reviewed eligible full-text study articles and conducted data extraction. We qualitatively summarized included articles according to exposures [e.g. body mass index (BMI), treatment, etc.] or specific PROs (e.g. sexual function)., Results: Of 1722 unique studies, 102 full-text articles were reviewed, of which a total of 27 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The most commonly used PRO questionnaires were the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) (n=9), Short Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36, n=8), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G, n=5), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI, n=4). Obesity was associated with lower quality of life (QOL) and physical functioning. Treatment type affected several outcomes. Laparoscopy generally resulted in better QOL outcomes than laparotomy. Likewise, vaginal brachytherapy was associated with better outcomes compared to external beam radiation. Sexual function outcomes were dependent on age, time since diagnosis, and having consulted a physician before engaging in sexual activities. In addition, a physical activity intervention was associated with improved sexual interest but not sexual function., Conclusions: Our review provides insight into the experience of EC survivors from the patient perspective. Factors that contribute to QOL, such as pain, fatigue, emotional and social functioning, should be monitored following an EC diagnosis., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)